Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Timeline for LA's pilot program is pushed back
    The sun glows in a hazy sky as cars drive on a freeway.
    Speed cameras slated to be operational in Los Angeles at the end of 2026 will capture the license plates of cars exceeding posted speed limits on certain corridors.
    Camera systems shown to reduce speeding might not be operational in Los Angeles until the end of 2026, a transportation engineer told officials Wednesday, putting the city behind some of its peers throughout the state that are also piloting the technology.

    What is the pilot program? In October 2023, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation authorizing L.A. and five other California cities to pilot camera systems that cite speeding drivers on dangerous roads. Malibu was added as a pilot city in legislation that followed. The pilot programs are authorized to run for five years or up until Jan. 1, 2032.

    What will the cameras do? The cameras will capture the license plates of cars exceeding posted speed limits on certain corridors. That information will be used to mail tickets to the owner of the vehicle.

    How much progress has L.A. made? The L.A. Department of Transportation said it's been monitoring other cities’ progress since the legislation was signed two years ago. Last month, it hired a consultant to develop policies related to its program and help choose potential locations for the cameras.

    Read on … for more on the program, when the cameras are slated to be operational in L.A. and progress reports on the handful of other cities that are also participating.

    Camera systems shown to reduce speeding might not be operational in Los Angeles until the end of 2026, a transportation engineer told officials Wednesday, putting the city behind some of its peers throughout the state that are also piloting the technology.

    Elected officials expressed frustration with the delay at an L.A. City Council transportation committee meeting.

    “It has been about two years since we approved this, and we’re still talking about [requests for proposals],” L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park said. “I find that a little frustrating.”

    In October 2023, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation authorizing L.A. and five other California cities to pilot camera systems that cite speeding drivers on dangerous roads.

    A representative for Streets Are For Everyone, a nonprofit also known as SAFE that sponsored the bill Newsom signed two years ago, said L.A. is falling behind on implementing its program.

    “Our findings show that Los Angeles has currently only completed 25% of the required steps,” Brett Slaughenhaupt, SAFE’s director of L.A. County advocacy, said at the meeting.

    What will the cameras do?

    The cameras will capture the license plates of cars exceeding posted speed limits on certain corridors. That information will be used to mail tickets to the owner of the vehicle.

    The number of cameras each city installs is based on population. L.A. is tasked with installing 125 cameras, the most of any of the participating cities.

    The locations for the cameras will be selected based on where there are a lot of drivers that speed and where past attempts to make driving safer hasn’t resulted in “significant speeding reductions,” according to the report the Department of Transportation presented to city officials Wednesday.

    School zones and street racing corridors will be prioritized, according to the report.

    The owners of speeding vehicles will receive warnings for the first two months the cameras are active. Eventually, they'll be fined based on how much the car was observed exceeding the speed limit.

    The purpose of the cameras is to help cities reduce speeding, which is the cause of nearly one-third of traffic fatalities, according to the Department of Transportation.

    In L.A., 304 people in the city died in traffic fatalities last year, according to police data. An audit released in April found that lack of cohesion across departments and insufficient political support hampered the city’s goal of reducing traffic deaths to zero by this year.

    What progress has L.A. made?

    Chris Rider, a transportation engineer managing L.A.’s speed safety camera program, said that over the last two years, officials have been monitoring the progress of other pilot cities and honing in on the criteria that will be used to select locations for the cameras.

    According to the report, the Department of Transportation hired a consultant in August to define policies around data retention, propose locations for the cameras and facilitate community engagement and public awareness about the program in the coming months.

    The most updated timeline has L.A. activating its cameras, at the latest, by the end of 2026.

    Achieving that timeline hinges on whether L.A. can “piggyback” or adopt the contract another pilot city has already signed with a camera system operator, Rider said.

    At Wednesday’s meeting, Rider indicated that L.A. is looking to replicate Oakland’s proposed contract with Verra Mobility. A spokesperson for the city of Oakland told LAist that they're “hoping to get the contract signed ASAP, but don’t have a firm date.”

    The pilot programs are authorized to run for five years or up until Jan. 1, 2032.

    Where are the other cities in the process

    San Francisco’s cameras have been operational since August.

    Data on the number of tickets the city’s 33 cameras helped issue won’t be available until the end of September, according to a spokesperson for the city’s transportation agency.

    Other cities are not far behind.

    The spokesperson for Oakland said its 18 cameras are expected to be installed by the end of the year.

    San Jose has identified potential camera locations, but its program has hit a snag. The city was going to use an $8.5 million grant from the Biden administration to fund its program. But the Trump administration updated the terms and conditions of that grant, as well as others focused on health and housing.

