Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Michael and Susan Dell donate funds for kids

    Topline:

    Michael and Susan Dell will donate $6.25 billion to fund investment accounts for 25 million U.S. children, under a plan unveiled Tuesday. The money from their charitable funds would help to seed "Trump Accounts" ushered into law in July.

    About the funds: The gift would put $250 into each eligible child's account, which is meant to grow over time through investments in low-cost stock funds that track market indexes.

    Who would receive the Dells' gift? To receive the Dell gift, children need to have Social Security numbers and be age 10 or under and born before Jan. 1, 2025.

    Read on... for what parents need to know.

    Michael and Susan Dell will donate $6.25 billion to fund investment accounts for 25 million U.S. children, under a plan unveiled Tuesday. The money from their charitable funds would help to seed "Trump Accounts" ushered into law in July.

    The gift would put $250 into each eligible child's account, which is meant to grow over time through investments in low-cost stock funds that track market indexes.

    "The idea is to give millions of children a head start on saving for the future," Michael Dell told NPR. "And we know that when children have accounts like this, even with modest sums, they have better outcomes in life."

    Michael Dell is the CEO of Dell Technologies.

    Here's a brief guide to the accounts, and the Dells' plan:

    Who would receive the Dells' gift?

    To receive the Dell gift, children need to have Social Security numbers and be age 10 or under and born before Jan. 1, 2025.

    Dell told NPR they're trying to reach kids who need the money the most, which is why the gift targets recipients who live in ZIP codes where the median income is less than $150,000.

    The Dells say the gift will reach nearly 80% of children in the eligible age group, across 75% of ZIP codes in the U.S.

    Parents need to create "Trump Accounts" to receive the gift

    As part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law this past summer, every American baby born from this year through 2028 is in line to automatically receive a Trump Account funded with $1,000 from the U.S. Treasury.

    All kids under 18 who have a Social Security number can have one of the accounts — but they don't get that initial $1,000.

    The Dell gifts are meant to help kids who are too old to receive that Treasury payment.

    "What we're doing with this gift is targeting kids that are 10 and under that aren't part of the federal program," Dell said.

    Susan Dell encouraged parents to "mark their calendars for July 4, 2026, which is when they could claim the accounts for their children."

    How Trump Accounts work

    Money in Trump Accounts would grow over time, using contributions to invest in low-cost stock funds that track market indexes. When the children turn 18, they can either convert the money into a retirement account or use the money for education, buying a home, or starting a business.

    Parents and others can contribute up to $5,000 annually until the year the child turns 18.

    Personal finance experts say the Trump Accounts are sort of a hybrid of existing plans. And the potential benefits would vary widely depending on how much a family can contribute.

    According to the White House, maximum contributions to a Trump Account could make it worth nearly $1.1 million by the time a beneficiary is 28 years old. If no additional contributions are made, it could be worth far less: $18,100.

    Essential details about how the Trump Accounts will be administered remain unknown. A recent update from Charles Schwab stated, "At this time, it isn't clear who will open the account or where it will be held."

    The investment bank recommends families consult a tax or financial adviser if they're interested in the plan.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Senators Padilla and Schiff express concerns
    Two men stand side by side in front of a bank of microphones. The man on the left is wearing a navy blue, zip-up jacket. The man on the right is wearing a grey zip-up jacket and black shirt underneath.
    California Democratic Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff speak to the media outside the California City Immigration Processing Center in Kern County after a congressional oversight tour Tuesday.

    Topline:

    Senators Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff toured the the California City Immigration Processing Center in Kern County on Tuesday. They met with staff for roughly six hours and left the tour concerned about the conditions at the facility.

    About the facility: The facility is the largest detention center in California. Up until March 2024, the facility served as both a state and federal prison, but was taken over by ICE last year. Roughly 1,450 people are currently being held there according to officials. The California City Immigration Processing Center in Kern County is roughly 100 miles north of Los Angeles and operated by private-prison contractor CoreCivic. The California City facility has not been inspected by the federal government since it started to receive detainees in August.

