Brian Williams gets probation for fake bomb threat
Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published October 6, 2025 4:19 PM
Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Brian K. Williams delivers a speech during the graduation ceremony for an LAPD recruit class in 2024.
(
Myung J. Chun
/
Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Former Los Angeles Deputy Mayor Brian Williams was sentenced on Monday to one year of federal probation and 50 hours of community service after pleading guilty to calling in a fake bomb threat to City Hall, an act he said stemmed from mental health issues.
The backstory: Williams pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court to a single count of making threats regarding fire and explosives. He called his city-owned cellphone using Google Voice on his personal phone to say he was going to bomb City Hall over its support of Israel, according to prosecutors. He then told police of the call, prompting the bomb squad to conduct a search.
Listen
0:43
Former LA deputy mayor gets probation for fake City Hall bomb threat
Prosecutors said there was no evidence Williams intended to carry out the threat.
Mental health: Williams was desperate to get out of an ongoing virtual meeting when he made the threat, according to prosecutors. “It was motivated not by a political agenda or violent extremist ideology, but rather by defendant’s acute personal stress and anxiety due to numerous factors,” prosecutors wrote in a pre-sentencing memo. Williams’ mother and nephew had died and his brother was diagnosed with cancer in the 18 months prior to the incident.
His career: Williams served as deputy mayor for public safety under Mayor Karen Bass, working on police and fire issues. Previously, he served as executive director of the Sheriff Civilian Oversight Commission, as a deputy city attorney and as a deputy mayor under Mayor James Hahn. Prosecutors said Williams’ behavior was “misguided and dangerous but it was also an aberration."
A Kaiser Permanente employee works on a computer at Kaiser Permanente Medical Office in Manhattan Beach, California.
(
Etienne Laurent
/
AFP via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Some 31,000 nurses and healthcare workers employed by Kaiser Permanente will begin an open-ended strike in California and Hawaii on Monday.
Why it matters: Southern California has the largest share of picketing Kaiser workers, with about 28,000 employees.
Why now: The health system and the union representing Kaiser workers — United Nurses Associations of California & the Union of Health Care Professionals — have been negotiating for a new labor contract since the end of September.
Some 31,000 nurses, pharmacists and healthcare workers employed by Kaiser Permanente will begin an open-ended strike tomorrow in California and Hawaii.
The health system and the union representing Kaiser workers — United Nurses Associations of California & the Union of Health Care Professionals — have been negotiating for a new labor contract since the end of September. Core bargaining issues include wages for nurses, understaffing, and retirement benefits.
Picketing is slated to begin at 12 local Kaiser medical facilities in the following communities: Anaheim, Baldwin Park, Downey, Fontana, Irvine, Los Angeles, Ontario, Riverside, Harbor City, Panorama City, West Los Angeles and Woodland Hills.
Kaiser said in a statement that their hospitals and medical offices will stay open during the strikes, but some pharmacies will close.
Southern California has the largest share of picketing Kaiser workers, with about 28,000 employees.
How the community come together to push back plans
Josie Huang
is a reporter and Weekend Edition host who spotlights the people and places at the heart of our region.
Published January 25, 2026 6:12 AM
Hundreds packed into Monterey Park City Hall to call for a moratorium on data centers.
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
Topline:
Monterey Park residents have been turning out in force to oppose a proposed data center, pressuring city leaders to go beyond a temporary moratorium on the facilities and consider banning data centers altogether.
Why it matters: Data centers are rapidly spreading across L.A. County, and beyond. The response of residents in Monterey Park shows how people outside of City Hall can influence whether that growth happens.
The project: The developer, HMC StratCap, wants to build a nearly 250,000 sq. foot data center in the Saturn business park.
The backstory: The project had been moving through City Hall for about two years before many residents learned about it in recent weeks and months, sparking a grassroots campaign that has quickly built momentum.
What's next: During the 45-day moratorium, city staff will draft an ordinance that would ban data centers outright if approved by the City Council. Meanwhile the developer says it will plan outreach to residents.
Billions of dollars are pouring into data centers to power streaming services, cloud storage and the biggest energy monster of all, artificial intelligence.
Dozens of data centers already dot the region, from El Segundo to downtown L.A. But in Monterey Park, residents concerned about the environmental and health impacts of data centers are drawing a line.
A developer has proposed building a nearly 250,000-square-foot data center in a local business park. Last Wednesday night, hundreds of people packed City Hall to say they didn’t want it – or for that matter, any such facility.
