The Brief

Los Angeles has failed to meet its Vision Zero goals.

That's the conclusion of a newly released audit, which found the city's long-running effort to eliminate traffic deaths by this year has been impeded by a lack of cohesion across departments, insufficient political support and an imbalanced approach.

In 2015, the city adopted Vision Zero, a policy framework from Sweden with the principle that no one should be killed in traffic. Then-Mayor Eric Garcetti set benchmarks for reducing traffic fatalities over a decade, culminating in the final goal of getting to zero traffic deaths by 2025.

The opposite has happened. Since the program’s adoption, traffic fatalities in L.A. have increased. In 2024, 303 people died in traffic fatalities in L.A., according to preliminary LAPD data reviewed by LAist.

“Eliminating traffic deaths is an ambitious goal but remains the correct one,” a spokesperson for the Department of Transportation said in a statement to LAist. “LADOT will continue to pursue and promote policy changes along with the most effective engineering design principles and continue to invest in proven treatments that make our streets safer.”

What’s the audit?

Following direction from the L.A. City Council in 2022, the office of the City Administrative Officer spent $500,000 on an independent contractor to evaluate the first seven years of Vision Zero.

The office of the City Administrative Officer and Department of Transportation wrote a report accompanying the audit, which was released Friday, with recommendations for the L.A. City Council “to relaunch the Vision Zero Program with a more deliberate and collaborative approach.”

What did the audit find?

While the Department of Transportation leads the city’s Vision Zero work, nearly every related project requires the participation of other agencies, including Engineering, Street Services, the LAPD and more.

In his directive establishing the program, Garcetti envisioned a Vision Zero Steering Committee made up of representatives from departments citywide to coordinate the implementation of traffic safety projects.

By mid-2018, that committee had stopped meeting, the audit found. The reduction in participation resulted in the loss of a “useful forum to collaborate on Vision Zero goals and nothing quite replaced this level of interaction,” the audit said.

The last time the Department of Transportation revised its action plan, the document that coordinates projects across city agencies, was in 2018.

The audit identified 56 “actions and strategies” from that plan that were meant to be completed by the end of 2020, including projects focused on street design and lighting and Vision Zero education campaigns.

Half of those projects remain incomplete as of the end of 2023, the audit found.

According to interviews the audit is based on, “the level of enthusiasm at City Hall” for Vision Zero has decreased since the program was launched.

“Some of the reasons cited include the pandemic, conflicts of personality, lack of total buy-in for implementation, disagreements over how the program should be administered and scaling issues,” the audit said.

Without political support and lack of communication from council members about the program, Vision Zero becomes less effective, the audit said.

“As a governing body, this city does not treat traffic violence as the public health crisis that it has become,” Damian Kevitt, the executive director of Streets Are For Everyone, told LAist.

The audit also noted that traffic enforcement in L.A. has fallen because of LAPD staffing shortages and concerns of over-policing.

“There has been a pattern observed over the years in terms of declining [driving under the influence] arrests and total citations related to safety,” the audit stated.

The audit also pointed out that the city overly focused on infrastructure and engineering, to the detriment of public education and regular monitoring of the program’s progress.

Mayor Karen Bass' office and the LAPD did not immediately respond to LAist's requests for comment.

Cyclists ride across the Sixth Street Bridge in Los Angeles in 2022.

(

Trevor Stamp

/

For LAist

)

What’s the status of traffic fatalities in L.A.?

In 2015, the year L.A. launched Vision Zero, around 240 people people died in traffic collisions, according to state data. The number has not fallen below 280 in any year since.

And by 2024, it had increased to 303, according to an LAist review of LAPD data.

Progress on reducing traffic fatalities nationally has slowed over the last decade. The problem became worse during the pandemic, likely due to an increase in riskier behaviors, according to UC Berkeley transportation safety researcher Matthew Raifman.

Over the last decade, traffic fatalities in L.A. grew faster than the national average. His findings are based on data from 2023, which is the most recent year national data is available.

The city has more pedestrian and cyclist fatalities than the other four most populated U.S. cities, Raifman told LAist.

“That’s deeply problematic because [walking and biking] are an important mode of transportation and something that we're trying to incentivize in many American cities,” Raifman said.

A safer future?

Since the audit was completed at the end of 2023, the city's Department of Transportation identified a new network of streets that see an outsized number of collisions resulting in death or serious injury based on updated data. The department also evaluated the effectiveness of interventions to make streets safer, which the department’s spokesperson said will be used to guide future projects.

The city is expected to have automated speed cameras installed on dangerous streets by the middle of next year as a result of state legislation signed in 2023. The audit points to the success similar cameras have had in helping to reduce traffic fatalities in other cities.