    Areas of concern: “A lot of the concerns we heard were about very valid healthcare issues not being addressed. The staff here acknowledged there’s been gaps,” Schiff said. The facility has the capacity to hold 2,500 people, but it already appears short-staffed and lacking proper medical supplies, like insulin for people with diabetes, the Democratic senators said after their congressional oversight tour. Some of the detainees said they became ill after eating moldy food and drinking water while in custody.

    Overcrowded cells, moldy food and lack of medical care are some of the issues plaguing a California detention center amid the recent onslaught of immigration raids by the Trump administration, according to Sens. Alex Padilla and Adam Schiff, who on Tuesday toured the facility in Kern County.

    About 1,450 people are currently being held at the California City Immigration Processing Center, according to officials. Schiff and Padilla expect more to be brought to the facility as the Trump administration ramps up immigration enforcement across the country.

    The Kern County facility has the capacity to hold 2,500 people, but it already appears short-staffed and lacking proper medical supplies, like insulin for people with diabetes, the Democratic senators said after their congressional oversight tour.

    The majority of the detainees they met at the facility do not have a prior criminal records and were detained at their immigration appointments.

    The senators toured the facility and met with staff for roughly six hours Tuesday. They left the tour concerned about the conditions at the facility.

    “A lot of the concerns we heard were about very valid healthcare issues not being addressed. The staff here acknowledged there’s been gaps,” Schiff said.

    Some of the detainees said they became ill after eating moldy food and drinking water while in custody.

    “I’m leaving here even more concerned than I was when I arrived,” Padilla said. “If the administration is true to their word, the population here is only going to grow. So the need to address nutrition, medical attention, mental healthcare is only going to grow.

    A beige building is pictured from a distance, across an asphalt road. A field of dirt surrounds the building
    Detainees from across Southern California are being held at California City Immigration Processing Center in Kern County.
    (
    Marina Peña
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    Some of the men and women being held at the facility were detained in Los Angeles County, but others were taken from other parts of the country.

    “That is absolutely a concern, not just for people from within the state of California to travel long distances, unable to see a family member, but I met a number of detainees here from elsewhere in the country,” Padilla said. “So access to their counsel prior and certainly to their family members is only exacerbated, to that effect.” 

    Padilla asked, “Why are people from other states being sent here? We also hear people from California being sent to other states.”

    Last year, 32 people died while in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, according to reporting from The Guardian. Some died in detention facilities, field offices and others died after they were transferred to hospitals for medical treatment.

    At least six people have died while in ICE custody this year, according to Padilla and Schiff.

    “In terms of getting the standards enforced to make sure they’re being upheld, that requires oversight, and it should be more than the two of us coming out to the detention facility without the power of the subpoena,” Schiff said. “Congress should hold hearings about the conditions in these detention facilities.”

    The California City Immigration Processing Center in Kern County is roughly 100 miles north of Los Angeles and operated by private-prison contractor CoreCivic. 

    CoreCivic and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment about Tuesday’s tour. The California City facility has not been inspected by the federal government since it started to receive detainees in August.

    Padilla, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Immigration Subcommittee, and Schiff toured the facility as masked agents continue to carry out an unrelenting wave of immigration sweeps across the country. The senators spoke to reporters outside the remote detention center, one year after President Donald Trump was sworn into office for his second term.

    “Today marks the first anniversary of the second Trump administration, and if there’s two takeaways from his first year,” Padilla said, “one is the economic chaos and uncertainty that so many working families are feeling, and the second clearly is the cruelty of a mass deportation agenda, which has included a lot of indiscriminate detentions, arrests, deportations, many without due process.

    ”The facility is the largest detention center in California. Up until March 2024, the facility served as both a state and federal prison, but was taken over by ICE last year.

