With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here .
Californians Will Likely Vote on Genetically Engineered Food Labeling Initiative in November
Image by adam.golabek via Shutterstock
By Gabriela Worrel / Special to LAistThis morning, The Genetically Engineered Food Labeling Initiative in California reported having gathered the target 850,000 signatures needed in order to ensure the initiative makes it onto the November 2012 State Ballot. The grassroots initiative, which seeks to have produce and packaged foods containing genetically engineered ingredients labeled as such, has been gathering signature since early 2012, with hopes of allowing California citizens to decide the issue in November.
Frank Plughoff, Regional Coordinator at LabelGMOs.org (a major player in the movement to label genetically engineered foods in California), states that as of yesterday's deadline for gathering signatures, the initiative successfully collected the targeted 850,000. While this is a victory for the group, which is composed mostly of volunteers, there are still many steps to the ballot. Signature gatherers must submit their lists to local county recorders, who will process the signatures over several weeks. It may be a while before the Secretary of State's office makes the official announcement that the item will appear on the November ballot.
This news comes in the wake of developing drama in Vermont, where similar legislation to provide labeling for genetically engineered food stalled amidst threats from agri-giant Monsanto. On April 20, however, the House Agricultural Committee voted to move forward with legislation despite the company's threats to take Vermont to court should the labeling legislation pass. In light of this, one wonders what lies ahead for California's efforts.
Plughoff explains the importance of the next steps in California's campaign for transparency in the food system: "We need to have consumers on our side." Now that the signature gathering phase is complete, his organization will focus on public education, outreach and preparing for the onslaught of contra advertising that Monsanto and other players in the genetic engineering business will surely bring to the Golden State.
Sponsored message
The most important thing we can do is keep the buzz alive, and buzz is something at which Los Angeles excels in spreading. As the most populous county, L.A. may be a key player in the passing -- or rejection -- of such an initiative. For those who believe consumers deserve the right to know what's in their food, word of mouth may be the most powerful tool. If you'd like to volunteer to help spread the work, click here .
Stay tuned for related events and rallies around town.
Now it's time for a snack. We'll stick with certified organic fare.
Related:
Word on the Street: What Do You Think About the GMO Labeling Initiative?
It's Signature Time: Label GMOs Initiative Inches Closer To 2012 Ballot
Tofutti, Tofurkey Or Turkey?
Get Trained To Help Combat GMOs In Our Food
Label GMOs Initiative Filed, Will You Sign?
Mary's Gone Crackers & Speaks Out Against GMOs
Exercise Democracy at The World Food Day Rally
Hidden in Our Food: GMOs & Your Right to Know
Is California Poised to Change the Nation's Food Landscape?
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
