Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Critics Slam Princess Diana Movie: 'She Has Died Another Awful Death'
The real Princess Diana in 1983 (left, as if we need to point it out) and Naomi Watts playing her in the new, critically savaged film 'Diana.' (Diana photo by Reg Lancaster/Express/Getty Images; Watts photo by Neil Mockford/FilmMagic)
()
The first reviews are in for the biopic Diana, starring Naomi Watts as the beloved "People's Princess," and they are brutal.
The film premiered last night in London and U.K. critics who have seen it are, predictably, not taking the often fictionalized depiction of Princess Di well.
"Poor Princess Diana. I hesitate to use the term 'car crash cinema,'" writes The Guardian. "But the awful truth is that, 16 years after that terrible day in 1997, she has died another awful death. This is due to an excruciatingly well-intentioned, reverential and sentimental biopic about her troubled final years, laced with bizarre cardboard dialogue—a tabloid fantasy of how famous and important people speak in private."
Guardian critic Peter Bradshaw continues, "Is this film an MI5 plot to blacken Diana's name and make her look plastic and absurd? The movie is [like] a horrendous Fifty Shades of Grey with the S&M sex taken out—and replaced with paparazzi intrusion and misunderstood charity work."
Support for LAist comes from
The film posits that Diana, who died in the tragic crash in Paris alongside her then-love Dodi Fayed, was actually using Fayed to make her real love, Pakistani heart surgeon Dr. Hasnat Khan, jealous. Khan—who is played by Naveen Andrews (Sayid on Lost)—told the Daily Mail last month that the film is "based on hypotheses and gossip." He hasn't seen it, and doesn't intend to. He said that the story, based on Kate Snell's book, Diana: Her Last Love, is "a complete lie. I have never given any approval."
Critics especially cringed over the terrible, Lifetime-y dialogue. The Times of London's reviewer lamented the "squirmingly embarrassing script," noting, "There are a number of lines you never, ever want to hear Diana, Princess of Wales say, and they include: 'I love feeling your hand there,' and 'Yes, I've been a mad bitch.'"
Most don't fault the previously Oscar-nominated Watts (who wore a prosthetic nose for the part), although The Mirror, who called the film "cheap and cheerless," wrote, "Despite a peroxide hair-job, she looks, sounds and acts nothing like the Princess of Wales. Wesley Snipes in a blonde wig would be more convincing."
The film is directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel, whose previous work includes the much-respected (and much-memed) Hitler biopic Downfall.) It opens in the U.S. on November 1st.
Perhaps critics will be kinder when Watts's BFF, Nicole Kidman, debuts as actress-turned-royalty Grace Kelly in the upcoming Grace of Monaco. Nah, they'll probably have their knives out for that one as well.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars. -
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.
-
Monarch butterflies are on a path to extinction, but there is a way to support them — and maybe see them in your own yard — by planting milkweed.
-
With California voters facing a decision on redistricting this November, Surf City is poised to join the brewing battle over Congressional voting districts.
-
The drug dealer, the last of five defendants to plead guilty to federal charges linked to the 'Friends' actor’s death, will face a maximum sentence of 65 years in prison.
Best of LAist