“No data centers in Monterey Park!” the crowd chanted.
Residents’ immediate goal was to ensure the City Council approve a 45-day moratorium on data center development, an item added to the agenda after weeks of mounting public pressure.
What they got, in a meeting that stretched past midnight, was the council’s commitment to draft an outright ban during the 45-day period for a later vote. “That is more than I ever could have hoped for from this meeting,” resident Steven J. Kung said. “I am shocked and a little bit overjoyed.”
Residents organize
Hours earlier at a rally he helped lead, Kung had been far more cautious.
He expressed little faith in city officials, especially after learning that the project had been moving through the city’s planning process for about two years without his knowledge.
Kung said he only found out about the proposal from the Australian-based developer when his husband showed him a social media post by SGV Progressive Action last month — despite their living about 1,300 feet from the proposed site.
“I was incensed that no one had told me, especially since I lived so close,” he said.
Steven J. Kung is part of the activist and resident-led No Data Center Monterey Park.
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
Kung joined a grassroots group of residents and activists called No Data Center Monterey Park, which has organized teach-ins, canvassing drives and yard sign campaigns in the weeks leading up to the vote.
Developer's promises
The developer, HMC StratCap, has said its proposed data center on 1977 Saturn Street would generate more than $5 million a year in tax revenue and more than 200 jobs during construction. It’s also promised to build a public park.
But residents said that’s not worth the tradeoff of the massive energy demand of data centers, pollution from diesel backup generators and noise from cooling equipment.
The developer counters that the generators will be strictly regulated, a “closed-loop cooling technology” will use water efficiently and noise will be “similar to a typical commercial area,” according to a handout shared with residents at Wednesday’s meeting.
Monterey Park City Hall was packed to capacity as people waited to testify in opposition to a proposed data center.
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
The developer has also agreed to an environmental impact report.
Kung and others say an EIR is the least the developer should do. They say they’re also troubled by the decision to locate a data center in a city of roughly 60,000 people, more than half of them immigrants.
“They see a small city full of Asians and Latinos, and they don’t think we’ll fight back,” Kung said. “But they’re wrong.”
“People, not machines”
So many people showed up that the lobby was converted into overflow space.
Among them was Alex Leon, a mathematician who attended with his wife, a phlebotomist, and their two young daughters.
“This has kind of been our dream, living in Monterey Park,” Leon said. “I just don’t want it to turn into an industrial farm for big data.”
Alex Leon came to speak out against the proposed data center with his wife Janette and their two daughters.
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
Like dozens of others, Leon wasn’t there just to watch but wanted council members to listen. When his turn came to give comment, he met the eyes of the council members.
“Monterey Park should be built for people, not machines,” he said. “For families, not server racks. For community life, not industrial infrastructure. This is our home, and it’s worth defending.”
“Open and honest conversations”
A handful of speakers supported the project, including a representative for the developer. Laziza Lambert pivoted at the podium to face the crowd.
“We just really want to be good, long-term partners with the community and hope to have open and honest conversations,” she said, as some in the audience started to jeer.
Residents voiced concerns that once one data center is approved, the floodgates would open, noting that the developer owns another parcel on the same street.
But much of the anger that night was aimed at city leaders. Speaker after speaker said they had been kept in the dark.
Tran and
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
Katherine Torres, a real estate agent and president of the Monterey Park Women’s Club, said the women’s club is apolitical but she would be sure to tell the members.
“I swear, I’m going to spread the word about the data center because they need to know,” she said as the room erupted in applause.
She looked at the council members with whom she was on a first-name basis.
“I have dinner with you guys,” she said. “I go to your events. Why didn’t I know?”
A surprise shift
By the fifth hour, nearly 80 residents had spoken. Then it was the council’s turn to give comments before their vote on the 45-day moratorium.
Two members said they supported going beyond a temporary pause and considering a permanent ban. Jose Sanchez’s opposition to data centers was already known to those closely following the issue. But Elizabeth Yang’s was not.
Yang told the room that her mother and stepfather live within a mile of the proposed site.
The council meeting was preceded by a rally against data centers.
(
Josie Huang
/
LAist
)
“I’m not going to vote for something that’s going to hurt my own family,” she said.
She added she was disappointed the developer had not done more with outreach and information.
“Because of all of you feeding us good information, I’m siding with no data center,” Yang said.