    A CoreCivic officer stood guard near the facility parking lot throughout the morning. A gaggle of news reporters waited outside the facility’s barbed wire fence for the tour to be complete. The oversight visit comes as some Democrats in Congress consider various restrictions on funding for ICE operations and two weeks after federal agents shot and killed Renee Good in  Minneapolis during an immigration operation. The latest estimates show that more than 73,000 people are being held in ICE custody .

  • Sponsored message
  • Emerging tech can help manage electricity demand
    A dark-skinned man is inserting an electric vehicle charging plug into his Nissan. He is wearing a white shirt and black pants, and his head is not shown. It is daytime, and cars are parked around him.
    A technology called "active managed charging" could alleviate strain on electricity grids as EV adoption grows.

    Topline:

    Early evening electricity demand is only expected to grow as the world moves away from fossil fuels, with more people buying induction stoves, heat pumps and electric vehicles. That’s a challenge for utilities, which are already managing creaky grids across the United States, all while trying to meet a growing demand for power. So they’re now trying to turn EVs from a burden into a boon.

    Active managed charging: One idea showing promise is using algorithms stagger when EVs charge, instead of them all drawing energy as soon as their owners plug in. The idea is for some people to charge later, but still have a full battery when they leave for work in the morning.

    Vehicle to grid: Another emerging technology allows EV batteries to supplement power available on the grid.

    Read on ... to learn more about how it all works.

    If you’re a typical American, you get home from work and start flipping switches and turning knobs — doing laundry, cooking dinner, watching TV. With so many other folks doing the same, the strain on the electrical grid in residential areas is highest at this time.

    That demand will only grow as the world moves away from fossil fuels, with more people buying induction stoves, heat pumps and electric vehicles.

    About this article

    This article was originally published by Grist, an LAist partner newsroom. Grist is a nonprofit, independent media organization dedicated to telling stories of climate solutions and a just future. Learn more at Grist.org. Sign up for Grist's weekly newsletter here.

    That’s a challenge for utilities, which are already managing creaky grids across the United States, all while trying to meet a growing demand for power. So they’re now trying to turn EVs from a burden into a boon.

    More and more models, for instance, feature “vehicle-to-grid,” or V2G, capabilities, meaning they can send power to the grid as needed.

    Others are experimenting with what’s called active managed charging, in which algorithms stagger when EVs charge, instead of them all drawing energy as soon as their owners plug in. The idea is for some people to charge later, but still have a full battery when they leave for work in the morning.

    A new report from the Brattle Group, an economic and energy consultancy, done for EnergyHub, which develops such technology, has used real-world data from EV owners in Washington state to demonstrate the potential of this approach, both for utilities and drivers.

    They found that an active managed charging program saves up to $400 per EV each year, and the vehicles were still always fully charged in the morning.

    Utilities, too, seem to benefit, as the redistributed demand results in less of a spike in the early evening. That, in turn, would mean that a utility can delay costly upgrades — which they need in order to accommodate increased electrification — saving ratepayers money.

    How it works

    Active managed charging works in conjunction with something called “time of use,” in which a utility charges different rates depending on the time of day. Between 4 p.m. and 9 p.m., when demand is high, rates are also high. But after 9 p.m., they fall. EV owners who wait until later in the evening to charge pay less for the same electricity.

    Time-of-use pricing discourages energy use when demand is highest, lightening the load and reducing how much electricity utilities need to generate. But there’s nothing stopping everyone from plugging in as soon as cheaper rates kick in at 9 p.m. As EV adoption grows, that coordination problem can create a new spike in demand.

    “An EV can be, on its own, twice the peak load of a typical home,” said Akhilesh Ramakrishnan, managing energy associate at the Brattle Group. “You get to the point where they start needing to be managed differently.”

    That’s where active managed charging comes in. Using an app, an EV owner indicates when they need their car to be charged, and how much charge their battery needs for the day. (The app also learns over time to predict when a vehicle will unplug.) When the owner gets home at 6 p.m., the owner can plug in, but the car won’t begin to charge. Instead, the system waits until some point in the night to turn on the juice, leaving enough time to fully charge the vehicle by the indicated hour.

