Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

Terrorism: What happens to those named in LAPD 'suspicious activity reports'?

LAPD's logo
LAPD's Suspicious Activity Reporting program is designed to prevent terrorist attacks.
(
LAPD
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 1:05
Terrorism: What happens to those named in LAPD 'suspicious activity reports'?

The LAPD’s Inspector General Tuesday said the department collected 215 reports of possible terrorism-related activity in the city during the fiscal year that ended June 30. Of those, 161 were found to be legitimate and forwarded to a federal government database for sharing with other law enforcement agencies.

But what happened to the people named in those reports is a mystery.  The LAPD’s top counter-terrorism chief refused to say.  

 “There are cases that were opened as a result of the suspicious activity reporting,” said LAPD Deputy Chief Mike Downing, who heads the counterterrorism bureau.“But that’s all I can say about that.”

Critics worry that innocent people are being caught up in that web.

Sponsored message

“It’s a secret program,” said James Lafferty, president of the National Lawyers Guild.Lafferty. “It has no due process. It violates the Constitution.” 

Downing’s comments followed an L.A. Police Commission meeting where the inspector general issued a generally positive report on the LAPD’s Suspicious Activity Reports, or SAR program. IG Alexander Bustamante said he found no evidence of racial profiling and only  six cases that should not have generated a suspicious activity report in the first place.

Under the program, two conditions must be present for the department to refer the names of people to the Joint Regional Intelligence Center. First, the observed activity must be “reasonably indicative of intelligence gathering or pre-operational planning related to terrorism,” according to an LAPD special order. Second, the activity must be one of 16 specific activities.

The activities range from the relatively innocuous, like taking pictures of sensitive buildings, to the more obvious, such as stockpiling weapons. Here is a breakdown of the activities that led to the reports, according to Inspector General Alexander Bustamante.

  • Expressed or Implied Threat--46
  • Misrepresentation--26
  • Observation/Surveillance--21
  • Photography--20
  • Testing/Probing of Security--13
  • Breach/Attempted Intrusion--10
  • Other Activity--15

Downing said photographing a sensitive building would not alone prompt a report. Detectives would follow up to determine if there was any evidence of a possible link to planning an attack.

“I think it has to be clearly articulable as to why the photography has a nexus to terrorism,” Downing told the commission. “It's the targeting of security personnel, the targeting of security cameras, or places of mass gatherings.”

“There were no cases where simply taking a photograph translated into a SAR report,” Bustamante said.

Sponsored message

Critics have long worried that the types of activities that can generate a suspicious activity report are too broad and the names of innocent people end up in databases.

“Show me any one of these suspicious activity reports that led to a conviction, that led to an arrest, that stopped an act of terrorism,” said Lafferty, of the lawyers guild.

Downing defended the program, which encourages people to report suspicious activity. The inspector general found 80 percent of reports were initiated by citizens calling police.

“At this point in our history – 14 years after 9/11 – we need people to stand up and help us. This threat is real and serious,” Downing said.  “The threats we face today are asymmetrical.”

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right