Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

Rent control expansion bill fails first test

LOS ANGELES, CA - FEBRUARY 01:  A for rent sign is posted in front of an apartment building on February 1, 2017 in Los Angeles, California.  According to the Consumer Price Index, rental prices in Southern California have spiked 4.7 percent in 2016 compared to 3.9 percent in 2015. The increase is the fastest since 2007.  (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
An attempt to allow cities in California to expand rent control failed its first legislative test.
(
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Listen 0:57
Rent control expansion bill fails first test

A state bill that would allow California cities to expand rent control failed to pass out of its first committee Thursday.

The proposed bill, AB 1506, takes aim at Costa Hawkins, a 1995 law that prevents cities from enacting rent control ordinances that include single family homes and new construction. 

The bill was introduced by Assembly Member Richard Bloom of Santa Monica, a city known for supporting tenant protections. 

"Rising rents continue to be an issue facing so many of our constituents," Bloom said. "We can agree that it's not one that is easy to address, but address it we must, and there are very few tools available to us. This is the most important and the most obvious one."

Officials in Los Angeles and San Francisco have at least partially blamed the 1995 law for skyrocketing rents in both cities. After 2017's homeless count showed a 23 percent rise in the county's homeless population, L.A. Mayor Eric Garcetti mentioned Costa Hawkins as a factor.

"We can't let rents soar by double digits every single year and the state shackles us with Costa-Hawkins, without being able to change what rents are in this city," Garcetti said in May, when the 2017's count results became public.

L.A. County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl has called on the legislature to revise the bill. 

Sponsored message

But legislators on the California Assembly's Housing and Community Development Committee had doubts a repeal would help alleviate the housing crisis. 

Assembly Member Marc Steinorth of Rancho Cucamonga worried that the heaviest impact would fall not on corporations that own large numbers of properties, but on individuals who rent out their single family home or condo.

"It's clear to me that the key to solving the housing crisis in California is building more homes," Steinorth said. "It's not clear that repealing Costa Hawkins would help, in fact it could exacerbate it."

Opponents of rent control argued Thursday that an expansion would dampen incentives and ability to built rentals and for existing rentals to stay on the market. 

"Our balance of jobs and housing is not there," said Debra Carlton of the California Apartment Association. "Owners have left the market, they've walked out. And we're going to see that again."

Supporters of the bill, however, said a repeal would allow local jurisdictions to make up their own minds about the costs and benefits of expanding rent control. 

"I don't disagree with the analyses of the impact that rent control does have on the economy, but we're playing with an economy that has progressed so far in one particular direction that sometimes it is up to government to provide some balancing," said Assembly Member Mark Stone of Santa Cruz. 

Sponsored message

Some members of the committee who opposed the bill indicated they might be open to talking about reforming Costa Hawkins instead of repealing it outright. Members of realty groups also said they were open to discussion.

Stone, however, was skeptical.

"This bill was introduced eleven months ago," he said. "Why we have to wait that long to have this notion brought forward is a little frustrating."

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right