Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Some tax returns have been rejected

    Topline:

    The federal electric vehicle tax credit underwent a big change in 2024. A very significant change is that the credit is now available to car buyers as a rebate at the time of purchase. But crucially, dealers also had to use a new online portal to process customers' rebates.

    Not all dealers are using the portal: To pull off this change, the IRS created a new online portal for the 2024 tax year. Dealers had to enroll in the new system to accommodate customers who wanted to claim the rebate up front. By last September, over 14,000 of just under 17,000 car dealers were registered to report sales to the IRS using the new portal. If dealers skipped this step, tax refunds are being rejected.

    What to do if you are filing for the tax credit: Multiple sources contacted for this story expressed concern about the thousands of people being laid off at the IRS, including those hired specifically to help taxpayers resolve problems and to help implement the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act. Alison Flores, the manager of the Tax Institute at H&R Block, recommends that anybody who is planning to claim the EV tax credit file their return as soon as possible, so that if they encounter a problem, they have time to try to resolve it.

    Kristina Meier had done everything right.

    She bought a plug-in electric minivan in September and knew she wanted to claim the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. And Meier, a physicist, wasn't afraid of a little research. "I'd read the IRS website," she says. She pored over the requirements for eligibility and for paperwork.

    As she was finalizing the purchase of her new car, she told the finance rep that the dealership would have to report the sale to the IRS and send her paperwork confirming it. The IRS instructions emphasized that to get the tax credit, she'd need a "seller report" — and the dealership sent her a document with those words on the top. She thought she was all set.

    But a few weeks ago, when Meier tried to claim the EV tax credit, the IRS rejected her return.

    She'd done everything right — but her dealer hadn't.

    The electric vehicle tax credit underwent a big change in 2024. It was a change that — for hundreds of thousands of people — made the valuable credit easier to access and more useful. But for a smaller number of buyers, it created a way for the credit to slip through their fingers.

    A new option for an up-front rebate

    The EV tax credit has been around for years, but after the Inflation Reduction Act passed during the Biden administration, it got a shake-up. Now there's also a credit for used vehicles, as well as stricter battery-sourcing requirements for new ones.

    And, in a very significant change, the credit is now available to car buyers as a rebate at the time of purchase. That means instead of waiting for months to get a credit on their tax returns, buyers can get the credit knocked off the price of a vehicle and even use it as a down payment.

    That has been good news for many consumers. It has made the credit much easier to access, especially for people with lower incomes and smaller tax bills, who can't take advantage of the credit at tax time.

    To pull off this change, the IRS created a new online portal for the 2024 tax year. Dealers had to enroll in the new system to accommodate customers who wanted to claim the rebate up front.

    But crucially, dealers also had to use the portal to report sales for buyers who planned to claim the credit at tax time — that is, dealers couldn't use the same forms they'd used prior to 2024.

    The Treasury Department and the IRS, working with the National Automobile Dealers Association and state dealer associations, did repeated rounds of outreach to spread the word about the changes. A former Treasury staffer, who did not want to be named because they aren't authorized to speak for the current administration, said that the outreach primarily focused on how to offer the credit up front. But, the former staffer said, "We did make it very clear that if you want to participate at all, this is what you have to do."

    The Treasury Department, IRS and NADA have not responded to NPR's requests for comment.

    Steven Barber, a certified public accountant who works with hundreds of dealers, says that the IRS and NADA did "a good job" getting the word out. He personally wrote memos for a state dealer association and walked his clients through the new process.

    "Our dealers are not having any issues with it, but it doesn't surprise me that other dealers are having issues," he says. "If you're not paying attention …"

    Not all dealerships signed up for the new system 

    By last September, over 14,000 car dealers were registered to report sales to the IRS using the new portal. That's most of the dealers in the U.S.; last year, there were just under 17,000 franchised car dealers nationwide, according to the dealers' trade group.

    But that still left some 3,000 dealers that weren't in the system — including the Santa Fe, N.M., dealer where Meier bought her vehicle.

    NPR has talked to a half-dozen other EV buyers throughout the country who are having trouble getting their credits because their various dealers didn't report the sale. Heatmap, a climate-focused news outlet, has also covered this problem, speaking to several other shoppers and reviewing dozens of accounts on social media.

