Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
Education

How Are California Schools Spending The $1 Billion Voters Approved For Arts Education?

A cluster of paintbrushes is gathered in a container, with the brush tips pointed to the camera.
For a lot of students, it might be a little bit surprising to discuss sustainability or climate justice in an art class, Carolyn McGrath says. So making art about it helps that process.
(
Tim P. Whitby
/
Getty Images
)

Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.

California labor leaders allege school districts are misspending money meant to expand arts education.

Listen 1:31
How Are California Schools Spending The $1 Billion Voters Approved For Arts Education?

In 2022, California voters approved setting aside about $1 billion a year for arts education. Proposition 28 required school districts to use the money to supplement existing funds, not replace them, with the goal of expanding the arts education opportunities available to students.

On Friday, a coalition of labor leaders called on the state’s education department, the governor, and lawmakers to require school districts to prove they are not violating the law.

What the letter says

The authors, which include leaders of Los Angeles Unified School District’s largest unions, say some districts are violating the law by using Prop. 28 funding to pay for existing programs, staff, and supplies.

For months, advocates have been questioning whether districts would implement the law as intended.

Sponsored message

“This is a new initiative,” Austin Beutner, the proposition’s author and former LAUSD superintendent, told LAist. “If we don't make sure that the law is implemented with fidelity at the outset, a pattern is going to be established and [it’s] very hard to recover from that.”

The authors call on state leaders to require school districts to submit documentation that proves they’re following the law — and if they are not, to return the Prop. 28 funding to the state.

LAist reached out to the California Department of Education and leaders of the Senate and Assembly education committees for comment, but hadn’t heard back as of Monday afternoon.

What Parents Can Do

Beutner said the law leaves it up to school communities, which includes families, to decide how to spend the money.

Here are a few questions to ask your principal and school board leaders to get more information:

  • What's being done with our Prop. 28 funds? 
  • Can you show us how the money is being used to add to programs at the school and not being used to pay for existing programs? 
  • How can I play a part in the school’s arts education funding? 

LAUSD's position

The letter doesn’t call out specific school districts, but Beutner said there is at least one example in LAUSD where documents obtained by a parent appear to show an existing part-time arts teacher being paid from Prop. 28 funds.

Sponsored message

“The law is clear,” Beutner said. “Every school gets extra money for the arts.”

A district spokesperson told LAist that LAUSD has increased its arts education funding from $74.4 million in the 2022-23 school year to $129.5 million in 2023-24, with an additional $76.7 million from Prop 28.

The Los Angeles Unified teachers union said it has requested more information about how the money is being spent at individual schools to hire new staff.

“We want the state leaders to hold the districts accountable," said UTLA president Cecily Myart-Cruz, "to make sure that the students get the arts education that California voters promised them."

LAist reporter Mariana Dale wants your help telling stories about K-12 education

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible year-end gift today

A row of graphics payment types: Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay and PayPal, and  below a lock with Secure Payment text to the right