The Brief

Orange County Supervisor Andrew Do directed an additional $6.2 million in taxpayer dollars to his 22-year-old daughter’s nonprofit group — nearly doubling the funding previously reported by LAist — according to county records obtained by LAist.

Those records show a total of $13.5 million in county funding that Do is now known to have played a major role awarding to Viet America Society since late 2020 — all without publicly disclosing the relationship.

The newly-discovered grants were awarded by Do to his daughter Rhiannon Do’s nonprofit outside of public meetings. Details of these grants were also not included in public meeting agendas. Do awarded the $6.2 million within roughly the last year when Rhiannon Do was listed at various times as the nonprofit’s president on county records. The records obtained by LAist show the money was paid up front to Viet America Society for future services.

Most of the funds — $5.2 million — were earmarked to feed seniors and people with disabilities, funded by federal coronavirus recovery dollars and county funds. The other newly reported $1 million was to design, build and maintain a Vietnam War memorial at a county park in Fountain Valley.

Do, his daughter and county staff have not provided answers in response to LAist’s repeated questions asking how the $6.2 million has been used by Viet America Society. The group also is long overdue in submitting federally-required audits showing how it spent millions of the taxpayer dollars previously reported by LAist.

“This isn't a story where there's one red flag. This is a story where there are two or three or four red flags,” said Jessica Levinson, a government ethics expert and law professor at Loyola Law School.

“It's everything from the timing of when Do started directing the money to the nonprofit, to the change in leadership of the nonprofit, to perhaps, most disturbingly, the lack of information from the nonprofit about where our tax dollars are being spent,” she added.

O.C. Supervisor Vicente Sarmiento said the millions in additional funding LAist found in county records — and the lack of answers about what happened with it — raises concerns about oversight and whether the money was spent as intended under the grants.

“It also really does, I think, make it difficult for the public to feel confident that public funds are being used well and used appropriately,” Sarmiento said, saying the public rightly expects to know how their tax dollars are spent.

“[It] makes it very difficult for us [and] for the public to come to a conclusion other than there's a reason why things don't want to be shared.”

Previously known funding for the group 

LAist previously reported:

• Supervisor Do allocated a separate $4.2 million in meal contracts to the group — nearly all of which is money that came out of federal coronavirus relief funds. This funding was provided from January 2021 through June 2023.
• Supervisor Do voted for Rhiannon Do’s group to receive up to $3.1 million from county-funded subcontracts for mental health services, during public votes where he did not disclose the family relationship. (The amount paid out so far under these subcontracts is unknown, because the county hasn’t provided county invoice records LAist first requested more than two months ago. This is long past the disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act.)

What we found: Details of the latest findings

The $6.2 million was discovered by LAist last month in county payment records the newsroom requested from the county Auditor-Controller’s Office, which issues payments on behalf of the county. That office — which is run by a person elected independently from the Board of Supervisors — provided financial records far more quickly than other county agencies.

The grant payments were made from December 2022 to October 2023 — a period in which Do’s daughter identified herself various times as the group’s president, including in county-funded subcontracts.

California Secretary of State records show Viet America Society was founded in June 2020 and, according to its first tax filing, started with a focus on promoting Vietnamese culture to youths and “feeding the elderly and poor.” Its focus has since expanded to mental health crisis hotline services and war memorial construction, funded by taxpayer money Do helped direct to the group. The group was entirely government-funded in 2021 and 2022, according to its tax filings.

Andrew Do (left) in a short video about the Vietnam War memorial, with Viet America Society founder Peter Pham (right) and Van Tran (center), Do’s chief of staff of external affairs who is running for Do’s seat in this year’s election. Do is termed out and has endorsed Tran.

(

Screenshot from video posted by Do’s official YouTube account with the County of Orange logo

)

Since LAist published its first article in November 2023 about Do’s funding of his daughter’s group, the Orange County Register’s editorial board has called three times for his resignation in response to the reporting. The paper previously endorsed Do ahead of both of his re-elections as supervisor.

Do has told other news outlets that he did nothing wrong. He and his daughter Rhiannon Do have not responded to multiple interview requests from LAist.

In an op-ed published Dec. 1, Do falsely claimed that LAist’s first article “radically inflated the amount of County contracts” to his daughter’s group.

