Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Podcast revisits City Hall tape scandal
    a handwritten sign is resting behind a microphone on a lectern in the city council chamber. It reads: Your policy is racist not just your leaked audio.
    Veronica Sance participated in a rally outside City Hall to denounce racism and demand change.

    Topline:

    The new season of the LAist Studios podcast Imperfect Paradise debuts today with Nury & The Secret Tapes, the story of how a secretly recorded conversation, leaked to journalists online, exploded into the largest political scandal in recent Los Angeles history and exposed deep-seated issues over race and politics.

    About Episode 1 — The Scandal: Cereijido takes us behind the scenes of the L.A. City Council tape scandal. She speaks with the people who were most affected by the tapes, including former L.A. City Councilmember Mike Bonin.

    Why you should listen: The tapes exposed problems that have long plagued L.A. politics. A year after the scandal, issues persist over anti-Black racism and colorism within the Latino/Latinx community, Democratic Party divisions, and the struggle to define Latino political power. The four-part podcast includes an exclusive interview with former L.A. City Council president Nury Martinez, who resigned in disgrace after she was heard making racist and derogatory remarks.

    The new season of the LAist Studios podcast Imperfect Paradise debuts Wednesday with Nury & The Secret Tapes, the story of how a secretly recorded conversation, leaked to journalists online, exploded into the largest political scandal in recent Los Angeles history and exposed deep-seated issues over race and politics.

    The four-part podcast includes an exclusive interview with former L.A. City Council president Nury Martinez, who resigned in disgrace after she was heard making racist and derogatory remarks. “I've thought about that particular day, God, a thousand times, if not more,” Martinez told host Antonia Cereijido.

    About Episode 1 — The Scandal

    Cereijido takes us behind the scenes of the L.A. City Council tape scandal. She speaks with the people who were most affected by the tapes, including former L.A. City Councilmember Mike Bonin.

    He recounts how he first heard about the recording in which four prominent Latino leaders use racist and demeaning terms to describe his son, who was then a toddler. “That's kind of when I lost it,” he said. “I was livid that she talked about beating him down.”

    Why you should listen

    The tapes exposed problems that have long plagued L.A. politics. A year after the scandal, issues persist over anti-Black racism and colorism within the Latino/Latinx community, Democratic Party divisions, and the struggle to define Latino political power.

    The scandal was international

    The tapes include Martinez making derogatory comments about Indigenous people from the Mexican state of Oaxaca.  “It shows why we've always known as Indigenous people,” said Odilia Romero, the co-founder and executive director at CIELO, an organization that advocates for Indigenous people's human rights, “that the other Mexicans have always discriminated against us.”

    How do I find the podcast?

    It's now available from LAist Studios. Check it out wherever you get your get podcasts and subscribe to Imperfect Paradise. Or listen to the this episode here:

    Listen 40:45
    We take you behind the scenes of the L.A. City Council tape scandal, a year later.
    We take you behind the scenes of the L.A. City Council tape scandal, a year later.

    Read Cereijido's essay

    Cereijido reflects on her motivation for hosting Nury & The Secret Tapes.

    How To LA covers the making of the podcast

    Our How To LA podcast talked to Cereijido about the making of this season of Imperfect Paradise .

    How To LA logo (graphical text) with LAist Studios logo (graphical text) with 6th street bridge in the background; with red to orange vertical gradient as background color
    Listen 15:56
    Our colleagues on the 'Imperfect Paradise' podcast team, including host Antonia Cereijido, challenged Martinez to account for the racist, hurtful things she said in that conversation. In today's episode 'How To LA,' Antonia talks with Brian about the making of the podcast.
    The Making Of The 'Nury And The Secret Tapes' Podcast
    Our colleagues on the 'Imperfect Paradise' podcast team, including host Antonia Cereijido, challenged Martinez to account for the racist, hurtful things she said in that conversation. In today's episode 'How To LA,' Antonia talks with Brian about the making of the podcast.

