Your gift is matched 3X today!

Your sustaining monthly support to strengthen our nonprofit newsroom will be TRIPLED today.
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • L.A. candidates fared well in primary
    A voter prepares their ballot at a voting booth during early voting
    A voter prepares their ballot at a voting booth during early voting in Los Angeles, California.

    Topline:

    Despite being outspent in nearly every race, progressive candidates in Los Angeles made a strong showing in the March 5 election, with several either winning outright or forcing opponents into runoffs.

    The results, though surprising to some, suggest L.A.’s political shift to the left shows little sign of slowing.

    Why it matters: In what some experts say is a maturing of the progressive movement, candidates and organizations were able to stage strong grassroots door-knocking efforts across multiple campaigns.

    This has some observers feeling positive about what could happen in the November general election.

    The backstory: Progressives did well in the March primary, including the following races:

    • L.A. Councilmember Nithya Raman was reelected in the 4th Council District, beating back a challenge by the better funded Deputy City Attorney Ethan Weaver; 
    • Tenant rights attorney Ysabel Jurado finished first in a crowded field in the 14th Council District and has forced incumbent Councilmember Kevin de León into a runoff; 
    • North Hollywood Neighborhood Council member Jilian Burgos forced the better funded former Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian into a runoff in the 2nd District; 

    What's next: The general election is Tuesday, Nov. 5.

    Despite being outspent in nearly every race, progressive candidates in Los Angeles made a strong showing in the March 5 election, with several either winning outright or forcing opponents into runoffs.

    The results, though surprising to some, suggest L.A.’s political shift to the left shows little sign of slowing.

    “I’m personally shocked at how well progressives did,” said David Levitus of left-leaning activist group L.A. Forward. “I was very nervous in the weeks leading up to this election just because of the low turnout.”

    In what some experts say is a maturing of the progressive movement, candidates and organizations were able to stage strong grassroots door-knocking efforts across multiple campaigns. One organization launched an independent expenditure campaign for the first time, sending out mailers to counteract a negative campaign against a progressive candidate by the police union.

    Progressive candidates also argue their message is resonating with voters. It's a message that focuses on increasing tenants rights and more aggressively building affordable housing; decreasing the use of an anti-camping law against unhoused people; shrinking the size of the L.A. Police Department’s budget; expanding environmental protections; and increasing efforts to combat climate change.

    It was also an anti-establishment message in an age of growing cynicism toward politics.

    “I think that people were ready for change,” said candidate Jillian Burgos, who is headed for a runoff against a better funded candidate in District 2. “I think that they are tired of the status quo.”

    How candidates fared in key races

    Voter turnout in the Primary Election appears to have been low — around 29%, according to the county. Low turnout elections tend to attract older and more conservative voters.

    But progressives did well, as shown in the following races:

    • L.A. Councilmember Nithya Raman was reelected in the 4th Council District, beating back a challenge by the better funded Deputy City Attorney Ethan Weaver; 
    • Tenant rights attorney Ysabel Jurado remains ahead of a crowded field in the 14th Council District, likely forcing incumbent Councilmember Kevin de León into a runoff; 
    • Burgos, a North Hollywood Neighborhood Council member, leads the group of candidates in the 2nd District, apparently forcing former Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian into a runoff; 
    • The citizen-led Healthy Streets Initiative, which will require billions of dollars in investment into more bike and bus lanes as well as street safety measures, overwhelmingly passed with 65% of the vote;
    • Deputy public defenders performed well in superior court judge races, with one beating an incumbent judge and three others winning spots in November runoffs. Three of the four were part of a progressive slate called The Defenders of Justice.

    Progressives ran strong campaigns, particularly on the ground, observers said, with District 14 serving as one example.

    Janet Torres, campaign field director for Jurado, recalled dispatching campaign volunteers to walk door-to-door to talk up the candidate and her platform. The district includes relatively flat downtown L.A. and Boyle Heights but also hilly El Sereno, Highland Park and Eagle Rock.

    “The terrain in CD14 is tough,” Torres said.

    An estimated 250 volunteers trekked up and down the streets within the district before the primary, knocking on 85,000 doors, Torres said. And in a break from typical campaign tactics, Jurado did not send out bulk mailers, except for 3,000 postcards handwritten by campaign staff.

    “Nothing beats having one-on-one conversations with folks at their door and them really being felt listened to, feeling respected,” Torres said. “It was all gas, no breaks to make sure we were able to secure a win.”

    A few thousand votes across the county still need to be counted.

    De León, who was elected to the City Council in 2020, finished election night on March 5 ahead of his challengers, but that lead eroded over the next several days as more votes were counted. Jurado surpassed him in the vote count late last week.