    While a U.S. District Court judge in August granted a preliminary injunction blocking the administration’s actions, the money isn’t yet available.

    “While our City Attorney's Office works on that issue, the speed camera program remains in a holding pattern,” said Colin Heyne, a public information officer for the city’s department of transportation. “We will work swiftly to award a contract, install the cameras, and start the program as soon as we have funding.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    Malibu Mayor Marianne Riggins said the five cameras the city is installing along Pacific Coast Highway will make pedestrians, cyclists and commuters safer.

    “The City’s new speed safety citation camera system is one of the most important tools we have to slow drivers down and save lives on Pacific Coast Highway,” Riggins said to LAist in a statement.

    Malibu officials said in an August meeting that it's targeting the end of the year for the installation of five cameras along Pacific Coast Highway.

    Locations for Long Beach’s cameras have been identified and will be made public in October, according to a community information officer.

    LAist reached out to the city of Glendale for a status update on its program.

  • House Democrats announce tracking system
    Federal law enforcement officers conduct an immigration enforcement operation at the Cedar Run Apartments in Denver, Colorado on Feb. 5, 2025.
    Federal law enforcement officers conduct an immigration enforcement operation.

    Topline:

    Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight on Monday launched a new tracking system to document possible misconduct and abuse during federal immigration enforcement operations under the Trump administration, according to Rep. Robert Garcia of Long Beach, who is the ranking member of the committee.

    The details: As of Monday, the the new dashboard listed 252 incidents dating back to Jan. 26. Only incidents verified by reputable media outlets or referenced in litigation are included, according to the committee website. Social media videos without corroboration are not included. Each incident is categorized as either under one or more of the following types of possible misconduct: "concerning use of force," "concerning arrest/detention," "concerning deportation," and an "enforcement action at a sensitive location.” Incidents involving U.S. citizens are categorized with a "U.S. Citizen" tag.

    The backstory: Immigrant rights organizations and many Democratic leaders have long expressed concerns about the practices of federal immigration authorities carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation plan. “Our Dashboard shines a light on the harmful actions perpetrated against U.S. citizens and immigrants across the country,” Garcia said in a statement.

    In-custody deaths: More than 40 members of the U.S. House, including 15 representatives from California, are also demanding answers from federal authorities about the record number of people who died in immigration detention this year. Fifteen people have died so far this year, including two at the Adelanto immigration detention center.

  • Sponsored message
  • Why sightings are more common during droughts
    A closeup image of a coyote on a wildlife camera, with a grassy area in the background.
    Coyotes like this one are among the many animals driven closer to humans during periods of drought.

    Topline:

    A study from UCLA found that in drier years, larger animals are more likely to head closer and closer to where people live.

    What’s driving this: It depends on the animal, but food and water are the main factors. Less rain means less standing water and less vegetation for herbivores. As these animals look for food and water in more populated areas, omnivores and carnivores also follow them.

    What animals are affected: Among many others, deer, elk, squirrels, mountain lions, bobcats, and black bears are all inclined to leave their natural habitats to seek out supplemental food sources in yards and agricultural areas.

    Read on... for more on what the data tells about our wild visitors and what are climate has to do with them.

    If you’ve noticed more wildlife visiting your yard in recent years — maybe digging up your vegetable garden or even drinking from your pool — you’re not alone.

    A recent study from UCLA found that larger predators like mountain lions and bears are more likely to interact with humans and travel closer to population centers in drier years. To determine this, the researchers analyzed state data collected on reported property damage, nuisances, conflicts and sightings.

    “It kind of runs the full gamut of how people interact with wildlife around their neighborhoods and their homes,” said UCLA postdoctoral researcher Kendall Calhoun, the lead author on the study.

    A mountain lion prowling in an area with dry vegetation.
    It's not just P-22. Mountain lions across the whole state are forced to leave their habitats for survival.
    (
    Courtesy Kendall Calhoun
    )

    Different motivations for different animals

    As you might expect, different animals might have different reasons for entering populated areas. But in large part, Calhoun said, it comes down to animals’ survival instincts.

    The primary motivator for many herbivores is likely to be food. That’s because with less precipitation, there’s also less plant material for them to eat. (Don’t forget: even with all the rain we’ve had recently, much of Southern California is still in a drought.)

    “ Deer and elk might be pushed to find those food resources in places that they normally wouldn't go, like agriculture, crops, things from people's yards, persimmons from your tree,” Calhoun said.

    And as herbivores get pushed toward humans, the animals that prey on them are too. In fact, the species that saw the highest increases in clashes with humans were omnivores and carnivores, specifically mountain lions, coyotes, black bears and bobcats.

