The Brief

Los Angeles is facing a possible budget gap of up to $400 million, which could prompt city leaders to cut vacant jobs in departments already trying to plug staffing holes.

The City Administrative Officer's report found overspending of $297 million, and General Fund revenues — which pay for many city services — are about $158 million short of what was expected in tax revenues.

The report recommends that city departments cut their “non-critical” vacant jobs to free up some funding, which could have long-term impacts on city services.

Breaking down the budget

The largest area of overspending went toward salaries for the Los Angeles Police Department, according to the report.

The costs are connected to the four-year contract the Los Angeles Police Protective League reached with the city last August. The deal was expected to increase spending by $97 million total for this fiscal year — $80 million for salaries and $17 million for overtime.

“We sort of expected that the LAPD would go over because of the new salaries and the new contract,” Controller Kenneth Mejia told LAist. “But, even before this year, generally the LAPD goes over their original adopted operating budget.”

The amount of money the city has to pay out to settle lawsuits is also much higher than expected. Mejia said claims jumped 100% in the last fiscal year alone.

As for General Fund revenues, the report states the city could recover some of that $158 million.

However, the largest gaps came from taxes.

Business taxes are $32 million under what was planned for, and sales taxes are $18 million under. According to the report, this is partly because of the dual Hollywood strikes and a rise in inflation.

The transient occupancy tax, which is a 14% charge for all properties where guests stay within the city for 30 days or less, is estimated to be $15 million below expectations. The report lays the blame on lower international tourism spending related to China’s economic slowdown.

Documentary transfer taxes — which includes proceeds from Measure ULA, the added tax on properties that sell for $5 million or more — have fallen short by $25 million shortfall because of higher interest rates cooling the housing market, according to the report.

Overall, the city is facing a projected budget gap between $350 million and $400 million for the next fiscal year, which starts in July.

How to address it

Most city departments have actually been generating “significant” budget surpluses because of their high vacancy rates. About 1 in 6 city jobs are unfilled, according to the controller’s office.

However, the report recommends the city take immediate steps to reduce spending, including getting rid of “all non-critical vacant positions.”

The LAPD, the fire department, correctional nurses, and public works are considered critical and would likely not be affected.

“The people who trim the trees, the people who clean the animals’ cages, the people who do the accounting, the people that are working throughout the city in recreation and parks — those folks are not critical under these definitions,” chief deputy controller Rick Cole told LAist.

Cole said those services may not seem critical at first, but after a while, the cages will get dirty, the accounting will pile up, and the grass in public parks could get completely out of hand.

He added that cuts would also likely affect the city’s aging infrastructure, training programs, and facilities.

“These things don't get fixed overnight,” Cole said. “They don't get fixed by a hiring freeze. They get fixed by a long-term commitment to budgetary reform.”

What’s next 

L.A. Mayor Karen Bass signed the city's $13-billion budget last May, and it went into effect on July 1.

The City Administrative Officer will hold joint meetings with Bass’ team late next month to check in with city departments about their funding priorities.

Typically, the mayor’s office releases the budget proposal in April. It’s then reviewed by the L.A. City Council, and if adopted, goes back to the mayor’s desk for final approval.

Updated March 31, 2026 at 19:43 PM ET

President Trump has escalated his efforts to reshape American elections, signing an executive order that seeks to create lists of U.S. citizens who are eligible to vote in each state, and instructs the U.S. Postal Service to play a larger role in states' mail voting programs.

Trump said in the Oval Office Tuesday that he believes the order is "foolproof" and may or may not be tested in court. But election experts said the order was unconstitutional and prominent voting rights attorneys quickly threatened to sue to block the order from going into effect.

A previous executive order on elections, signed about a year ago, has been blocked by federal judges who said the president lacked the constitutional authority to set voting policy.

The Constitution says the "Times, Places and Manner" of federal elections are determined by individual states, with Congress able to enact changes.

Trump has long railed — baselessly — about widespread illegal voting by noncitizens and fraud with mail ballots. The new executive order — which was first reported by The Daily Caller — takes aim at both.

