Sponsored message
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • The legal cases and candidates running in SoCal
    A large "Yes on 50!" sign appears above a freeway with cars driving underneath.
    A Yes on 50 sign is posted on a walkway over Highway 101 on Nov. 3, 2025.

    Topline:

    Since Californians decisively passed Proposition 50 to redraw the state’s congressional district maps, there have been legal challenges, a shift in the national redistricting arms race and maneuvering among congressional candidates lining up to run in 2026.

    The lawsuit: California Republicans announced they were challenging Prop. 50 in federal court, arguing the new district maps favor Latinos at the expense of other groups in violation of the Constitution. The federal Department of Justice filed last week to join the lawsuit. This doesn't affect Prop. 50 for now, although the plaintiffs have requested to pause Prop. 50 while the case goes through review.

    The national redistricting race: A federal court ruled that Texas cannot use its recently redrawn congressional maps in the 2026 midterm elections, finding it was racially gerrymandered. If the decision holds, Democrats will be ahead in the national redistricting race. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling.

    The congressional races: The new Prop. 50 map is causing a big game of musical chairs among sitting congressional representatives now deciding which new districts to run in. Two Republican incumbents are facing off in the 40th District covering Orange and Riverside counties, while there's an open seat in the mostly-blue 38th District in southeast L.A. County.

    Read on...for more about how the 2026 races are shaping up.

    It's been nearly three weeks since we found out Californians decisively passed Proposition 50 to redraw the state’s congressional district maps. The Associated Press called the vote within minutes of polls closing, but the vote won’t become official until after results are certified in early December — and yes, votes are still being counted with about 12,000 to go statewide.

    In the meantime, we’re keeping tabs on potential legal battles, the status of the national redistricting arms race, and how Prop. 50 is already shaping choices for the 2026 midterm elections.

    Here's what's been going on so far.

    Texas’ map is getting reviewed by the Supreme Court

    • What happened: A federal court ruled that Texas cannot use its recently redrawn congressional maps in the 2026 midterm elections, finding it was racially gerrymandered. The Supreme Court has now taken up the case, and has temporarily allowed the map to stand while it figures out which map Texas should default to as the case goes under review.
    • Wasn’t this the map that led to Prop. 50 to begin with? Yep. A quick refresher: Over the summer, President Donald Trump encouraged Texas officials to start an unusual mid-decade redistricting process to help Republicans gain five seats in the House of Representatives in the 2026 midterms. After Texas’ state legislature produced those new maps, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that California would respond with a similar move to redistrict in favor of Democrats and neutralize Texas' map — which eventually became Prop. 50. 
    • Does the case affect Prop. 50? No. But there's a separate challenge underway in California. More on that below. 
    • What does this mean for the House elections in 2026? If Texas winds up having to use its older map drawn in 2021 for next year's midterms — either as a default while the Supreme Court reviews the case or a result of the newer map being struck down — Democrats will be ahead in the nationwide redistricting battle. But if the new map stands, Democrats and Republicans remain neck-and-neck in the redistricting battle.

    California Republicans and the DOJ filed a lawsuit

    • What happened: Shortly after Election Day, California Republicans announced they were challenging Prop. 50 in federal court, arguing the new district maps favor Latinos at the expense of other groups in violation of the Constitution. The federal Department of Justice filed last week to join the lawsuit.
    • Does this change anything? Not at the moment. The lawsuit requests a preliminary injunction — essentially a pause on Prop. 50 going into effect — while the case gets reviewed, but it’s not clear if the court will grant one. Any injunction would have to happen very soon, since candidates are already gearing up for the 2026 elections.