  • Trump administration threatens to gut standards
    Small children stand in a line in a classroom in front of cabinets with folders and papers.
    Policies including low student-to-teacher ratios and minimum teacher qualifications could be on the chopping block under the Trump administration's proposals for the Head Start program. Here, preschoolers at a Head Start center in Emeryville, California, in 2024.

    Topline:

    The Trump administration appears poised to gut the central policies that shape Head Start, a popular and long-established early childhood education program that serves the country’s neediest children, including thousands in California.

    Why now: The federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs posted a notice that it intends to “significantly reduce regulatory requirements” for Head Start, effectively stripping the program of the unique features that have defined it since its creation in the mid 1960s. The announcement came in late May and will likely go through a review process before becoming official in 2027.

    The backstory: So far, Head Start has evaded major budget cuts, and the federal government doesn’t appear poised to slash funding now. A handful of California Head Start programs shuttered during the government shutdown last fall, but reopened when legislators returned to work.

    Read on ... for more on what this means for kids in California.

    This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

    The Trump administration appears poised to gut the central policies that shape Head Start, a popular and long-established early childhood education program that serves the country’s neediest children, including thousands in California.

    The federal Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs posted a notice that it intends to “significantly reduce regulatory requirements” for Head Start, effectively stripping the program of the unique features that have defined it since its creation in the mid 1960s.

    The announcement came in late May and will likely go through a review process before becoming official in 2027.

    The agency doesn’t specify what exactly it plans to cut, but reports indicate that it could be most of the program’s standards and guidelines. That may include low student-to-teacher ratios, minimum teacher qualifications, and stipulations that Head Start accept all income-eligible children regardless of whether they’re disabled or if their parents are citizens.

    The agency also suggested it wants to shift Head Start funding to the states, although it didn’t specify how or when this would happen.

    “The complete gutting of these goals ignores what we know really works in early childhood education,” said Deborah Stipek, a former dean of the Stanford School of Education who’s researched the topic. “If you’re going to spend money on something, wouldn’t you want it to have positive effects?”

    The agency said in its announcement it expects the cuts to be “well-received by Head Start programs, since they will welcome reduced (administrative) burden and increased flexibility.”

    It also said it would allow local Head Start programs to keep policies that “best address the needs of their communities.” But individual Head Start programs are unlikely to comply with standards that aren’t required, particularly if they’re facing pressure to serve more students, said Melanee Cottrill, executive director of Head Start California, a nonprofit that advocates for California’s 1,813 Head Start centers.

    In the same announcement, the agency said it also planned to boost the nutrition and physical exercise components of Head Start, but didn’t offer further details.

    ‘It will be very different’

    So far, Head Start has evaded major budget cuts, and the federal government doesn’t appear poised to slash funding now. A handful of California Head Start programs shuttered during the government shutdown last fall, but reopened when legislators returned to work.

    But a reduction in standards would, eventually, have a significant impact, Cottrill said. It’s likely Head Start will have less qualified teachers, larger class sizes and fewer opportunities for parent involvement, she said.

    “Those standards are what make Head Start a high quality program,” Cottrill said. “Head Start will still exist, but it will be very different from what it is today.”

    Head Start, launched in 1965 as part of President Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty, is a federal childcare program that serves the country’s lowest-income families – those earning less than $33,000 a year for a family of four. The federal government issues grants directly to school districts, nonprofits or other organizations that run Head Start programs, sometimes in combination with other funding sources.

    Head Start offers health screenings, meals, curriculum focused on literacy and math, and resources for parents such as parenting classes. Children who attend Head Start are more likely to go to college and hold professional jobs later in life, a 2022 study found.

    In California, about 70,000 children are enrolled in Head Start. The number would be higher but programs have had to turn away families because they struggled to hire staff. Early childhood educators sometimes earn less than fast food workers and turnover is high, Cottrill noted.

