Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA Sheriff on body cam video: 'I'm a fan of transparency'

Los Angeles County Sheriff candidate Jim McDonnell greets supporters at his election gathering at the JW Marriott in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday, June 3, 2014.
Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell.
(
Maya Sugarman/KPCC
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonnell said Thursday he's "a fan of transparency" in explaining why he plans to permit the release of at least some videos shot by his deputies once they're outfitted with body cameras.

In a conversation with KPCC's AirTalk, McDonnell discussed his proposal to eventually equip nearly 6,000 of his deputies with body cams. He will permit the release of body cam videos unless they involve incidents still under investigation or they would violate someone’s privacy.

McDonnell told KPCC’s AirTalk that more openness would be good for the public, and for his deparment.

"I think it only benefits us to be able to share with the public as to what our deputies are dealing with in the field, the challenges that we’re facing," he said. 

KPCC first reported on McDonnell's proposed video policy on Monday.

The sheriff said a lot of his deputies would welcome the chance to show how they’re performing, because it would help them defend themselves against allegations of wrongdoing.

With regard to whether deputies should be allowed to review body cam video before filing a report, McDonnell said his position is "nuanced." In cases involving a "significant use of force," he said he's "comfortable" having a deputy "give a statement prior to reviewing" the video.

Sponsored message

If it's "a routine investigative matter," McDonnell said "I don't think that's a bad thing" to let a deputy review the video first, since "that's like referring to your notes."

The agency's proposal would put the nation's largest sheriff's department at odds with the LAPD, the third-largest police department in the U.S.

The LAPD doesn’t release any body cam video, although it is reviewing that policy. Chief Charlie Beck did release video once – of a man running with a gun – to calm public anger over reports that the man was unarmed.

Policies vary widely at police departments across California, but many comply with current state law that allows them to classify all video as possible evidence in an investigation and therefore exempt from the 1968 Public Records Act.

Law enforcement agencies are beginning to relax their release policies – in part because the public is demanding it, said Peter Bibring of the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California.

The sheriff’s plan calls for deploying the full complement of body cams over a few years. It would cost about $55 million a year. He said much of that would be for extra staff to review and edit videos before they’re released.

"Based on our experiences and research, we expect four hours of review and redaction for every one hour of recorded video," according to Dean Gialamas, director of technology services at the Sheriff's Department.

Sponsored message

The department estimates it needs to eventually hire 64 civilian employees to handle public requests, including 32 "forensic video specialists" and 32 clerical support positions – although they might have other duties including auditing how the system is working, said Gialamas.

In June 2016, the Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a motion noting that the department had operated a successful pilot program in 2014 and urging McDonnell to roll out body cams "in an expeditious manner."

Referring to comments by McDonnell that the rollout would take time, the motion stated, "implementation in 2018 is too late."

McDonnell said he is still waiting to hear whether the County Board of Supervisors will approve his request. The board is considering hiring a consultant to determine if it can be done better or cheaper before approving any plan, 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right