One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Great News! LA 2024 Not Likely To Bankrupt The City, According To New Report
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum (Photo by moskowmonkey via the LAist Featured Photos pool on Flickr)
The race for the 2024 Summer Olympics draws even closer, and a new report indicates the risk for financial losses would be fairly low if Los Angeles gets the bid, according to Curbed. Considering the Olympics' track record of debilitating their host cities (so much so that some cities terminated their bid) the possibility of a profitable games offers hope with a side of skepticism.
The report, coming from the California Legislative Analyst's Office, describes a 10% contingency plan to cover possible budget shortfalls. SB 1465 limits a state's contribution for said shortfalls to $250 million, and it can only provide the funds once the main guarantor (in this case, Los Angeles) has contributed $250 million. As a result, starting in 2022—when the games start earning revenue—the city will begin allocating a contingency of $477 million. This approximates to 10.1% of the budgeted expenditures of the games. $250 million of the contingency has a mandated allocation for covering budget shortfalls with written consent from the city, while the remaining funds may be used at the discretion of the games. Financial burden to cover overrun costs always rests with the host city, so the contingency is in place to prevent taxpayers from footing the final bill.
According to the report, this contingency is possible because LA 2024 is "basing its bid on existing or already‑on‑track venues and infrastructure [which] reduces the chance that cost overruns will occur." The pre-existing locations include the Olympics-veteran Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum, the Sprint Center, UCLA and USC facilities, and other locations scattered throughout the city. The main facility still under construction is the Rams/Chargers stadium in Inglewood, which will be an integral part of the opening and closing ceremonies. These risk-averse measures also allowed City Council to unanimously support the bid, according to the LA Times.
L.A. has always held its profitable 1984 Olympics as a major source of pride, so the possibility of another financially successful games would make the city a huge outlier in the history of the Olympics. The projected success isn't a guarantee, though, with the report saying "it is easy to imagine that pressures could emerge to change one or more elements of the bid plan in future years."
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
