Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Proposal to tackle traffic congestion
    A building with a red roof with signage that says "DOORDASH KITCHENS" in white lettering. A man in a green shirt looks down at his phone and waits in the open doorway to the building. In front of the building, there's a white table accompanied by a sign that says: "ORDER CHECK TABLE ONLY."
    Traffic and sidewalk congestion around a ghost kitchen in North Hollywood led to the establishment of an exclusion zone in May.
    L.A. City Council passed a motion at the end of July aimed at mitigating the traffic and parking concerns around ghost kitchens, the new type of commercial kitchens designed to produce high volumes of food for pickup and delivery.

    What’s the problem?: Neighbors around ghost kitchens describe a tense atmosphere around ghost kitchens, where the sidewalks and roads are congested because delivery drivers are waiting to match with an order.

    What’s the proposal?: The motion city council passed directs city staff to draft a policy creating “exclusion zones” around ghost kitchens. Delivery drivers would have to stay outside of these zones to get matched with a delivery at the ghost kitchen. Councilman Hugo Soto-Martínez, who represents neighborhoods from Echo Park and Silverlake to Hollywood, led the motion.

    How could that help?: Proponents say exclusion zones would spread delivery drivers around the ghost kitchens and dissuade them from congregating on the surrounding sidewalks and streets.

    Read on … for more about the proposal, what food delivery app companies are saying and how an exclusion zone already has been established in North Hollywood.

    Drivers whipping around U-turns, clogged streets, and the kind of parking from your nightmares.

    That’s how neighbors described a busy stretch of Lankershim Boulevard in North Hollywood after the 2021 opening of a ghost kitchen, the new type of commercial kitchen designed to produce high volumes of food for pickup and delivery.

    The situation in North Hollywood reportedly improved once the neighborhood established a exclusion zone around the ghost kitchen to spread out app-based food couriers until they clinched an order.

    The Los Angeles City Council now is considering adopting this solution citywide.

    Council members passed a motion at the end of July asking city staff to draft a policy establishing the same kind of zones around ghost kitchens across L.A.

    Councilman Hugo Soto-Martínez, who represents neighborhoods from Silverlake and Echo Park through Hollywood, led the motion. He said he receives complaints about ghost kitchens in his district “every single day.”

    “In my district and across the city, we are seeing ghost kitchens pop up in areas that were not built to handle hundreds of vehicles coming in and out, idling in neighborhoods, causing nuisances to neighborhoods, backing up traffic, and creating unsafe conditions for people walking or driving around the area,” Soto-Martínez said at a July 30 council meeting.

    Food app delivery companies and restaurant industry leaders caution against a blanket policy for ghost kitchens, arguing exclusion zones citywide would harm workers and small business owners while encouraging community-tailored solutions.

    Once the city council’s transportation committee receives the report about the draft policy, as well as ideas on pilot programs and associated costs, local lawmakers will have the option to make amendments and recommendations. There are a lot of details that would need to be worked out in this process, including how expansive the exclusion zones would be and how the city would work with delivery app companies to institute them.

    North Hollywood offers an example

    James Askew, vice president of the North Hollywood Neighborhood Council, said the Lankershim Boulevard ghost kitchen, which services major restaurants, including Chick-fil-A, goop Kitchen, and Wingstop, brought a tense energy to the neighborhood.

    “There were actual fist fights between drivers …  fighting over which one of them was gonna get a parking space,” Askew said.

    Hayk Shahinyan owns a tech repair store across the street from the ghost kitchen on Lankershim Boulevard and said his customers would walk in dumbfounded by the crowds outside.

    “They would ask us, ‘Who are those people? Is there a concert outside? What's going on?’” Shahinyan said. “We're like, ‘No, these are just food delivery drivers.’”

    Neighbors and local business owners brought their concerns to the neighborhood council and Council District 2, formerly represented by Paul Krekorian and now represented by Adrin Nazarian.

    After several meetings and calls with business owners and Uber and DoorDash, the neighborhood established an exclusion zone bounded by Collins Street and Burbank Boulevard.

