With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
Election 2020: Your Guide To Prop 13, The Only Statewide Ballot Measure In The March 3 Election

This is part of Voter Game Plan, our project to get you prepped for the 2020 elections. And if you have questions about voting, ask us anything.
TIP: Hey, LA County Voters. Here Are Some Vote Centers Without Long Lines >>
Remember that time California had an election with 17 ballot propositions? Well, the studying-averse got lucky this year -- if you're voting in the March 3 primary, there'll only be one statewide ballot measure to read up on. It's Proposition 13 -- no, not that Proposition 13. Unlike the 1978 ballot measure that cut school operating budgets, this brand new Prop 13 is about creating new money for school construction.
Here's what to know before you vote.
WHAT PROP 13 WOULD DO
If it passes, Prop 13 would authorize $15 billion in general obligation bonds (money that California has to borrow from bond buyers) that would go toward construction projects on both K-12 and college campuses around the state. It includes:
- $9 billion for preschool and K-12 schools (of which $2.8 billion would go toward new construction, $5.2 billion would go toward modernization, $500 million would go toward facilities for charter schools and $500 million would go toward career technical education programs)
- $4 billion for universities
- $2 billion for community colleges
Under Prop 13, the way that schools receive state bond money would also be different.
Currently, schools apply for those funds and get it on a first-come, first-served basis.
Prop 13 would change that by prioritizing schools that require health or safety-related repairs (like improved drinking water or earthquake-related renovations), schools with large proportions of students facing financial hardships, and schools with projects that use unionized labor.
On top of that, Prop 13 would give school districts the ability to raise more money through local property taxes to pay for their own bond sales.
It would also prohibit school districts from charging developer fees on multi-family residential developments within half a mile of a major transit stop. You can read more about that here. (Currently, schools can issue one-time fees on new developments for school construction if it can show the development will bring new students into the district.)
The Legislative Analyst's Office estimates that Prop 13 will cost about $26 billion total, or $740 million per year for each of the next 35 years.
ARGUMENTS FOR IT
Supporters say Prop 13 provides for much-needed renovations, and point out that most of the funds would go toward modernization rather than new construction. They say that Prop 13 will help protect children from aging pipes and critical disrepair, and create better and safer learning environments. Supporters also say the accountability measures built into Prop 13 help ensure that funds will go directly to schools that need the money most.
You can read some op-eds supporting Prop 13 from the L.A. Times, State Superintendent Tony Thurmond and the San Francisco Chronicle.
WHO'S DONATING MONEY TO SUPPORT IT?
Major donors to the "yes" campaign include the California Teachers Association, California Democratic Party, California Charters Schools Association and foundations for various University of California campuses.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST IT
Opponents say the measure will likely push up property taxes for homeowners to pay for it because school districts will be able to issue local bonds at higher amounts. They also say that due to the ban on developer fees on multi-family units near transit stops, school districts will seek to make up for those funds by raising property taxes as well. Others argue that prioritizing union labor for construction work unfairly punishes private developers.
You can read some op-eds opposing Prop 13 from the Desert Sun, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the Orange County Register.
WHO'S DONATING MONEY TO OPPOSE IT?
Opponents aren't spending any money against Prop 13; no ballot measure committees were formed to oppose it.
RELATED:
- The Developer Bonus Tucked Inside This Ballot's Prop 13 (School Bonds, Not Property Taxes) (CalMatters)
YOUR GUIDE TO THE RACES FOR:
- LAUSD Board District 3 >>
- LAUSD Board District 7 >>
- L.A. County District Attorney >>
- L.A. County Supervisor 2nd District >>
- L.A. Superior Court Judges >>
- L.A. County Measure R >>
- California Proposition 13>>
And fill out your sample ballot through our Voter Game Plan>>
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.

-
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places.
-
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures.
-
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump.
-
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
-
This is the one time you can do this legally!
-
Metro officials said it will be able to announce an opening date “soon.”