    Here’s how O.C. cities voted on Prop. 50

    A line of people wait to vote on the right side of the image. On the left side of the image voting booths are shown with Orange County's logo and the words "Orange County Elections." An American flag hangs in the widow behind the people waiting in line.
    Voters wait to cast their ballots in the California Statewide Special Election at the Huntington Beach Central Library on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025.
    (
    Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Imag
    /
    Los Angeles Times
    )

    • What happened: Prop. 50 won in Orange County, but data from the county's registrar’s office gives us a clearer picture of how that vote broke down across cities. 
    • Who voted no? “No” votes led by more than 60% in Villa Park, a mostly residential enclave in the heart of Orange County, along with Newport Beach and Yorba Linda, traditional Trump strongholds.
    • Supporting Prop. 50: The cities of Santa Ana, Irvine, Anaheim and Tustin were among those with the highest support for the measure. You can see the full breakdown of vote margins across O.C. here.

    Prop. 50 moved an entire district out of the Inland Empire 

    • What happened: The previously safe-Republican 41st Congressional District, which covered the Inland Empire and Coachella Valley in Riverside County, is now primarily in blue L.A. County, with some small slices of Orange County.
    • What cities are in the new 41st District? It includes Downey, Lakewood, Sante Fe Springs and Brea. You can see a map of the district here. The 41st District currently stretches through Riverside County from Corona to Palm Desert. It’s represented by Republican Rep. Ken Calvert.
    • Geographic changes this big are unusual, right? Yes — even though Prop. 50 shifted most California congressional districts, this change stuck out. As Jodi Balma, a political science professor at Fullerton College, told LAist: "The others, you could kind of understand how the borders changed and some segment of the district remained the same. But this one just wholesale was picked up from the Inland Empire and moved to Los Angeles, and it's a completely new district."
    • Who could represent the new 41st District? So far, there's only one candidate in the race. That’s Democratic Rep. Linda Sánchez, who currently represents the 38th District. She could have chosen to run in either the newly drawn 38th District (covering Bell, Diamond Bar, Rowland Heights and part of Yorba Linda) or the new 41st District, since both include communities she currently represents. Here’s what she said when she announced the decision:
      “After Proposition 50 passed and split my current district, deciding where to run was an emotional but ultimately an easy choice — I chose home. Boundaries may change, but my commitment to fighting for the people I love will never waver.”
    Linda Sanchez, a woman in glasses, red shirt and large pearl necklace, speaks at a podium with two men behind her.
    U.S. Rep. Linda Sanchez speaks at the U.S. Capitol on May 10, 2023 in Washington, DC.
    (
    Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    The other SoCal congressional candidates running in 2026

    As expected, the Prop. 50 map is causing a big game of musical chairs among sitting congressional representatives now deciding which new districts to run in. New candidates are also jumping in to see if voters in freshly redrawn districts will elect them to office. Here’s what Southern California’s choices are looking like for the 2026 elections:

    • Two sitting Republicans face off to represent O.C. and Riverside: The 40th Congressional District is one of the only districts that’s significantly more Republican under Prop. 50, so it’s prime territory for GOP candidates. 
    • Previously in the 40th District: It covered eastern Orange County, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, including North Tustin, Chino Hills, Yorba Linda, Laguna Hills and Mission Viejo. It’s currently represented by Republican Rep. Young Kim. 
    • The 40th District after Prop. 50: It hangs on to parts of Orange County, including Mission Viejo and Villa Park, but now includes large swathes of Riverside County, including Lake Elsinore, Murrieta and Menifee. 
    • Who’s running in 2026: The 40th’s current representative, Republican Rep. Young Kim, will run for reelection. Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, who currently represents the Riverside County areas being added to the 40th District, says he will run against Kim in 2026, so voters will see a rare race between two incumbents from the same party.

    An open seat in southeast L.A. County

    A woman with light skin tone and dark hair wearing a black jacket over a red blazer stands behind a podium speaking into a microphone.
    L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis speaks at a press conference on Feb. 18, 2025 in Los Angeles.
    (
    Carlin Stiehl
    /
    LAist
    )

    The mostly-blue 38th Congressional District seat is staying mostly blue, although it’s grabbed a larger piece of Orange County — and the seat is up for grabs.