Behind closed doors

Do’s awarding of the $6.2 million to his daughter’s group was previously unknown to the public because he directed the money outside of public meetings, using a process called “district discretionary” funding.

Under this process, each supervisor gets to direct federal and county dollars meant to help people within their district. Do and other supervisors voted in 2022 and 2023 to authorize distributing the money without a requirement that recipients be publicly named in meeting agendas.

A version of the practice was in place during the first year of the pandemic, when O.C. supervisors created an emergency process where more than $200 million in contracts were approved by county staff without being disclosed to the public on meeting agendas. It was a change from pre-pandemic rules that required public votes on large contracts.

For the $200 million-plus in coronavirus contracts, supervisors received regular updates about who was receiving the money, but the public did not. In February 2021, Do publicly complained about public records requests from the nonprofit newsroom Voice of OC asking who received those funds.

After public outcry, county staff promised to put all future pandemic contracts on public agendas. But a year later, supervisors revived the practice for millions in federal relief dollars they planned to distribute in their districts, this time under the “district discretionary” process.

The funding method is controversial and has been criticized by taxpayer advocates who point out it operates outside of standard transparency practices for allocating public funds.

Supervisors, including Do, have chosen to name some of the other recipients of their district discretionary funds on public agendas. But a search by LAist of meeting agendas since Viet America Society was founded showed no mention of any of the newly-discovered $6.2 million Do awarded his daughter’s group.

Records show the funding is an outlier 

The funding to Do’s daughter’s group is an outlier among $50 million in total federal pandemic relief dollars county supervisors were allowed to distribute in their district under this process.

Out of more than 100 organizations and cities that received this American Rescue Plan Act funding across all five supervisors’ districts, Viet America Society received the second-largest amount — all of it directed by Do — according to a breakdown the county provided LAist.

It was the most funding to any non-governmental organization — topped only by money Supervisor Katrina Foley provided the city of Costa Mesa to build two projects at local parks that the city had planned for years: a new cafe, and an expanded skate park.

Family ties weren’t disclosed

Do did not disclose his family connection, according to a review of public meeting videos, a search of meeting captions, and interviews with three of Do’s four fellow county supervisors.

“It certainly seems to be a lack of sensitivity to the need for public disclosure around areas where there could be an issue of self dealing,” said Tracy Westen, a government ethics expert and past head of the L.A.-based Center for Governmental Studies.

He said Do’s decision to not publicly share his close family connection, while not illegal, can “undermine public confidence in the integrity of government decisions.”

“Anytime there is this appearance of self dealing, there's a need for politicians going over and beyond the strict requirements of the law for disclosure,” Westen said.

In such cases, he said, there’s a strong need for transparency about what happens with government spending.

“The public's entitled to know what happened to their tax dollars in some considerable detail.”

Reaction from other supervisors

Supervisor Don Wagner said he sees nothing wrong with what Supervisor Do did, including not disclosing his family connection, and not requiring that the nonprofit report how many meals were provided.

“It is entirely up to each of us, what sort of reports back we will have or require” for coronavirus discretionary dollars each supervisor distributed in their district, Wagner said.

“I'm not going to second guess any of my colleagues and how they decide they're going to distribute the money,” he added.

As for the nonprofit’s long-overdue audits showing where prior millions went, Wagner said that’s “a fair question.”

“The fact that later they don't comply [with the audit requirements] says, okay, next time we don't give you anything,” he said.

Asked if he was concerned that Do gave Viet America Society an additional $6.2 million after it failed to submit the federally-required audits, Wagner said: “I think that's the question that needs to be asked and answered. And I don't have an answer to that.”

Supervisor Katrina Foley said it’s important for the public to know what happened to these dollars.

“The money is allocated for a specific purpose. We need to make sure it's being used for that purpose,” she said.

“If they can prove that they gave meals to seniors, then the money was used as it was intended. If they can't, that's another story.”

That said, Foley said she trusts county staff put safeguards in place to find out how many meals were actually provided with the newly-discovered grant funding. County staff have not answered LAist’s repeated requests for this information.

Supervisor Doug Chaffee has not responded to multiple interview requests from LAist.