    The margin between the two candidates was small — roughly 400 votes as of Monday evening — but De León is a politically wounded incumbent.

    In October 2022, he was heard on a secretly recorded audio tape engaging in a conversation that included racist and derogatory remarks. He apologized but most of the Democratic establishment had called on him to resign, including President Joe Biden.

    Jurado said her campaign “consistently emphasized the marginalized voices in the district — folks that have felt forgotten and not listened to.”

    Meghan Choi of Ground Game L.A., one of the groups whose members walked precincts for Jurado and other candidates, said her group and others have worked to build the progressive movement in Los Angeles.

    “We’re really excited to see that there is in fact so much appetite for real change coming from Angelenos,” Choi said.

    Taking a more personal — but labor intensive — approach to campaigning seems to have paid off, at least so far.

    “They have gone back to basics — and that is the ground game,” said Fernando Guerra, professor of political science at the Center for the Study of Los Angeles at Loyola Marymount University. “They have mastered how to do it. It's incredibly difficult to implement but they’re doing it.”

    Political action groups help fight ‘fire with fire’

    In Jurado’s case, according to her campaign field director, there was a cadre of young people willing to walk the district. Torres said groups including Ground Game L.A., Boyle Heights Vota, Sunrise Movement, The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, and Democratic Socialists of America helped walk precincts.

    Jurado overcame massive spending on behalf of one of her opponents, Assemblymember Miguel Santiago, who ended up finishing third in the primary. Santiago’s campaign was bolstered by nearly $700,000 in independent expenditures on his behalf — mostly by labor unions who supported his work in Sacramento.

    Raman faced more than $1.3 million in independent expenditures against her, including by the police and firefighters unions, real estate interests, and the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce.

    In Raman’s case, progressives decided to “fight fire with fire,” said Levitus, from L.A. Forward.

    For the first time, the organization launched its own independent expenditure campaign. on behalf of Raman. It spent $300,000 on her behalf, mostly on mailers.

    Unite Here Local 11, the hotel and restaurants workers union, also spent $100,000, mostly on get-out-the-vote efforts for Raman.

    Raman won reelection outright with 50.64% percent of the vote. It was just a few hundred votes that put her over 50%, allowing her to avoid a runoff in November against her closest challenger, Ethan Weaver.

    “Given how close the vote was, I have very little doubt that she would have probably ended up under 50% had it not been for what we did,” Levitus said.

    Levitus also said progressive voter guides are having a growing influence on voters.

    He pointed to guides from his own organization, Knock L.A. and L.A. Progressive, as well as from individual influencers like televisionT.V. writer and comedian Adam Conover, who is active in politics.

    Conover has more than 350,000 followers on Instagram.

    The voter guides can be particularly influential in judicial races, where candidates had little money to get their message out.

    “We’re making these races competitive,” said Ivette Alé-Ferlito of La Defensa, which campaigned on behalf of judges. “All of this political education we’ve been doing has catapulted judicial races into the public sphere.”

    L.A. Forward in recent years also began a judicial leadership academy that trains people to be candidates for judicial seats.

    One of the City Council candidates endorsed by those guides was Burgos, who finished second and made it into the runoff in District 2 despite being far outspent by her opponents. Burgos is an optician, owner of the North Hollywood theater company Dainty Dames Events, and a member of the North Hollywood Neighborhood Council.

    Burgos also pointed to endorsements and volunteer help from L.A. Forward, Streets for All, Feel The Bern San Fernando Valley, and California Women’s List.

    “They just really put the time in for us,” she said.

    And she echoed a familiar theme.

    “We made sure to knock doors, really have those conversations with people. Our people were passionate,” she said.

    Burgos said she believes her social media campaign was effective, too. She produced Tik Tok and Instagram reels that not only promoted her candidacy but were also instructive about city governance.

    “I would talk about how to use 311, how to report a pothole, how city council works, different things that really teach the community,” she said. “A lot of people gave us good feedback about the topics. I pretty much make a reel every day,”

    Looking forward to November

    Despite those successes, progressive didn’t fare well in all races.

    In the more conservative 12th City Council District race in the western San Fernando Valley, incumbent John Lee won reelection handily, beating back a challenge by former Ethics Commission President Serena Oberstein.

    In the 10th District, which covers Koreatown, mid-Wilshire and Leimert Park, pastor and community organizer Eddie Anderson had 19% of the vote early this week and appeared to be out of the runoff.

    Progressive L.A. County District Attorney George Gascón garnered just 25% of the vote and was forced into a runoff with former Republican state attorney general candidate Nathan Hochman. Gascón’s showing was low for an incumbent and it shows November may be a big challenge for him.