    • Previously in the 38th District: This L.A. County district included Montebello, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk, Whittier and Diamond Bar, and is currently represented by Democratic Rep. Linda Sánchez.
    • The 38th District after Prop. 50: It holds on to Montebello, Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights and part of Diamond Bar, and adds on Bell and part of Yorba Linda. It also loses Norwalk, Whittier, Santa Fe Springs and La Habra to the 41st District. 
    • Who’s running in 2026: With incumbent Sánchez running in the 41st District, the 38th is open. L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solís, a Democrat, is already in the race. Solís previously served in the House from 2001 to 2009 before becoming Secretary of Labor under President Barack Obama and then being elected to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in 2014.

    Huntington Beach moves to a Democratic stronghold

    The city has an all-Republican City Council that’s supported voter ID laws and restrictions on children’s books in public libraries. Under Prop. 50, Huntington Beach will join the 42nd Congressional District, which includes a heavily Democratic swath of L.A. County.

    • Previously in the 42nd District: It was in L.A. County alone, covering Huntington Park, Downey, Bell, Lakewood and Long Beach. It’s currently represented by Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia.
    • The 42nd District after Prop. 50: It covers the coast between L.A. and Orange counties, starting at Long Beach and going south to Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach. The new district includes significantly more Republican voters than before, but it still has a Democratic majority. 
    • Who's running in 2026: Incumbent Garcia is running for reelection. If he wins, that would put the progressive Long Beach Democrat — who has directly challenged the Trump administration on immigration enforcement and spending cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — in place to represent some of the most conservative areas of Orange County.

    This story was adapted from an issue of LAist's Make It Make Sense newsletter. You can sign up here.

  • Ex-OC Supervisor Andrew Do formally disbarred
    A man in a chair wearing a suit jacket, tie and glasses looks forward with a microphone in front of him. A sign in front has the official seal of the County of Orange and states "Andrew Do, Vice Chairman, District 1."
    Then-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do serving at an Orange County Board of Supervisor's meeting back in November 2023.

    Former Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do has been disbarred, stemming from his conviction last year on a federal bribery charge. The disbarment was expected. It stems from a state Supreme Court order that came down Dec. 1 and is now recorded as such on the state bar's website.

    What's the backstory?

    Do is currently serving a five-year prison sentence in Arizona after admitting to directing money to several nonprofit groups and businesses that then funneled some of that money back to himself and family members for personal gain. LAist has been investigating the alleged corruption since 2023. Do was also ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution for his role in the bribery scheme that saw millions in taxpayer dollars diverted from feeding needy seniors, leading authorities to label him a “Robin Hood in reverse.”

    What does the bar action mean?

    The official disbarment means Do is prohibited from practicing law in California. He was also ordered to pay $5,000 to the State Bar.

    Go deeper ...

    Here's a look at some of LAist's coverage of one of the biggest corruption scandals in Orange County history:

    LAist investigates: Andrew Do corruption scandal
    Ex-Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do is ordered to pay $878,230.80 in restitution
    'Robin Hood in reverse.' O.C. Supervisor Andrew Do resigns and will plead guilty to bribery conspiracy charge
    Former OC Supervisor Andrew Do turns himself in, begins 5-year federal prison term
    6 questions we still have after disgraced former OC Supervisor Andrew Do’s sentencing
    A quiet retreat for the judge married to disgraced OC politician Andrew Do

  • Sponsored message
  • CA's first fully accredited tribal college
    Eight men and women wearing graduation caps, face masks and wrapped in colorful blankets stand next to each other on stage. Above and behind them hangs a banner that reads California Indian Nations College.
    The first graduation at California Indian Nations College, class of 2020 and 2021.

    Topline:

    California now has it's first fully accredited tribal college in almost 30 years.

    California Indian Nations College in Palm Desert recently received an eight-year accreditation from the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

    Why it matters: The accreditation grants the college access to state and federal funding for higher education. Assemblymember James C. Ramos of San Bernardino calls the milestone historic, saying California has the highest number of Native Americans in the U.S.

