Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Hollywood Is Still Predominantly White, Male, Straight & Able-Bodied, Study Says
A report released Wednesday by the Media, Diversity and Social Change Initiative at USC's Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism reveals that Hollywood still isn't particularly diverse, even after #oscarssowhite and outrage over the whitewashing of roles. The study in question has looked at the cast, directors and writers of the top 100 films (in terms of popularity, not necessarily merit) of each year since 2007, KPCC reports. The report reveals that 2015 was not much more inclusive than previous years:
- In the top 100 films, there were 4,370 roles where the characters were named or spoke. 73.7 percent of those characters were white, compared to 12.2 percent black, 5.3 percent Latino, and 3.9 percent Asian.
- 68.6 percent of all speaking or named characters were men, while only 31.4 percent were women.
- A total of 32 speaking or named characters whose sexualities were known were gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender. Only one was transgender, which is one more than in 2014, according to the L.A. Times.
- 2.4 percent of speaking or named characters were depicted as having a disability. This is the first year the study has included characters with disabilities in its findings.
- Women are more often shown in revealing outfits (or no outfits at all) than men. They are also more inclined to be referred to by other characters as attractive.
- 92.5 percent of the 107 directors were men. Four of them were black. Six were Asian or Asian American.
- There were no Asian leads or co-leads in any of the films surveyed. There were also no LGBT leads or co-leads.
- There was only one female composer in 2015.
There were some positive findings, including the fact that the number of women leads or co-leads went up by 11 percent.
The #InclusionCrisis facing female directors: Only these 29 worked as directors across 800 films @MDSCInitiative pic.twitter.com/UwpKJTWzEh
— Annenberg Inclusion Initiative (@Inclusionists) September 7, 2016
Lagging not leading: bias against inclusion on screen & behind the camera in @MDSCInitiative report #InclusionCrisis pic.twitter.com/Qu9uk6LGi8
— Annenberg Inclusion Initiative (@Inclusionists) September 7, 2016
Support for LAist comes from
According to researcher Stacy L. Smith, when it comes to diversity in Hollywood, there's been "a lot of talk and a little action."
We're seeing entrenched inequality. Whether we're studying gender, race, ethnicity, LGBT or characters with disabilities, we're really seeing exclusionary forces leaving out anybody that's not a straight, white, able-bodied man. Despite all the chatter and all the activism and all the press attention, it's another year where the status quo has been maintained.
Some 2015 films that were more diverse included The Force Awakens and the latest Fast and the Furious, while Mad Max was praised for having several female characters.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago. -
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
Best of LAist