Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This archival content was originally written for and published on KPCC.org. Keep in mind that links and images may no longer work — and references may be outdated.

KPCC Archive

LA City Council approves controversial $4.8 billion LAX improvements plan

Travelers are stopped at a security check point at Los Angeles International Airport on November 23, 2011 in Los Angeles.
Travelers are stopped at a security check point at Los Angeles International Airport on November 23, 2011 in Los Angeles.
(
Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images
)

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Listen 2:35
LA City Council approves controversial $4.8 billion LAX improvements plan

The Los Angeles city council voted today to move ahead with a controversial, $4.8 billion dollar improvement plan for L.A. International Airport. The project includes moving a runway closer to nearby homes. That decision angers some residents.

Under the plan, LAX's northern-most runway will be moved a couple of hundred feet away from the central terminal, closer to the communities of Westchester and Playa Del Rey. That will allow for the construction of a taxi lane that could accommodate large airplanes like the airbus 380.

Dozens of people interrupted city council members as they hashed out the issue. Residents of those nearby neighborhoods held up signs that said "Air Quality, No Voice At LAX." 

Craig Eggers, who chairs theeAirport Relations Committee of the Westchester-Playa Neighborhood Council, worries the plan will increase traffic and air pollution.

"And when I say air pollution, it's not necessarily or exclusively the aircraft, it's all the vehicle traffic that goes into supporting aircraft operations including passengers getting to and from the airport."

But  Los Angeles World Airports Executive Director Gina Marie Lindsey says the project would increase safety, generate jobs and accommodate jumbo jets.

"The efficiency of the airfield is critically important," Lindsey said. "Because getting those people on and off not only the big airplanes but the smaller airplanes as well is really important for the economy because that makes travel convenient... and we want to be a friendly airport."

Sponsored message

Gary Toebben, president of the L.A. Area Chamber of Commerce, says federal support of the plan helped push it through the council.

"That has been recommended by the Federal Aviation Administration," emphasized Toebben. "In fact the aviation administrator sent a letter yesterday urging the city council to support the recommendation and move the runway and add a taxiway." 

L.A. City councilmembers Eric Garcetti - who's running for mayor - and Bill Rosendahl - who's nearby 11th district would be affected by the expansion - expressed their opposition to moving the runway.

Janine Watkins of Watts cheered when they spoke.

"My neighborhood is on the way to the airport so all the airplanes go over," said Watkins. "We have yet to understand the impact. We have yet to understand ground transportation that's going to be rerouted to us." 

SEIU union organizer David Huerta says his group, on behalf of many members that serve LAX, will continue to explore legal challenges to stop the runway expansion.

"Those four thousand workers deserve to have a voice in this process because what happens at the airport directly affects them, the health of themselves because they live in the surrounding community." 

Sponsored message

The L.A. City Council voted 10-3 in favor of the LAX modernization project. Airport officials say they could break ground on the north runway plan in five years. 

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today