A difference in accountability measures

Grant agreements between the county and Viet America Society reviewed by LAist appear to be missing accountability measures present in grant agreements with different organizations from the same funding source.

For example: grant agreements covering $2.2 million for Viet America to provide meals do not state the number of meals to be provided, do not require a cost per meal and do not require the nonprofit to report back to the county specifying how many meals were provided.

Do did require a minimum number of meals in a similar grant to a different nonprofit.

And when Do gave a much smaller amount — $40,000 — to a consultant to help plan an archway over Bolsa Avenue in Little Saigon, the agreement required the consultant provide two reports last year detailing their work.

Rhiannon Do is law student at UC Irvine 

With this article, LAist has now detailed $13.5 million in direct county funding and subcontracts that Supervisor Do directed to Viet America Society.

The non-profit received most of those dollars since Do’s daughter has been signing on-and-off as the nonprofit’s president. She is first known to have done so in December 2022.

Rhiannon Do is a full-time law student at UC Irvine. Aside from her role at Viet America Society and a now-defunct company closely connected to it, her LinkedIn profile listed only internships as work experience. That profile is no longer available on LinkedIn and appears to have been removed in recent weeks. When it was available in November, Rhiannon Do listed herself as president of Warner Wellness Center since 2021, the name recently used by Viet America Society to conduct business.

After LAist published its first story, her LinkedIn title changed to vice president at Warner Wellness.

Rotating leadership at Viet America 

Records show leadership at Viet America Society has ping-ponged back and forth between Rhiannon Do and its founder Peter Pham, starting around the time Supervisor Do began directing the recently-discovered $6.2 million to the group.

The switching, at times, happened within days.

On Dec. 20, 2022, Pham signed as president of Viet America Society on the first county agreement of the $6.2 million in payments. The following day, he signed again as president on a years-overdue form registering the group for the first time as a nonprofit with regulators at the state Attorney General’s Office.

Records show leadership of the group shifted to Do’s daughter the following day.

On Dec. 22, 2022, as the first county check from the new $6.2 million grant was cashed, Rhiannon Do signed as president of Viet America Society on a county-funded subcontract.

A few days later, on Dec. 28, Pham was back to signing as the group’s president on county paperwork.

“It’s very messy governance, from what we can tell,” said Rose Chan Loui, a longtime attorney for nonprofits who directs UCLA Law School’s program on philanthropy and nonprofits, after reviewing the group’s public tax filings.

“What’s publicly available really shows a lot of neglect or a lack of knowledge of a lot of different nonprofit laws,” she said, such as needing a secretary who’s a different person than the president. That requirement is detailed in a nonprofit legal guide from the state Attorney General’s office, which regulates charities.

Pham initially said in November that he would speak with LAist, but has not responded to multiple requests since then to arrange an interview. He also has not responded to emailed questions, starting in early December, asking what happened with the millions in taxpayer dollars received by Viet America Society.

The switching of who signed as president of Viet America Society continued back and forth between Do’s daughter and Pham last year. In May 2023, Pham signed as president on long-overdue state paperwork to renew the group’s legal status. A month later, Rhiannon Do signed again as president on a mental health subcontract funded by the county. And a few weeks after that, Pham signed in August as president on a county meals contract.

Another government document shows Do’s daughter in a top leadership role.

Viet America’s latest tax filing, for calendar year 2022, lists Rhiannon Do as the group’s vice president and Pham as president. It also lists Rhiannon Do as the only director, a position that is typically held alongside other directors to compose a board of directors that is in charge of a nonprofit group. The filing also says she is one of just two officers and key employees at the group, the other being Pham.

That tax filing, posted online by ProPublica, contradicts Do’s claim in his December op-ed that his daughter “was not a director or officer” at the nonprofit.

LAist has been asking Pham and Rhiannon Do in writing and via phone calls for copies of Viet America Society’s public tax filings since Dec. 4, but no filings have been produced. Federal regulations require disclosure within 30 days of a written request — a mandate that also is noted in the tax filings nonprofits are required to submit.

Law school while leading a group handling millions in taxpayer funds

Viet America’s latest tax filing shows Rhiannon Do working an average of 40 hours per week for the group in 2022.

