Protect local news!

Be one of 5,000 supporters to make a monthly gift during our fall member drive and help strengthen our nonprofit newsroom.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • The public media lion transformed KCRW-FM
    ruth-seymour-kcrw-retires.jpg
    Ruth Seymour, a lion in Southern California public media landscape, seen here in photo that accompanied her 2009 retirement announcement.

    Topline:

    Ruth Seymour, a public media lion who transformed KCRW-FM (89.9) from a struggling signal in Santa Monica into one of the most successful public radio stations in the country, has died. She was 88.

    Why it matters: “L.A. is a better place for Ruth having lived and worked in it,” said Bill Davis, president emeritus of Southern California Public Radio. “The world will be a less interesting place without Ruth in it.”

    The backstory: Under Seymour pioneering guidance, KCRW provided the soundtrack to life in Southern California and a backdrop to countless commutes with a potent programming mix of news, music and talk that shaped Los Angeles culture as much as covered it.

    What's next: Plans for a memorial are underway, to be held in Santa Monica. The public will be invited to attend, said her daughter, Celia Hirschman.

    Ruth Seymour, a public media lion who transformed KCRW-FM (89.9) from a struggling signal in Santa Monica into one of the most successful public radio stations in the country, has died. She was 88.

    A statement announcing her death said Seymour died at her home in Santa Monica on Friday after a long illness.

    Under Seymour's pioneering guidance, KCRW provided the soundtrack to life in Southern California and a backdrop to countless commutes with a potent programming mix of news, music and talk that shaped Los Angeles culture as much as covered it.

    Some of those programs included “Morning Becomes Eclectic,” “To the Point” and the groundbreaking “Which Way, L.A.?,” a news program that in particular served as a kind of daily therapy session for a city struggling to regain its footing after the civil unrest that followed four white police officers acquitted in 1992 in the videotaped beating of Black motorist Rodney King.

    “L.A. is a better place for Ruth having lived and worked in it,” said Bill Davis, president emeritus of Southern California Public Radio. “The world will be a less interesting place without Ruth in it.”

    In a 2010 interview with Los Angeles Magazine to mark her retirement, Seymour called her station “singular, idiosyncratic, daring, independent, smart, and compelling.”

    All words that could have described Seymour herself.

    From her earliest years in Los Angeles radio, Seymour recognized that having the ear of Angelenos and Southern California listeners was both a privilege — and an opportunity. She had a shrewd sense of what listeners wanted and where the industry was headed, all qualities that served her well as she elevated KCRW to the National Public Radio flagship outlet in Southern California, and the envy of public radio stations nationwide.

    She considered “Which Way, L.A.?” to be a “crowning achievement,” said her daughter, Celia Hirschman. “My mother was very proud of that… she sought to raise the discussion to a higher level.”

    The host of that show, veteran broadcast journalist Warren Olney, said Seymour was "the smartest, most creative, most challenging and demanding person I ever worked with in almost 60 years of broadcasting." He added that sometimes Seymour could be "cranky and distant" and noted that some called her ```the iron whim," but those changes of mind mostly validated her predictions, built audience and gained respect for the station."

    He said the idea for "Which Way, LA?" grew from Seymour's belief that "a major lesson of the disturbance was that LA’s myriad voices weren’t being listened to seriously."

    And she wanted to change that.

    Seymour was also a resonating voice on the Southern California media landscape — and that voice was all Bronx.

    Listeners were no match for it. Seymour was adept at coaxing — or was it hectoring? — listeners to reach into their pockets during pledge drives. At one point, with Seymour at the wheel, the beachy Santa Monica station ranked third — behind urban heavyweights Boston and Chicago — in terms of membership dues raised for National Public Radio.

    “She was a monster” at fundraising, said an admiring Nick Harcourt, handpicked by Seymour to become KCRW’s music director and an on-air presenter for the signature show, “Morning Becomes Eclectic.” “She was just so good at it, getting money out of the news audience.”

    She was successful, he said, because listeners understood and believed in Seymour’s commitment to public radio’s mission.

    Her early life in the Bronx

    It’s no surprise where Seymour was born — the Bronx, as Ruth Epstein.

    There, she attended public school and her education was supplemented with language and literature classes in Yiddish, fueling a love that would last a lifetime.

    When profiled in 1995 by the L.A. Times, she recalled that her Russian-Polish immigrant parents were working-class and deeply intellectual, exposing her to “an extraordinary world of ideas, literature and politics.”

