Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.

This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.

News

Can Longer Yellow Lights Make Intersections Safer?

yellowlight.jpg
Photo by AlexandreNunes via Shutterstock

This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting, make a donation to power our newsroom today.

Some groups think so and are advocating for them, as the era of red-light cameras in Los Angeles comes to a close.

Red-light cameras were hailed as a way to make intersections safer, but the program ended up being a sieve for city dollars and some groups complained that the cameras actually increased certain kinds of collisions caused by people braking to avoid a ticket.

One group Safer Streets L.A. is pushing for longer yellow lights in Los Angeles, so that drivers have time to clear the intersection:

If the yellow signal phase is too short, a “dilemma zone” is created. Motorists who are unfortunate enough to be within this section of the roadway when the yellow signal illuminates may neither be able to stop safely nor legally enter the intersection before the onset of the red phase. Dilemma zones virtually assure that some percentage of drivers will be forced to brake suddenly or violate the red, thereby creating the potential for rear end collisions or vehicle conflicts within the intersection.

But city transportation officials disagree, saying that extending the time at some of the city's most dangerous intersections could actually make matters worse.

As city officials voted to completely kill the red-light camera program, Pauline Chan, a senior engineer for LADOT, fielded questions about yellow lights from the city council. She told them she is against lengthening yellow lights. Instead she suggested looking at collision data to figure out how to reduce wrecks.

"I believe that looking at four intersections ... over a very short period of time, because of monetary restrictions, would have probably very limited use and probably would not help us evaluate traffic safety impacts of extending the signal timing," Chan said.

Sponsored message

Councilmen Bernard Parks and Mitchell Englander wanted to keep cameras up at four intersections to test whether extending the length of yellow lights would lead to fewer red-light violations, but the council ended up voting to take the cameras down entirely.

The city's transportation committee saysit will continue to look into the yellow light issue and revisit it later.

You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.

Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.

If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.

Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief

Make your tax-deductible donation today