Truth matters. Community matters. Your support makes both possible. LAist is one of the few places where news remains independent and free from political and corporate influence. Stand up for truth and for LAist. Make your year-end tax-deductible gift now.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Six Of The National Monuments Being 'Reconsidered' Under Trump Are in California
Wildflowers at Carrizo Plain National Monument (Photo by Curtis Kautzer courtesy of the U.S. Department of the Interior, via Twitter)
President Trump issued an executive order Wednesday instructing Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to review 19 national monuments set aside as public land, reports the LA Times. The potential consequences of this review will disproportionately impact California, where six of the national monuments slated for review are located.
The California national monuments on the list —the San Gabriel and Berryessa Snow Mountains, Giant Sequoia and Sand to Snow National Monuments, Carrizo Plain and the Mojave Trails —could all lose their protected status under this review. President Trump's executive order targets all areas that span at least 100,000 acres, many of which were designated as national monuments by former Presidents Barack Obama, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, the Washington Post reports. Carrizo Plain has been in the news as of late for its incredible super bloom blossoms.
California state government has already clashed with the Trump administration on numerous federal-funding issues, fromCaltrain maintenance grants to"sanctuary cities"; now, California conservation groups are preparing for a fight to preserve local landmarks.
Some environmental advocates, like Char Miller, a professor of Environmental Analysis at Pomona College, see the review as an empty gesture meant to appeal to small-government conservatives; "I think what we'll end up seeing is a report from the Interior that has no teeth and no power," Miller told LAist, predicting that the review may attract increased donations to environmental organizations like the Sierra Club and the NRDC, in the same way that January's travel ban led to record donations to the ACLU.
You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community. We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead. Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved. The support we receive before year-end will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
If this story helped you today, please become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission. It just takes 1 minute to donate below.
Your tax-deductible donation keeps LAist independent and accessible to everyone.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