    How we got here: There aren't any fully accredited tribal colleges in California. But a Palm Desert school might change that.

  • Winners of the latest draw notified today
    A golden trophy stands on a pedestal. Writing at the trophy base reads "FIFA World Cup"
    Winners of the latest phase of the FIFA World Cup ticket draw were notified Thursday.

    Topline:

    In six months, the FIFA World Cup arrives at the SoFi Stadium in Inglewood and winners of the latest phase of the FIFA World Cup ticket draw were notified today. But if you missed it, there is another opportunity to snag tickets.

    Why now? The third phase of ticketing began today, according to tournament officials.

    How it works: Ticketing for all games — including those at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood — happens in phases through a lottery draw system. You must register a profile through FIFA’s site in order to enter. Today, those registered will find out if they were picked via email.

    If I get picked, what’s next? Successful applicants will receive a notice in their emails and be automatically charged for the tickets they picked in the draw. A partially successful applicant means that you will receive the number of tickets requested, but not for all the requested matches.

    Do I have another chance? The next opportunity is called the Last-Minute Sales phase, which FIFA has said will open in early April. FIFA is also running its own Resale/Exchange Marketplace, which will close Feb. 22 and reopen April 2.

    The complete L.A. schedule:

    • June 12 @ 6 p.m.: USA vs Paraguay
    • June 15 @ 6 p.m.: Iran vs New Zealand 
    • June 18 @ Noon: Switzerland vs Italy, Wales, Bosnia-Herzegovina/Northern Ireland Winner
    • June 21 @ Noon: Belgium vs Iran
    • June 25 @ 7 p.m.: Türkiye /Romania/Slovakia/Kosova Winner vs USA 
    • June 28 @ Noon: Round of 32 Match
    • July 2 @ Noon: Round of 32 Match
    • July 10 @ Noon: Quarter-Finals Match 

    On the secondary market: Prices for a single ticket to watch USA vs. Paraguay on June 12 at SoFi Stadium are slightly higher than what’s listed on FIFA’s ticketing portal. As of Wednesday, the lowest price for a single ticket to that game on StubHub is around $1,490, including fees, and $45,000 on the high end.

    Read on… for your essential LAist guide on the 2026 World Cup in Los Angeles here.

  • How new dietary guildelines could impact schools

    Topline:

    In early January, the Department of Health and Human Services and the USDA unveiled new Dietary Guidelines for Americans, along with a new food pyramid. The USDA sets school nutrition standards based on those dietary guidelines. Here's what to know about how the new food pyramid could impact schools.

    More meals from scratch: The new pyramid places an emphasis on protein and encourage Americans to consume full-fat dairy products and limit highly processed foods. Bringing sugar and salt levels down further would likely require that food companies adapt their recipes and that schools prepare more meals from scratch. A recent survey of school nutrition directors by the School Nutrition Association found that most programs would need better equipment and infrastructure as well as more trained staff — and nearly all respondents said they would also need more money.

    Higher costs: At the top of the new food pyramid are animal products such as meat and cheese. The new guidelines prioritize consuming protein as a part of every meal and incorporating healthy fats. A typical school breakfast today might include fruit, milk and a cereal cup or muffin; some schools may serve breakfast burritos or sandwiches. Current standards allow for schools to serve either grains or meats/meat alternates for breakfast. Protein options are costlier than grain options.

    Putting together a school meal isn't easy.

    "It is a puzzle essentially," said Lori Nelson of the Chef Ann Foundation, a nonprofit that promotes scratch cooking in schools.

    "When you think about the guidelines, there's so many different pieces that you have to meet. You have to meet calorie minimums and maximums for the day and for the week. You have to meet vegetable subgroup categories."

    Districts that receive federal funding for school meals — through, for example, the National School Lunch Program — must follow rules set by the Department of Agriculture (USDA).