    Cost of losing disability screening

    One Head Start standard that could be especially costly to eliminate is disability screening. Identifying and addressing disabilities such as dyslexia early can reduce the need for special education later on, potentially saving thousands of dollars, Stipek said.

    Beth Meloy, an early childhood education consultant who worked on the federal government’s Head Start standards, said that simplifying and streamlining the standards is probably a good idea. Navigating too many standards may be overly burdensome for some local Head Start programs, she said.

    But gutting them entirely would be a disaster, she said.

    “Head Start is built around a mission of giving low-income children a path to sustained education and life outcomes,” Meloy said. “These changes lack the thoughtfulness that these children deserve.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Sponsored message
  • A look at the biggest spenders so far
    A Black woman in a pink jacket and shirt (left) speaks behind a microphone and podium that says "Karen Bass" and "Decision 2026," as another woman wearing pink looks at her in front of a podium that says "Nithya Raman" and "Decision 2026."
    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass (left) and Councilmember Nithya Raman (right) at a mayoral debate in May 2026.

    Topline:

    New campaign finance data shows who’s bankrolling the closely-watched race for Los Angeles mayor — and most of the money is backing Mayor Karen Bass. Money supporting Bass — whether in direct donations, public matching funds or outside spending — has outpaced money backing City Councilmember Nithya Raman by about 3 to 1.

    Biggest spender: According to city data, the largest spender so far in the mayor’s race is the LAPD officers’ union, which reported spending $1.2 million on ads against Raman — who made the runoff — and progressive community organizer Rae Huang, who didn’t.

    Who’s next: The second-biggest is Airbnb, which reported giving $750,000 to a committee backing Bass. This year, Bass advanced a proposal backed by the company to relax city regulations by letting Airbnb hosts rent out second homes and investment properties through 2028.

    Who else: Another large spender is Douglas Emmett, which is a large property investment company. It gave $525,000 to the police union’s main spending committee, of which at least $225,000 was disclosed on anti-Raman ads by the committee. In recent years, the company is known for attempting the largest eviction from rent-controlled housing in Los Angeles in at least four decades, citing a need to upgrade fire sprinklers. The city declined to legally intervene on behalf of the renters, who ended up suing and winning a 2024 court ruling that found the evictions were illegal.

    The candidates’ money: Among money raised directly by candidates (and subject to the $1,800 per donor limit), donors who gave $1,000 or more accounted for 47% of Bass’ donors and 18% of Raman’s.

    Listen 0:24
    LISTEN: Who are the biggest spenders so far in the L.A. mayor’s race?

    New campaign finance data shows who’s bankrolling the closely-watched race for Los Angeles mayor — and most of the money is backing Mayor Karen Bass.

    Money supporting Bass — whether in direct donations, public matching funds or outside spending — has outpaced money backing City Councilmember Nithya Raman by about 3 to 1.

    The disparities in the mayor’s race are much starker among groups that handle the largest donations because they’re not subject to contribution limits. Those money flows from independent expenditure committees have backed Bass 36-to-1, compared to Raman.

    Among money raised directly by candidates, donors who gave $1,000 or more account for 47% of Bass’ donors and 18% of Raman’s. Those donors are subject to an $1,800 per donor limit.

    A look at the top spenders

    The largest spender so far is the LAPD officers’ union, which reported spending $1.2 million on ads against Raman — who made the runoff — and progressive community organizer Rae Huang, who didn’t. The data covers what’s been reported so far for the 2026 election cycle, including the lead up to the June primary.

    The second-biggest is Airbnb, which reported giving $750,000 to a committee backing Bass. This year, Bass advanced a proposal backed by the company to relax city regulations by letting Airbnb hosts rent out second homes and investment properties through 2028.

    Another large spender is Douglas Emmett, which is a large property investment company. It gave $525,000 to the police union’s main spending committee, of which at least $225,000 was disclosed on anti-Raman ads by the committee.

