One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Why Store-Bought Tomatoes Suck (And Why Your Farmers' Market Rocks)
(Photo by Krista Simmons/LAist)
Be thankful as your farmers' market stalls spill over with heirloom tomatoes this month, Angelenos. Many folks might not have access to the sweet, plump 'maters we have here in SoCal, and are stuck with lifeless, water-logged globes from super market chains. It turns out the lackluster flavor of those tomatoes is not solely the fault of being picked too early and doused in pesticides. A new study published in Science magazine reveals that commercially-farmed tomatoes are actually missing a gene that allows them to produce sugar. And it's all a product of uniformity.
Back in the 1930s, farmers discovered a variety of tomato that didn't have dark green "shoulders," meaning their color was consistent throughout. These evenly-green tomatoes made it easier to determine harvest time, so they bred accordingly.
But there's one slight problem: Researchers at UC Davis and Cornell recently discovered that this breed of tomato that allowed for full, even redness by the time it reached the supermarket negatively impacted flavor. Those uneven spots of green on the wild tomatoes called "green shoulders" actually contribute to production of glucose and fructose, as well as lycopene. In modifying them, farmers cut off the fruit's food supply, rendering them watery and lifeless.
If that doesn't sell you on farmers' market produce, I don't know what will.
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