    She attended City College of New York, married and became Ruth Hirschman, had two children, and came to L.A. when her husband was hired at UCLA. She talked her way into a job in public radio at KPFK, working as a drama and literary critic and worked her way up the ranks — and into the spotlight.

    The station’s manager, who was also her boss, Will Lewis, was later jailed in 1974 for refusing to give the FBI tapes left at the station by the Symbionese Liberation Army and the Weather Underground, turning KPFK and its management into counterculture celebrities.

    Early days at KCRW

    Upheaval at KPFK led to Seymour’s departure in 1976, paving the way for her hiring at KCRW in 1977. Then, the station was located inside a middle school classroom in Santa Monica and had the oldest transmitter west of the Mississippi.

    “There was no place to go but up,” Seymour would say.

    She would move the station to Santa Monica College, and go on to become one of the first programmers to embrace eclectic music and carve out an audience niche for it, Davis said, calling the decision “incredibly influential.” And KCRW was “one of the first [public radio] stations in the country to sign up for “Morning Edition,” making other stations take notice, he added. KCRW was also the first station to carry “This American Life” outside of its home base in Chicago.

    Seymour had a saying, Harcourt recalled, quoting it: “If you only worry about the listeners you have, they are the only ones you will have.”

    Embracing eclectic music

    Harcourt said that philosophy meant that even though Seymour “didn’t really understand the music I played” on “Morning Becomes Eclectic,” with its genre busting playlists and emerging world music, Seymour knew she wasn’t the show’s intended audience.

    “She understood that it brought in a younger, highly-engaged audience, including decision makers in the entertainment industry,” Harcourt said. “And that was what was making the station a must listen in a demo that had money, and would support the station financially.”

    And younger music listeners who were curious might stay for the news as well.

    Keeping the Yiddish language and culture was a cause close to Seymour’s heart. (So was honoring family. When she divorced, she took the surname Seymour, in honor of her Polish-born great-grandfather, a rabbi.)

    'Not one phone call came in'

    When she noticed in the 70s that there were little radio options for Jews like her. So in December of 1978 she had an idea. She created and hosting “Philosophers, Fiddlers and Fools,” a joyous and colorful show that dove deep into Jewish culture, drawing from short stories, and Yiddish folk music and other touchstones familiar to those who might feel left out in a world dominated by Christmas trees.

    But during that three-hour programming experiment in December the phones stayed deadly silent. “Not one phone call came in,” Seymour would later write in a history on the show. “I assumed — all of us there, that day, assumed — that we had lost the audience.”

    But lo and behold, when the show ended, “The phones began to ring. And ring. And ring. They rang for hours,” she recalled. It was as if the lag was due to rapt listeners who couldn’t pull themselves away from the programming to pick up the phone.

    Instead of a colossal failure, Seymour had a hit on her hands.

    Celia Hirschman said her mother delighted in creating an entirely new show for Hanukkah each year thereafter.

    By the time she announced her decision to step down in 2009, after nearly 30 years at KCRW, the station was in a period of transition. Ratings were struggling, as they were in many other outlets amid the ever-shifting media landscape.

    As she told the Times: “It’s going to be a new era. Time to begin without me.”

    There was no immediate information about services, although a memorial is expected to be held in her beloved city of Santa Monica.

    “There was no one else like Ruth,” Davis said. “She was an absolute force in the history of public media in Los Angeles and the history of public radio in the country.”

  • Bass calls for pause to utility shutoffs
    The sun sets and shows off the silhouettes of power lines.
    The sun sets behind power lines near homes during a heat wave in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    For the rest of the year, Los Angeles residents won't get their water and power shut off if they can’t pay their bills.

    The details: Mayor Karen Bass announced Tuesday that she asked the L.A. Department of Water and Power’s board to pause any residential shutoffs for nonpayment through the end of 2026. The request comes after a series of record-breaking heatwaves this summer and fall. A spokesperson for LADWP said the changes will be implemented immediately. The board is expected to formally vote to approve the ask at its next meeting, set for Oct. 27 at 10 a.m., according to a spokesperson for Bass. According to the LADWP spokesperson, customers who need assistance will get extra time to pay their bill by entering into a payment arrangement without any interest or late fees.

    Bill breakdown: DWP bills two months at a time, and right now, many customers are being hit with one of their highest bills of the year — from August and September. In those months, 2% of DWP's 1.6 million customers received a bill of over $3,000, the DWP said; 3% were between $2,000 and $3,000; 12% were between $1,000 and $2,000; and 18% were between $500 and $1,000. At least 60% were under $500, the DWP said. LADWP says customers can call 800-DIAL-DWP (342-5397) if they have questions about their bills.