    The Department of Transportation increased parking enforcement in the area until the problem abated, and the Department of Sanitation added six garbage cans to minimize littering.

    Though it never was easy to find a spot on that stretch of Lankershim Boulevard, parking has improved since the exclusion zone went into effect in May, according to Adriana Zuniga, owner of Cara Vana Coffee Shop.

    “They know where to stand, and [there isn’t] a chaotic mess with parking,” Zuniga said.

    Shahinyan said he doesn’t blame the delivery drivers themselves for the congestion.

    “They're here just to make their daily living,” he said, adding that he thinks it's the responsibility of the food delivery app companies to “not cause inconvenience to other businesses” around ghost kitchens.

    Jillian Burgos, the president of the North Hollywood Neighborhood Council, said the goal is to “support everyone trying to make a living in Los Angeles.”

    “We understand that gig jobs help essential workers make ends meet and offer flexibility, but we must also ensure that businesses support their neighbors, as well,” Burgos said in an email.

    In Echo Park, residents are fed up

    Suzanne Hollingshead said her small street in Echo Park was already congested. When a ghost kitchen that serves nearly 30 restaurants opened on the corner in 2023, Hollingshead said her quality of life plummeted. There are now cars double parked in red zones and blocking fire hydrants, and she said she even sees bottles of urine lining the street because food couriers don’t have adequate access to facilities.

    Hollingshead said she’s “skeptical” about the exclusion zones and worries that will just push the problems to a neighboring street.

    “I  have friends that are on other blocks,” Hollingshead said. “I don't want this happening to them either.”

    Ideally, if a ghost kitchen–or as Hollingshead describes it, the “mini mall mega business”–exists, it should be elsewhere altogether and not on a residential street that lacks proper signage or crosswalks for safety, she said.

    Not a one-size-fits-all solution, app companies say

    An Uber spokesperson said the company is “committed to working together on a solution that addresses neighborhood concerns, while also protecting the delivery services that local restaurants, small businesses, and customers use every day and the earning opportunities that couriers rely on.”

    The spokesperson said the company already is reducing parking and traffic congestion by using tools like order batching, which allows a delivery person to pick up and deliver multiple orders in one trip. The spokesperson also said loitering indicates there are more delivery people than there are orders and pointed to how it’s worked in large cities, including London and Paris, to balance supply and demand.

    A DoorDash spokesperson said “one-size-fits-all proposals” don’t always work as intended and could harm "working-class Dashers and the local businesses our communities rely on.”

    “We hope the Council will work with us to craft smarter, targeted solutions that better address the root of these issues and create new opportunities, rather than restrictions, for those already struggling to get by," the DoorDash spokesperson said.

    Lily Rocha, executive director of the Latino Restaurant Association, shared the same sentiment.

    Rocha wrote in a public comment that exclusion zones could unintentionally increase delivery times and costs and reduce the take-home pay of drivers.

    “Implementing exclusion zones on a large scale is untested and may not even be feasible. No other city has attempted a policy of this kind, and there is no evidence to suggest that delivery platforms could comply effectively or equitably with such a regulation,” Rocha wrote.

    Instead, Rocha said stakeholders should work together to find “solutions that are fit for each community.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is kharjai.61.

    Other solutions

    Another motion moving its way through L.A. city government takes issue with how ghost kitchens are zoned as catering companies rather than having a unique land use definition.

    “Catering land uses prepare food in large batches for a few scheduled deliveries,” the motion, also led by Soto-Martínez, reads. “‘Ghost Kitchens’ prepare individual take-out orders on demand, with high-volume orders, causing higher impacts on local streets.”

    Shahinyan said he doesn’t understand why a ghost kitchen, which doesn’t involve customers entering and ordering food, has a storefront alongside typical retail businesses.

    “ They can be located somewhere, like a warehouse type of place where they have [a] big parking lot for their employees, first of all, and then for their independent contractor drivers,” he said.

    Burgos said there’s other property in the neighborhood with dedicated parking that could better suit the ghost kitchen, as opposed to a storefront “meant for small businesses.“

    “The popularity of the ghost kitchen has grown beyond the capacity of the space,” Burgos said.

