Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Supreme Court rules app can be shut down in U.S.

    Topline:

    The Supreme Court ruled Friday that the federal government can legally shut down TikTok, delivering a stunning blow to the viral video app used by about half of Americans.

    How we got here: Last April, President Biden signed a bipartisan bill that said TikTok must spin off from its China-based parent company, or shut down in the United States.

    TikTok's response: TikTok contested the ban in court, arguing that it violates the free speech rights of both users and the company — an appeal that it took all the way to the Supreme Court, which heard the case on Jan. 10.
    The ruling: The high court's decision means that starting on Jan. 19, tech giants Apple and Google can no longer offer TikTok on their app stores. Web-hosting providers must cut ties with the platform or be subject to fines of $5,000 for each user that can still access the service, a penalty that can easily add up to billions of dollars.

    Read on ... for more about the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling and what the inauguration of President-elect Trump could mean for the app's future.

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the federal government can legally shut down TikTok in the U.S., delivering a stunning blow to the viral video app used by about half of Americans.
    Last April, President Biden signed a bipartisan bill that said TikTok must spin off from its China-based parent company, or shut down in the U.S.
    TikTok contested the ban in court, arguing that it violates the free speech rights of both users and the company — an appeal that it took all the way to the Supreme Court, which heard the case on Jan. 10.
    The high court's decision means that starting on Jan. 19, tech giants Apple and Google can no longer offer TikTok on their app stores. Web-hosting providers must cut ties with the platform or be subject to fines of $5,000 for each user who can still access the service, a penalty that can easily add up to billions of dollars.

    TikTok's seemingly nonstop legal limbo has sown widespread confusion among users over when and if the app will indeed stop working. But now, the country's highest court has affirmed the federal ban.
    "There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok's data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary," the court wrote in an unsigned opinion. "We conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners' First Amendment rights."
    The justices acknowledged the tight time frame they were operating under, emphasizing that the ruling should be seen as applying only to TikTok, not as a sweeping precedent. "That caution is heightened in these cases, given the expedited time allowed for our consideration. Our analysis must be understood to be narrowly focused in light of these circumstances," the justices wrote.
    Anupam Chander, a law professor at Georgetown University who has followed the TikTok case closely, said the justices did indeed frame the ruling as TikTok-specific, but it could have implications that exceed the app's corporate ownership.
    "There is a Bush v. Gore aspect to the decision in that it's a one-off and not meant to have greater precedential value," said Chander, referring to the landmark 2000 ruling. "But this will be a very important decision," he said. "And it gives enormous power to Congress to act on data privacy questions."
    The ruling follows an emergency hearing held last week in which justices appeared skeptical that the free speech rights of millions of American TikTok users should surpass the national security risk Congress says China poses. Lawmakers fear the Chinese government could use the app to spy on Americans or disseminate pro-China propaganda, even though TikTok skeptics have never shown concrete examples of that happening.
    When Congress passed the law in April taking aim at TikTok, lawmakers provided a way for the company to avoid expulsion: Fully divest from China-based parent company ByteDance, which would resolve the national security concerns of lawmakers and the intelligence community in Washington.
    But to TikTok executives, that is merely a symbolic life raft, since ByteDance has consistently indicated that the platform, China's first global social media hit, is not for sale. Furthermore, export control laws in China prevent TikTok's algorithm from being sold unless Beijing regulators bless the transaction, something China experts have said the country is not likely to do.
    The only justice to voice concern about the free speech implications of a ban was Neil Gorsuch, who called banning TikTok to remove the China threat a "paternalistic point of view."
    "I mean, don't we normally assume that the best remedy for problematic speech is counter speech?" said Gorsuch, adding that TikTok has raised the possibility of including a disclaimer on its app indicating that some content could be covertly manipulated by China.
    U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the federal government, quickly shot that down with this analogy: "Imagine if you walked into a store and I had a sign that said one of 1 million products in this store causes cancer," she told the court. "That is not going to put you on notice about what product is actually jeopardizing your health."
    On Friday following the Supreme Court's ruling, Biden White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement that it would be up to the incoming administration to implement the law. "Given the sheer fact of timing, this administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next administration, which takes office on Monday," she said.
    All eyes are now on President-elect Donald Trump. He filed a brief with the Supreme Court ahead of last week's oral arguments asking that the justices delay a ruling to provide him time for his administration to cut a "negotiated solution" that would resolve the national security concerns.
    Trump, who tried unsuccessfully to ban TikTok in his first term, has since reversed course and now wants to save the app. He has publicly attributed his change of heart to his belief that TikTok boosted the youth turnout vote for him in November. But others have pointed to the timing of his flip-flop coming after Trump met with a billionaire hedge fund manager whose trading group owns a major stake in ByteDance, TikTok's parent company.
    The TikTok ban will start Sunday. The following day, Trump will be sworn into office.
    Once in the White House, Trump can instruct his Justice Department to not enforce the ban. That would put Apple, Google and other companies that do business with TikTok in an awkward position, since the firms would technically be in violation of federal law.
    Another scenario is that Trump could extend the start date of the ban, even though it will have already started on Jan. 19.
    "As I understand it, we shut down. It is possible that come January 20, 21st, 22nd, we might be in a different world," said TikTok's lawyer Noel Francisco to the court last week, suggesting Trump may be able to put the ban on pause.
    Indeed, under the law, the president can delay the ban for a 90-day period, but only in the event that progress has been made toward a sale away from ByteDance.
    On Friday, Trump posted on his social media platform that he has not made a decision yet. "The Supreme Court decision was expected, and everyone must respect it. My decision on TikTok will be made in the not too distant future, but I must have time to review the situation. Stay tuned!"
    Prelogar, with the federal government, told the court during oral arguments that if the ban takes effect, it might just give the U.S. government enough leverage to convince ByteDance and Chinese regulators to allow the sale of TikTok to an American company or group of U.S. investors.
    "When push comes to shove and these restrictions take effect, I think it will fundamentally change the landscape with respect to what ByteDance is willing to consider, and it might be just the jolt that Congress expected the company would need to actually move forward with the divestiture process," she said.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Pasadena firm hired to relight bridge
    a bridge set against a sunset with a city in the background
    The Sixth Street Viaduct during the opening ceremony in July 2022.