    Every customer NPR spoke to understood their dealer wasn't offering the rebate up front. But they were still under the impression they could get the credit later.

    Some, including Meier, even requested confirmation that their dealer had followed the right process. And they received documents from their dealers that were labeled as "seller reports," just as the IRS told them to expect. But they turned out to be outdated forms. They might have worked in 2023, but they weren't valid in 2024.

    Other buyers didn't realize that there was a process to follow at all.

    Meier's dealership, Lithia Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Fiat of Santa Fe, acknowledges that it made a mistake last fall. Michael Garza, the general manager, says that his employees just used the paperwork that was loaded into their dealership computer systems.

    "It was the wrong form," he says. "We're working to get it resolved for the customer."

    The problem is that it may be too late. Dealers weren't just required to use the new system. They had to report sales within three days.

    Meier says that her dealership now has access to the portal — an employee showed it to her. But, she says, the employee still wasn't able to submit the sale to the IRS. The system rejected it because the sale date was too far in the past.

    It's not yet clear how many buyers are affected

    Of course, since most dealers did sign up for the new portal, many EV purchases were properly reported to the IRS — more than 300,000, with the overwhelming majority of the tax credits delivered up front as rebates.

    It's not clear how many buyers, like Meier, might have fallen through the cracks. Over a million new electric vehicles were sold last year in the U.S., but many of those transactions would not have been eligible for the credit in the first place. (Buyers need to be under an income cap, and new vehicles need to meet strict battery-sourcing requirements.)

    "It's early in the filing season," says Alison Flores, the manager of the Tax Institute at H&R Block. "We haven't seen enough people to really get a fair sample. So I really can't tell you how common this is."

    But, she says, H&R Block is seeing more EV credits rejected than it had anticipated.

    Flores says that the changes the IRS made to allow that up-front tax rebate were, overall, very positive changes. But they carried a risk.

    "This is a new system," she says. "And unfortunately, consumers and dealers have struggled to get apprised of the new rules."

    Frustrated customers NPR spoke to are considering different remedies: working with the Taxpayer Advocate Service, calling their representatives in Congress, filing paper returns with letters of explanation, appealing the rejection of their credit through an IRS process, weighing legal action against dealers.

    And all of them had plans for the money they thought they were saving. Meier intended to use her credit to build up a nest egg after years of grad school. Another buyer was going to pay off a student loan. A retiree in Maine who bought a used EV had planned to put the credit toward living expenses, like covering his heating oil bill.

    The IRS could take a step to solve this problem by temporarily allowing retroactive reports. The agency has done that before.

    But multiple sources contacted for this story expressed concern about whether the upheaval in the federal government would make it more challenging to resolve this problem. The IRS is currently laying off thousands of people, including those hired specifically to help taxpayers resolve problems and to help implement the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act.

    In the meantime, Flores recommends that anybody who is planning to claim the EV tax credit file their return as soon as possible, so that if they encounter a problem, they have time to try to resolve it.

    And if you're planning to buy an electric vehicle this year, she says, lock that discount in as an up-front rebate to avoid getting an unpleasant surprise next year.

    Meier is still hopeful she'll be able to get the credit — eventually. And despite the headache, she has no regrets about her purchase.

    "We love the car," she says. She raves about the convenience of plugging it in at home, the gas savings, the extra room for car seats and finally having a backup camera.

    But the tax credit process has left her more than a little frustrated. "Both my husband and I do research for a living," she says ruefully. "And we still struggled with trying to figure out all this information — and were unsuccessful."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Dodgers fans grapple with loyalty ahead of it
    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers shirt, speaks into a microphone standing behind a podium next to others holding up signs that read "No repeat to White House. Legalization for all" and "Stand with you Dodger community." They all stand in front of a blue sign that reads "Welcome to Dodger Stadium."
    Jorge "Coqui" H. Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on Wednesady to demand the Dodgers not visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.

    Topline:

    Less than 24 hours before season opener, longtime Dodgers fans demand the team divest from immigration detention centers and decline the White House visit.