  • Trump admin loses initial court ruling in case
    President Donald Trump listens to a reporter's question in the Oval Office of the White House on Friday.

    Topline:

    A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Trump administration from following through on plans to freeze billions of dollars in childcare and welfare funding to California and four other Democrat-led states. Friday’s ruling came less than a day after the states filed suit.

    What’s next: The temporary order expires in 14 days. The court battle will continue to play out, with further decisions by the judge expected in the coming weeks, after more arguments from both sides.

    The context: In halting childcare and welfare benefits to hundreds of thousands of low-income Californians, the Trump administration wrote that “recent federal prosecutions” are driving concerns about “systemic fraud.” But an LAist review found fraud in the targeted programs appears to be a tiny fraction of the total spending. Prosecutions that have been brought around child care benefits amount to a small fraction of 1% of the federal childcare funding California has received, according to a search of all case announcements in the state. When pressed for details about what specific prosecutions justify the freeze in California, administration officials have offered few specifics.

  • Sponsored message
  • Federal judge orders LA to pay $1.8M in settlement
    A tall, white building is surrounded by shorter buildings and trees during the day.
    A view of L.A. City Hall in downtown.

    Topline:

    A federal judge has ordered Los Angeles to pay more than $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees and costs to the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights and other organizations that sued the city over what it deemed an inadequate response to the homelessness crisis.

    The details: In addition to $1.6 million in attorneys’ fees and $5,000 in costs to L.A. Alliance, the judge awarded about $200,000 in fees and $160 in costs to the Los Angeles Catholic Worker and Los Angeles Community Action Network.

    Why now: The city is appealing the decision.

    Why it matters: In his order, released Tuesday, the judge compared the recent award to the millions of taxpayer dollars city officials agreed to pay an outside law firm representing L.A.in the settlement.

    Read on ... for more about this week's order.

    A federal judge has ordered Los Angeles to pay more than $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees and costs to the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights and other organizations that sued the city over what it deemed an inadequate response to the homelessness crisis.

    The city is appealing the decision.

    The details

    L.A. Alliance is a group of business owners and residents who sued the city and county of Los Angeles in 2020 in an effort to push both governments to provide more shelter to unhoused people in the region.

    The city of L.A. settled with the plaintiffs in 2022, and U.S. District Judge David O. Carter is overseeing the city’s progress in keeping up with the terms of that agreement. The judge found the city breached its agreement in multiple ways in a ruling last summer.

    Specifically, the judge found that the city did not provide a plan for how it intends to create 12,915 shelter beds, as promised, by 2027. The court also found the city “flouted” its responsibilities by failing to provide accurate, comprehensive data when requested and did not provide evidence to support the numbers it was reporting, according to court documents.

    In addition to $1.6 million in attorneys’ fees and $5,000 in costs to L.A. Alliance, Carter awarded about $200,000 in fees and $160 in costs to the Los Angeles Catholic Worker and Los Angeles Community Action Network.

    The organizations are considered “intervenors” in the suit, representing people experiencing homelessness on Skid Row. Their attorneys include those from the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles.

    Why it matters

    In his order, released Tuesday, Carter compared the recent award to the millions of taxpayer dollars city officials agreed to pay an outside law firm representing L.A. in the settlement.

    Carter wrote in the order that the attorneys' fees and costs to L.A. Alliance and others “is reasonable, especially in light of the approximately $5.9 million that the City’s outside counsel is charging.”

    LAist’s housing and homelessness coverage was cited several times in the order.

    “It has fallen to plaintiff, intervenors, and journalists to point out the deficiencies in the city’s reporting,” Carter wrote, referring to data the city is required to report to the court as part of the settlement.

    “Plaintiff and intervenors must be compensated for this,” he said.

    The city’s response 

    Attorneys representing the city filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on Thursday.

    L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein-Soto’s office did not respond to LAist’s requests for comment by phone or email.