    But even these animals have varying reasons for getting close to people.

    “Mountain lions might be more inclined to look for supplemental food in livestock — that might be a sheep or a goat,” Calhoun said. “Black bears may be more willing to go into your trash to look for food to help supplement what they're missing in their resource-scarce natural areas.”

    Meanwhile, animals of all kinds might enter a yard even when they have enough food to look for standing water.

    About the data

    Researchers analyzed data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that were reported over the last several years as part of a citizen science initiative.

    One important caveat is that the researchers primarily looked at conflicts between wildlife and residents, and there may be differences in how these interactions are reported.

    For example, you might not report a deer eating fruit from an overloaded tree as a nuisance, but even a peaceful black bear digging through your trash could raise alarm bells.

     "People also really value having wildlife living alongside them," Calhoun said. "It really is important for us to try to strike that balance where there's pros for both sides, without some of the negative interactions that come with living in close proximity with wildlife species."

    Learn more about human-wildlife interactions

    There’s more background on the research on UCLA’s website, and you can find the full study here.

    You can also learn much more about interactions between humans and wildlife in LAist’s Imperfect Paradise podcast series, “Lions, Coyotes, & Bears.”

    Listen 45:45
    Lions, Coyotes, & Bears Part 1 Redux - The Mountain Lion Celebrity

  • Qualifying families can sign up for updates
    A close-up of a hand on a laptop computer.
    A student takes notes during history class.

    Topline:

    Fast, affordable internet service in parts of L.A. County is expected to become available soon and organizers say now is a good time to sign up for alerts when the program goes live.

    How much will the service cost? There will be different plans available — low income, market rate and small business — at different internet speeds and fixed price rates. The low-cost service plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month.

    How will it work? The internet provider, WeLink, will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof that will then connect to the internet network.

    Why it matters: About 23% of households in East L.A. and Boyle Heights, and more than 40,000 households in South L.A., don’t have home internet.

    Read on … for how to stay in the loop when the service rolls out.

    Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of L.A. County at the end of this year, and organizers say eligible households can sign up for alerts when the service becomes available.

    The service — a partnership between L.A. County and internet provider WeLink — is the latest project from the county’s “Delete the Divide,” an initiative meant to bridge the digital divide in underserved neighborhoods.

    Major funding for the project comes from the American Rescue Plan Act, as well as a grant from the California Public Utilities Commission.

    It’s badly needed

    About 23%, or more than 20,000, households in the East L.A. and Boyle Heights area don’t have home internet, according to Delete the Divide.

    The service will also soon be coming to South L.A., where more than 40,000 households were identified as lacking home internet.

    What you need to know

    There will be different plans available — including low-income, market-rate and small business options — at fixed prices. The low-cost plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month. Monthly rates are fixed until at least September 2027.

    Every plan includes unlimited data, a router and parental controls.

    This shows a close-up map of LA County. The area shaded in orange represents South L.A.
    Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in South L.A. at the end of this year.
    (
    Courtesy of L.A. County
    )
    This shows a close-up map of L.A. County. The parts in the middle shaded in orange are the areas in East L.A. and Boyle Height.
    Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of East L.A. and Boyle Heights at the end of this year.
    (
    Courtesy of L.A. County
    )

    How it works 

    WeLink will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof to connect the household to the internet.

    Interested households can sign up for updates and be notified by WeLink when service is available here.

  • CA program for fruits and veggies returns
    baskets of strawberries on a table. Squashes and eggplants and string beans on another table in the background.
    Fresh produce and fruits at the farmers market.

    Topline:

    A program that offers CalFresh recipients an extra $60 a month to spend on fresh produce at participating stores and farmers markets is restarting thanks to renewed state funding.

    The backstory: The CalFresh Fruit and Vegetable EBT Pilot Project was most recently funded at $10 million, but that was only enough to run the program for about three months.

    How it works: When CalFresh recipients spend money on fresh fruits and vegetables at participating locations, their EBT cards are immediately rebated the amount they spend, up to $60 a month.

    Funding boost: Thanks to a boost of $36 million in state funding, program organizers are hopeful it will last about 10 months. The renewed funding comes after food banks and meal programs in Los Angeles were forced to scramble to serve a rush of people looking for help during the longest government shutdown in American history.

    The quote: The continuation of the program was a priority for State Sen. Laura Richardson, who represents cities including Carson and Compton. “You know, people are hurting," Richardson told LAist. "The number one thing that we hear that people are concerned about is affordability."

    Find participating locations: There are about 90 participating retailers and farmers markets. You can find a list here.