    The backstory: As atmospheric pollution drives hotter, longer heat waves, utility bills are soaring too. That's why, in 2023, LADWP's board voted to end power shutoffs for all customers during extreme weather. Under that policy, LADWP will not shut a customer’s water and power off if they are delinquent on their bill when the National Weather Service has issued an extreme heat or cold weather advisory or warning. Outside of such weather advisories, however, customers can still face shutoffs. Under Bass’ request, shutoffs won’t occur through the rest of the year regardless of weather advisories.

    Other resources: Bass encouraged customers to sign up for LADWP’s Level Pay program, which allows customers to pay off past-due bills over time or even out the peaks of high-energy-use seasons across a longer term. You can sign up and find other bill assistance programs on the DWP website.

    Go deeper: Why is my LADWP bill so high?

  • Sponsored message
  • District prepares for El Niño
    A yellow school bus from Los Angeles Unified School District.
    District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors, in preparation for El Niño.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is preparing for possible “Super El Niño” storms that could damage schools and lead to closures, the district announced in a media release Tuesday.

    What's being done: District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors. LAUSD is also testing emergency equipment, including pumps and emergency lighting systems, and stocking supplies such as flashlights and drinking water.

    Guidance for families during this year's El Niño season: LAUSD encouraged families to update their contact information to ensure they receive district calls, texts and emails. Families should also monitor weather alerts, follow emergency officials’ instructions, avoid flooded roads and review safe routes to and from school, according to the release.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is preparing for possible “Super El Niño” storms that could damage schools and lead to closures, the district announced in a media release Tuesday.

    District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors. LAUSD is also testing emergency equipment, including pumps and emergency lighting systems, and stocking supplies such as flashlights and drinking water.

    “Preparing for severe weather starts well before the first raindrop,” Superintendent Andrés Chait said in a statement. “We can’t control the weather, but we can take steps now to protect our students and employees and help our schools stay ready.”

    The district will monitor weather patterns using information from the National Weather Service and local emergency officials, it said.

    LAUSD encouraged families to update their contact information to ensure they receive district calls, texts and emails. Families should also monitor weather alerts, follow emergency officials’ instructions, avoid flooded roads and review safe routes to and from school, according to the release.

    “Preparing for a storm is a shared effort — from the crews maintaining school buildings to the principals reviewing emergency plans and the families making sure they can receive critical updates,” LAUSD said in the release. “By taking these steps before the rain begins, Los Angeles Unified is working to help students and employees stay safe and keep school communities as prepared as possible for the winter ahead.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • This will be the first cold storm of the season
    Two people in yellow rain ponchos walk toward a fog-shrouded downtown Los Angeles skyline on a rainy day.
    Rain is expected Wednesday night and Thursday morning across Southern California. It will be the first cold storm of the rainy season.

    Topline:

    Significant rain is in the forecast this week, just days after heat and Santa Ana winds fueled wildfires across Southern California

    The rain: The bulk of the rain is expected on Wednesday night and Thursday morning. Most of L.A. and Orange counties could get around an inch, with more expected in the hills and mountains. There is also a chance of thunderstorms and hail.

    Flood risk: A National Weather Service flood watch is in effect for the Santa Monica Mountains and surrounding communities. The area includes burn scars from last week’s Bryson Fire and last year’s Palisades Fire. Wildfire burn scars are susceptible to landslides and flooding during heavy rain.

    Cooldown: Forecasters say the storm will bring cool air into southern California. Highs on Wednesday and Thursday will peak in the 60s and low 70s in most places. High elevations will likely be even cooler.

    Read on … for more on this week’s forecast.

    Southern California is likely in for a solid dose of rain this week, just days after heat and Santa Ana winds helped fuel several wildfires across the region.

    Forecasters expect the bulk of the rain to roll into the Los Angeles basin Wednesday night and continue into Thursday morning, with a small chance of thunderstorms and hail.

    The San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley and coastal areas across L.A. and Orange counties could get around an inch over the next few days. Hills and mountains could get up to 3 inches.

    “We could see some pretty high rain rates,” said National Weather Service meteorologist Mike Wofford. “It's a good storm for this time of year — it's a little stronger than what we would see normally.”

    The possibility of significant rain in the mountains raises concerns about flooding in areas recently burned in wildfires, particularly around the Bryson Fire burn scar near Malibu, which is only a few days old. Burn scars can’t absorb heavy rainfall and are susceptible to landslides.