    Shayla Myers, senior attorney with the Unhoused People's Justice Project at the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, told LAist the intervenors participated in the case without compensation “because it's incredibly important given what is at stake in these proceedings that unhoused folks have a voice.”

    Matthew Umhofer, an attorney for L.A. Alliance, told LAist he’s thrilled the court is imposing accountability on the city, including sanctions for violating the settlement agreement. But Umhofer said he’s saddened that L.A. Alliance is going to have to keep fighting to hold the city to its promises.

    “The obvious city strategy here is hire a big, good law firm to fight on absolutely every front in hopes that the plaintiffs, the intervenors or the court will ultimately give up trying to hold the city accountable,” he said.

    What's next

    The parties are scheduled to appear in federal court in downtown L.A. on Monday, when a hearing will resume to determine whether the judge will hold the city of Los Angeles in contempt of court.

    Carter has said in documents that he’s concerned “the city has demonstrated a continuous pattern of delay” in meeting its obligations with court orders under the settlement and that the “delay continues to this day.”

  • DTLA food fair has 13 new vendors this weekend
    A woman with dark skin smiling in a bold red chef’s jacket and patterned headscarf stands proudly in front of her “Hot Grease” stall,  with her arms outstretched, framed by sizzling menu boards and the hum of the street market behind her.
    Asha Stark's Hot Grease specializes in Black fish fry with a side of social justice.

    Topline:

     Smorgasburg L.A. reopens this Sunday with 13 new food vendors joining the downtown market's annual grand reopening at the Row.

    Why now: The January grand reopening with new vendors is a longstanding tradition that kicks off the year ahead. Vendors apply through Smorgasburg's website, and the team meets with every applicant to taste their food before acceptance. Competition remains fierce, with many more applicants than available spots. This year marks the market's 10th anniversary celebration in June.

    Why it matters: The new vendor class demonstrates the resilience of L.A.'s independent food scene, following a challenging year for the restaurant industry, with concepts ranging from a Grammy-nominated producer's Persian-influenced pizza to Southern fried fish honoring Black migration history.

    Every January, the open-air downtown food fair reopens after its winter break and announces new additions to its carefully selected group of regular vendors.

    This year’s new vendor class demonstrates the resilience of L.A.'s independent food scene, ranging from a Grammy-nominated producer's Persian-influenced pizza to Southern fried fish celebrating Black American culinary traditions, to an LAist 2025 Tournament of Cheeseburger heavyweight contender.

    The reopening also marks the start of Smorgasburg LA's 10th anniversary year, and will feature 41 returning vendors, who've helped build the regular event into a fun, family-friendly opportunity to try new, often cutting-edge food you may not be familiar with.

    Doors open from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at DTLA’s The Row, with free entry and free parking for the first two hours.

    A new year

    General manager Zach Brooks said this is his favorite time of year. "We add the new vendors at the beginning of the new year, everyone's excited."

    Vendors apply through Smorgasburg's website, and the team meets with every applicant to taste their food before acceptance. Brooks said it's not a vetting process like "Shark Tank" but rather a matter of seeing if it's a good fit. Competition remains fierce, with many more applicants than available spots.

    "I think it's just a testament to L.A. and the resilience of people who love this business and have a passion for it, and are going to continue to persevere and start their businesses and want to be out there selling food," Brooks said.

    Here are a few highlights:

    Viral orange chicken sandwich 

    Long Beach-based Terrible Burger becomes Smorgasburg's new permanent burger vendor after standout appearances at LAist's Tournament of Cheeseburgers and the market's rotating Smorgasburger Stand. The smashburger pop-up, run by husband-and-wife team Nicole and Ryan Ramirez, specializes in burgers that draw from pop culture and global influences. They've made waves with a Korean barbecue burger topped with bulgogi barbecue sauce and a viral orange chicken sandwich, previously available only at their Tuesday night residency at Long Beach's Midnight Oil, making its L.A. debut Sunday.