    Topline:

    After copper wire theft left the Sixth Street Bridge in darkness for years, the city of Los Angeles has hired a Pasadena-based engineering firm to restore the lighting, a move aimed at improving safety for Boyle Heights and the surrounding neighborhoods.

    The backstory? Aging infrastructure, copper wire theft and delayed repairs led to nearly 2,000 streetlight service requests in Boyle Heights in 2024. Nearly seven miles of copper wire have been reported stolen from the Sixth Street Bridge.

    Read on ... for more on the history of the Sixth Street Bridge.

    After copper wire theft left the Sixth Street Bridge in darkness for years, the city of Los Angeles has hired a Pasadena-based engineering firm to restore the lighting, a move aimed at improving safety for Boyle Heights and the surrounding neighborhoods.

    City officials contracted Tetra Tech to relight the bridge, which has been plagued by copper wire theft since its opening in 2022. The outages have frustrated residents and commuters who use the bridge to walk, run, bike and drive between downtown LA and the Eastside.

    Aging infrastructure, copper wire theft and delayed repairs led to nearly 2,000 streetlight service requests in Boyle Heights in 2024. Nearly seven miles of copper wire have been reported stolen from the Sixth Street Bridge.

    Tetra Tech began working on the project’s design in January and is scheduled to restore the wiring to all lights along the bridge, including along roadways, barriers, ramps, stairways and arches before the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games come to Los Angeles that summer, according to a Feb. 18 news release from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office.

    The firm – which was selected by the city’s Bureau of Engineering – will fortify the pull boxes, service cabinet and conduits to protect against copper wire theft. Tetra Tech will also install a security camera system to deter vandalism and theft.

    “When our streets are well-lit, our neighborhoods feel safer and more connected,” Jurado said in the news release. “The Sixth Street Bridge plays a vital role in connecting Angelenos between the Eastside and the heart of the City.”

    Jurado – who pledged to look into fixing the Sixth Street Bridge lights when she was elected in 2024 – said the partnership with Tetra Tech “moves us one step closer to restoring one of the City’s most iconic landmarks as a safe, welcoming public space our communities deserve.”

