With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today.
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Surprise! Airbnb Sues Santa Monica Over Short Term Rental Laws
Airbnb filed a lawsuit against the city of Santa Monica on Friday, arguing that the city's rules enacted to regulate short-term rentals are unconstitutional. As the L.A. Times reports, Airbnb's suit argues city law violates both the 1st (free expression) and 4th (unlawful search and seizure) amendments of the Constitution.
Santa Monica first passed stringent rules governing (and basically eliminating) short term rentals within the city itself in May of 2015. While Santa Monica stopped short of completely banning Airbnb (and Airbnb like services), the city's legislation makes it basically impossible for "hosts" to lease any sort of property aside from an extra bedroom inside a house the host also lives in. And even in that instance, the host would have to register with Santa Monica for a business license, pay the city's 14 percent hotel tax and remain at the site whenever the tenant is there too. The rules require Airbnb to also disclose the names and addresses of hosts within the city.
While most of the legislation is aimed at discouraging individual hosts, Curbed L.A. points out that Airbnb may be held liable for failing to remove the listings of any hosts who violate the city's rules.
Evidently Airbnb doesn't like any of this. The lawsuit filed on Friday seeks, basically, to eliminate any municipal legislation in Santa Monica, and to allow Airbnb to continue connecting hosts to short-term tenants unencumbered. As Alison Schumer, a spokesperson for Airbnb, explained to the Times: "Santa Monica's clumsily written law punishes hosts who depend on home sharing to make ends meet and travelers looking for low-cost accommodations near the beach... The city is unwilling to make necessary improvements to its draconian law, so while this isn't a step we wanted to take, it’s the best way to protect our community of hosts and guests."
Sponsored message
The goal of Santa Monica's legislation is to eliminate so-called "rentalpreneurs", people who use services like Airbnb to lease out several units that, critics argue, would otherwise be used as housing stock in L.A.'s historically tight rental market. For example, a group of evicted tenants sued their former landlord last December, after their old homes showed up in Airbnb's listing pages.
In early July Santa Monica busted its first "rentalpreneur", earning a no-contest plea of operating illegal rentals from the boisterous Scott Shatford. Shatford had previously voiced that he was "not concerned" about Santa Monica's rules, claiming it wouldn't be possible for the city to enforce them. In fact, the city has extracted $20,000 from Airbnb in late July, after enforcing its short term lease laws precisely 893 times, according to KPCC
Santa Monica is the third city Airbnb has sued over local legislations. In late July, the company sued Anaheim for its strict short-term rental rules, just as its done in the company's hometown of San Francisco.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Senior Vice President News, Editor in Chief