The remaining residents started clapping and rose to their feet.
What’s ahead
The council unanimously approved the 45-day moratorium during which city staff will draft an ordinance that could ban data centers outright — a proposal that will return to the council for a vote.
Outside council chambers, Steven J. Kung praised his fellow residents for speaking out and pushing the council to think bigger.
“I’m so proud of Monterey Park and our residents,” he said. “The more I’m here, the more I fall in love with the people.”
He’d celebrate that night. But then it’d be back to work, making sure the ban stands and Monterey Park keeps data centers out for good.
The developer would not be sitting back either. Lambert, the representative for the developer, said they were moving forward with plans to host a town hall with residents in the next couple of weeks.
Keep up with LAist.
If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report. Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less.
Have you checked the weather on social lately? The weather genre online spans a wide range of sources — from amateurs with no science background to accredited meteorologists.
Why now: Experts say that while weather influencers can help fill an information gap, platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X tend to prioritize engagement and likes over accuracy.
But: That means extreme weather updates on social media are often sensationalized or lack context,saysexperts.
When Christian Bryson needs quick weather information, like for this weekend's massive snowstorm, he doesn't wait for the 5 p.m. local newscast. Instead, he turns to Ryan Hall.
"It's as if he's sitting in the living room with you tracking the storm," said Bryson, a 21-year-old meteorology student at the University of Tennessee at Martin.
Hall, who goes by "Ryan Hall, Y'all" on his social media platforms, calls himself a "digital meteorologist" and "The Internet's Weather Man." His YouTube channel has over 3 million subscribers. Hall did not respond to a request to comment about his platform.
Hall is part of an increasingly popular genre of social media weather accounts that share information leading up to extreme weather, and then livestream for their viewers, sometimes for hours at a time. Overall, Hall offers solid information and is a good communicator with a few technical omissions, experts told NPR. But the weather genre online spans a wide range of sources — from amateurs with no science background to accredited meteorologists.
Experts say that while weather influencers can help fill an information gap, platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X tend to prioritize engagement and likes over accuracy. That means extreme weather updates on social media are often sensationalized or lack context,saysGary Lackmann, a professor of atmospheric science at North Carolina State University.
"They're not going to the National Weather Service web page, they're just looking at what's in their feed," Lackmann said. "Once you start clicking on viral extreme weather stuff, then the algorithm is going to just feed you more and more."
Rise in social media use for weather updates
Lackmann, who is also head of NC State's department of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences, said in 2024 during Hurricane Helene, a weather disaster that swamped western North Carolina, killing 108 people, he started to see more and more people getting their weather information from social media
He says that, in the face of extreme weather events, people need credible and authoritative sources such as the NWS.
But with social media, sometimes "you get some kid who wants to get a lot of shares and likes and be an influencer on social media," he said.
Matthew Cappucci, a senior meteorologist for the weather app MyRadar, has personal experience with both worlds. He worked for years at the Washington Post as a meteorologist, and now posts weather forecasts on the internet.
Cappucci said his success on Facebook, Instagram, and X shows how rapidly people are shifting from getting their weather information from traditional news outlets versus social media.
"Within two months, I was able to reach 60 million-plus people on social media, just on Facebook," Cappucci said
Bryson, the 21-year-old, said Hall and other credible weather influencers use language that non-meteorologists understand and they can share information at any time of the day.
"The fact that it's available at your fingertips," Bryson said. "I could go to Ryan Hall at 4 p.m. I'm eating my dinner and get the information that I need."
Digital meteorology can help fill information gaps
There are positives to having meteorologists and credible weather sources on social media, Lackmann said. He's seen local weather influencers in North Carolina help disperse information from official outlets.
"There's a real need for that kind of localization and personalization of weather information," Lackmann said.
Aaron Scott, an assistant professor of meteorology at the University of Tennessee at Martin, said digital meteorology, a relatively new certification program that encompasses all forms of digital media, has an important place in the new media landscape.
"People do trust them, and they have built rapport," Scott said. "Sometimes that can make the difference if someone's going to actually go take shelter from a tornado or not."
Scott's department at UT Martin is now offering a digital meteorology class dedicated to teaching students how to engage with an online audience.
Cappucci also sees the positives with his own content. Social media allows for more flexibility than on-air television, he said. He pushes back on climate misinformation or weather conspiracy theorists.
