Congress has cut federal funding for public media — a $3.4 million loss for LAist. We count on readers like you to protect our nonprofit newsroom. Become a monthly member and sustain local journalism.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
Surprise! Airbnb Sues Santa Monica Over Short Term Rental Laws
Airbnb filed a lawsuit against the city of Santa Monica on Friday, arguing that the city's rules enacted to regulate short-term rentals are unconstitutional. As the L.A. Times reports, Airbnb's suit argues city law violates both the 1st (free expression) and 4th (unlawful search and seizure) amendments of the Constitution.
Santa Monica first passed stringent rules governing (and basically eliminating) short term rentals within the city itself in May of 2015. While Santa Monica stopped short of completely banning Airbnb (and Airbnb like services), the city's legislation makes it basically impossible for "hosts" to lease any sort of property aside from an extra bedroom inside a house the host also lives in. And even in that instance, the host would have to register with Santa Monica for a business license, pay the city's 14 percent hotel tax and remain at the site whenever the tenant is there too. The rules require Airbnb to also disclose the names and addresses of hosts within the city.
While most of the legislation is aimed at discouraging individual hosts, Curbed L.A. points out that Airbnb may be held liable for failing to remove the listings of any hosts who violate the city's rules.
Evidently Airbnb doesn't like any of this. The lawsuit filed on Friday seeks, basically, to eliminate any municipal legislation in Santa Monica, and to allow Airbnb to continue connecting hosts to short-term tenants unencumbered. As Alison Schumer, a spokesperson for Airbnb, explained to the Times: "Santa Monica's clumsily written law punishes hosts who depend on home sharing to make ends meet and travelers looking for low-cost accommodations near the beach... The city is unwilling to make necessary improvements to its draconian law, so while this isn't a step we wanted to take, it’s the best way to protect our community of hosts and guests."
The goal of Santa Monica's legislation is to eliminate so-called "rentalpreneurs", people who use services like Airbnb to lease out several units that, critics argue, would otherwise be used as housing stock in L.A.'s historically tight rental market. For example, a group of evicted tenants sued their former landlord last December, after their old homes showed up in Airbnb's listing pages.
In early July Santa Monica busted its first "rentalpreneur", earning a no-contest plea of operating illegal rentals from the boisterous Scott Shatford. Shatford had previously voiced that he was "not concerned" about Santa Monica's rules, claiming it wouldn't be possible for the city to enforce them. In fact, the city has extracted $20,000 from Airbnb in late July, after enforcing its short term lease laws precisely 893 times, according to KPCC
Santa Monica is the third city Airbnb has sued over local legislations. In late July, the company sued Anaheim for its strict short-term rental rules, just as its done in the company's hometown of San Francisco.
As Editor-in-Chief of our newsroom, I’m extremely proud of the work our top-notch journalists are doing here at LAist. We’re doing more hard-hitting watchdog journalism than ever before — powerful reporting on the economy, elections, climate and the homelessness crisis that is making a difference in your lives. At the same time, it’s never been more difficult to maintain a paywall-free, independent news source that informs, inspires, and engages everyone.
Simply put, we cannot do this essential work without your help. Federal funding for public media has been clawed back by Congress and that means LAist has lost $3.4 million in federal funding over the next two years. So we’re asking for your help. LAist has been there for you and we’re asking you to be here for us.
We rely on donations from readers like you to stay independent, which keeps our nonprofit newsroom strong and accountable to you.
No matter where you stand on the political spectrum, press freedom is at the core of keeping our nation free and fair. And as the landscape of free press changes, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust, but the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news from our community.
Please take action today to support your trusted source for local news with a donation that makes sense for your budget.
Thank you for your generous support and believing in independent news.

-
The union representing the restaurant's workers announced Tuesday that The Pantry will welcome back patrons Thursday after suddenly shutting down six months ago.
-
If approved, the more than 62-acre project would include 50 housing lots and a marina less than a mile from Jackie and Shadow's famous nest overlooking the lake.
-
The U.S. Supreme Court lifted limits on immigration sweeps in Southern California, overturning a lower court ruling that prohibited agents from stopping people based on their appearance.
-
Censorship has long been controversial. But lately, the issue of who does and doesn’t have the right to restrict kids’ access to books has been heating up across the country in the so-called culture wars.
-
With less to prove than LA, the city is becoming a center of impressive culinary creativity.
-
Nearly 470 sections of guardrailing were stolen in the last fiscal year in L.A. and Ventura counties.