Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

Arts & Entertainment

Critics Slam Princess Diana Movie: 'She Has Died Another Awful Death'

naomi-watts-diana.jpg
The real Princess Diana in 1983 (left, as if we need to point it out) and Naomi Watts playing her in the new, critically savaged film 'Diana.' (Diana photo by Reg Lancaster/Express/Getty Images; Watts photo by Neil Mockford/FilmMagic)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

The first reviews are in for the biopic Diana, starring Naomi Watts as the beloved "People's Princess," and they are brutal.

The film premiered last night in London and U.K. critics who have seen it are, predictably, not taking the often fictionalized depiction of Princess Di well.

"Poor Princess Diana. I hesitate to use the term 'car crash cinema,'" writes The Guardian. "But the awful truth is that, 16 years after that terrible day in 1997, she has died another awful death. This is due to an excruciatingly well-intentioned, reverential and sentimental biopic about her troubled final years, laced with bizarre cardboard dialogue—a tabloid fantasy of how famous and important people speak in private."

Guardian critic Peter Bradshaw continues, "Is this film an MI5 plot to blacken Diana's name and make her look plastic and absurd? The movie is [like] a horrendous Fifty Shades of Grey with the S&M sex taken out—and replaced with paparazzi intrusion and misunderstood charity work."

The film posits that Diana, who died in the tragic crash in Paris alongside her then-love Dodi Fayed, was actually using Fayed to make her real love, Pakistani heart surgeon Dr. Hasnat Khan, jealous. Khan—who is played by Naveen Andrews (Sayid on Lost)—told the Daily Mail last month that the film is "based on hypotheses and gossip." He hasn't seen it, and doesn't intend to. He said that the story, based on Kate Snell's book, Diana: Her Last Love, is "a complete lie. I have never given any approval."

Critics especially cringed over the terrible, Lifetime-y dialogue. The Times of London's reviewer lamented the "squirmingly embarrassing script," noting, "There are a number of lines you never, ever want to hear Diana, Princess of Wales say, and they include: 'I love feeling your hand there,' and 'Yes, I've been a mad bitch.'"

Most don't fault the previously Oscar-nominated Watts (who wore a prosthetic nose for the part), although The Mirror, who called the film "cheap and cheerless," wrote, "Despite a peroxide hair-job, she looks, sounds and acts nothing like the Princess of Wales. Wesley Snipes in a blonde wig would be more convincing."

Sponsored message

The film is directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel, whose previous work includes the much-respected (and much-memed) Hitler biopic Downfall.) It opens in the U.S. on November 1st.

Perhaps critics will be kinder when Watts's BFF, Nicole Kidman, debuts as actress-turned-royalty Grace Kelly in the upcoming Grace of Monaco. Nah, they'll probably have their knives out for that one as well.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today