    In recent years, the company is known for attempting the largest eviction from rent-controlled housing in Los Angeles in at least four decades, citing a need to upgrade fire sprinklers. The city declined to legally intervene on behalf of the renters, who ended up suing and winning a 2024 court ruling that found the evictions were illegal.

    Significant spending for Bass has also comes from several other large unions for workers, including about $200,000 from Laborers’ Local 300 — which represents workers in construction and maintenance — and $180,000 from affiliates of SEIU, which represents most of the city government’s staff.

    The latest spending numbers come from city data based on disclosures required by state law to be filed by the spending committees. Friday was the deadline to submit a more complete set of filings showing all raising and spending in the first half of this year.

    Bass had a head start for years, entering this year with a hefty $1.5 million in her re-election account. Raman started fundraising in February.

    Other big spenders

    • $100,000 to a pro-Bass committee from the construction workers’ group State Building and Construction Trades Council of California.
    • $50,000 to a pro-Bass committee from Kaiser Permanente CEO Gregory Adams.
    • $50,000 to a pro-Raman committee from Arts District redeveloper Yuval Bar-Zemer.  
    • $25,000 to a pro-Bass committee from the real estate company of Frank McCourt.  McCourt co-owns the parking lots around Dodger Stadium and has been seeking approvals from the L.A. Metro board — which Bass serves on and now chairs — for a controversial gondola project.

    Records show unions spent big against candidate and former reality TV star Spencer Pratt, who did not make the runoff. The umbrella group for unions in the region — the L.A. County Federation of Labor — reported spending about $500,000 against Pratt, paid by a committee largely funded by the union for L.A. County sheriff’s deputies.

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is ngerda.47.

    Pratt was supported by about $329,000 in spending by the Save L.A. committee. The committee was funded largely by four executives: John Hering, the San Francisco-based founder of cybersecurity company Lookout.; Jason Larian, the L.A.-based president of Zero Point Capital; Redwood City-based David Dollinger of Silicon Valley landlord company Dollinger Properties; and Phillip Sarofim, the L.A.-based founder of the investment firm Trousdale Ventures.

    How the biggest donations flow

    Direct giving to the candidates’ campaigns is legally restricted to $1,800 per donor each election cycle. So the biggest donors instead spend through “independent expenditure” committees, or “IEs.” State law allows individual donors to spend unlimited amounts on elections through IEs, as long as it’s not coordinated with the candidates’ campaigns.

    That IE money often flows through multiple committees — many of which combine money meant for candidates in multiple different races — on its way to election ads, which can make the money hard for the public to easily track.

    The general election will take place Nov. 3, with ballots mailed to registered voters about a month ahead of time.

  • Oyster deals, Shakespearean robots and more
    A group of four medium-skinned woman in brightly colored dance dresses with flowers in their hair.
    RiverFest happens this Sunday at L.A. State Historic Park.

    In this edition:

    RiverFest, Shakespearean robots, National Oyster Day and more of the best things to do around L.A. and Southern California this weekend and beyond.

    Highlights:

    • Shakespeare in the Park … but make it robots? Welcome the most gentlemanly robot overlords into your theater life this summer as The Actors’ Gang does their (50-minute! You can handle this!) take on the Bard’s Two Gentlemen of Verona in Two Gentlebots of Verona.
    • Friends of the LA River host their 5th annual LA RiverFest, full of arts (including an environmental art gallery), entertainment, family-friendly “eco-activities” and more at the L.A. Historic Park. Plus, there will be plenty of treats from local food trucks. You can even sign up to volunteer here.
    • National Oyster Day may only be one day (it’s today, August 5), but the Evangeline Swamp Room downtown is making it last all month. Every Wednesday in August from 5 to 9 p.m., the New Orleans-themed hot spot will be offering their signature Charbroiled Oysters for $25 per dozen (usually $25 per half-dozen).

