Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Traffic Still Sucks On The 405, Even With Those New Carpool Lanes

405_freeway_at_10.jpg
405 freeway (Photo by morgan.arnold via the LAist Featured Photos pool)

One year ago, Congress defunded public media. Now that we're 100% community funded, please become a sustaining member or increase your existing membership today.

Remember Carmageddon? Its sequel Carmageddon II? Jamzilla? The Rampture?

Thanks to all those pesky closures now have a shiny new 10-mile carpool lane. What we don't have is less traffic, according to a new study from traffic service provider INRIX.

Jim Bak said its analysts found "relatively no change" in travel speeds and times. The company compared data between the second and third weeks of September in 2013 and those same weeks in 2014 on the northbound 405 between the 10 and the 101 freeways, according to KNX. Between 4 and 7 p.m. it looks like the average travel time between those two freeways is actually about a minute slower than last year, KPCC notes.

It's not all bad news: INRIX notes that rush hour seems to be ending earlier. Last year it took about 28 minutes to drive from the 10 to the 101 between 7 and 8 p.m. This year it took 22 minutes.

Just because traffic isn't any better doesn't necessarily mean the carpool lane was a complete waste of 5 years and $1 billion dollars. Bak says that traffic tends to get worse as the economy improves, so keeping traffic levels steady might be an accomplishment in itself.

Then again adding more roads or lanes or even more public transportation options usually doesn't reduce congestion, so we shouldn't be all that surprised. Economist Matthew Turnertold KPCC, "There's a lot of trips that you don't take because you don't want to drive when it's congested and if it's little bit less congested there's a lot of trips people are willing to take."

Metro spokesman Dave Sotero told L.A. County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky's website that Metro's goal wasn't necessarily to cure the rush hour blues but to move more people. And the carpool lane is just one part of that. There are plans, however hazy, to bring public transportation to the Sepulveda Pass (perhaps a bus, underground train or aerial tram).

Sponsored message

"We are taking an 'all of the above' strategy to improve mobility in the Sepulveda Pass," Sotero said.

One year ago, Congress voted to defund public media, eliminating a critical $1.7 million from our budget every year going forward. But they couldn’t silence us, and we’re not going anywhere. LAist is now 100% community funded and that means we’re taking our future into our own hands and turning to you to keep local reporting strong.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our nonprofit newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our communities. We are free to follow facts wherever they lead and to hold power to account without fear or favor. Our only loyalty is to our readers and listeners and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen Southern California’s communities.

If this story helped you, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today