    Gascón has faced withering criticism for his policy of reducing criminal penalties to address mass incarceration.

    The March results have progressive leaders like L.A. City Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martinez optimistic about the general election..

    “The appetite for progressive bold policy is stronger than I thought,” he said.

    And some say progressive candidates may expect to fare even better in November when more voters, young people in particular, are expected to cast ballots.

    “The electorate has embraced some of these progressive reforms,” said Sara Sadhwani, assistant professor of politics at Pomona College. “Although I think we will see just how far they have done so come November.”

  • Experts say this election should be unaffected
    Election workers in a warehouse sit at voting tables and process votes
    L.A. County election workers tallying votes in 2022.

    Topline:

    The U.S. Department of Justice has attempted to use a number of tactics in recent weeks to remove California voters they say are likely noncitizens from state voter rolls. Election experts stressed that there are safeguards in place to ensure voters’ legitimate ballots are counted.

    About the case: Election security officials told LAist that the federal government’s case is unlikely to succeed and that voters should proceed filling out their ballots as normal. “I don't think most people in the L.A. area or beyond will actually encounter any of the disruption that the administration is trying to project,” Loyola Marymount law professor Justin Levitt said.

    The backstory: Last week, Department of Justice election officials sent a list of 20,000 California voters it says it has “high confidence” are not citizens. L.A. County election officials said they received records on a thumb drive, which they could not open for security reasons. Two days later, the Trump administration sued California for not complying with its request to use the list to remove any noncitizens from local voter rolls. California on Tuesday filed an extensive response to the DOJ lawsuit, saying it “borders on the absurd.”

    Casting your vote: Levitt recommended voting as early as possible to give time to check your registration and resolve any issues. If you have concerns, he recommended visiting an early voting center in person.

    After you vote: UCLA law professor Rick Hasen encouraged voters to double-check the status of their ballots to ensure they’ve been processed and counted. “We have very good ballot tracking,” Hasen said. “California is not going to simply start throwing out ballots from people who are on an unvetted federal list of supposed noncitizen voters.”

    Read on ... for more about the back-and-forth between the federal government and the state.

    The U.S. Department of Justice has attempted to use a number of tactics in recent weeks to remove California voters they say are likely noncitizens from state voter rolls — despite the voting process having already begun.

    Election security experts told LAist, however, that the federal government’s case is unlikely to succeed, and that voters should proceed filling out their ballots as normal.

    “I don't think most people in the L.A. area or beyond will actually encounter any of the disruption that the administration is trying to project,” Loyola Law School professor Justin Levitt said.

    The backstory

    Last week, Department of Justice election officials sent a list of 20,000 California voters it says it has “high confidence” are not citizens. (L.A. County election officials said they received records on a thumb drive, which they could not open for security reasons.) Two days later, the Trump administration sued California for not complying with its request to use the list to remove any noncitizens from local voter rolls.

    California on Tuesday filed an extensive response to the DOJ lawsuit, saying it “borders on the absurd.”

    Separately this week, the DOJ announced it had filed charges against 28 people, accusing them of registering to vote as noncitizens.

    What is the DOJ claiming?

    DOJ representatives said Monday they are attempting to keep U.S. citizens’ votes from being canceled out by noncitizens.

    “We have an election coming up next month,” Bill Essayli, first assistant U.S. attorney, said. “Our biggest priority is to safeguard the integrity of the election.”

    Essayli suggested he may prosecute election officials who knowingly process ballots “once we’ve informed them who the non-citizens are” and indicated the DOJ is working on “many more cases.”

    Regarding the list sent to state and local officials, DOJ officials also said they have “high confidence” — not complete certainty — that the people on the federal government’s list are noncitizens.

    “There may be some names on there who it turns out ultimately are citizens,” Trent McCotter, acting deputy attorney general, said Monday. “We're not perfect, and that's why we've asked California to cooperate with us.”

    In a court declaration filed today, L.A. County Assistant Registrar Monica Flores said the DOJ’s list is “unreliable.” Analyzing a sample of 200 records, she said a majority are not active voters, and nearly 40% of the records indicate the individual was born in the U.S.

    The L.A. County registrar of voters said officials here did not comply with the request to use the federal list and began coordinating with state officials — a point DOJ officials stressed on Monday, with McCotter saying this is “an emergency of their own [California’s] creation.”

    Rick Hasen, a UCLA law professor who runs the school’s Safeguarding Democracy Project, disagreed.

    “The federal government didn't produce its list of voters or its methodology to California until just a few days ago, so this is not an emergency of California's own making,” Hasen said. “It is not the federal government's job to decide who is on voting rolls. That is a job that is given to states.”

