Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Downtown Streetcar Could Cost Double What Voters Were Told
Last year residents in downtown were offered a chance to bring a streetcar to their hood at a cost of about $125 million, and voters overwhelmingly said yes. Now it turns out the number they were given was kind of BS, according to the Los Angeles Times.
The project hadn't done enough engineering work to know how much it would actually cost so they gave voters a "guesstimate." An aide to City Councilman Jose Huizar told the Times that they gave voters a "back-of-the-envelope" figure based on how much Portland paid for its streetcar. Portland's 7.2-mile streetcar cost $251.45 million, so they figured Los Angeles' 4-mile line would cost about $125 million. Eric Metz, the project director for Los Angeles Streetcar Inc., wrote to city staff in an e-mail obtained by the Times: "It's really that simple. We didn't hire an engineer or anything that fancy."
That back-of-the-envelope number didn't take into account inflation or the fact that underneath Broadway there are lots of power lines and old pipes. The city wasn't sure just how much it would cost to deal with utilities, but the city's Transportation Department knew that it would be more than they expected long before the issue went to voters. One official with the department wrote during a meeting five months before the vote: "Do not know what is under the street. Could add significantly to cost overruns."
It sure did. It turns out that it could cost the project about $200 million just to deal with relocating utilities, instead of the $10 million the city planned on.
Support for LAist comes from
But voters never heard about these concerns. The Times reports:
Staff members who spoke on the condition of anonymity said examining the project budget and revealing the shortfall had been politically awkward. Huizar's staff wanted to enter the federal funding process quickly, without disclosing the shortfall, emails indicate.
The latest estimate now stands at $327.8 million, which is more than double what voters expected. An aide with Huizar's office calls it the "worst-case scenario" and expects engineers will find a way to bring down costs. But the higher costs could mean that the streetcar will take five years longer than expected and part of the route past Walt Disney Concert Hall will get cut.Related:
Downtown L.A. Streetcar Project Accelerates With $62.5 Million in Local Funding
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
After rising for years, the number of residential installations in the city of Los Angeles began to drop in 2023. The city isn’t subject to recent changes in state incentives, but other factors may be contributing to the decline. -
The L.A. City Council approved the venue change Wednesday, which organizers say will save $12 million in infrastructure costs.
-
Taxes on the sale of some newer apartment buildings would be lowered under a plan by Sacramento lawmakers to partially rein in city Measure ULA.
-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
Best of LAist