    More details: More than 30 people joined Richard Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. “We are demanding that the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together we have the power to make a change.”

    The backstory: The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    Read on ... for more on how some fans are feeling leading up to Opening Day.

    This story first appeared on The LA Local.

    Since 1977, Richard Santillan has been to every Opening Day game at Dodger Stadium. 

    “The tradition goes from my father, to me, to my children and grandchildren. Some of my best memories are with my father and children here at Dodger Stadium,” Santillan told The LA Local, smiling under the shade of palm trees near the entrance to the ballpark Wednesday morning. He was there to protest the team less than 24 hours before Opening Day.

    Santillan, like countless other loyal Dodgers fans, is grappling with his fan identity over the team’s decision to accept an invitation to the White House and owner Mark Walter’s ties to ICE detention facilities.

    More than 30 people joined Santillan on Wednesday morning for a press conference held near 1000 Vin Scully Drive to convey a message directly to the team. 

    “We are demanding the Dodgers stop participating in funding of inhumane treatment of families and do not go to the White House to celebrate with the criminal in chief,” Evelyn Escatiola told the crowd. “Together, we have the power to make a change.”

    Escatiola, a former dean of East Los Angeles College and longtime community organizer, urged fans to flex their economic power by “letting the Dodgers know that we do not support repression.”

    Jorge “Coqui” Rodriguez, a lifelong Dodgers fan, spoke to the crowd and called on Dodgers ownership to divest from immigration detention centers owned and operated by GEO Group and CoreCivic.

    A man with medium skin tone, wearing a blue Dodgers t-shirt, speaks into a microphone behind a podium.
    Jorge Coqui H Rodriguez speaks at a press conference outside Dodger Stadium on March 25, 2026, to demand the Dodgers not to visit the White House following their 2025 World Series win.
    (
    J.W. Hendricks
    /
    The LA Local
    )

    In a phone interview a day before the protest, Rodriguez told The LA Local he did not want the Dodgers using his “cheve” or beer money to fund detention centers. 

    “They can’t take our parking money, our cacahuate money, our cheve money, our Dodger Dog money and invest those funds into corporations that are imprisoning people. It’s wrong,” Rodriguez said. 

    Rodriguez considers the Dodgers one of the most racially diverse teams and said the players need to support fans at a time when heightened immigration enforcement has become more common across L.A.

    The team’s 2025’s visit to the White House drew ire from the largely Latino fan base, citing the Trump administration’s ongoing attacks on immigrants. 

    In June, the team came under further scrutiny when rumors swirled online that federal immigration agents were using the stadium’s parking, which immigration authorities later denied in statements posted on social media accounts.

    The team again came under fire after not releasing a statement on the impacts of ICE raids on its mostly Latino fan base at the height of immigration enforcement last summer. The team later agreed to invest $1 million to support families affected by immigration enforcement.

    When he learned the Dodgers were pledging only $1 million to families in need, Rodriguez called the amount a  “slap in the face.” 

    “These guys just bought the Lakers for billions of dollars and they give a million dollars to fight for legal services? That’s a joke,” Rodriguez said. “They need to have a moral backbone and not be investing in those companies.”

    According to reporting from the Los Angeles Times, former Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershawsaid last week that he is looking forward to the trip.

    “I went when President [Joe] Biden was in office. I’m going to go when President [Donald] Trump is in office,” Kershaw said. “To me, it’s just about getting to go to the White House. You don’t get that opportunity every day, so I’m excited to go.”

    The Dodgers have yet to announce when their planned visit will take place. 

    Santillan sometimes laments his decision to give up his season tickets in protest of the team. His connection to the stadium and the memories he has made there with family and friends will last a lifetime, he said. On Thursday, he will uphold his tradition and be there for the first pitch of the season, but with a heavy heart.

    “It’s a family tradition, but the Dodgers have a lot of work to do,” he said.

  • Sponsored message
  • Warmer weather has caused more biting flies
    A zoomed in shot of a fuzzy black fly with some white spots.
    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley.

    Topline:

    The warmer weather and high water flow are causing an early outbreak of black flies in the San Gabriel Valley, according to officials.

    What are black flies? Black flies are tiny, pesky insects that often get mistaken for mosquitoes. The biting flies breed near foothill communities like Altadena, Azusa, San Dimas and Glendora. They also thrive near flowing water.

    What you need to know: Black flies fly in large numbers and long distances. When they bite both humans and pets, they aim around the eyes and the neck. While the bites can be painful, they don’t transmit diseases in L.A. County.

    A population spike: Anais Medina Diaz, director of communications at the SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District, told LAist that at this time last year, surveillance traps had single-digit counts of adult black flies, but this year those traps are collecting counts above 500.

    So, why is the population growing? Diaz said the surge is unusual for this time of year.

    “We are experiencing them now because of the warmer temperatures we've been having,” Diaz said. “And of course, all the water that's going down through the river, we have a high flow of water that is not typical for this time of year.”

    What officials are doing: Officials say teams are identifying and treating public sources where black flies can thrive, but that many of these sites are influenced by natural or infrastructure conditions outside their control.

    How to protect yourself: Black flies can be hard to avoid outside in dense vegetation, but you can reduce the chance of a bite by:

    • Wearing loose-fitted clothing that covers the entire body. 
    • Wearing a hat with netting on top. 
    • Spraying on repellent, but check the label. For a repellent to be effective, it needs to have at least 15% DEET, the only active ingredient that works against black flies.
    • Turning off any water features like fountains for at least 24 hours, especially in foothill communities.

    See an uptick in black flies in your area? Here's how to report it

    SGV Mosquito and Vector Control District
    Submit a tip here
    You can also send a tip to district@sgvmosquito.org
    (626) 814-9466

    Greater Los Angeles Vector Control District
    Submit a service request here
    You can also send a service request to info@GLAmosquito.org
    (562) 944-9656

    Orange County Mosquito and Vector Control
    Submit a report here
    You can also send a report to ocvcd@ocvector.org
    (714) 971-2421 or (949) 654-2421

  • Rent hike to blame
    A black and brown dog lays down on a brown sofa on the foreground. In the background, a man wearing a plaid shirt sits.
    Jeremy Kaplan and Florence at READ Books in Eagle Rock.
    Topline:
    Local favorite mom and pop shop READ Books in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say they’re just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    The backstory: Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and their shop dog Florence.

    What happened? The building where Kaplan and his wife Debbie rent was recently sold and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    What's next? While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Read on... for what small businesses can do.

    A local favorite mom-and-pop bookshop in Eagle Rock is facing displacement due to a steep rent hike. The owners say theirs is just one of several small businesses along Eagle Rock Boulevard struggling to keep up with lease increases.

    Over the past 19 years, many in the neighborhood have come to love READ Books for its eclectic collection of used titles and shop dog Florence.

    Co-owner Jeremy Kaplan said it’s been a delight to grow with the community over the years.

    “Like seeing kids come back in, who were in grade school and now they’re in college,” Kaplan said.

    But the building where Kaplan and wife Debbie rent was recently sold, and the rent increased by more than 130% to $2,805 a month, Kaplan said. He told LAist it was an increase his small business simply could not absorb.

    Kaplan said he originally was given 30 days notice of the rent increase. After some research, assistance from Councilmember Ysabel Jurado’s office and some pro-bono legal help, Kaplan said he pushed back and got the 90-day notice he’s afforded by state law.

    California Senate Bill 1103 requires landlords to give businesses with five or less employees 90 days’ notice for rent increases exceeding 10%, among other protections.

    Systems Real Estate, the property management company, did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

    What can small businesses do? 

    Nadia Segura, directing attorney of the Small Business Program at pro bono legal aid non-profit Bet Tzedek said California law does not currently allow for rent control for commercial tenancies.

    Outside of the protections under SB 1103, Segura said small businesses like READ Books don’t have much other recourse. And even then, commercial landlords are not required to inform their tenants of their protections under the law.

    “There’s still a lot of people that don’t know about SB 1103. And then it’s very sad that they tell them they have these rent increases and within a month they have to leave,” Segura said.

    She said her group is seeing steep rent hikes like this for commercial tenants across the city.