Rhiannon Do started her first year of law school in August 2022, according to a UC Irvine spokesperson. On LinkedIn, she listed herself a president — later changed to vice president — of Warner Wellness during periods that overlap with the school year. Records show she signed as president of Viet America Society in December 2022 and June 2023 on county-funded subcontracts.

UC Irvine law school’s rules state that no student may work more than 20 hours per week, according to the school’s website. And aside from faculty research assistant roles, first-year students cannot be employed without permission from an assistant dean, the rules state.

Her commitments at the nonprofit continued in 2023. She signed as the group’s president and indicated she was the main point of contact for county-funded subcontracts that ran through the whole year.

Citing student privacy laws, a separate spokesperson for the law school declined to comment on whether Rhiannon Do’s work at the nonprofit complies with the school’s rules, and whether she received permission for it.

What’s next: A vote on ethics reforms

O.C. supervisors are scheduled to vote Tuesday on ethics reforms brought forward in response to LAist’s reporting on Do.

The proposal, from Supervisor Sarmiento, would add adult children and siblings to the types of family connections that supervisors must publicly disclose when voting on contracts and other official actions.

If approved, the reforms also would require more public transparency about the district discretionary funding that Do and other supervisors have used to direct money outside public meetings. Supervisors would have to disclose any known family relationships to funding recipients, and in those cases a public vote by the full board would be required.

Additionally, the reforms would require the county to publicly post a log of approved district discretionary contracts on its website every three months, at the end of each quarter.

California’s conflict-of-interest laws

State law requires officials to disclose and recuse themselves when awarding money to spouses or children who are under 18. But it doesn’t apply after their children become adults.

There was momentum to change that back in 2016. The state Senate and two Assembly committees unanimously approved a bill to expand the conflict definition to the adult children, parents and siblings of officials.

Violations would result in “disqualification from ever holding any office in California in addition to prison time and/or a fine” of up to $1,000, the bill’s author said in a news release at a time.

That ban would have applied only when officials were aware of a conflict.

It never reached a full vote in the Assembly, and did not become law.

Levinson, the Loyola Law School professor, says Supervisor Do’s actions show it’s time to revisit reforms.

“This is why we should expand disclosure when it comes to money going to family members,” Levinson said.

That kind of disclosure, she added, is “also intended to deter corruption or the appearance of corruption.”

Read more from LAist's investigation

At Signature Post in Burbank, Mariella Abaunza, the post-production company’s executive vice president for business development, shows off a photo of her talking to Gov. Gavin Newsom at the recent signing of AB 2319 at the Television Academy in North Hollywood.

Marielle Abaunza holds a photo of her and Gov. Gavin Newsom at the signing ceremony for California's new stand-alone post-production tax credit.

(

Adolfo Guzman-Lopez

/

LAist

)

She was there with the coalition that lobbied for the creation of a new stand-alone tax credit for post-production work done in California.

“It definitely restored my faith in government. ... Advocacy works,” she said.

It was a sizable coalition. Abaunza is president of the California Post Alliance, the post-production industry’s trade group. Leaders of the Motion Picture Association and the Editors Guild were there too.

The post-production tax credit is aimed at stopping the flight of TV and film work to other states and countries, attracted by generous tax incentives.

While there are existing tax credits for filming in California, under the new law, productions qualify for a 35% to 50% tax credit if post-production work such as editing, color correction, scoring and sound mixing is done in California, even if the filming was done outside the state.

But industry advocates acknowledge there’s a weakness in the law: Proponents initially asked lawmakers to set aside $100 million for the post-production tax breaks. By the time Newsom signed the bill into law, that amount had been drastically reduced to $10 million.

“That's going to get used up in a couple days. … It's not hard to allocate $10 million in post-production in California,” said Stephen Weizenecker, an entertainment lawyer based in Atlanta who advises TV and film productions on how to take advantage of tax credits in U.S. states and overseas.

But he said that regardless of the much lower cap, the credits will make California more competitive.

Abaunza hopes it will be a boost for Signature Post. The 6-year-old post-production company, which mixed sound for films and shows like  "Everything Everywhere All at Once," "American Fiction," and "Lessons in Chemistry," has been experiencing a slowdown, like many others.

“We're still ahead of the game, and we still have the largest concentration of post-production talent of anywhere in the world,” Abaunza said of Southern California.