    The National Weather Service has issued a flood watch for the Santa Monica Mountains and surrounding communities from Wednesday afternoon through Thursday. That means heavy rain there could flood streets, creeks and rivers. The flood watch area includes both the Bryson Fire and Palisades Fire burn scars.

    This will also be the first nontropical storm of the season, meaning it’s moving into the region from the north. Most storms that hit Southern California follow a similar path, especially during the winter, unlike the tropical storms that formed off the coast of Mexico and brought muggy weather to the region this summer.

    Nontropical storms also bring cold air to the region. On Wednesday and Thursday, forecasters expect highs in the 60s and 70s. High elevations will be even cooler.

  • The bulk of the money could go to one institute
    Modern multistory building with dark metal facade and tiered terraces, set behind a green lawn and a wide wooden-and-concrete stepped seating area.
    Courtyard view of the UCLA Research Park under construction in the former Westside Pavilion shopping center in West Los Angeles on Aug. 19, 2024

    Topline:

    The science research institute that would likely receive $4.2 billion in public taxpayer money if voters approve Proposition 38 this November had only three employees as of last month — far fewer than the 51 staffers it planned to have hired by last year. Public statements and public records CalMatters obtained raise questions about how well prepared the institute is to shepherd so much money if the bond measure passes.

    Why it matters: Prop. 38 would allocate up to $8.4 billion in bonds for scientific research on diseases and cures concerning the immune system, with an emphasis on finding treatments for Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart disease. The ballot language stipulates that a single, unnamed research institute would receive half the bond’s money to conduct research and partner with other researchers if it meets highly specific criteria. Bonds are a type of debt that must be repaid. Previous reporting by CalMatters found only one institute in California currently meets those criteria: the California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy. The institute’s principal funder is billionaire Gary K. Michelson, who wrote Prop. 38 and is by far the largest donor to its political campaign.

    What opponents say: The measure’s critics say Prop. 38 is well-intentioned but poorly designed because it overlooks the many established public and nonprofit university and hospital research labs in California. They also say California should not subsidize subsets of scientific research and instead should support research more broadly.

    The science research institute that would likely receive $4.2 billion in public taxpayer money if voters approve Proposition 38 this November had only three employees as of last month — far fewer than the 51 staffers it planned to have hired by last year.

    Public statements and public records CalMatters obtained raise questions about how well prepared the institute is to shepherd so much money if the bond measure passes.

    Prop. 38 would allocate up to $8.4 billion in bonds for scientific research on diseases and cures concerning the immune system, with an emphasis on finding treatments for Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart disease. The ballot language stipulates that a single, unnamed research institute would receive half the bond’s money to conduct research and partner with other researchers if it meets highly specific criteria. Bonds are a type of debt that must be repaid.

    Previous reporting by CalMatters found only one institute in California currently meets those criteria: the California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy. The institute’s principal funder is billionaire Gary K. Michelson, who wrote Prop. 38 and is by far the largest donor to its political campaign.

    Backers of the proposition said state bond money is needed to stabilize research funding after President Donald Trump repeatedly attempted to cut existing and future federal science grants.

    The measure’s critics say Prop. 38 is well-intentioned but poorly designed because it overlooks the many established public and nonprofit university and hospital research labs in California. They also say California should not subsidize subsets of scientific research and instead should support research more broadly.

    CalMatters obtained documents that included the five-year business plan of the California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy. The plan was part of the formal affiliation agreement between UCLA and the institute, which the two parties signed in August 2024. Among other details, the agreement requires the institute to pay UCLA 7.5% of the net revenue of any drugs and technologies developed by the institute’s staff. The institute is one of the founding tenants at a UCLA-owned research park in West Los Angeles, where the institute is leasing 235,000 square feet of research space, the institute says.

    Far fewer employees than plan called for

    Between summer 2024 and summer 2025, the institute committed to hiring “approximately” 51 employees, including six executives, five “world-class” scientists who can lead research labs, and 40 other employees, such as data scientists, lab technicians, biologists and administrative personnel. Between 2025 and 2027, the institute would hire roughly 90 more workers, including 10 research lab leaders, according to the agreement.

    But John Mazziotta, a senior UCLA official who also serves as a board member of the immunology institute, last month said the institute has hired just three employees: a chief operating officer, a general counsel, and a scientific advisor, and “they're well into the search” for a director. Mazziotta, the CEO of UCLA Health and vice chancellor for health sciences at UCLA, made his comments during the Sept. 16 UC Regents meeting.