    A fried chicken sandwich on a toasted brioche bun features a large crispy chicken cutlet coated in orange glaze and sesame seeds, topped with shredded cabbage, scallions, and sauce, served on black and white checkered paper with the Terrible Burger logo in the background.
    Terrible Burger's viral orange chicken sandwich makes its LA debut at Smorgasburg after being available only in Long Beach.
    (
    Courtesy Terrible Burger
    )

    "We have been big Smorgasburg fans for a really long time before we even started Terrible Burger. We would go to Smorgasburg on dates, just eat and hang out. And it was just always a little dream of, "oh, what if we ever sold food here?" Nicole Ramirez said.

    Crispy fried snapper and thick-cut fries 

    Orange County-based Hot Grease, run by Asha Starks, is among four vendors graduating from residencies to permanent status. The Southern fried fish pop-up celebrates Black American history through food that honors Starks' family heritage.

    "Folks often forget that there are Black folks in Orange County. My family came to Orange County during the second wave of the Great Migration, and they settled in Santa Ana... my food is very cultural. And the story, I feel like, is just as important to highlight," Starks said.

    A basket lined with black and white checkered paper holds golden-brown fried fish filets, thick-cut French fries, a slice of white bread, a lemon wedge, fresh dill garnish, and two small containers of sauce
    Hot Grease's crispy buttermilk fried snapper with thick-cut fries and "Ill Dill" tartar sauce.
    (
    Courtesy Hot Grease
    )

    Hot Grease serves crispy buttermilk fried snapper with thick-cut fries and small-batch sauces like "Ill Dill" tartar. Honoring the fish fry's history as a site of mutual aid, Starks directs 3% of sales to the Potlikker Line, Hot Grease's reproductive justice mutual aid fund. For January, she's added fish and grits, black-eyed peas and collard greens.

    Pizza with a Persian twist

    A charred Neapolitan-style pizza on a wooden cutting board topped with melted mozzarella, green pesto or herb sauce drizzled in a pattern, and fresh basil leaves in the center
    Mamani Pizza brings studio-born energy to Smorgasburg LA with pies featuring Persian-inspired creativity.
    (
    Courtesy Mamani Pizza
    )

    Mamani Pizza, from the Grammy-nominated producer Farsi, part of the music production team Wallis Lane, started making Neapolitan-style pizzas at his West L.A. recording studio a year ago. What began as late-night pies for friends and artists became an underground hit. Most pizzas are traditional, but Farsi adds Persian touches like The Mamani, topped with ground wagyu koobideh, roasted Anaheim chilis, Persian herbs and pomegranate molasses.

    Other new vendors

    Banana Mama - Asian-inspired pudding
    Barranco's Yogurt - Oaxacan fruit yogurt
    Franzl's Franks - Austrian sausages
    Melnificent Wingz - Gourmet chicken wings
    Piruchi - Peruvian street food
    RuRu's Golden Tea - Karak chai
    Stick Talk - vegan corn dogs
    SouuLA - Taiwanese breakfast concept
    Unreal Poke - Hawaiian poke
    Zindrew Dumpling Shop - Spicy wontons

  • How to file a claim if your car gets damaged
    A close up of a street with a cracked pothole in the middle, which is full of rain water.
    Potholes pop up after rain because water seeps into the road's crevices and weakens the foundation. Cars driving over it exacerbates the damage, leading to more cracks.

    Topline:

    All that rain didn’t just flood L.A. County streets, it chewed up our roads. You’re likely driving over more potholes than usual, so what do you do if your car gets damaged from one? You could get the government to pay for it.

    How it works: You’ll want to take pictures of the pothole and your car. Then, submit a claim form. Personal property damage claims have a six-month filing period, and you’ll have to pay out-of-pocket first.

    Manage your expectations: Keep in mind, this isn’t a quick way to cash. Claims can take months. You’ll also have to prove the agency was aware of the problem before your incident, such as by looking at street maintenance records for your area. Here are tips from the now-defunct site LAPotholes.com.

    What’s next: Potholes continue to plague the city of L.A., and that’s probably not ending soon. In the next budget, StreetsLA (aka Bureau of Street Services) is proposing to prioritize funding for “large asphalt repair,” which means patching over sections rather than fully repaving streets, which some argue will lead to worse roads.