But she said that post-production advantage has been eroded by new facilities and worker talent in the U.K. and Canada, among other countries.

Monica Levinson, executive producer of FX’s "Love Story," "Say Nothing," and many other TV and film projects, points out that those countries have another advantage: a lot more government social services.

She compared that to the U.S. “The one thing that this country has are unions, and it has health insurance, and it has pension plans, and the things that need to be put into the budgets of productions,” she said.

Weizenecker also noted that as much as producers might want to keep production in California or the U.S., they may not be the ones making the decisions about where work is done.

“ If Netflix only gives you so much to spend on the production, including post,” he said, “you're gonna go where it's the most cost-effective.”

Federal game changer

While the California tax credit is a step in the direction of keeping productions in the state, a much bigger tax credit is now making its way through the federal legislative process that may be even more transformative.

It’s called the Motion Picture, Television and Entertainment Revitalization Act and was co-authored by U.S. Sens. Adam Schiff, a Democrat from California, and Tim Scott, a Republican from South Carolina. President Donald Trump has also said he supports it.

If the bipartisan birth and early life of the bill isn’t enough to raise eyebrows, what it promises may be: a 20% federal, labor-based tax credit to U.S. TV and film productions where 75% of the days spent on principal photography happen in this country.

The bill would also favor post-production work and extend benefits to productions in some rural areas and places affected by disasters.

Marielle Abaunza is executive vice president of business development for Signature Post in Burbank.

(

Adolfo Guzman-Lopez

/

LAist

)

“These things could be real game changers to bring back the work here,” Levinson said. She’s the co-chair of the legislative committee for Producers United, a 3-year-old group that advocates for established TV and film producers. That position led her to join the coalition of groups working to get the federal bill passed.

TV and film production and post-production used to be dominated by California, and L.A. County in particular. But Hollywood, as it refers to what you see on the big and small screen, is a national business now.

“Everybody in this country is behind this federal incentive. And therefore, that's why it's become such a bipartisan effort because there's production in every state right now,” Levinson said.

Supporters have not said how much less money would go to public coffers if this federal tax credit passes.

A long-running court battle between California veterans and the Trump administration will continue, as federal officials consider asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a lower court’s order to build more housing for unhoused L.A. veterans.

A federal appeals court on Thursday agreed to temporarily pause the order to construct more than 2,500 new housing units on the Veterans Affairs campus in West L.A.

Mark Rosenbaum, an attorney with Public Counsel representing the plaintiffs, told LAist the delay could spell life or death for unhoused veterans, especially as the region braces for strong El Niño-driven storms.

“These are veterans who risked their lives and suffered both the visible and invisible wounds of war,” Rosenbaum said. “What the government is saying to them is, you're supposed to stay on the street."

VA officials did not immediately respond to LAist’s request for comment.

Veterans' lawyers in a court filing called a possible appeal to the Supreme Court a “hopeless shot.”

“The government has lost every time they have taken this to court. No court has ruled for them on any of these matters,” Rosenbaum told LAist. “This is part of the administration’s war on its own veterans, and it’s time for that war to come to an end.”

Could long-running case end up at the Supreme Court?

The litigation was initiated in 2023 by L.A. veterans struggling with homelessness. The case has centered on the 400-acre V.A. campus, which U.S. District Judge David O. Carter has ruled should offer more housing to the approximately 2,250 veterans experiencing homelessness in L.A. County.

In 2024, Carter ordered officials to add thousands of temporary and permanent homes, and end leases with UCLA, a private K-12 school and an oil drilling company, which he said did not serve the needs of veterans.

An appeals court last month blocked the federal government’s efforts to halt the housing construction. But veteran advocates knew that federal officials could ask for further delays as the case winds through the courts.

VA officials now have until Dec. 10 to decide whether to appeal their fight to the Supreme Court. Judges with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals told lawyers for the federal government that if they do not decide to appeal by Dec. 10, “the stay will be lifted immediately.”

The Los Angeles Unified School District shortened the application window for specialized academic programs this year, and will no longer accept paper forms.

Applications for the district’s magnet, dual language and affiliated charter schools for the next academic year opened Oct. 1 and are due Nov. 6, 2026.

How does it work?