    The Yes on Prop. 38 campaign has repeatedly refused to comment on whether the bond was written specifically for the immunology institute. Claudia Briggs, a spokesperson for the campaign, told CalMatters in July that whichever nonprofit receives the $4.2 billion portion of the bond fund should be a sophisticated one that “is prepared to accelerate lifesaving research immediately while maintaining the highest standards of scientific quality, accountability, and stewardship of public funds.”

    At a September press conference, a Yes on Prop. 38 spokesperson appeared to confirm CalMatters’ findings that only one institute currently qualifies to be the one to receive half the bond money. “It is very likely that CIII, which is a research institute affiliated with UCLA, will qualify for half of the funds under the current criteria,” said Robin Swanson. CIII is the initialism for the immunology institute.

    According to the five-year plan, the institute was supposed to spend $25 million on personnel between 2024-25 and 2025-26 and $45 million total on operating expenses in that time, including maintenance, utilities and rent. It was also supposed to spend an additional $167 million in that time on capital expenses, such as construction and demolition. However, Mazziotta told UC regents that the institute had so far spent a total of $20 million on “operating expenses, hires” and other expenses.

    The Yes on 38 campaign refused CalMatters’ request to interview Michelson for this story, as did Michelson himself in a separate email. A spokesperson for the institute, Becky Warren, sent a written statement that didn't answer CalMatters' questions about employing far fewer people than the five-year plan laid out. Instead, she highlighted the promise of the institute and a few of its milestones, including signing the affiliation agreement with UCLA and clearing a state environmental review of its forthcoming research facility.

    The institute won’t get state bond money if it isn’t ready to begin work, “plain and simple,” wrote Swanson, the Yes on 38 spokesperson, in an email. She stressed that though the institute very likely qualifies, the ultimate decision to award half the bond funding is up to the California Department of Public Health.

    Institute facility will be built by 2028

    The UCLA research park that houses the institute isn’t slated to be fully built until at least late 2028, according to the agenda item of the September UC regents meeting. The research park is a former mall UCLA acquired in late 2023 that’s now undergoing major retrofitting.

    But the 2024 affiliation agreement between UCLA and the institute anticipated this. The agreement permitted the institute to use UCLA health research space on another campus property on an interim basis. Mazziotta told regents that research is underway there.

    Mazziotta also told the regents the institute's construction costs are not fully funded — it still needs roughly $100 million. He said UCLA was in serious talks with a donor to provide about $50 million to the institute.

    If Prop. 38 passes, the bond funding would be provided in increments based on how often the institute requests new money that senior state officials approve. If all the funds are depleted, Californians would repay the bond at a rate of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years.

    Institute would be exempt from public records act

    CalMatters submitted the public records request to UCLA, which must comply with the California Public Records Act. The institute, as a private nonprofit, does not have to comply. And while Prop. 38 would channel billions of dollars in taxpayer money to the institute, the proposition’s language specifically exempts the nonprofit that will receive the $4.2 billion from state public meetings laws, political reform laws and the public records act. The other half of the funds would go to a council that’ll pick projects led by researchers from a limited pool of universities and nonprofits. The council would generally be governed by the state’s political reform act, which prohibits financial self-dealing.

    Briggs defended the institute’s exemption in Prop. 38, writing that applying state transparency laws to existing private organizations would “not fit well with how private entities are organized and operate.” Instead, she noted the selected nonprofit institute would be required to publish annual reports on its research progress and financial plans plus commit to annual state audits, among other disclosures written into the ballot measure.

    Still unclear to the UC regents is the relationship between UCLA and the institute on matters of public disclosure. Four senior UCLA officials sit on the institute’s board. So is a document held by those UCLA officials public because it’s related to UCLA affairs or private because it’s related to the institute’s affairs? UC’s general counsel couldn’t explain where that dividing line is after a regent member asked him. The regent member, Michael Cohen, said he wants more clarity when the regents meet again in November.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom and the California Democratic Party endorsed Prop. 38, as have dozens of patient and research advocacy groups, plus the state GOP. The union of graduate students and post-doctoral researchers, whose pay often relies on science research funding, has also endorsed the proposition. The union doesn’t represent faculty.

    Money raised in support of Prop. 38 now exceeds $66 million, including at least $61.2 million in contributions from Michelson and his policy institute. Roughly $14 million of that includes loans from Michelson. The no camp has raised about $8,800

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.