    At the Hollywood Bowl last week, I had the pleasure of sitting next to Jose Rizo, longtime afternoon host at our local jazz station, KJZZ. Jose is a walking history lesson in the California jazz scene and beyond. The encounter inspired a rewatch of La La Land and reminded me about the excellent jazz clubs — like Sam First by LAX — that we have at our fingertips. Plus, it’s extra fitting because this week kicks off the first-ever L.A. Jazz Festival, which is bringing a slew of mostly free concerts to venues across the area.

    If you’re not a jazz person (and like Sebastian says, if you hate jazz, you just don’t have context), check out Licorice Pizza’s picks for some rock ‘n' roll.

    Music

    A medium-dark-skinned woman in a yellow suit holds a microphone onstage.
    Patti LaBelle will be at the Pacific Amphitheatre this week.
    (
    Erika Goldring
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Wednesday

    Thursday

    Friday

    Saturday:

    Sunday:

    Monday:

    Tuesday:

    Events

    10 Years LA!

    Through Saturday, Aug. 15; Summer Party event Thursday, Aug. 6, 6 p.m. to 10 p.m.
    Sprüth Magers
    5900 and 6145 Wilshire Blvd., Miracle Mile
    COST: FREE; MORE INFO

    A black-and-white film still of a person in a jumpsuit, helmet and sunglasses. Text reads Spruth Magers x Wilshire Online Sizzler Summer Party.
    (
    Spruth Magers
    /
    Sutton Comms
    )

    Catch the expansive group show at Sprüth Magers (and the former Sizzler down the street) before it’s gone. The exhibit includes the gallery’s artists from the past decade who have represented Los Angeles in a variety of forms, from Jenny Holzer’s electronic messages to Barbara Kruger’s room-sized wall installations to L.A.-based artists like Sterling Ruby and Analia Saban. Thursday’s event at the Sizzler space includes 22 video works from the late 1960s to the present, plus there will be hot dogs by Tail O’ the Pup; music by Wormwood Star, Mo0d and Yacht; and a cash bar.


    Two Gentlebots of Verona

    Through Saturday, Aug. 15 
    Media Park
    9091 Culver Blvd., Culver City 
    COST: FREE; MORE INFO 

    An illustrated robot on a blue, yellow and red background. Text reads Two Gentlebots of Verona.
    (
    Courtesy Culver City
    )

    Shakespeare in the Park … but make it robots? Welcome the most gentlemanly robot overlords into your theater life this summer as The Actors’ Gang does their (50-minute! You can handle this!) take on the Bard’s Two Gentlemen of Verona in Two Gentlebots of Verona. The action takes us to fair Culver City, where the bots’ friendship is tested over their love for Silvia Dot Matrix. Order your Coco to the park (or maybe not, the organizers may get mad at me for that one!) and see what happens.


    LA RiverFest

    Sunday, Aug. 9, 2:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. 
    L.A. State Historic Park
    1245 N. Spring St., Downtown L.A. 
    COST: FREE; MORE INFO

    A medium-dark-skinned man in a white t-shirt and a medium-light-skinned woman in a black hat write on small pads.
    (
    Courtesy dubroWORKS
    )

    Friends of the LA River host their 5th annual LA RiverFest, full of arts (including an environmental art gallery), entertainment, family-friendy “eco-activities” and more at the L.A. Historic Park. Plus, there will plenty of treats from local food trucks. You can even sign up to volunteer here.


    World Taste of the Anaheim Packing District

    Tuesday, August 11, 5 p.m to 9 p.m. 
    440 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim
    COST: $33.85; MORE INFO

    A balloon-style graphic that says Anaheim Packing District's World Taste Connecting People Through Food.
    (
    Courtesy Anaheim Packing District
    )

    The annual World Taste of the Anaheim Packing District coincides with the big Disney fan fest D23 this year, so they are making all the events D23-themed. Disney fans and fanatics of all ages will enjoy Disney-themed trivia and giveaways, plus you can punch your World Taste passport for all different bites at the wide range of restaurants along the way. LAist readers get 15% off using the direct link here.


    Iceage

    Thursday and Friday, Aug. 6 and 7
    The Masonic Lodge at Hollywood Forever
    5970 Santa Monica Blvd., Hollywood
    COST: $37.75; MORE INFO

    Five light-skinned men stand in a row.
    (
    Courtesy Pitch Perfect PR
    )

    Danish post-punk outfit Iceage returns to Los Angeles for a two-night residency at the Masonic Lodge in support of their new album, For Love of Grace & the Hereafter — one of the most critically acclaimed releases yet as part of the band's ascent. Their sound is hard to pin down, but there's an instant familiarity to each listen, paired with wry lyrics that feel sharply attuned to the moment — songs like "The Weak," "No Fear," and "Tender Blades" among them channel everything from Beggars Banquet-era Rolling Stones to Bends-era Radiohead, with a heavy dose of sardonic wit throughout, just enough to feel something. – Gab Chabrán


    Blueprints of Nature: A Cyanotype Sunprint, Tea Blending & Sound Journey

    Sunday, Aug. 9, 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. 
    1451 Carroll Ave., Echo Park
    COST: $80, sliding scale available; MORE INFO

    A blue and white image with an image of a leaf and two flowers, and text that reads Cyanotype August 9 11am-1pm Sunday.
    (
    Courtesy Granada Events
    )

    I remember making cyanotypes as a kid (I think we knew them better as sun prints back then), and in the past couple of years I’ve seen them making a resurgence both as craft — like this fun workshop in Echo Park — and even in fancy art galleries. Get your inner artist inspired by learning how to make your own cyanotypes alongside a relaxing tea blending and sound experience.


    Yoko Only 

    Saturday, Aug. 8, 7:30 p.m. to 11 p.m. 
    The Broad 
    221 S. Grand Ave., Downtown L.A. 
    COST: SOLD OUT; MORE INFO

    A white poster featuring a woman in black and white leaning against a wall wearing large sunglasses. Text reads Yoko Only The Music of Yoko Ono.
    (
    The Broad
    /
    Motormouth Media
    )

    Artists from Rufus Wainwright to Sleater-Kinney to Silvan Esso will gather to give Yoko Ono her (long past!) due at this super-group tribute concert curated by Yuka Honda celebrating Ono’s solo show at The Broad. The show is sold out, but keep an eye out for last-minute availability. The exhibit is on through October and is well worth checking out!


    National Oyster Day deal 

    Wednesdays in August
    Evangeline Swamp Room
    701 N. Spring St., Downtown L.A. 
    COST: $25 per dozen; MORE INFO 

    Oysters on a tray with charred lemons.
    (
    Christy Linder
    )

    National Oyster Day may only be one day (it’s today, August 5), but the Evangeline Swamp Room downtown is making it last all month. Every Wednesday in August from 5 to 9 p.m., the New Orleans-themed hot spot will be offering its signature Charbroiled Oysters for $25 per dozen (usually $25 per half-dozen). They’re charbroiled in a beer and butter sauce, topped with white cheese, breadcrumbs, Cajun spices, onion, bacon bits and served with lemon. Wash them down with an Abita beer or a classic New Orleans cocktail for a perfect summer dinner.

  • New court filings by feds, detainees are at odds
    A blurred sign in the foreground reads: "Shut down Adelanto" wit a building with flags on poles and a white van at a chainlink fence is in the background.
    Protests at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center have been a regular sight since the Trump Administration began filling the detention facility again last year.

    Topline:

    New filings from lawyers representing people detained at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center say federal officials have not been complying with a July 16 court order to improve conditions at the facility.

