Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here .

Arts & Entertainment

Pan's Labyrinth Disappoints

With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.

You couldn't ask for a better director than Guillermo del Toro -- visually inventive, intellectually nimble, devoted and self-effacing -- but with his latest film, Pan's Labyrinth, his technique outshines his film making, and the result is a movie that's more admirable than it is enjoyable.

There's enough in Pan's Labyrinth to make it worth watching, because even on his worst day (Blade II) Guillermo del Toro brings more to the table than 90% of working film directors. But at his best ( Hellboy) he's capable of creating one of the most profound and interesting superhero mythologies ever brought to film. That's partly why I found Pan's Labyrinth so disappointing.

As a companion piece to del Toro's fantastic and fantastical 2001 film, The Devil's Backbone , Pan's Labyrinth treads much of the same territory but with different results. Both films are set against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War and post-war Fascist repression. Both films feature orphaned or semi-orphaned child protagonists dropped into unfriendly social milieus. And both films showcase del Toro's flair for creating self-contained, mythologized realities where ghosts, fairies and other such creatures interact with ordinary humans in a way that's inextricably bound to the film's story. But where The Devil's Backbone uses careful plotting and clever visuals to meticulously interweave the fantastical and realistic narrative threads, Pan's Labyrinth is all baroque styling and tangential plot turns that bog down a fairly thin skeleton of a movie.

Sponsored message

Arriving with her ailing, heavily pregnant mother at an isolated mill that has been transformed into an outpost for Nationalist troops, 10-year-old Ofelia (Ivana Baquero) experiences a brutal adjustment to life under her new stepfather, who (if such a thing is possible) is even more of a Fascist in private than in public. The unrelentingly villainous Captain Vidal (Sergi Lopez) is written and played as such a one-note character it's almost comical; I wouldn't have been surprised to see him rip the heads off kittens with fanged teeth.

Immediately upon her arrival Ofelia is led by a precocious grasshopper to a nearby stone labyrinth where she meets Pan, who tells her an elaborate story about how the god of the underworld is waiting for his long-lost daughter to return. Conveniently, Ofelia is the chosen one. If she completes three tasks, she can shed her mortal existence and take her rightful place as princess of this mytho-universe. In the meantime, the leftist rebels -- aided by the mill's doctor and head maid -- have stepped up their insurgency, and Ofelia's mother has grown sicker.

The real and mythical storylines aren't well integrated. Events in one world rarely have vital impact on events in the other. And the halfhearted attempts to bridge the two worlds are capped by a hollow climax that essentially says: You can't always fix things in the real world, but in your fantasies you can do anything. Instead of an antidote to saccharine fairytale endings, it feels like a cop out. Guillermo del Toro seems too smart to top off such a labyrinthine movie with such a flimsy ending, but Pan's Labyrinth is like an overly rich tiramisu doused with cheap Nestle Quick.

At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.

But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.

We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.

Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Chip in now to fund your local journalism

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right