The order instructs the Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration to "compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list of individuals confirmed to be United States citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of an upcoming Federal election and who maintain a residence in the subject State."

The executive order comes as Trump's Justice Department is seeking sensitive voter data from states, and is engaged in more than two dozen lawsuits for that data. The administration claims it needs the data to enforce states' voter list maintenance. Federal judges in three states have dismissed the Justice Department's lawsuits in those states.

In another case, a DOJ official admitted in court last week that the department plans to share that data with the Department of Homeland Security, to run it through the so-called SAVE system to search for noncitizens.

NPR has reported that some U.S. citizens have also been inaccurately flagged by SAVE.

Trump's order also targets mail voting, claiming that "additional measures are necessary" to secure voting by mail – a form of voting he has used himself but has also maligned for years. In the 2024 general election, nearly a third of voters cast mail ballots.

The order says that a state's mail voters should be cleared by federal officials and that all mail ballots be tracked by USPS. Envelopes must also be reviewed by the Postal Service.

"Unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, enable confirmation that only citizens receive and cast ballots, reducing the risk of fraud and protecting the integrity of Federal elections," the order says.

This would be a significant change to how mail-in ballot programs are currently administered in American elections, which are largely carried out by state and local officials.

The Brennan Center for Justice, which advocates for expanded voting access and sued to block Trump's last elections order, said in a statement that the president "has no lawful authority to write the rules that govern our elections."

"Our government's citizenship lists are incomplete and inaccurate," the group said on X. "The United States Postal Service is overburdened and inadequate. This combines a car crash with a train wreck."

And the order also comes as Trump pressures Republicans in Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, a sweeping election overhaul that would impose new voter identification and documentation requirements. 

That bill is stalled in the Senate due to Democratic opposition and the legislative filibuster.

The Supreme Court is also expected to rule this year on whether Mississippi should be allowed to count mail ballots that are postmarked by Election Day but received by election officials after Election Day. The legal challenge, which could have more sweeping implications for mail-in voting nationwide, was filed by the Republican National Committee and Trump's 2024 presidential campaign.

Copyright 2026 NPR

Federal immigration officials arrested more than 14,000 people in the greater Los Angeles area in 2025 — the majority of whom had no criminal record, according to an LAist analysis of new data from the Deportation Data Project.

The data project, an initiative between UCLA and UC Berkeley, publishes federal data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.

In 2025, federal officials arrested 14,394 people, up from 4,681 the year prior. Forty-six percent of people arrested had criminal convictions, 15% had pending charges, and 39% had no criminal charges or convictions.

In a December news release, the Department of Homeland Security said it had arrested more than 10,000 people in the L.A. area since immigration raids began in June of last year, including "murderers, kidnappers, sexual predators and armed carjackers,” but did not publish details of the number of people who had criminal records.

The data from the Deportation Data Project shows that arrests in L.A. spiked in June, and about two-thirds of people arrested that month had no criminal convictions.

More than 313,000 people were arrested by ICE nationwide in 2025, according to an LAist analysis.

In a statement, a DHS spokesperson said the agency has not “verified the accuracy, methodology or analysis of the project and its results” and said “this only reveals how data is manipulated to peddle the false narrative that DHS is not targeting the worst of the worst.” The spokesperson said 61% of people ICE arrested across the country either had criminal convictions or pending charges.

The agency has regularly published press releases identifying people they have arrested and who they have called “the worst of the worst,” including from the raids in L.A. in June. But an LAist investigation and reporting from other outlets has found that some of the people on those lists already has been in custody and were serving lengthy sentences.

Small businesses struggling financially have another program they could qualify for to help pay the bills.

The program is for businesses in Council District 1, which includes the neighborhoods of Koreatown, Pico Union, Westlake, MacArthur Park and Highland Park.

Individual brick-and-mortar businesses can qualify for grants ranging from $5,000 to $10,000, while street vendors can receive about $3,000, according to city officials. A total of $400,000 is available through the program, and applications are now open. 

Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez announced the program’s goal, describing it as a way to support locally owned businesses navigating rising operating costs, shifting customer patterns, and the impacts of recent wide-scale events, like the ongoing immigration raids, along with wildfires, and broader economic uncertainty.

