Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Playboy Will No Longer Publish Nudes: 'It's Just Passé'

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Playboy, Hugh Hefner's magazine that helped usher in the sexual revolution, will no longer be publishing its trademark fully nude centerfolds. "The Bunny transcends nudity," the publication says.The magazine, started in Chicago, made its debut in 1953 with a nude centerfold featuring Marilyn Monroe. There have been many more stripped-down celebrities and "girls next door" ever since. But starting in March 2016, its print publication will be completely SFW. (And it turns out that Playboy has already been keeping its website nude-free for the last year.)

"That battle has been fought and won," Scott Flanders, the company’s chief executive, told the New York Times. "You're now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. And so it’s just passé at this juncture."

There may not even be centerfolds, but there will still be photos of beautiful women in provocative PG-13 poses. Flanders says these shoots will be "A little more accessible, a little more intimate."

By 1975, when business was booming, the publication's circulation was 5.6 million. Now it's about 800,000, according to the New York Times. Many of Playboy's competitors have also fallen on hard times. Now Playboy sees Vice and not the waning Penthouse as its competition. (Flanders served up a little burn sauce in his announcement: "The difference between us and Vice is that we're going after the guy with a job.") The magazine will still have those great in-depth interviews, investigative journalism and fiction that everyone likes to joke about reading. There will be a new sex-positive female columnist. (And we'd already noticed the site was keeping up with the times, like with this flowchart against street harassment.)

The magazine is banking on you actually coming back for the articles: "Our journalism, art, photos and fiction have challenged norms, defied expectations and set a new tone for decades. So we say: Why stop now?"

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today