    A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment for this article beyond pointing to Essayli’s X social media feed.

    What role will local election officials play?

    In large part, Hasen and Levitt said officials will play the same role that they always have, even though more eyes will be on them. County election officials send out ballots, process and verify signatures, and reach out to voters if there are any outstanding issues. The registrar then has 13 days to report on ballots to the state, including provisional ballots and same-day registration ballots, and 30 days to finish counting them.

    That said, Hasen said Essayli’s threat of possible criminal prosecution against election officials is “really dangerous” — even though he said these cases are also unlikely to succeed.

    “We've got a threat of criminal prosecution against election administrators for not being aggressive enough in policing voting rolls to the Trump administration's liking,” Hasen said. “Even if they were negligent in how they policed their voting rolls, there's no criminal liability here.”

    What should voters do?

    Levitt, who previously worked on voting rights at the Justice Department, said he doesn’t think Trump’s DOJ is serious about the legal merits of their lawsuit against California.

    “I can completely understand that people may be freaked out,” he said. “Part of what DOJ is doing is an attempt to freak people out.”

    For their part, local officials have reassured voters that they should proceed to cast their ballots. In a statement, L.A. County Supervisor Janice Hahn called the DOJ’s actions “voter intimidation and a blatant attempt to undermine trust in our midterm elections.”

    Levitt recommended voting as early as possible to give voters time to check their registration and resolve any issues. If you have concerns, he recommended visiting an early voting center in person.

    Hasen encouraged voters to double-check the status of their ballots to ensure they’ve been processed and counted.

    “We have very good ballot tracking,” Hasen said. “California is not going to simply start throwing out ballots from people who are on an unvetted federal list of supposed noncitizen voters.”

    What’s the future of this lawsuit?

    Hasen and Levitt said the legal problems with the federal government’s arguments can be traced back to federal law and the Constitution.

    “The Constitution gives states the power to run elections subject to Congress passing laws that can override that,” Hasen said. “There's no congressional override that would give the federal government the authority to do this.”

    That makes the DOJ’s case unlikely to succeed, the professors agreed.

    “It's possible that a court might not even really deal with it at all,” Levitt said.

    What about the people accused of voting fraud?

    The charges announced this week against 28 people accused of registering or voting as noncitizens, however, may be more successful, depending on the evidence presented in each case.

    “Isolated cases of alleged voter fraud occur in red and blue states alike, and they should be prosecuted wherever they occur,” a spokesperson for California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement.

    But Bonta noted that the 28 people charged represent 0.0001% of California’s registered voters. The percentage is about the same in L.A. County: The 12 L.A. County residents charged this week make up roughly 0.0002% of people on the voter rolls.

  • Sponsored message
  • Bass calls for pause to utility shutoffs
    The sun sets and shows off the silhouettes of power lines.
    The sun sets behind power lines near homes during a heat wave in Los Angeles.

    Topline:

    For the rest of the year, Los Angeles residents won't get their water and power shut off if they can’t pay their bills.

    The details: Mayor Karen Bass announced Tuesday that she asked the L.A. Department of Water and Power’s board to pause any residential shutoffs for nonpayment through the end of 2026. The request comes after a series of record-breaking heatwaves this summer and fall. A spokesperson for LADWP said the changes will be implemented immediately. The board is expected to formally vote to approve the ask at its next meeting, set for Oct. 27 at 10 a.m., according to a spokesperson for Bass. According to the LADWP spokesperson, customers who need assistance will get extra time to pay their bill by entering into a payment arrangement without any interest or late fees.

    Bill breakdown: DWP bills two months at a time, and right now, many customers are being hit with one of their highest bills of the year — from August and September. In those months, 2% of DWP's 1.6 million customers received a bill of over $3,000, the DWP said; 3% were between $2,000 and $3,000; 12% were between $1,000 and $2,000; and 18% were between $500 and $1,000. At least 60% were under $500, the DWP said. LADWP says customers can call 800-DIAL-DWP (342-5397) if they have questions about their bills.

    The backstory: As atmospheric pollution drives hotter, longer heat waves, utility bills are soaring too. That's why, in 2023, LADWP's board voted to end power shutoffs for all customers during extreme weather. Under that policy, LADWP will not shut a customer’s water and power off if they are delinquent on their bill when the National Weather Service has issued an extreme heat or cold weather advisory or warning. Outside of such weather advisories, however, customers can still face shutoffs. Under Bass’ request, shutoffs won’t occur through the rest of the year regardless of weather advisories.