    According to officials, the total contract value with Tetra Tech is $5.3 million, which includes work on the Sixth Street Bridge as well as the Sixth Street PARC project, which encompasses 12 acres of recreational space underneath and adjacent to the bridge.

    The PARC project will make way for sports fields, fitness equipment, event spaces and a performance stage. PARC’s grand opening is anticipated later this year.

    Because the work for the PARC project and the bridge is connected, the Board of Engineers recommended using the existing PARC contract with Tetra Tech to ensure completion ahead of the 2028 Games, officials said.

    The cost for the design work on the bridge alone is roughly $1 million.

    On Thursday, Jurado announced that her streetlight repair crew had restored lighting and strengthened infrastructure for more than 400 streetlights across her district, including Boyle Heights, Lincoln Heights, and El Sereno. Next, they plan to tackle repairs in downtown L.A.

  • Sponsored message
  • South Central staple provides jobs and security.
    a women in a large restaurant kitchen pulls a tray of pies from an oven
    27th Street Bakery co-owner Jeanette Bolden-Pickens removes sweet potato pies from the oven Feb. 12.

    Topline:

    For the last 70 years, the  27th Street Bakery hasn’t just been the go-to place for people who want to spend less time in the kitchen — it’s become a staple in South Central, providing jobs and security for people living in the neighborhood.

    The history: The bakery sits on Central Avenue, the focal point of Black Los Angeles between the 1930s and 1960s. As segregation laws were struck down, Black people in LA began to move elsewhere and took their businesses with them. The bakery, though, is still Black-owned and operating 70 years later.

    Read on ... for more on the local landmark.

    For the last 70 years, the  27th Street Bakery hasn’t just been the go-to place for people who want to spend less time in the kitchen — it’s become a staple in South Central, providing jobs and security for people living in the neighborhood.

    The bakery is Black-owned and in its third generation as a business. It’s co-owned by sisters Denise Cravin-Paschal and Olympic gold-medalist Jeanette Bolden-Pickens, as well as her husband Al Pickens.

    “My grandfather employed a lot of people around here as he was growing his business and so have we,” Cravin-Paschal told the LA Local. “They feel that this is a safe place to come. We have the respect of being here for 70 years and so we enjoy it.”

    The bakery sits on Central Avenue, the focal point of Black Los Angeles between the 1930s and 1960s. As segregation laws were struck down, Black people in LA began to move elsewhere and took their businesses with them. The bakery, though, is still Black-owned and operating 70 years later.

    Today it is considered the largest manufacturer of sweet potato pies on the West Coast, the bakery’s website states. Last year, the city and District 9 Councilmember Curren Price Jr. presented the bakery with a plaque that reads: “A Walk Down Central Avenue — A legacy of community: powered by the people and its places.”

    It hangs on the wall in the bakery’s lobby along with several other photos and recognitions they’ve received over the years.

    “Our goal is to keep this legacy alive and we’re celebrating 70 years of being here in business. We are so grateful to the community,” Bolden-Pickens said.

    In celebration of its anniversary, a sign in the bakery says it is offering one slice of sweet potato pie for 70 cents on Saturdays starting this weekend through Oct. 31.

    The bakery was a restaurant at first bringing Southern flavor to LA

    The bakery began as a restaurant in the 1930s on Central Avenue founded by Harry and Sadie Patterson, according to the family and Los Angeles Conservancy. Back then, Central Avenue was the epicenter of LA’s Black community and Patterson, who came from Shreveport, Louisiana, decided to bring his Southern recipes to life in Los Angeles.

    The restaurant later became a bakery in 1956, according to the bakery’s website. Patterson’s daughter Alberta Cravin and her son Gregory Spann took over the bakery in 1980. After Spann passed away, Cravin’s daughters — the sisters who are current owners — took over the family business. Five other relatives also help them out, Cravin-Paschal said.

    These days, the bakery is open Tuesday through Saturday each week and the bulk of their customers are other businesses. They serve nearly 300 vendors including convenience stores like 7-Eleven, Ralphs grocery stores, Smart & Final, ARCO gas stations, restaurants and other mom-and-pop stores. Louisiana Fried Chicken has been a customer since 1980, Cravin-Paschal said.