    “If customers don’t believe that we’re going to get them there, then they’re not going to allow us to control their vehicle effectively,” said Freddie Hall, a data scientist at EnergyHub.

    The typical driver goes only 30 miles in a day, Hall added, requiring about two hours of charging each night. By actively managing many cars across neighborhoods, the system can more evenly distribute demand throughout the night: Folks will leave for work earlier or later than their neighbors, vehicles with bigger batteries will need more time to charge, and some will be almost empty while others may need to top up.

    They’re all still getting the lower prices with time of use rates, but they’re not taxing the grid by all charging at 9 p.m.

    “The results are actually very, very promising in terms of reducing the peak loads,” said Jan Kleissl, the director of the Center for Energy Research at UC San Diego who wasn’t involved in the report. “It shows big potential for reducing costs of EV charging in general.”

    Active managed charging would allow the grid to accommodate twice the number of EVs before a utility has to start upgrading the system to handle the added load, according to the report. (And consider all the additional demand for energy from things like data centers.) Those costs inevitably get passed down to all ratepayers. But, the report notes, active managed charging could delay those upgrades by up to a decade.

    “As EVs grow, if you don’t implement these solutions, there’s going to be a lot more upgrades, and that’s going to lead to rate impacts for everyone,” Ramakrishnan said.

    Vehicle-to-grid technology

    At the same time, EVs could help reduce those rates in the long term, thanks to V2G, a separate emerging technology.

    It allows a utility to call on EVs sitting in garages as a vast network of backup power. So when demand surges, those vehicles can send power to the grid for others to use, or just power the house they’re sitting in, essentially removing the structure from the grid and lowering demand. (And think of all the fleets of electric vehicles, like school buses, with huge batteries to use as additional power.)

    With all that backup energy, utilities might not need to build as many costly battery facilities of their own, projects that ratepayers wouldn’t need to foot the bill for.

    Active managed charging and V2G could work in concert, with some batteries draining at 6 p.m. as they provide energy, then recharging later at night. But that ballet will require more large-scale experimentation.

    “How are we going to fit in discharging a battery, as well as charging it overnight?” Hall said. “Because you do want it available the next day.”

    To cut greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as possible, the world needs more EVs. Now it’s just a matter of making them benefit the grid instead of taxing it.

  • School district plans for cuts
    Students wait to cross an intersection towards a building with large glass windows and signage on top that reads "Roosevelt High School."
    Students cross Fourth Street on their way to Roosevelt High School.

    Topline:

    Next month Los Angeles Unified School District leaders will vote on layoffs at central offices and school sites as part of a plan to save $1.4 billion over the next two years.

    Why now: LAUSD is spending more money than it brings in. There are more than 40% fewer students compared to the early 2000s and the district has not closed schools or significantly reduced staff as costs have increased. LAUSD hired more staff to support students during the pandemic, but the federal relief dollars that initially funded those positions are gone. For the last two years, the district has relied on diminishing reserves to backfill a multi-billion-dollar deficit.

    Who will be laid off? The district’s fiscal stabilization plan outlines three categories where layoffs are likely: central office ($150 million), unfunded positions ($60 million) and the Student Equity Needs Index, or “SENI” ($99 million) which supports schools with higher-need students. District staff said the exact number and types of positions will be provided to the board in the coming weeks.

    What's next: The Board is scheduled to vote on the layoffs at its Feb. 10 meeting and impacted staff will be notified by March 15 as required by California law.  “It is not a foregone conclusion that people will lose jobs,” said Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. For example, he said staff may be reassigned to vacant positions or given the opportunity to transfer to another school.

    What’s still unknown: Several factors will shape LAUSD’s spending plan including the outcome of stalled contract negotiations with the district’s teachers union, the final state budget and changes to federal education funding.

    Next month, Los Angeles Unified School District leaders will vote on layoffs at central offices and school sites as part of a plan to save $1.4 billion over the next two years.