    And those rules may be changing soon.

    In early January, the Department of Health and Human Services and the USDA unveiled new Dietary Guidelines for Americans, along with a new food pyramid.

    The USDA sets school nutrition standards based on those dietary guidelines, which now place an emphasis on protein and encourage Americans to consume full-fat dairy products and limit highly processed foods.

    Here's what to know about how the new food pyramid could impact schools:

    Cutting back on ready-to-eat school meals won't be easy

    Highly processed and ready-to-eat foods often contain added sugars and salt. Think mac and cheese, pizza, french fries and individually packaged peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.

    These foods are also a big part of many school meals, said Nelson. That's because schools often lack adequate kitchen infrastructure to prepare meals from scratch.

    "Many schools were built 40-plus years ago, and they were built to reheat food. So they weren't built as commercial cooking kitchens," said Nelson.

    Even so, schools have been able to bring sodium and sugar levels down in recent years.

    "They've been working with food companies to find a middle ground, to find recipes that meet [the current] standards and appeal to students and that schools can serve given the equipment that they have," said Diane Pratt-Heavner, a spokesperson for the School Nutrition Association.

    Bringing sugar and salt levels down further would likely require that food companies adapt their recipes and that schools prepare more meals from scratch, Pratt-Heavner said.

    But leaning into scratch cooking won't be easy. A recent survey of school nutrition directors by the School Nutrition Association found that most programs would need better equipment and infrastructure as well as more trained staff — and nearly all respondents said they would also need more money. "You cannot go from serving heavily processed, heat-and-serve items to scratch cooking immediately," said Nelson. "It is a transition."

    Protein-rich school meals will come at a higher cost

    At the top of the new food pyramid are animal products such as meat and cheese. The new guidelines prioritize consuming protein as a part of every meal and incorporating healthy fats.

    "That could cause a change in school breakfast standards," said Pratt-Heavner. "Right now, there's no mandate that breakfasts include a protein."

    A typical school breakfast today might include fruit, milk and a cereal cup or muffin; some schools may serve breakfast burritos or sandwiches.

    She said schools would "absolutely need more funding," should they be required to provide protein under the USDA's School Breakfast Program.

    Current standards allow for schools to serve either grains or meats/meat alternates for breakfast, and Pratt-Heavner said, "Protein options … are more expensive than grain options."

    She said it's unclear whether the USDA would require protein under its own category or whether the agency would consider milk to be sufficient to meet any new protein requirements.

    Whole milk is getting a lot of attention

    Schools that participate in federal school meal programs are required to offer milk with every meal, though students don't have to take it. Up until recently, an Obama-era rule allowed for only low-fat and nonfat milk in schools.

    But the new food pyramid emphasizes whole fat dairy, like whole milk. At the same time, recent federal legislation reversed that Obama-era rule and now allows schools to serve reduced-fat and full-fat milk.

    One more thing to know about milk: Federal law also limits saturated fats in school meals — and whole milk has more of those than low-fat and nonfat varieties. But the recent federal legislation now exempts milk fat from those limits.

    What does all this mean for schools? They're now able to start serving whole milk, and they won't have to worry about whole milk pushing them past the limits on saturated fats.

    It'll be a while before these changes trickle down to schools

    While the USDA sets regulations for schools based on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, it takes time to draft and implement new rules after new guidelines are released.

    "The current school nutrition standards that we're operating under were proposed in February 2023, finalized in April 2024," said Pratt-Heavner. "The first menu changes in school cafeterias were not required until July 2025." Other changes are still rolling out.

    Which is to say: The new dietary guidelines won't bring immediate changes to school cafeterias. They're only the first step in a regulatory process that will take time.

    "We're going to have to see what USDA proposes," said Pratt-Heavner.

    Then, she said, "the public will comment on those regulations, and then final rules will be drafted and issued."

    The USDA then gives schools and school food companies time to update recipes and implement the new nutrition standards.
    Copyright 2026 NPR