If you want your child to attend their neighborhood school, enrollment is fairly straightforward. There’s a separate process for the district’s specialized programs called Choices.

There are two windows to apply — on-time and late. The latter consists of all the spaces left after families who applied on time accept their offers.

Here’s the timeline for the 2027-28 school year:

• Sept. 2026: School fairs start.
• Oct. 1, 2026: Choices application opens.
• Nov. 6, 2026:  Deadline to apply online.
• Dec. 1, 2026:  Late applications begin. 
• February 2027: On-time applicant results sent. 
• March 5, 2027: Deadline to accept or decline school offers for on-time applicants. School assignments for late applications follow the processing of on-time applications. Students may be offered a spot through the start of the spring semester. 
• Aug. 12, 2027: The school year begins.

LAUSD will no longer accept paper Choices applications. If families do not have a computer, they can use a smartphone to complete an application. LAUSD will also allow families to use computers at school parent centers.

How to prepare

Every child within LAUSD boundaries is assigned a school — find yours through the district’s “resident school identifier.”

But there are also hundreds of other programs available through the Choices process.

Those include:

• Magnets: Programs on a specific theme, such as science, math, language, advanced studies or art. These programs were originally established to integrate segregated schools and have a unique “points” system to prioritize applications. 
• Dual language or immersion: Students learn in English and in a second language such as Spanish, Mandarin, Korean or Armenian. 
• Affiliated charter schools: District-run schools with more freedom to try different types of teaching or other programs. 

No one type of school is inherently better than another, and no one metric defines a great school — there are many factors beyond test scores to consider, and we go over some of those here.

By far the most frequent piece of advice we’ve heard is to go on an in-person school tour if possible.

“The very best thing that people can do is go to the school and try to watch the way that educators interact with students, the way that students interact with each other, and the way that families are included or not in the life of a school,” said Jack Schneider, a University of Massachusetts, Amherst, education researcher and parent. “Once you do that, you really get a sense of what kind of place kids are going to school.”

Some schools post tour information online, but you may need to call for details.

LAUSD also hosts fairs, organized by geographic region, where multiple schools table and share information about their programs, through mid-October.

The Justice Department found Thursday that the law school at the University of California, Los Angeles, illegally considered race in admissions.

The announcement follows a similar finding against the university’s medical school and comes as President Donald Trump’s administration ramps up scrutiny of colleges’ processes for selecting students. The administration also has accused the UC Berkeley Law School and the medical school at the University of California, San Diego, of illegally discriminating against white and Asian applicants.

The UCLA School of Law said in a statement that it was committed to making admissions decisions in compliance with all applicable laws.

“Students are admitted through a comprehensive, merit-based review process that considers each applicant’s achievements and experiences,” the statement said. “We are confident in our process.”

Affirmative action in college admissions has been illegal since a 2023 Supreme Court ruling forbade it. The same ruling said colleges could continue to assess how applicants’ backgrounds might speak to broader characteristics, but Trump has accused colleges of using applicants’ personal statements and other proxies to consider race in admissions — which conservatives view as illegal discrimination.

The Justice Department’s investigation found UCLA’s law school discriminated against white and Asian American students by favoring Black and Hispanic applicants in its 2023, 2024 and 2025 incoming classes. Its analysis found the mean LSAT score was lower for admitted Black applicants than for admitted white applicants.

The department also said admissions staff at the law school instructed applicants during recruitment efforts, including one called the “Diversity Admissions Open House,” how to reveal their race in essays.

“Like many of its peer institutions, UCLA Law School runs a two-tiered admissions system whose academic bar for acceptance shifts up or down depending on the color of your skin,” said Harmeet Dhillon, head of the department’s Civil Rights Division, in a news release.

California voters ended affirmative action in college admissions in a 1997 ballot measure. In a brief filed in the Supreme Court case, the UC system said the change led to a precipitous drop in underrepresented minorities, especially at the system’s most selective campuses. The brief said UC went on to implement a range of race-neutral measures to increase diversity.

The Trump administration also has sued over the main UCLA campus’s response to allegations of antisemitic harassment. The administration’s latest finding sets the stage for a voluntary resolution to bring UCLA into compliance with the Justice Department’s legal interpretation or, if none can be reached, potential legal action.

___

The Associated Press’ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.