    An average delivery today is usually 45 dozen pies and they also ship orders out of state, Cravin-Paschal said.

    She also told The LA Local they have six full time employees and most of them have worked for the bakery at least 25 years.

    “I like working here, I like the people,” Maximina “Maxi” Rodriguez, a longtime employee, told The LA Local. After 32 years at the bakery, she said she plans to retire in June. “I’m going to miss it.”

    Rodriguez said working at the bakery is a family affair for her, too. Her sister, Guadalupe Garibaldi, has worked at the bakery for over 40 years and her niece, Yoselin Garibaldi, is now a cashier and driver.

    Patterson’s lessons inspired 3 generations to keep the business running

    For Bolden-Pickens and Cravin-Paschal, running the bakery is a labor of love. Both told The LA Local that their grandfather taught them to stay true to the fresh ingredients they use and not to cut corners.

    These lessons helped Bolden-Pickens in her life before taking over the family business. She won a gold medal as part of the U.S. 4×100 meter relay team in track and field during the 1984 Olympics.

    “What I learned from being an Olympian is that it takes a lot of hard work. I learned that from my grandfather,” she said.

    Bolden-Pickens said it hasn’t been easy running the business, but they’ve been able to stay afloat because of the lessons learned from their grandfather.

    “I remember during the pandemic, we actually had to go to the egg farm and stand in line for a couple of hours just to get the eggs that we needed,” Bolden-Pickens said. “We use the best spices. We make our own vanilla.”

    Cravin-Paschal said after the death of their brother Gregory Spann, who was the main baker for nearly two decades, they struggled for a few years to keep the recipe and taste consistent. But eventually they figured it out.

    “We had a little rough spot because we all know the recipes but you have to put it together (correctly),” Cravin-Paschal said. “Now we’re back to the original taste.”

  • Study finds increase in psychosis
    A person prepares a marijuana cigarette in New York City on April 20, 2024.
    A person prepares a marijuana cigarette in New York City on April 20, 2024.

    Topline:

    As marijuana use among teens has grown in the past decade, researchers have been trying to better understand the health risks of the drug. Now, a new longitudinal study finds that cannabis use among adolescents increases risks of being diagnosed with bipolar and psychotic disorders, as well as anxiety and depression, years later.

    What was the study: Researchers analyzed health data on 460,000 teenagers in the Kaiser Permanente Health System in Northern California. The teens were followed until they were 25 years old.

    What was the result: They found that the teens who reported using cannabis in the past year were at a higher risk of being diagnosed with several mental health conditions a few years later, compared to teens who didn't use cannabis.

    Read on ... for more on what the study found.

    As marijuana use among teens has grown in the past decade, researchers have been trying to better understand the health risks of the drug. Now, a new longitudinal study finds that cannabis use among adolescents increases risks of being diagnosed with bipolar and psychotic disorders, as well as anxiety and depression, years later.

    "This is very, very, very worrying," says psychiatrist Dr. Ryan Sultan at Columbia University, a cannabis researcher who wasn't involved in the new study published in the latest JAMA Health Forum.

    Strong study design

    Researchers analyzed health data on 460,000 teenagers in the Kaiser Permanente Health System in Northern California. The teens were followed until they were 25 years old. The data included annual screenings for substance use and any mental health diagnoses from the health records. Researchers excluded the adolescents who had symptoms of mental illnesses before using cannabis.

    "We looked at kids using cannabis before they had any evidence of these psychiatric conditions and then followed them to understand if they were more likely or less likely to develop them," says Dr. Lynn Silver, a pediatrician and researcher at the Public Health Institute, and an author of the new study.

    They found that the teens who reported using cannabis in the past year were at a higher risk of being diagnosed with several mental health conditions a few years later, compared to teens who didn't use cannabis.

    Teens who reported using cannabis had twice the risk of developing two serious mental illnesses: bipolar, which manifests as alternating episodes of depression and mania, and psychotic disorders, such as schizophrenia which involve a break with reality.

