With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today during our fall member drive.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
LA River Plan held up because of Steven Spielberg?
()
It's just a rumor, so don't really hold it too close to heart, but it goes something like this: The LA River Plan's recreational and commuter bike trails are being held up because Spielberg does not want people rolling by his office window. I don't even know where his office is and I doubt that he is a Grinch that stole LA's river (I imagine him as a gregarious gentleman ready to sign a huge check to kick start the project for people of Los Angeles... hint, hint). But the fact is, movie studios are concerned over the LA River Plan because of security and their own property rights.
So be it. If years down the line the LA River Plan is close to finish with one huge gap between CBS Radford Studios and Disney, the people will speak up, right? Maybe they will park their cars in a circle around each studio and light them on fire (my college freshman philosophy teacher proposed this idea in regards to UCLA and traffic and Emmanual Kant. I still don't understand it, but the visual has stuck).
In the spirit of all the 'design your own Los Angeles' talk (Dodger Subway, WeHo Pink Line, Downtown Streetcars), here's what I would like to see for my neck of the woods and why.
Support for LAist comes from
Between the 405 and 170/101 (Sherman Oaks through Studio City), the LA River recreational and commuter bike paths should be completed soon. Why? Amenities and mid-density housing serve this particular route for local travel.
Starting at the 405 and the river, you've got the Sherman Oaks Galleria, Whole Foods and all those businesses that line Ventura Blvd. (not to mention Castle Park for some mini-golf). At Van Nuys Blvd., you get access to Van Nuys/Sherman Oaks Park, Best Buy, Gelsons, and all that the Business Improvement District has to offer (great falafel at Pita Kitchen). At Hazeltine, you've got Trader Joes and Westfield Fashion Sqaure. On the other side of Westfield is Woodman where more small businesses and restaurants serve the Ventura Corridor. Same goes for Fulton.
Now in Studio City, Coldwater Canyon is where the river is almost against Ventura Blvd. Here you've got Ralphs and a few blocks down along the river is Jerry's Deli, Staples and Bed, Bath & Beyond to name a few. Studio City's popular shopping area, between Whitsett and Laurel Cyn., already has an existing bike path that has been closed more than it has been open for the spectacular reason of county vs. city fighting (although, people kick down the plastic fencing and use it anyway). Then there is the Valleyheart Greenway, a beautiful meandering path between Laurel Canyon and Radford.
Imagine all that by bike or foot.
So what are we waiting for? Other than the obvious money, planning, politics, etc., it is the community that rallies behind an idea they support that is missing here. And that may be the most important.
Do you live along the LA River? What would you like to see?
Photo by Zach Behrens/LAist
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
If California redistricts, the conservative beach town that banned LGBTQ Pride flags on city property would get a gay, progressive Democrat in Congress. -
Most survivors of January's fires face a massive gap in the money they need to rebuild, and funding to help is moving too slowly or nonexistent. -
Kevin Lacy has an obsession with documenting California’s forgotten and decaying places. -
Restaurants share resources in the food hall in West Adams as Los Angeles reckons with increasing restaurant closures. -
It will be the second national day of protest against President Donald Trump. -
The university says the compact, as the Trump administration called it, could undermine free inquiry and academic excellence.
Best of LAist