A minefield of misinformation on social media
But all three experts interviewed by NPR see the downsides in the way social media algorithms push the most sensationalized — not always the most accurate — information to the forefront.
"The brightest colors, the most outlandish information will always get more following than actual truthful information," Cappucci said.
Cappucci said the ability to make increasing amounts of money on social media can also lead to inaccurate weather information.
"As TV viewership wanes and as salaries come down, it's easier to make up that money by posting crazy stuff online," Cappucci said.
Meteorologists use a number of different numerical models as they predict the possible outcomes of an extreme weather event. Because of this, people can "cherry-pick" one model and sensationalize a forecast, Lackmann said.
"You cry wolf too often, and people won't take proper precautions when there really is a high probability of an extreme event," Lackmann said.
The effort to preserve credible weather reports
Meteorologists and other weather professionals are grappling with how to navigate the new media landscape and prioritize accurate information, the experts said.
NWS has increased its social media presence, Lackmann said. Experts at the American Meteorological Society have discussed a social media certification that extends beyond the digital media certification currently available.
Scott said how the field will grapple with social media, and now AI-generated media, is "a huge question mark."
"That's the million-dollar question," Scott said. "How do we make it? Do we have some type of badging system where you're certified, you're not? Then, who decides that?"
Copyright 2026 NPR
The Los Angeles Tool Library will operate out of the Presbyterian Church in Koreatown for anyone to rent power tools, ladders and other items.
(
Hanna Kang
/
The LA Local
)
Topline:
Starting Saturday, the Los Angeles Tool Library will officially open. In this volunteer-run lending library, community members can borrow tools instead of purchasing new ones.
The backstory: The idea began two summers ago, when founding member Chih-Wei Hsu was trying to build benches with friends and realized they didn’t have the right tools. After researching tool libraries around the country, Hsu learned that while they’re common elsewhere, there were none in his neighborhood.
How it works: The model is simple: Residents can sign up for a membership online or in person, browse available tools online or in-person and check them out for up to 10 days and renew once if no one else has reserved them. Borrowers are asked to bring an ID and proof of address, similar to a traditional library.
Read on ... to learn more about what Hsu hopes to offer the community.
Housed in the basement of Immanuel Presbyterian Church in Koreatown is a small room filled with ladders, drills, saws and other tools that many renters don’t have space – or reason – to own.
Starting Saturday, that room will officially open as the Los Angeles Tool Library. In this volunteer-run lending library, community members can borrow tools instead of purchasing new ones.
The idea began two summers ago, when founding member Chih-Wei Hsu was trying to build benches with friends and realized they didn’t have the right tools. After researching tool libraries around the country, Hsu learned that while they’re common elsewhere, there were none in his neighborhood.
“I feel like one of the biggest ways this can help people is – especially for a lot of people that are only wanting to build, say a shelf or a bench – it doesn’t make sense to go out and buy something that costs you $100, $200 just to do this one cut for this one project,” Hsu said.
The model is simple: Residents can sign up for a membership online or in person, browse available tools online or in-person and check them out for up to 10 days and renew once if no one else has reserved them. Borrowers are asked to bring an ID and proof of address, similar to a traditional library.
The library will operate Wednesdays and Thursdays from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m., and Saturdays from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., with plans to expand hours as more volunteers join.
“Instead of buying one thing and letting it sit on a shelf forever, we’d be able to share resources,” Hsu said. “A lot of people live in apartments or smaller spaces. Not everyone has a garage. A ladder is very useful to change a lightbulb, but not everyone has space to store a six-foot ladder.”
The library is designed with renters in mind, particularly in central Los Angeles. Hsu said the project is meant to be accessible and affordable, with monthly membership costs of $10 to $20 and with slight discounts for annual sign-ups. The library also offers volunteer opportunities in exchange for membership.
The library does not yet offer bilingual services, though Hsu said organizers are working to recruit Spanish-speaking volunteers.
Finding a space that is affordable was a major hurdle, but Hsu eventually secured a basement space at Immanuel Presbyterian Church.
The library has raised about $4,000 through donations and a founding membership drive, with much of its inventory coming from individual donors and in-kind contributions from the Makers Hub, a tool library in Compton.
“Everyone who’s working right now is a volunteer,” Hsu said. “If we scale up enough, we can look into hiring people, but the idea was always for this to be volunteer-driven.”
Beyond tool lending, organizers hope the space can serve as a community hub, hosting gatherings like book clubs or skill-sharing events.