    Other resources: Bass encouraged customers to sign up for LADWP’s Level Pay program, which allows customers to pay off past-due bills over time or even out the peaks of high-energy-use seasons across a longer term. You can sign up and find other bill assistance programs on the DWP website.

    Go deeper: Why is my LADWP bill so high?

  • District prepares for El Niño
    A yellow school bus from Los Angeles Unified School District.
    District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors, in preparation for El Niño.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is preparing for possible “Super El Niño” storms that could damage schools and lead to closures, the district announced in a media release Tuesday.

    What's being done: District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors. LAUSD is also testing emergency equipment, including pumps and emergency lighting systems, and stocking supplies such as flashlights and drinking water.

    Guidance for families during this year's El Niño season: LAUSD encouraged families to update their contact information to ensure they receive district calls, texts and emails. Families should also monitor weather alerts, follow emergency officials’ instructions, avoid flooded roads and review safe routes to and from school, according to the release.

    The Los Angeles Unified School District is preparing for possible “Super El Niño” storms that could damage schools and lead to closures, the district announced in a media release Tuesday.

    District staff are clearing drains, trimming trees and checking roofs, windows and doors. LAUSD is also testing emergency equipment, including pumps and emergency lighting systems, and stocking supplies such as flashlights and drinking water.

    “Preparing for severe weather starts well before the first raindrop,” Superintendent Andrés Chait said in a statement. “We can’t control the weather, but we can take steps now to protect our students and employees and help our schools stay ready.”

    The district will monitor weather patterns using information from the National Weather Service and local emergency officials, it said.

    LAUSD encouraged families to update their contact information to ensure they receive district calls, texts and emails. Families should also monitor weather alerts, follow emergency officials’ instructions, avoid flooded roads and review safe routes to and from school, according to the release.

    “Preparing for a storm is a shared effort — from the crews maintaining school buildings to the principals reviewing emergency plans and the families making sure they can receive critical updates,” LAUSD said in the release. “By taking these steps before the rain begins, Los Angeles Unified is working to help students and employees stay safe and keep school communities as prepared as possible for the winter ahead.”

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • This will be the first cold storm of the season
    Two people in yellow rain ponchos walk toward a fog-shrouded downtown Los Angeles skyline on a rainy day.
    Rain is expected Wednesday night and Thursday morning across Southern California. It will be the first cold storm of the rainy season.

    Topline:

    Significant rain is in the forecast this week, just days after heat and Santa Ana winds fueled wildfires across Southern California

    The rain: The bulk of the rain is expected on Wednesday night and Thursday morning. Most of L.A. and Orange counties could get around an inch, with more expected in the hills and mountains. There is also a chance of thunderstorms and hail.

    Flood risk: A National Weather Service flood watch is in effect for the Santa Monica Mountains and surrounding communities. The area includes burn scars from last week’s Bryson Fire and last year’s Palisades Fire. Wildfire burn scars are susceptible to landslides and flooding during heavy rain.

    Cooldown: Forecasters say the storm will bring cool air into southern California. Highs on Wednesday and Thursday will peak in the 60s and low 70s in most places. High elevations will likely be even cooler.

    Read on … for more on this week’s forecast.

    Southern California is likely in for a solid dose of rain this week, just days after heat and Santa Ana winds helped fuel several wildfires across the region.

    Forecasters expect the bulk of the rain to roll into the Los Angeles basin Wednesday night and continue into Thursday morning, with a small chance of thunderstorms and hail.

    The San Fernando Valley, San Gabriel Valley and coastal areas across L.A. and Orange counties could get around an inch over the next few days. Hills and mountains could get up to 3 inches.

    “We could see some pretty high rain rates,” said National Weather Service meteorologist Mike Wofford. “It's a good storm for this time of year — it's a little stronger than what we would see normally.”

    The possibility of significant rain in the mountains raises concerns about flooding in areas recently burned in wildfires, particularly around the Bryson Fire burn scar near Malibu, which is only a few days old. Burn scars can’t absorb heavy rainfall and are susceptible to landslides.

    The National Weather Service has issued a flood watch for the Santa Monica Mountains and surrounding communities from Wednesday afternoon through Thursday. That means heavy rain there could flood streets, creeks and rivers. The flood watch area includes both the Bryson Fire and Palisades Fire burn scars.

    This will also be the first nontropical storm of the season, meaning it’s moving into the region from the north. Most storms that hit Southern California follow a similar path, especially during the winter, unlike the tropical storms that formed off the coast of Mexico and brought muggy weather to the region this summer.

    Nontropical storms also bring cold air to the region. On Wednesday and Thursday, forecasters expect highs in the 60s and 70s. High elevations will be even cooler.