With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
Judge in LA rules California FAIR Plan’s smoke-damage policy is illegal
Topline:
An L.A. County Superior Court judge ruled Tuesday that the way California’s last-resort fire insurance provider handles smoke damage violates state law.
The ruling: Judge Stuart Rice said the California FAIR Plan violates the state’s insurance code because it offers less coverage than is required by state policy. That policy provides coverage for all "loss by fire" damage.
What the FAIR plan says: Since 2017, the Fair Access to Insurance Requirements Plan has required claimable fire damage to result in “direct physical loss” with “permanent physical changes” to a property. The plan also requires smoke damage to be visible, rather than proved by lab testing. Homeowners have long argued these policies shortchange them. Tuesday’s ruling struck down both.
The response: The California FAIR Plan Association told LAist it is reviewing the decision but does not expect to appeal. "Since last year, we have been working collaboratively with the California Department of Insurance to update and clarify our policy language around smoke damage," a spokesperson for the association wrote in an emailed statement. "Our goal is to continue providing fair and reasonable coverage for wildfire-related losses while maintaining the financial integrity of the FAIR Plan for all policyholders." Some insurance experts say the ruling could raise rates for homeowners on the plan.
What’s next: The ruling could result in the FAIR plan’s policy changing. The commissioner of the California Department of Insurance is working to reform the FAIR plan, including investigating smoke damage claims handled by the plan after the Los Angeles fires. The state's insurance department also recently launched an investigation into smoke damage claims handled through State Farm.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
-
The study found recipients spent nearly all the money on basic needs like food and transportation, not drugs or alcohol.
-
Kevin Lee's Tokyo Noir has become one of the top spots for craft-inspired cocktails.
-
A tort claim obtained by LAist via a public records request alleges the Anaheim procurement department lacks basic contracting procedures and oversight.
-
Flauta, taquito, tacos dorados? Whatever they’re called, they’re golden, crispy and delicious.
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress.
-
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent.