Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • An overview of the prosecution's case
    A man wearing a grey shirt and black sunglasses sits in front of a neon blue wall
    Sean Combs onstage during Invest Fest 2023 at the Georgia World Congress Center on Aug. 26, 2023, in Atlanta.

    Topline:

    After six weeks, federal prosecutors rested their case Tuesday against hip-hop mogul Sean Combs, also known as Diddy or Puff Daddy.

    The charges: Combs has pleaded not guilty to a vast array of charges including sex-trafficking, racketeering, and kidnapping. Over the month and a half the federal prosecutors spent presenting their case, their narrative against Combs has been rather meandering — and it's unclear whether that was an intentional strategy or simply a matter of managing witnesses' schedules and needs.

    What's next?: As the prosecution's case drew to a close on Monday, defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo told Subramanian that his team did not plan to call any witnesses on Combs' behalf. Instead, the defense will present evidence that they hope persuades the jury that the women involved with Combs were not victims but willing participants.

    Read on . . . for an overview of the charges, evidence, and witnesses that the Southern District of New York has presented against Combs.

    This report includes descriptions of physical and sexual violence.

    After six weeks, federal prosecutors rested their case Tuesday (June 24) against hip-hop mogul Sean Combs, also known as Diddy or Puff Daddy. Here's an overview of the evidence and witnesses that the Southern District of New York has presented against Combs — materials and statements that they hope will persuade the jury to convict him of sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and racketeering.

    It's been a wild month and a half outside of the actual courtroom proceedings. Neither the media nor the public are allowed to bring any electronics into court, so dozens of reporters and many fans have been handwriting hundreds of pages of notes apiece during the trial. There are scores of TikTokers and YouTubers attending the proceedings each day — many sitting in the overflow courtroom that offers a live video feed of the main courtroom — and then stampeding outside during breaks to stream hot-take videos for their followers. Diddy superfans and manosphere influencers proclaim their allegiances aloud in the overflow room (and in the actual courtroom as well). Each day, there are curious international tourists who stop by to take in a thoroughly American celebrity trial. There was even a brief appearance by the musician now known as Ye. Starting in the pre-dawn hours every weekday, there are scrums of camera crews who spend hours lurching across lower Manhattan's Pearl Street in hopes of grabbing shots of the extended Combs clan, including many of the tycoon's sons and daughters and his flamboyantly dressed mother, Janice Combs.

    The scene inside the courthouse is often no less intriguing, and sometimes feels nearly as chaotic. On June 16, Judge Arun Subramanian dismissed one of the jurors, who gave inconsistent answers about whether he lives in New York City or in New Jersey. The judge agreed with the prosecution's concerns that the juror was potentially looking for a way to be part of a high-profile criminal trial. Last week, the judge also questioned another juror about potentially improper conversations he may have had with a former colleague. In mid-June, Subramanian chastised both the prosecution and defense teams about a leak of sealed evidence to TMZ and The Daily Mail. "Someone is lying here," Subramanian said.

    As the prosecution's case drew to a close on Monday, defense lawyer Marc Agnifilo told Subramanian that his team did not plan to call any witnesses on Combs' behalf. Instead, the defense will present evidence that they hope persuades the jury that the women involved with Combs were not victims but willing participants.

    The charges against Combs, who has pleaded not guilty, are vast. Over the month and a half the federal prosecutors spent presenting their case, their narrative against Combs has been rather meandering — and it's unclear whether that was an intentional strategy or simply a matter of managing witnesses' schedules and needs. One of their prime witnesses, Combs' ex-girlfriend Casandra "Cassie" Ventura, was noticeably pregnant when she took the stand, and delivered her baby just two weeks after stepping down. Additionally, many of the roughly 30 witnesses and much of the evidence the prosecution has presented to the jury cover multiple elements of the government's accusations.

    Within that densely knotted web, it's often been hard to tease out which elements of evidence and statements from the stand prosecutors hope to align with which of their accusations. Here's a look at the charges and what the government has presented to the jury.

    Sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution

    The charges include two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion as well as bringing people across state lines to engage in prostitution.

    Both alleged victims named in the criminal proceedings — Cassie Ventura and "Jane" — described very similar situations and environments surrounding the so-called "freak-offs, "hotel nights" or "wild king nights," which allegedly included taking drugs and performing sexually with male sex workers in front of Combs for many hours at a time, with Combs directing their specific activities while filming them.

    Wearing headphones, the jury also viewed video clips and screengrabs of some of these sex sessions; those videos were presented under seal, so that neither the public nor the media would be able to see or hear the material. The defense maintains that the sexual encounters in this footage were entirely consensual.

    Over four days of testimony, Ventura — who filed the first prominent civil suit against Combs (which was settled a day later for $20 million) — alleged that he had physically assaulted her on numerous occasions, raped her, trafficked her and sought to control every aspect of her personal and professional life. Ventura testified that she loved Combs deeply, but that their relationship was built on control, power imbalances, coercion and physical abuse, and that he would allegedly threaten to blackmail her with the videos of the sexual encounters. She also said that on a widely seen surveillance video from 2016, in which Combs violently attacked her in a California hotel hallway, she was trying to leave a freak-off. The jury also saw photos of Ventura's bruises and injuries from other alleged physical incidents.

    The prosecution offered both witnesses and written evidence that attempted to confirm that Combs had brought sex workers, Ventura and Jane across state lines to participate in the freak-offs. Jurors have also viewed receipts, phone records and texts referring to some of those interstate trips. Additionally, they heard testimony from government agents with Homeland Security Investigations, who raided Combs' properties and found guns, drugs and thousands of bottles of baby oil and lubricant allegedly used in the freak-offs.

    The jury has also heard first-person testimony from some of the sex workers, including Daniel Philip and Sharay Hayes, who used the nickname "The Punisher." Many other witnesses said that they either saw Combs physically assault Ventura, or that they knew about the alleged extortion attempts.

    During her six days of testimony, Jane said that in the course of her relationship with Combs, he promised a romantic relationship with her in the form of dates and quality time, but instead pressured her into sex marathons. Like Ventura, Jane said that preparing for and recuperating from Combs' sex marathons took up so much of her time that her career took a backseat, leaving her financially dependent on Combs. She also said that the hotel nights were so frequent that she often developed urinary tract and yeast infections.

    After she read Ventura's civil lawsuit against Combs in November 2023, Jane texted him: "I feel like I'm reading my own sexual trauma." Prosecutors also showed texts and notes entries she wrote to Combs over a three-year period saying that she did not want to have sex with other men, and that the hotel nights made her feel humiliated. The jury also saw texts from Combs' employees that implied hiring male sex workers had become a running joke among his staff.

    Combs' defense team has argued that while the rapper and producer has "unconventional" sexual preferences that include a "swinger lifestyle," he is not a sex trafficker, and that the sex marathons were all consensual encounters. It also pointed to texts in which both Ventura and Jane expressed love for Combs, and helped him plan and coordinate these marathons, suggesting that they were in fact willing participants.

    Racketeering conspiracy

    This is the RICO charge that alleges Combs used his business empire — and his employees — to hide criminal activities. According to the indictment, those "members and associates engaged in, and attempted to engage in, among other crimes, sex trafficking, forced labor, kidnapping, arson, bribery, and obstruction of justice." Within those charges, the government does not have to prove that Combs committed any of the acts himself, but show the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that such acts were committed to ultimately benefit Combs and fulfill his wishes.

    Some former Combs employees whose names came up again and again on the stand did not testify for the prosecution. They include Kristina Khorram, Combs' former chief of staff, who witnesses accused of helping Combs obtain the footage from the 2016 California hotel incident; assisting Combs in transporting illegal and prescription drugs across state lines; and monitoring Ventura's activities and whereabouts for Combs. The jury has viewed texts sent by Khorram in which she described various activities she undertook on Combs' behalf, including obtaining drugs for her boss and taking them across state lines.

    The jury has also viewed texts between Kristina Khorram and Jane, in which Jane told Khorram that Combs had threatened to release sex tapes of her, indicating that Khorram knew about an alleged blackmail attempt. The jury has also seen texts between Khorram and Ventura discussing an alleged episode in Los Angeles in September 2016 in which a friend of Ventura, Bryana Bongolan, says that an enraged Combs dangled her over a balcony.

    The jury also heard recorded phone calls between Khorram and Jane made after Ventura filed her lawsuit, in which Jane told Khorram that she felt used and exploited — but that Khorram continued to book hotel rooms and travel for Jane to participate in the hotel nights.

    Several former assistants testified that they set up or cleaned hotel rooms for the freak-offs or picked up or bought drugs for Combs as part of their jobs. But many of them also spoke highly of Combs and his business acumen. One, George Kaplan, testified that he quit after witnessing Combs behave violently toward Ventura and another girlfriend — but also called him "a god among men."

    The government also showed hotel invoices and flight records from accounts owned by Combs and his companies that confirmed payment for travel and hotel rooms and for extensive damages to those rooms, including from baby oil.

    Forced labor

    In addition to the freak-offs and the alleged coercion of Combs' girlfriends into de facto sex work, several former employees of Combs testified about how the hip-hop tycoon mistreated them as staffers.

    During her three days on the witness stand, a former employee testifying under the pseudonym Mia said that Combs often asked her to work 20-hour days, on one occasion kept her from sleeping for several days and refused to pay her overtime. Mia also testified that Combs physically and sexually assaulted her multiple times over the eight-year span she worked for him, but said that she stayed in the job because she was "brainwashed" to believe that the work environment was acceptable if she wanted a bigger career in the entertainment industry. The defense called out dozens of social media posts in which Mia lavishly praised Combs. "The highs were very high and the lows were very low," she said repeatedly.

    Kidnapping

    Capricorn Clark, a former Combs employee, testified that she had been kidnapped by people associated with Combs in 2004 after Combs suspected her of stealing high-end jewelry. She said that associates of Combs locked her into a dilapidated office building for five days, subjecting her to numerous lie detector tests. Additionally, she said that her interrogator told her that if she failed the tests, she would be "thrown into the East River"; the tests were inconclusive. She says she was fired when she reported the alleged kidnapping to executives at Combs' Bad Boy Records. She later received a settlement from Combs after she accused him of wrongful termination.

    Clark later returned to working for Combs, after being unable to secure any other job in the music industry. Again in his employ and under his control, she said that Combs kidnapped her once more in 2011, after he learned that Ventura had been dating the musician Kid Cudi and that Clark knew about it.

    Arson

    Musician Scott Mescudi, who records as Kid Cudi, took the stand to testify that in December 2011, while he was romantically involved with Cassie Ventura, there was a break-in at his home. On the stand, he said he and Ventura ended their relationship because he was concerned for his personal safety: "I knew Sean Combs was violent," he testified.

    The following month, someone set fire to Mescudi's Porsche, which was parked just outside of his home; years later, he said Combs pulled him aside at an event and apologized for "everything."

    The prosecution also called officers from the Los Angeles Police Department and the Los Angeles Fire Department whose testimony aligned with Mescudi's about the break-in and arson. LAFD arson investigator Lance Jimenez said that the fire was caused by a Molotov cocktail in what he opined was a "targeted" incident. LAPD officer Christopher Ignacio testified that while responding to a call about a possible break-in at Mescudi's residence, he observed a Cadillac Escalade in front of the home, and that the Escalade was registered to Combs' recording label.

    While she was on the stand, Clark said Combs forced her to accompany him to Mescudi's house, saying "We're going to go kill him." She also testified that Combs threatened to kill her if she went to the authorities, and that he said he would kill her, Mescudi and Ventura if Mescudi told police he suspected Combs of having been in his home. Additionally, she said she witnessed Combs brutally beating Ventura after he learned of her relationship with Mescudi.

    Bribery

    On June 3, Eddy Garcia, a former security supervisor at the InterContinental Hotel in Los Angeles, testified that Combs bribed him and his colleagues with $100,000, delivered in a paper bag, in exchange for the 2016 hotel security video. Garcia also testified that he signed a nondisclosure agreement that called for the destruction of evidence and for Garcia's silence. (Nondisclosure agreements, or NDAs, do not prevent people from testifying truthfully in legal proceedings.)

    According to Garcia, Kristina Khorram was also involved in that negotiation for the security tape, buttressing the prosecution's claims of racketeering. The jury also viewed texts between Ventura and Khorram, in which Ventura wrote "no one deserves to get dragged by their hair."

    Mia also testified that she believed a former security employee nicknamed D-Roc tried to bribe her after Ventura filed a civil lawsuit against Combs; the jury saw a blizzard of texts and phone calls that Diddy, Khorram and D-Roc sent Mia in that time period, including one in which D-Roc wrote: "I know u didn't ask for anything, but I can send my sister a gift."

    Obstruction of justice

    Cassie Ventura's mother, Regina, testified that her family paid Combs $20,000 in 2011 to prevent him from releasing sexually explicit videos of Cassie after Combs learned that she had begun dating Mescudi. (She testified that Combs paid her back days later.) Her testimony was supported by that of former Combs Enterprises chief financial officer Derek Ferguson, who confirmed that he had seen a payment of $20,000 from the Ventura family to Combs.

    A former stylist for both Combs and Ventura named Deonte Nash also buttressed Regina Ventura's testimony. Nash testified that along with witnessing Combs physically attacking Cassie Ventura, he also witnessed Combs threatening to release sex tapes of her, including sending them to the places her parents worked in order to get them fired.

    During the course of the trial so far, the jury has heard many other allegations against Combs — including many episodes of physical abuse perpetrated against girlfriends and employees and rampant drug use. The defense has maintained that while Combs may be an abuser and involved in "toxic" and "jealous" relationships, and while the jury may not agree with his lifestyle, none of those accusations are charges against him in this federal trial.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Fire department honored with 'Award of Excellence'
    A close-up of a star plaque in the style of the Hollywood Walk of Fame on top of a red carpet. The star reads "Los Angeles Fire Dept." in gold text towards the top.
    The "Award of Excellence Star" honoring the Los Angeles Fire Department on Friday.

    Topline:

    The Hollywood Walk of Fame has a new neighbor — a star dedicated to the Los Angeles Fire Department.

    Why it matters: The Fire Department has been honored with an “Award of Excellence Star” for its public service during the Palisades and Sunset fires, which burned in the Pacific Palisades and Hollywood Hills neighborhoods of L.A. in January.

    Why now: The star was unveiled on Hollywood Boulevard on Friday at a ceremony hosted by the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and Hollywood Community Foundation.

    Awards of Excellence celebrate organizations for their positive impacts on Hollywood and the entertainment industry, according to organizers. Fewer than 10 have been handed out so far, including to the LA Times, Dodgers and Disneyland.

    The backstory: The idea of awarding a star to the Fire Department was prompted by an eighth-grade class essay from Eniola Taiwo, 14, from Connecticut. In an essay on personal heroes, Taiwo called for L.A. firefighters to be recognized. She sent the letter to the Chamber of Commerce.

    “This star for first responders will reach the hearts of many first responders and let them know that what they do is recognized and appreciated,” Taiwo’s letter read. “It will also encourage young people like me to be a change in the world.”

    A group of people are gathered around a red carpet with a Hollywood star in the center. A man wearing a black uniform is hugging a Black teenage girl on top of the star.
    LAFD Chief Jaime E. Moore, Eniola Taiwo and LAFD firefighters with the "Award of Excellence Star" Friday.
    (
    Matt Winkelmeyer
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    The Award of Excellence Star is in front of the Ovation Entertainment Complex next to the Walk of Fame; however, it is separate from the official program.

    What officials say: Steve Nissen, president and CEO of the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement Taiwo’s letter was the inspiration for a monument that will “forever shine in Hollywood.”

    “This recognition is not only about honoring the bravery of the Los Angeles Fire Department but also about celebrating the vision of a young student whose words reminded us all of the importance of gratitude and civic pride,” said Nissen, who’s also president and CEO of the Hollywood Community Foundation.

    Go deeper: LA's wildfires: Your recovery guide

  • Sponsored message
  • Councilmember wants to learn more
    A woman with brown hair past her shoulders is speaking into a microphone affixed to a podium. She's wearing a light blue turtleneck under a navy blue checkered jacket and small earrings. Two other women can be seen standing behind her on the left.
    L.A. City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto was accused of an ethics breach in a case the city settled for $18 million.

    Topline:

    Fallout from allegations of an ethics breach by Los Angeles’ elected city attorney has reached the City Council. Councilmember Ysabel Jurado introduced a motion Friday requesting a closed-session meeting about an allegation that City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto improperly contacted a witness days before her office entered into one of the city’s biggest settlements in recent years. The motion came a day after LAist reported about the allegation.

    The case: In September, the city settled a lawsuit brought forward by two brothers in their 70s who said they suffered serious injuries after an LAPD officer crashed into their car. Days before the $18 million settlement was reached, lawyers for the brothers said Feldstein Soto called an expert witness testifying for the plaintiffs and “attempted to ingratiate herself with him and asked him to make a contribution to her political campaign,” according to a sworn declaration to the court by the plaintiffs’ attorney, Robert Glassman.

    The response: Feldstein Soto did not respond to an interview request. Her spokesperson said the settlement “had nothing to do” with the expert witness. Her campaign manager told LAist the city attorney had been making a routine fundraising call and did not know the person had a role in the case, nor that there were pending requests for her office to pay him fees.

    What Jurado says: In a statement to LAist, Jurado said she wants to “make sure that the city’s legal leadership is guided by integrity and accountability, especially when their choices affect public trust, civic rights and the city’s limited resources."

    What’s next: The motion needs to go through a few committees before reaching the full City Council. If it passes, the motion calls for the city attorney to “report to council in closed session within 45 days regarding the ethics breach violation and give updates to the City Council."

    Topline:

    Fallout from allegations of an ethics breach by Los Angeles’ elected city attorney has reached the City Council. Councilmember Ysabel Jurado introduced a motion Friday requesting a closed-session meeting about an allegation that City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto improperly contacted a witness days before her office entered into one of the city’s biggest settlements in recent years. The motion came a day after LAist reported about the allegation.

    The case: In September, the city settled a lawsuit brought forward by two brothers in their 70s who said they suffered serious injuries after an LAPD officer crashed into their car. Days before the $18 million settlement was reached, lawyers for the brothers said Feldstein Soto called an expert witness testifying for the plaintiffs and “attempted to ingratiate herself with him and asked him to make a contribution to her political campaign,” according to a sworn declaration to the court by the plaintiffs’ attorney, Robert Glassman.

    The response: Feldstein Soto did not respond to an interview request. Her spokesperson said the settlement “had nothing to do” with the expert witness. Her campaign manager told LAist the city attorney had been making a routine fundraising call and did not know the person had a role in the case, nor that there were pending requests for her office to pay him fees.

    What Jurado says: In a statement to LAist, Jurado said she wants to “make sure that the city’s legal leadership is guided by integrity and accountability, especially when their choices affect public trust, civic rights and the city’s limited resources."

    What’s next: The motion needs to go through a few committees before reaching the full City Council. If it passes, the motion calls for the city attorney to “report to council in closed session within 45 days regarding the ethics breach violation and give updates to the City Council."

  • How one Santa Ana home honors the holiday
    At the center of the altar is a statue of the Lady of Guadalupe -- a brown-skinned woman wearing a green veil with her hands clasped in prayer and an angel at her feet. Behind the statue is a tapestry with a glass-stained window design. The statue is surrounded by flowers of all kinds of colors.
    Luis Cantabrana turns the front of his Santa Ana home into an elaborate altar in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe.

    Topline:

    Today marks el Día de La Virgen de Guadalupe, or the day of the Virgen of Guadalupe, an important holiday for Catholics and those of Mexican descent. In Santa Ana, Luis Cantabrana builds an elaborate altar in her honor that draws hundreds of visitors.

    What is the holiday celebrating? In 1513, the Virgin Mary appeared before St. Juan Diego, asking him to build a church in her honor. Her image — a brown-skinned woman, wearing a green veil with her hands clasped in prayer and an angel at her feet — miraculously appeared on his cloak. Every year on Dec. 12, worshippers of the saint celebrate the Guadalupita with prayer and song.

    Read on … for how worshippers in Santa Ana celebrate.

    Every year in Santa Ana, Luis Cantabrana turns the front of his home into an elaborate altar in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe that draws hundreds of visitors.

    Along the front of the house, the multi-colored altar is filled with lights, flowers and a stained-glass tapestry behind a sculpture of the Lady of Guadalupe. Cantabrana’s roof also is lit up with the green, white and red lights that spell out “Virgen de Guadalupe” and a cross.

    Visitors are welcomed with music and the smell of roses as they celebrate the saint, but this year’s gathering comes after a dark year for immigrant communities.

    A dark-skinned man wearing a navy blue long sleeve shirt stands in front of the altar he built for the Lady of Guadalupe. At the center of the altar is a statue of the Lady of Guadalupe -- a brown-skinned woman wearing a green veil with her hands clasped in prayer and an angel at her feet. Behind the statue is a tapestry with a glass-stained window design. The statue is surrounded by flowers of all kinds of colors.
    Luis Cantabrana stands in front of the stunning altar he built in front of his home in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe. Every year, his display draws hundreds of visitors.
    (
    Destiny Torres
    /
    LAist
    )

    Why do they celebrate? 

    In 1513, the Virgin Mary appeared before St. Juan Diego between Dec. 9 and Dec. 12, asking him to build a church in her honor. Her image — a brown-skinned woman wearing a green veil with her hands together in prayer and an angel at her feet — miraculously appeared on his cloak.

    To celebrate in Santa Ana, worshippers gathered late-night Wednesday and in the very early hours Dec. 12 to pray the rosary, sing hymns and celebrate the saint.

    Cantabrana has hosted worshippers at his home for 27 years — 17 in Santa Ana.

    The altar started out small, he said, and over the years, he added a fabric background, more lights and flowers (lots and lots of flowers).

    “It started with me making a promise to la Virgen de Guadalupe that while I had life and a home to build an altar, that I would do it,” Cantabrana said. “Everything you see in photos and videos is pretty, but when you come and see it live, it's more than pretty. It's beautiful.”

    The roof of a home is decked out in green, white and red lights. At the center peak of the roof is a small picture of the Virgin Mary. Lights spell out the words, "Virgen de Guadalupe." on the slope of the roof, the lights are laid out in the display of a cross.
    The Santa Ana home's elaborate altar in honor of La Virgen de Guadalupe draws hundreds of visitors each year.
    (
    Destiny Torres
    /
    LAist
    )

    Gathering in a time of turmoil 

    Many also look to the Lady of Guadalupe for protection, especially at a time when federal enforcement has rattled immigrant communities.

    “People don’t want to go to work, they don’t want to take their kids to school, but the love we have for our Virgen de Guadalupe,” Cantabrana said. “We see that la Virgen de Guadalupe has a lot of power, and so we know immigration [enforcement] won’t come here.”

    Margarita Lopez of Garden Grove has been visiting the altar for three years with her husband. She’s been celebrating the Virgencita since she was a young girl. Honoring the saint is as important now as ever, she said.

    “We ask, and she performs miracles,” Lopez said.

    Claudia Tapia, a lifelong Santa Ana resident, said the Virgin Mary represents strength.

    “Right now, with everything going on, a lot of our families [have] turned and prayed to the Virgen for strength during these times,” Tapia said. “She's a very strong symbol of Mexican culture, of unity, of faith and of resilience.”

    See it for yourself

    The shrine will stay up into the new year on the corner of Broadway and Camile Street.

  • Audit says state agency spent millions
    A woman wearing a blue long sleeved top and black pants walks past a large, dark green building with signage that reads, "Employment Development Department"
    The offices of the Employment Development Department in Sacramento on Jan. 10, 2022.

    Topline:

    California’s unemployment agency kept paying cellphone bills for 4 1/2 years without checking whether its workers actually were using the devices. That’s how it racked up $4.6 million in fees for mobile devices its workers were not using, according to a new state audit detailing wasteful spending at several government agencies.

    The investigation: The Employment Development Department acquired 7,224 cellphones and wireless hotspots by December 2020. State auditors analyzed 54 months of invoices since then and found half the devices were unused for at least two years, 25% were unused for three years and 99 of them were never used at all. The investigation, which auditors opened after receiving a tip, identified 6,285 devices that were unused for at least four consecutive months and said the department spent $4.6 million on monthly service fees for them.

    Department response: Officials told auditors they were unaware of the spending, but auditors pointed to regular invoices from Verizon that showed which phones were not being used. The unemployment department began acting on the auditors’ findings in April, when it canceled service plans for 2,825 devices. It has since implemented a policy to terminate service plans for devices that go unused for 90 days.

    California’s unemployment agency kept paying cellphone bills for 4 1/2 years without checking whether its workers actually were using the devices.

    That’s how it racked up $4.6 million in fees for mobile devices its workers were not using, according to a new state audit detailing wasteful spending at several government agencies.

    The Employment Development Department’s excessive cellphone bills date to the COVID-19 pandemic, when it shifted call center employees to remote work and faced pressure to release benefits to millions of suddenly unemployed Californians.

    It acquired 7,224 cellphones and wireless hotspots by December 2020. State auditors analyzed 54 months of invoices since then and found half the devices were unused for at least two years, 25% were unused for three years and 99 of them were never used at all.

    The investigation, which auditors opened after receiving a tip, identified 6,285 devices that were unused for at least four consecutive months, and said the department spent $4.6 million on monthly service fees for them.

    From the beginning, the department had about 2,000 more cellphones than call center employees, according to the audit. The gap widened over time after the pandemic ended and the department’s staffing returned to its normal headcount.

    As of April, the audit said the department had 1,787 unemployment call center employees, but was paying monthly service fees for 5,097 mobile devices.

    “Although obtaining the mobile devices during COVID-19 may have been a good idea to serve the public, continuing to pay the monthly service fees for so many unused devices, especially post-COVID-19, was wasteful,” the audit said.

    Department officials told auditors they were unaware of the spending, but auditors pointed to regular invoices from Verizon that showed which phones were not being used.

    “We would have expected EDD management to have reconsidered the need to pay the monthly service fees for so many devices that had no voice, message, or data usage,” the audit said.

    The unemployment department began acting on the auditors’ findings in April, when it canceled service plans for 2,825 devices. It has since implemented a policy to terminate service plans for devices that go unused for 90 days.

    The California state auditor highlighted the mobile devices in its regular report on “improper activities by state agencies and employees.” The audit also showed that the California Air Resources Board overpaid an employee who was on extended leave as he prepared to retire by $171,000.

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.