    Why now: The new filings are responding to a plan filed last week by federal officials who'd been ordered by a U.S. District Court judge to make immediate improvements to the privately ruin facility and make a long-term plan for changes.

    Where things stand: Federal officials say they're already meeting orders to immediately improve medical care, water and food. Attorneys for those detained say inhumane conditions remain the norm.

    Keep reading... for details on the diverging narratives and what's next.

    Recent court filings paint two contradictory pictures about what is happening behind closed doors at the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, the privately run immigration detention center 90 miles northeast of downtown Los Angeles.

    On the one hand, federal officials argue conditions at Adelanto already meet the standards set by U.S. District Court Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. Sykes ordered the government to make immediate improvements at the detention facility on July 16.

    And, in any case, they’ve asked the judge to hold off on enforcing her order while they appeal.

    Lawyers representing the plaintiffs — people detained at the facility — instead describe routine violations of the court order still taking place today. They argue delaying enforcement will prolong violations of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees due process and fair treatment before the law.

    How we got here

    The case was filed in January by lawyers representing people detained at Adelanto after two people died at the facility — two more people have died since then.

    Here are some key allegations in the lawsuit:

    • Problems with access to medical care and disability accommodations
    • Contaminated water
    • Water unavailable 24/7
    • Food that doesn't meet dietary requirements

    Sykes found enough evidence to support these claims to require immediate action. That’s where the preliminary injunction comes in.

    And that did two things: It ordered some changes to be made right away, like 24-hour access to clean water and healthy food. Then it asked the government to prepare a plan for long term improvements. That’s the plan filed by federal officials late Thursday, July 30, which was short on details and also claimed many of the alleged complaints were invalid.

    A July 31 filing by plaintiffs’ attorneys fundamentally disagreed, saying “conditions at Adelanto are not a matter of dispute; they are documented by extensive expert testimony, declarations from detained individuals, and the Government’s own admissions.”

    The filing calls the government’s request for a stay a delaying tactic, one that would keep in place “conditions this Court found likely unconstitutional, and in which four people have died.”

    Sophia Wrench, an attorney for the plaintiffs with Public Counsel, said the government’s request is full of contradictions.

    “This request to hold off on enforcing this injunction represents a pattern of behavior on the part of the government to continually delay implementing court orders,” Wrench said. “They are simultaneously arguing that they’re already doing everything that the court order is asking them to do, but also saying that it would irreparably injure them to continue to implement the order. So meanwhile, the 1,800 plus people at Adelanto still don’t have clean water consistently, still don’t have clean facilities, and still experience mold that has not been remediated.”

    Asked for comment about the plaintiff’s most recent filing, The GEO Group Inc., the private company contracted to run Adelanto under a $400 million annual contract through 2029, referred LAist to ICE.

    The Department of Homeland Security has not yet responded to a request to comment for this story, but in a previous, unsigned statement, the agency said reports of substandard conditions at Adelanto are false.

    Alleged worms in the water

    One central area of dispute is over water, both access and quality.

    Federal officials say both are adequate. In a declaration filed to the court on July 30, Ryan Smith, an ICE assistant field office director, said conditions outlined in the July 16 court injunction are being met.

    Smith’s declaration said the facility already provides clean drinking water 24 hours a day, with access to drinking fountains supplied by the same municipal water company that supplies the town of Adelanto.

    Shortly after Smith’s declaration was filed, L.A. Taco reported a man held at Adelanto, Carlitos Ricardo Parias, said he discovered black worms in the drinking water there. An attorney representing Parias said Parias got the water from coolers provided by the facility, and shared the video showing the worms with LAist.

    Other people detained at Adelanto complained about the water in new court filings. A declaration filed by Wrench, of Public Counsel, includes reports from four men held inside the facility who all report “significant delays” accessing clean drinking water since the court order.

    Water is available from a sink inside the cells and in Igloo jugs, according to the declaration, which also notes those detained said it’s only been since the lawsuit was filed in January that GEO guards instructed them to drink from the sink.

    The declaration says that even the water in the jugs “appears to be stale and dirty, with visible black sediment in the water.”

    Guards occasionally take the water dispensers away, one plaintiff reported, leading the men in his unit to chant “Agua! Agua! Agua!”

    One plaintiff said the men in his unit do not have clean drinking water for four hours at a time nearly every day. He said on July 22, nearly a week after the order, around 25 people in the unit filed a collective grievance and were told by a guard that they could drink water from the sink instead.

    While it’s true that the Adelanto Water Department provides water to the facility, Wrench said that doesn’t explain away issues with water cleanliness.

    “The city of Adelanto serves water to the entire city of Adelanto. So they are responsible to that point, but once the water is in the detention center, Adelanto is responsible for the storage of the water, the quality of the pipes, the overlay with the sewer system,” Wrench said. “We’re getting things like people saying the water smells, alternatively, like bleach or smells like water, we’re seeing that the water is dark colored. That’s what we’re hearing from folks inside. That doesn’t align with what GEO Group and ICE are telling us.”

    How to reach me

    If you have a tip, you can reach me on Signal. My username is Jbennett.18.

    Alleged defiance of the order and ongoing staffing issues

    The plaintiffs also report in the court declarations that ICE has failed to improve access to healthy food, medical care or exercise in the yard.

    According to the declaration, people detained at Adelanto report The GEO Group employees telling them they either have not heard of the order, or that ICE has told them not to make any changes until the appeal is finalized.

    One example in the declaration: A detained man who raised the court order with a GEO officer, a captain, reported she told him that she had not seen the order and said that the facility was short-staffed. The next day, the man said that the captain called him into her office to explain that, since the order was being appealed, it would not be enforced.

    “She explained that once ICE told them to enforce the [preliminary injunction], they would do so immediately, but that ICE had not told them to enforce it,” according to the declaration.

    In their application to delay implementing the July 16 order, lawyers for the federal government explain that there are approximately 52 ICE employees on-site, along with 350 security and operations staff and 100 medical staff employed by GEO Group. There are currently about 1,800 people being held at Adelanto.

    Wrench told LAist that staffing appears to be a major issue at Adelanto.

    “We are hearing that guards have to work 16, 18 hour shifts, and so they’re burning out quickly, either getting fired or leaving, quitting their jobs,” Wrench said. “Almost every time I go to Adelanto, I’m hearing new people being trained on the job when I’m speaking to different staff. That means they don’t have enough guards to clean, they don’t have enough guards to supervise people in their outdoor time, and so that means they have to cut corners.”

    Who is responsible for Adelanto?

    In court filings, the federal government has argued that the government cannot address the issues in the court order, because the Adelanto facility is run by GEO, its contractor.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs dispute this reasoning, what the recent court filings call the “defendant’s central gambit.” They claim Sykes was briefed on this argument and rejected it in issuing the order for relief. According to plaintiffs’ filings, ICE has the contractual authority to require GEO’s compliance with any conditions the court orders. “ICE need not physically operate the mop to ensure the floors are clean, it need only exercise the contract provisions that already require GEO to do so,” a filing from July 31 states.

    “It’s quite frankly ridiculous that they continue to argue that because GEO is not a direct party to the case, that they don’t have levers of control over GEO to be implementing this order,” Wrench told LAist. “They have a contract with GEO Group to be doing the day-to-day operations for this facility. There is a constitutional duty that the government has whenever they are detaining someone.”

    In the latest earnings call, GEO’s CEO and founder George Zoley, who immigrated to the U.S. from Greece in 1953, said the federal government was looking to take direct ownership of immigration detention centers.

    “As some blue states are considering more active involvement in oversight of facilities, I think the logical solution to much of that is federal ownership of the facilities,” Zoley said. “They are federal facilities to begin with, in my opinion.”