With our free press under threat and federal funding for public media gone, your support matters more than ever. Help keep the LAist newsroom strong, become a monthly member or increase your support today .
This is an archival story that predates current editorial management.
This archival content was written, edited, and published prior to LAist's acquisition by its current owner, Southern California Public Radio ("SCPR"). Content, such as language choice and subject matter, in archival articles therefore may not align with SCPR's current editorial standards. To learn more about those standards and why we make this distinction, please click here.
AIDS Healthcare Foundation Dumps Another $300,000 Into That Terrible NIMBY Ballot Measure
Photo courtesy of Vote Yes On Measure S/Coalition To Preserve LA via Facebook
()
It's become a tale of two cities. For developers, renters, and affordable housing advocates, Los Angeles is years deep into a housing crunch that is seeing rents skyrocket, vacancy rates bottom out, and the homeless population explode. For others, the city's development and public transportation booms are out of control, and threaten the very identity of Los Angeles.
The AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) has been an unlikely leader of the latter group. The nonprofit campaigned strongly against last year's transportation-centric Measure M. And in the upcoming citywide election, AHF has written and proposed Measure S—which, among other things, would place a two-year moratorium on most major development in the city. Measure S was previously known as the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative.
AHF is also the major funder of Measure S. According to Curbed LA, campaign finance filings for January 1 through January 21 show that AHF has donated $300,000 of the $300,952 in monetary funds Measure S received for the period. Beyond that, for the first three weeks of January, Measure S also received nearly $195,898.53 in non-monetary contributions (which, Curbed posits, are presumably the Yes on S billboard ads blanketing the city).
According to the Coalition to Preserve LA, the official title of the group sponsoring Measure S, as of January, there were 120 billboards across the city urging voters to vote yes on S.
Support for LAist comes from
"With 120 billboards across Los Angeles, the Coalition to Preserve LA is getting the word out about Measure S and the need to reform City Hall's rigged and unfair development approval system," the group wrote on their Facebook page. "We need you to help us. Share this post and/or take pictures of our billboards when you see them and post on social media. Thank you!"
For the three months prior, AHF contributed $504,332 to the campaign. According to Curbed, AHF has contributed more than $2 million to Yes on S campaign since the start of 2016.
How is the No On S team doing? For the same January 1 through January 21 period, No On S raised $190,910 in monetary contributions, and an additional $114,712.11 in non-monetary contributions. Who is bankrolling the opposition? Downtown developers City Century and SunCal are major funders, as well as international architecture firm Gensler.
So why is AHF (specifically president and founder Michael Weinstein) so opposed to a more robust public transportation system in Los Angeles? Or continued development?
"People moved here for the L.A. lifestyle. And that's a lifestyle that I love. If I wanted to live in Manhattan, I would live there," Brooklyn-born Weinstein told LA Weekly in 2016.
The cynic in us all might even guess Weinstein's opposition has something to do with the twin towers proposed behind the Hollywood Palladium. The towers, proposed by Miami-based developers Crescent Heights (which donated over $1 million in 2016 to the No On S campaign) would presumably block Weinstein's 21st floor office's views.
Weinstein is "...like that ex-boyfriend where you think you’ve seen the worst of them, but then they just continue to surprise you with how low they can go,” Steven Afriat, a Burbank-based entitlements consultant representing Crescent Heights for the Palladium development, told The Real Deal.
Support for LAist comes from
"He's a very intense man, who takes action when he thinks he's justified, and he doesn't back off," Jackie Goldberg, who ran against Weinstein in a city council race, told LA Weekly. "That makes a lot of people angry, particularly elected officials. I remember some elected officials talked to me about him, saying, 'You always get burned by him.'"
According to AHF's website, the non-profit's express purpose is to "rid the world of AIDS through a network of pharmacies, thrift stores, healthcare contracts and other strategic partnerships". So why is Weinstein spending AHF's money (albeit, money made by the foundation's pharmacies, not donations) on various city planning campaigns?
LA Weekly asked Weinstein that question. His response was a particularly dodgy. "We're a corporate citizen. This is our international headquarters. Why not? Why are we being asked the question and not all the business groups and the people who want to build anything they want? Why is it somehow less valid for us to be concerned about what happens in a community that we've invested in?"
Related: Why That Terrible NIMBY Ballot Measure Would Be A 'Horror Show' For Housing In L.A.
At LAist, we believe in journalism without censorship and the right of a free press to speak truth to those in power. Our hard-hitting watchdog reporting on local government, climate, and the ongoing housing and homelessness crisis is trustworthy, independent and freely accessible to everyone thanks to the support of readers like you.
But the game has changed: Congress voted to eliminate funding for public media across the country. Here at LAist that means a loss of $1.7 million in our budget every year. We want to assure you that despite growing threats to free press and free speech, LAist will remain a voice you know and trust. Speaking frankly, the amount of reader support we receive will help determine how strong of a newsroom we are going forward to cover the important news in our community.
We’re asking you to stand up for independent reporting that will not be silenced. With more individuals like you supporting this public service, we can continue to provide essential coverage for Southern Californians that you can’t find anywhere else. Become a monthly member today to help sustain this mission.
Thank you for your generous support and belief in the value of independent news.
Chip in now to fund your local journalism
(
LAist
)
Trending on LAist
-
Immigration raids have caused some U.S. citizens to carry their passports to the store, to school or to work. But what documents to have on you depends on your citizenship. -
The historic properties have been sitting vacant for decades and were put on the market as-is, with prices ranging from $750,000 to $1.75 million. -
Users of the century old Long Beach wooden boardwalk give these suggestions to safely enjoy it. -
The Newport Beach City Council approved a new artificial surf park that will replace part of an aging golf course. -
The utility, whose equipment is believed to have sparked the Eaton Fire, says payouts could come as quickly as four months after people submit a claim. But accepting the money means you'll have to forego any lawsuits. -
The City Council will vote Tuesday on a proposal to study raising the pay for construction workers on apartments with at least 10 units and up to 85 feet high.
Best of LAist