The spokesperson from the Department of Transportation said city officials will “pursue additional changes in legislation" to ensure consistent enforcement and accountability for risky driving behavior such as running red lights, driving under the influence, distracted driving and excessive speed.

At the end of 2024, Bass directed the city to establish L.A.’s first Capital Improvement Plan, a long term planning document that nearly every other major U.S. city uses to prioritize and allocate funding for infrastructure projects. The city is still very early on in developing this plan, but it could help alleviate some of the coordination and planning woes the audit found.

Lines stretched around the block Sunday at the Original Saugus Cafe in Santa Clarita. It was supposed to be the restaurant's last day before closing after 139 years — making it the oldest continually operated restaurant in Los Angeles County.

But earlier this week, a sign was posted on the door saying, "Reopening under new ownership soon," although there were few details about who would be running it.

The sign was a surprise to the Mercado family, who have operated the restaurant for nearly 30 years. The family now is in a legal dispute with the Arklin family, who owns the property, about the potential re-opening and who owns the historic name.

The background

Alfredo Mercado worked his way up from bartender to restaurateur, purchasing the business in 1998. Since then Mercado and his daughters have operated the restaurant, leasing from the Arklin family. For most of that time, according to the Mercado side, the two families maintained good terms. Property owner Hank Arklin Sr., a former state assemblyman who owned other properties in the area, kept a verbal month-to-month agreement with the Mercados — no written lease required.

That changed when Arklin died in August at age 97.

New terms, failed negotiations

Larry Goodman, who manages multiple properties for the Arklin family's company, North Valley Construction, took over the landlord relationship. In September, the Mercado family say they were presented with a new written month-to-month lease.

Yecenia Ponce, Alfredo's daughter, said the new terms included various changes to the existing agreement, including a rent increase and charges for equipment.

Months of back and forth negotiations about different options, including selling the business, ultimately fell apart. Their attorney, Steffanie Stelnick, says they are being forced out, without proper legal notice, and has sent a cease-and-desist letter to Goodman saying the family has plans to continue running the business.

LAist reached out to Goodman for comment repeatedly Wednesday and Thursday by phone but did not hear back.

Goodman told The Signal, a Santa Clarita valley news outlet, that Alfredo Mercado had changed his mind several times in recent weeks about keeping the business.

“I said, ‘Fine,’ then I got out and got someone to take it over,” Goodman said.

He said he'd been in contact with Eduardo Reyna, the CEO of Dario's, a local Santa Clarita restaurant, and that the cafe could re-open as soon as Jan. 16.

Who owns what?

The dispute also focuses on who owns the rights to the Original Saugus Cafe name.

Ponce said when her father purchased the restaurant in 1998, it was called The Olde Saugus Cafe, but the name was then changed to The Original Saugus Cafe. State records show that name registered as an LLC under Alfredo Mercado.

After Arklin’s death, however, the Arklin family filed a pending trademark application to lay its own claim to the name.

The Mercado family is resisting.

"As long as they don't buy the name from us, we're not handing it over," Ponce said.

Ponce said the family had no idea the landlord planned to continue operations.

"We truly did think we were closing," she said. "We were not aware that they had plans to continue."

She apologized to customers for the confusion.

Whether the decades-old restaurant name survives — and under whose control — may ultimately be decided in court.

Community leaders and politicians in Los Angeles are responding in outrage after an ICE agent shot and killed a woman in Minnesota on Wednesday.

The fatal ICE shooting of 37-year-old Renee Good has sparked anger and fear in Los Angeles, which has been an epicenter of federal immigration enforcement since the summer.

Jorge-Mario Cabrera with the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, or CHIRLA, says the killing was upsetting but not surprising.

" Los Angeles has been witness of the escalating aggressiveness of these federal agents against the community," he told LAist.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has defended the shooting, saying Good was trying to run agents over with her car. That account has been disputed by eyewitnesses, the mayor of Minneapolis and other officials. Bystander video also challenges the federal narrative, according to MPR News.

L.A. politicians have joined a chorus demanding justice for Good. Mayor Karen Bass posted on X, saying that ICE agents are waging "a purposeful campaign of fear and intimidation" on American cities.

"The senseless killing of an innocent and unarmed wife and mother by ICE agents today in Minneapolis is shocking and tragic and should never have occurred," she said in the post.

L.A. County Supervisor Janice Hahn called on Noem to withdraw ICE from U.S. cities.

“These ICE agents are undertrained and trigger happy and everyone who has seen this video knows ICE murdered this woman,” she said in a statement.

Some protesters also gathered outside the federal building in downtown L.A. Thursday morning to condemn the killing.