Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
KPCC Archive

'Camelot' downsized to 8 actors at Pasadena Playhouse

David Lee Downsizes Camelot to 8 Actors at Playhouse
David Lee Downsizes Camelot to 8 Actors at Playhouse
(
Steve Julian/KPCC
)

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

Listen 3:41
'Camelot' downsized to 8 actors at Pasadena Playhouse

The legend of King Arthur and the Roundtable is a millennium old. Not quite that long ago – in 1961 – composers Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe told the tale of Camelot. Its original Broadway production glittered with pageantry and boasted a cast that would become theatrical royalty – Richard Burton, Julie Andrews, and Robert Goulet as King Arthur, Lady Guinevere and Sir Lancelot. But the Broadway version was dense – and, for today’s audiences, pretty long, with a running time of more than four hours.

A Southland production that opens tonight could go by the name “Came-lite.” It offers a condensed version of the legend with only eight actors. David Lee, who co-created, produced, and wrote TV's Frasier and Wings, directs this contemporary version at the Pasadena Playhouse. KPCC’s Steve Julian asked David Lee why he took the ‘lot’ out of Camelot.

"Over the years, they’ve taken things out and rewritten it but I thought the writing is so stunningly beautiful, and the score is so magnificent, there has to be a more efficient way to tell this tale," said Lee. "So, a couple of years ago, I went through the script, and I took out everything that didn’t have to do with telling the story about Arthur, Lancelot and Guinevere. And what I was left with was still Alan Jay Lerner’s beautiful writing and the vast majority of the score, but I was left with a piece that could be told with only eight actors. And I thought, that’s sort of interesting."

David Lee took out the extraneous actors and focused it among the action of the three primaries.

Sponsored message

"And what happened was – and others may disagree – but I found the story more accessible, easier to understand, and therefore ultimately more touching. Because of the economy of the script, I was able to add back in music and songs that are often excised because of the length of the piece."

Lee made the play more contemporary – with much younger actors.

"It’s something I’ve wanted to do with Camelot for a long time because there’s been this trend over the years, and I’m not sure why it’s happened, but Arthur gets played by increasingly older and older men," said Lee. "In the story of Arthur and Guinevere, he was 22 when they met and she was 17. And his building the Roundtable occurred when he was in his 20s, and much of the story is about Arthur trying to figure out life, and it’s really interesting to watch a 20-year-old guy try to figure out life, and it’s a little sad to see a 60-year-old guy trying to figure out life.

The story's a thousand years old and continues to resonate.

"On its surface, the main story is about ideals coming into conflict with human frailty, that no matter how much you plan things out, no matter how much you think what you’re doing is for the good, you have to add into the equation that it may not work out because people are not perfect," said Lee.

"And there’s another line with Guinevere," Lee continued. "When you look at her first song, she talks about the romance of war and how she misses the fact that knights aren’t going to tilt for her, and that kith won’t kill their kin for her, and she really devoutly wants all that excitement and all that romance, and she gets through the course of the play everything she asks for, and she learns that there’s a difference between the romance of war and the romance of knights killing themselves over her, and the reality of that. Those are some big themes, which is why the story keeps getting told over and over and over again."

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right