    The district’s fiscal stabilization plan outlines three categories where layoffs are likely: central office ($150 million), unfunded positions ($60 million) and the Student Equity Needs Index, or “SENI,” ($99 million), which supports schools with higher-need students. District staff said the exact number and types of positions will be provided to the board in the coming weeks.

     “It is not a forgone conclusion that people will lose jobs,” said Superintendent Alberto Carvalho. For example, he said staff may be reassigned to vacant positions or given the opportunity to transfer to another school.

    How did we get here

    LAUSD is spending more money than it brings in. There are more than 40% fewer students compared to the early 2000s and the district has not closed schools or significantly reduced staff as costs have increased. LAUSD hired more staff to support students during the pandemic, but the federal relief dollars that initially funded those positions are gone.

    For the past two years, the district has relied on diminishing reserves to backfill a multi-billion-dollar deficit. Most recently, the district pulled $496 million from its reserve.

     “Every available reserve of the district is being used to either offset reductions that otherwise would've happened or to pay for cost increases that we're expecting over the coming years,” said chief financial officer Saman Bravo-Karimi.

    Several still-unknown factors will shape LAUSD’s spending plan, including the outcome of stalled contract negotiations with the district’s teachers union, the final state budget and changes to federal education funding.

    Weigh in on LAUSD’s planned layoffs

    The Board is scheduled to vote on the layoffs at its Feb. 10 meeting and impacted staff will be notified by March 15, as required by California law.

    Find Your LAUSD Board Member

    LAUSD board members can amplify concerns from parents, students and educators. Find your representative below.

    District 1: Map, includes Mid City, parts of South L.A.
    Board member: Sherlett Hendy Newbill
    Email: BoardDistrict1@lausd.net

    Call: (213) 241-6382 (central office); (323) 298-3411 (field office)

    District 2: Map, includes Downtown, East L.A.
    Board member: Rocío Rivas
    Email: rocio.rivas@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6020

    District 3: Map, includes West San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood
    Board member: Scott Schmerelson
    Email: scott.schmerelson@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-8333

    District 4: Map, includes West Hollywood, some beach cities
    Board member: Nick Melvoin 
    Email: nick.melvoin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6387

    District 5: Map, includes parts of Northeast and Southwest L.A.
    Board Member: Karla Griego
    Email: district5@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-1000

    District 6: Map, includes East San Fernando Valley
    Board Member: Kelly Gonez
    Email: kelly.gonez@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6388

    District 7: Map, includes South L.A., and parts of the South Bay
    Board Member: Tanya Ortiz Franklin
    Email: tanya.franklin@lausd.net
    Call: (213) 241-6385

  • Highs in the mid 60s to low 70s
    May gray skies provide a gloomy background over the Los Angeles basin in a view with homes and skyscrapers in the background. Palm trees line some of the streets below.
    Mostly cloudy today.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly Cloudy
    • Beaches: 63 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: 61 to 70 degrees
    • Inland: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    What to expect: A mostly cloudy day with highs in the mid 60s around the coast up to the low 70s for the valleys.

    Rain in the forecast: A low pressure system is bringing a chance of light to moderate rain to SoCal for the next few days.

    QUICK FACTS

    • Today’s weather: Mostly cloudy
    • Beaches: 63 to 71 degrees
    • Mountains: 61 to 70 degrees
    • Inland: 69 to 74 degrees
    • Warnings and advisories: None

    The mostly cloudy skies today are courtesy of a low-pressure system that brings a 30 to 50% chance of showers to the region. It will be dry today, but we can't rule out a slight chance of showers tonight.

    Today's temperatures will be cooler, with highs mostly in the mid- to upper 60s for the beaches and coastal communities. The valleys will see temperatures between 68 to 73 degrees and up to 74 degrees over in the Inland Empire.

    High temperatures in the Coachella Valley will reach 70 to 75 degrees. Meanwhile, in the Antelope Valley, temperatures there will remain between 58 to 66 degrees.

    The National Weather Service says any showers will be light to moderate come Thursday into Friday morning.