This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.
This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.
PG&E makes $3.6 million settlement with Hinkley, its second in 20 years
A pipe is one of the few signs that houses once stood on the property where Pacific Gas & Electric bought and razed them after the company was found to have polluted the ground water with cancer-causing hexavalent chromium for 30 years. The community's pollution struggle inspired the movie 'Erin Brockovich.'
(
David McNew/Getty Images
)
Listen
1:19
PG&E makes $3.6 million settlement with Hinkley, its second in 20 years
PG&E makes $3.6 million settlement with Hinkley, its second in 20 years
Water regulators in San Bernardino County have slapped Pacific Gas & Electric with a $3.6 million dollar settlement in the town whose toxic pollution woes inspired the film “Erin Brockovich.”
PG&E has already famously paid $333 million dollars to end a lawsuit brought by Hinckley residents about 15 years ago, when toxic chromium the utility used on equipment seeped into the water table. But now, monitoring has revealed that the pollution plume had spread, according to Lauri Kemper of the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board.
"PG&E has done a lot of efforts to clean it up and stop its movement," she acknowledges. "But they didn’t do enough. And so we have a situation where they have a thousand days of contamination spread essentially [...] beyond the area where they promised the board they would control it."
PG&E admits no wrongdoing in the new agreement, but the utility will install new wells and other controls in the next month. It will also pay a $1.8 million fine. And it will spend an equal amount of money improving the water supply at Hinckley Elementary School.
"It’ a pretty small community and the school is the heartbeat," says PG&E spokesman Jeff Smith.
The utility proposed the school project, he says, in part because it recognized a need to ease residents’ fears.
"We took a good look at Hinkley," he sums up, "and what we began to do was to try and take steps to build that relationship and improve that trust."
Sponsored message
The settlement is just the latest in a long line of legal obligations imposed on PG&E to clean up the chromium problem the town.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
