With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Just How Many Oscar Voters Are Old White Men?

Who decides who wins the little gold men at the Oscars? It turns out it's mostly old, white men.
This fact alone isn't earth-shattering if you've ever paid attention to which movies get nominated or you happened to notice what a big effing deal it was for a black women to win a Best Actress award in the 21st century.
But the Los Angeles Times conducted a recent study to figure out just HOW white and old and male the Academy really is. The actual figures themselves are pretty stunning (although it does not break down how many of these members are old, white and male):
- 94% are white
- 2% are black
- < 2% are latino
- 77% were male
- 62 years old is the median age
- 14% are under 50 years old
The figures the Times came up with aren't perfect, but the reporters said they confirmed the identities of 5,100 members—or 89 percent of voting members. It did this by investigating old rosters and the names of nominees to the Academy which have been public since 2004 (and you can read about their methodology here).But the Academy itself would not confirm the identities of its 5,765 current voting members. In all likelihood, the Times guesses that the identities of the people it couldn't confirm are older, white males, so it predicts these numbers are actually generous.
The article discusses how the Academy's membership compares to the rest of Hollywood, and it rehashes the critiques that has been lobbed at the Oscars over the years for its lack of diversity. But it's the stats themselves (that took a lot of legwork) that are most revealing.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”
-
While working for the county, the DA’s office alleges that 13 employees fraudulently filed for unemployment, claiming to earn less than $600 a week.
-
The L.A. County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to declare immigration enforcement actions a local emergency.
-
Tens of thousands of workers across Southern California walk out over pay and staffing issues.
-
People in and around recent burn scars should be alert to the risk of debris flows. Typical October weather will be back later this week.
-
Jet Propulsion Laboratory leadership says the cuts amount to 11% of the workforce.