Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
A vision in black — see the women supporting the Golden Globes 'blackout'
The 2018 Golden Globes haven't started yet but the arrivals have. As expected, many actresses are showing their support for the movement to end sexual harassment and inequality in the entertainment industry — and they're doing it with their choice of clothing. They're wearing all black gowns.
The coordinated wardrobe blackout is part of Time's Up, an ambitious initiative to fight sexual harassment in Hollywood and other industries. Approximately 300 prominent actresses, filmmakers, agents and executives — including Shonda Rhimes, America Ferrera, Eva Longoria, and Reese Witherspoon — have signed on to the campaign.
Time's Up has created a $13 million legal defense fund to help people who have experienced workplace harassment.
Campaign organizers are supporting legislation that would forbid the use of nondisclosure agreements to silence victims. They're also pushing for gender parity at studios and talent agencies.
As part of Time's Up, they're encouraging Golden Globes attendees to wear black. Many have heeded the call.
According to the Hollywood Reporter, representatives from L.A.'s fashion and accessory showrooms are "reporting a run on all-black clothing, from gowns to cocktail dresses to men's suits."
Several men have turned up at the Golden Globes wearing black "Time's Up" pins on their lapels.
It's probably a safe bet that none of those gowns on the red carpet were designed by Marchesa.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline.
-
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.