One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
24,000 California Deaths Linked to Pollution
A state report (.pdf) to be presented today says that "as many as 24,000 deaths annually in California are linked to chronic exposure to fine particulate pollution," according to the LA Times. That's more than triple the figures announced by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) when they asked Governor Schwarzenegger and President Bush to declare a state of emergency regarding the 5400 environmental/pollution related deaths a year.
With the alarming amount of deaths, the obvious question is, what is going to be done about it?
Earlier this year, Britney Spears needed to go to the hospital, a near 7-mile journey. The LAPD escorted her at the cost of $25,000 because of the danger the paparazzi presented to her life. That's fine, they did what needed to be done. But if the State of California is finding that 24,000 people are dying annually (that's about 66 people a day) and we know the cause, will the pollution police start using their resources at full capacity to stop this immediately?
Someone, no doubt, will say we need to stop all the cars on the roads. Then a level-headed politician will go, but the economy stupid -- a bad economy just means more crime, more death and injury. But with $70 billion as the estimated economic cost of the premature deaths and illness caused by the pollution, says another study, how much crime can be attributed to that, if any at all?
So what's quick solution? Here is one: "Researchers also found that when particulates are cut even temporarily, death rates fall. 'When Dublin imposed a coal ban, when Hong Kong imposed reductions in sulfur dioxide, when there was a steel mill strike in Utah . . . they saw immediate reductions in deaths,'" Bart Croes, chief researcher for the California Air Resources Board, told the Times.
Photo by chang'r via Flickr
One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.
If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