Small businesses struggling financially have another program they could qualify for to help pay the bills.

Who is eligible?

The program is open to independently owned businesses and street vendors located within District 1.

To qualify, businesses must have a valid Los Angeles business license and have been operating in Council District 1 since December 2020, with some flexibility for street vendors. They also need to show they’ve been financially impacted by any largescale events, like the COVID pandemic, immigration enforcement, or the broader economy. Businesses that changed owners can also apply if they’re essentially running the same operation.

How can the money be used?

Grants can be used for daily operational expenses, including rent, payroll, utilities, overhead and other business costs. Roochnik said the funding could also help businesses cover missed rent payments.

Who is running the program?

The grants will be distributed in partnership with the PACE Business Development Center and New Economics for Women. The two organizations provide support to small and immigrant-owned businesses across Los Angeles.

How will recipients be selected?

Funding will be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis, with applications remaining open until funds run out, Roochnik said. 

What’s the goal?

Hernandez said the program is meant to help stabilize neighborhoods that have been affected by immigration enforcement and economic hardships.

“These small businesses are the backbone of our neighborhoods,” she said, adding the funding is meant to help them “stay open, keep workers employed, and continue serving our communities.”

Naomi Villagomez Roochnik, CD1 communications director, said the announcement was made during a press conference at Delicias Bakery and Some, a longtime Latina-owned business in Highland Park. The neighborhood has experienced significant rising rents due to gentrification and the location was meant to highlight the kinds of businesses the program is meant to support.

How to apply:

To apply, small businesses and vendors can complete the application at bit.ly/cd1smallbizsupport.

Is this a one-time program or part of a larger effort?

The grant is part of a pilot program, with the possibility of it expanding depending on demand and outcomes. The council office has launched similar aid efforts in the past, Roochnik said, such as food distribution and rental assistance. 

Businesses that may not qualify for this specific grant can be connected to other resources, according to Roochnik, including the city’s legacy business program, which is for businesses operating for at least 20 years. 

The post Small businesses, vendors struggling against ICE raids, economic uncertainty eligible for up to $10,000 in grants appeared first on LA Local.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon ruled Tuesday that construction on President Trump's White House ballroom "must stop until Congress authorizes its completion."

Using a notable number of exclamation points, Leon said the plaintiff, the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States, is likely to succeed in their lawsuit and therefore he is granting a preliminary injunction to halt construction.

"The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!" Leon wrote.

Leon said however that he will delay the enforcement of the injunction for 14 days because he expects the administration to appeal immediately. He also said he would allow construction to continue for "the safety and security of the White House" – a clear reference to the secure bunker being constructed under the building.

A long-time dream project for President Trump, the ballroom is designed to seat 1,000 guests and will cost at least $300 million, according to estimates by the president. It has generated massive controversy and public pushback, but recently got approval from the Commission of Fine Arts, an architectural review panel now packed with Trump allies. The commission voted to give it a final signoff despite not seeing the final design. It had received more than 2,000 public comments, which according to staff were 99% negative.

The National Capital Planning Commission is set to vote on the ballroom project during a meeting on Thursday.

President Trump responded to the ruling in a social media post complaining that the National Trust for Historic Preservation doesn't appreciate his efforts at "sprucing up" Washington's buildings from the White House to the Kennedy Center.

"So, the White House Ballroom, and The Trump Kennedy Center, which are under budget, ahead of schedule, and will be among the most magnificent Buildings of their kind anywhere in the World, gets sued by a group that was cut off by Government years ago, but all of the many DISASTERS in our Country are left alone to die. Doesn't make much sense, does it?" he wrote.

Leon had previously allowed the construction to continue in a February ruling. In that filing, the National Trust for Historic Preservation argued the president hadn't followed proper procedure in tearing down the East Wing of the White House and soliciting private donations to fund the $300-million ballroom.

In that February opinion, Leon wrote that he wasn't making a determination on the merits because of the way the suit had been framed. He concluded, saying that if the group were to amend its complaint "the Court will expeditiously consider it and, if viable, address the merits of the novel and weighty issues presented."

Copyright 2026 NPR