    “We are seeing this even more with the World Cup coming up, the Olympics coming up. And I will say it was very sad to see that also after the wildfires,” Segura said.

    Part of Bet Tzedek’s ongoing work is to advocate for small businesses, working with landlords who are increasing rents to see if they are willing to give business owners longer leases that lock in rents.

    What’s next 

    After READ Books posted about their situation on social media, commenters chimed in to express their outrage and love for the little shop.

    While he looks for a new spot, Kaplan says he’s forming a coalition of local businesses and activist groups to see what can be done to help other small businesses facing similar displacement. He wants to address the displacement issue for businesses like his, which have made Eagle Rock the distinctive neighborhood that it is today.

    Owl Talk, a longtime Eagle Rock staple selling clothing and accessories in a unit in the same building as READ Books, is facing a “more than double” rent increase, according to a post on their Instagram account.

    Kaplan said he’s been in touch with the office of state Assemblywoman Jessica Caloza and wants to explore the possibility of introducing legislation to set up protections for small businesses like his, including rent-control measures or a vacancy tax for landlords. Kaplan said he also reached out to the office of state Sen. Maria Durazo.

    By his count, Kaplan said there are about a dozen businesses within surrounding blocks that are at risk of closing their doors or have shuttered due to rent increases or other struggles.

    When READ Books was founded during the Great Recession, Kaplan said he knew it was a longshot to open a bookstore at the same time so many were struggling to stay in business.

    “It was kind of interesting to be doing something that neighborhoods needed. That was important to me growing up, that was important to my children, that was important to my wife growing up,” Kaplan said.

    “And then somebody comes in and says, ‘We’re gonna over double your rent.”

  • Ballots to be sent out
    A person sits in the carriage of a crane and places solar panels atop a post. The crane is white, and the number 400 is printed on the carriage in red.
    A field team member of the Bureau of Street Lighting installs a solar-powered light in Filipinotown.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote on Tuesday to send ballots to more than half a million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which has essentially been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote on Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired.The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles City Council approved a plan in a 13-1 vote Tuesday to send ballots to more than a half-million property owners asking if they are willing to pay more per year to fortify the city’s streetlight repair budget, most of which essentially has been frozen since the 1990s. The item still requires L.A. Mayor Karen Bass’ signature, but her office confirmed to LAist on Wednesday that she’ll approve it.

    Frozen budget: Most of the city’s Bureau of Street Lighting budget comes from an assessment that people who own property illuminated by lights pay on their county property tax bill. The amount people pay depends on the kind of property they own and how much they benefit from lighting. A typical single-family home currently pays $53 annually, and in total, the assessments bring in about $45 million annually for the city to repair and maintain streetlights. Changing the amount the Bureau of Street Lighting gets from the assessment requires a vote among property owners who benefit from the lights.

    Ballots: L.A. City Council’s vote gives city staff the green light to prepare and send out those ballots. Miguel Sangalang, who oversees the bureau, said at a committee meeting earlier this month that he expects to send out ballots by April 17. Notices about the ballots will be sent out prior to the ballots themselves.

    Near unanimous vote: L.A. City Councilmember Monica Rodriguez was the only “No” vote Tuesday, saying she wanted to see a more current strategic plan for the bureau. Sangalang said the bureau developed a plan in 2022 that lays out how money will be spent. Councilmember Imelda Padilla was absent for the vote.

    Vote count: Votes will be weighted according to the assessment amount. Basically, the more you’re asked to pay yearly to maintain streetlights, the more your vote will count. Ballots received before June 2 will be tabulated by the L.A. City Clerk.

    How much more money: According to a report, the amount needed in assessments from property owners to meet the repair and maintenance needs of the city’s streetlighting in the next fiscal year is nearly $112 million.

    Use of the money: Sangalang said at a March 11 committee meeting that the extra funds would be used to double the number of staff to handle repairs and procure solar streetlights, which don’t face the threat of copper wire theft. That would all potentially reduce the time it takes to repair simple fixes down to a week. Currently, city residents wait for months to see broken streetlights repaired. The assessment would come with a three-year auditing mechanism.