    Now, only a small fraction — nearly 4,000 — of all teens in the study were diagnosed with each of these two disorders. Both bipolar and psychotic disorders are among the most serious and disabling of mental illnesses.

    "Those are the scarier conditions that we worry about," says Sultan.

    Silver points out these illnesses are expensive to treat and come at a high cost to society. The U.S. cannabis market is an industry with a value in the tens-of-billions — but the societal cost of schizophrenia has been calculated to be $350 billion a year.

    "And if we increase the number of people who develop that condition in a way that's preventable, that can wipe out the whole value of the cannabis market," Silver says.

    Depression and anxiety too

    The new study also found that the risk for more common conditions like depression and anxiety was also higher among cannabis users.

    "Depression alone went up by about a third," says Silver, "and anxiety went up by about a quarter."

    But the link between cannabis use and depression and anxiety got weaker for teens who were older when they used cannabis. "Which really shows the sensitivity of the younger child's brain to the effects of cannabis," says Silver. "The brain is still developing. The effects of cannabis on the receptors in the brain seem to have a significant impact on their neurological development and the risk for these mental health disorders."

    Silver hopes these findings will make teens more cautious about using the drug, which is not as safe as people perceive it to be.

    "With legalization, we've had a tremendous wave of this perception of cannabis as a safe, natural product to treat your stress with," she says. "That is simply not true."

    The new study is well designed and gets at "the chicken or the egg, order-of-operations question," says Sultan. There have been other past studies that have also found a link between cannabis use and mental health conditions, especially psychosis. But, those studies couldn't tell whether cannabis affected the likelihood of developing mental health symptoms or whether people with existing problems were more likely to use cannabis — perhaps to treat their symptoms.

    But by excluding teens who were already showing mental health symptoms, the new study suggests a causal link between cannabis use and later mental health diagnoses. Additional research is needed to understand the link fully.

    'Playing with fire'

    Sultan, the psychiatrist and researcher at Columbia University, says the study confirms what he's seeing in his clinic — more teens using cannabis who've developed new or worsening mental health symptoms.

    "It is most common around anxiety and depression, but it's also showing up in more severe conditions like bipolar disorder and psychosis," he says.

    He notes that mental health disorders are complex in origin. A host of risk factors, like genetics, environment, lifestyle and life experiences all play a role. And some young people are more at risk than others.

    "When someone has a psychotic episode in the context of cannabis or a manic episode in the context of cannabis, clinicians are going to say, 'Please do not do that again because you're you're you're playing with fire,'" he says.

    Because the more they use the drug, he says the more likely that their symptoms will worsen over time, making recovery harder.

    "What we're worried about [is if] you sort of get stuck in psychosis, it gets harder and harder to pull the person back," says Sultan. "Psychosis and severe mood disorders, particularly bipolar disorder are like seizures in your brain. They're sort of neurotoxic to your brain, and so it seems to be associated with a more rapid deterioration of the brain."

  • New bill aims to create accountability
    The silhouettes of two people riding electric bikes on a coastline near the ocean at sunset is depicted. There are clouds in the sky obscuring the sun.
    Teenagers ride electric motorcycles along the La Jolla coastline at sunset Dec. 27, 2025, in San Diego.

    Topline:

    A proposed bill in the California legislature would require certain electric bikes to register with the Department of Motor Vehicles and to carry license plates.

    Why does it matter?: This proposal would make it easier to identify people involved in dangerous incidents.

    Why now?: E-bike related injuries increased 18-fold between 2018 and 2023, according to data from the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System.

    Read on for more details …

    Some electric bikes in California could soon require license plates under a proposed state bill aiming to address the rise in electric bike related injuries.

    AB 1942 or the E-bike Accountability Act, would apply exclusively to Class 2 and Class 3 electric bikes.

    Class 2 bikes can be operated without peddling until it reaches the speed of 20 mph.

    Class 3 bikes reach a max speed of 28 mph; motor assist could only kick in with peddling.

    The bill would also require owners to carry proof of ownership and would direct the Department of Motor Vehicles to establish a registration process. It was introduced by Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan of Orinda in Contra Costa County earlier this month.

    E-bike injuries spiked 18-fold between 2018 and 2023, according to state traffic data.

    The bill may be heard in committee March 16.