The Brief

Update, Friday: LA City Council approves $1 million in new spending for LAPD

L.A. Mayor Karen Bass has asked the City Council to increase the Los Angeles Police Department’s budget by $4.4 million to hire 410 more officers before July.

In a letter to council members yesterday, Bass wrote that the city needs to have enough officers to keep Angelenos safe in coming years, including during major events like the 2026 FIFA World Cup and the 2028 Olympic Games.

LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell made a similar argument at a Budget and Finance Commission meeting Tuesday, where he said that despite the city’s budget problems, he worries about whether L.A. will be prepared for the Olympics in 2028 under currently approved staffing.

Several City Council members have already been pushing back against the proposal, arguing that the budget for those positions was negotiated and signed by Bass in June.

“The council and the mayor signed a budget that included 240 new hires,” Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky said at the Budget and Finance Commission meeting on Tuesday. “The department chose to hire that full 240 in the first six months of this year.”

“Our job is to keep the city safe. We also have a responsibility to keep it solvent,” Yaroslavsky told LAist in an emailed statement. “I want to grow the police department, but I have yet to see a proposal that identifies an ongoing funding source to pay for more officers.”

LAPD Officers line up in preparation to form a skirmish line in front of protesters near the federal detention facility in downtown L.A. on June 7, 2025.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

LAPD hiring goals twice as high as current budget

Mayor Bass initially proposed a budget back in April recommending funding to support 480 new LAPD officers.

The final budget was a compromise reached by the City Council that approved hiring 240 new recruits in the midst of a budget crisis and attempts to reduce layoffs across the city. According to a press release on June 7, the day after she signed the final budget, Bass announced a plan to find additional funding within 90 days to bring the total LAPD hires to 480.

The funding never materialized and no additional positions have yet been approved.

LAPD has already hit its hiring cap of 240 new officers, according to a letter from the city personnel department.

The city’s most recent financial status report filed on Dec. 5 by City Administrative Officer Matt Szabo says if LAPD continues hiring at its current pace, the department would add 410 new sworn officers and exceed the plan previously budgeted.

The report shows that costs of the additional 410 officers would be expected to exceed $4.4 million through June, then about $23.7 million in the next fiscal year.

Chief McDonnell spoke to council members at the Budget and Finance Committee about the pace of hiring, and said that the department did what it was “told to do.”

“Our understanding was . . . that we would be able to hire an additional 240 if we hired 240 in the first six months,” McDonnell said, “we did that.”

The department cannot continue hiring without the additional positions requested by Bass.

Show me the money

At Tuesday’s Budget and Finance meeting, Councilmember Tim McOsker asked Szabo whether any funds had ever been identified to fill those positions.

“There has not been a formal report issued to this body identifying funds for additional hiring above what is in the budget,” Szabo replied.

“Is there any proposal — any sort of competent, grown up, adult proposal — for how we pay for this?” McOsker, who also chairs the Personnel and Hiring Committee, asked in a follow up question to Szabo.

“Not that I'm aware of,” Szabo replied. He said his office would be happy to identify reductions to fund additional hiring, but had not been instructed to do so.

That means the proposed hires would need to come from the city’s reserve funds, which Szabo’s office cautioned against.

“The impact of this overspending in 2025-26 and 2026-27 cannot be overlooked,” his office’s financial status report states, “as it represents a departure from the approved plan with likely repercussions to the City’s Reserve Fund.”

The reserve fund currently sits at 5.06 percent of the total general fund budget, according to the report, but overspending — primarily driven by LAPD and liability payments — could bring the reserve fund below emergency levels of 5 percent.

“We should never, as a practice, assume the use of the reserve fund for hiring police officers,” Szabo told the Budget and Finance Committee. “The reserve fund is there for unexpected circumstances.”

In an emailed statement provided to LAist, McOsker said he agrees with the mayor that public safety is the highest priority.

“I agreed with the Mayor six months ago when she originally proposed this saying she would work with Council Leadership to find the money to fund more officers.” McOsker said, “But six months later, this remains a proposal with no funding identification.”

Bass told Larry Mantle on AirTalk that the city is looking at “every account possible” to find money for more officers, and that not approving more hiring will also have a financial cost.

“ Either we hire new officers or we continue to spend millions and millions of dollars in overtime,” she said.

Listen to the interview

The CEO of California’s high-speed rail authority resigned late Wednesday, saying he needs to focus on “important personal and family priorities,” according to a copy of the emailed resignation obtained by CalMatters.

“This has not been an easy decision, as leading the Authority has been one of the most meaningful and rewarding chapters of my professional life,” wrote Chief Executive Ian Choudri.

The abrupt announcement comes in the midst of a two-day meeting of the board that oversees the project, which continues Thursday. It follows Choudri’s tumultuous two-year tenure, which has been troubled by budget woes, project delays, transparency concerns and various scandals including the misuse of nearly $600,000 in taxpayer money for questionable trips by rail authority consultants.

Under Choudri, the authority also lost $4 billion in federal funding under President Donald Trump’s administration, after the agency repeatedly missed deadlines required by the funding agreement to buy trains. The state initially sued Trump for the funding but abruptly dropped the lawsuit in December 2025, blaming Trump as “not a reliable partner” and turning to private investors instead.

Choudri did not respond to an email or text from CalMatters requesting comment Wednesday night. It is unclear when his last day will be.

State investigators last month found the rail agency’s consultants flew first class, hailed premium rides and traveled to a nightclub, cigar lounge and restaurants on taxpayers’ dime, sometimes at Choudri’s request. Many of the trips involved traveling to Folsom, the Sacramento suburb where Choudri has a home, sometimes after hours.

The board voted earlier this month to limit Choudri’s contracting authority following the probe, requiring the in-house legal counsel to sign off first on contracts under $25 million.

The board has been weighing additional disciplinary action against Choudri for weeks, including possible termination, according to a source with the authority who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak on the matter.

California voters in 2008 approved a $10 billion bond to build a bullet train connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles by 2020, with a projected cost of $45 billion. But progress stalled amid rising costs, legal fights and funding uncertainties.

The authority’s latest business plan said the project could now cost between $126 billion and $231 billion, with the current 171-mile leg between Merced and Bakersfield under construction, and a full buildout expected by 2040.

The board was supposed to decide at the meeting this week if Choudri qualified for a potential $25,000 bonus based on his performance this year, agency spokesperson Micah Flores told CalMatters last month.

Choudri’s compensation this year is more than $534,000, according to agency spokesperson Annie Parker.

Cost overruns, project delays, legal challenges

Choudri was hired in August 2024 after spending decades in transportation engineering, with experience building high-speed rail in France and Spain. The board hired him in part due to his “strong understanding of complex transportation projects,” according to then-board chair Tom Richards.

Under Choudri, the agency has continued construction of the Central Valley segment and is on the cusp of getting environmental clearance from the state for all 500 miles of planned railway between San Francisco and Southern California. Newsom, a big supporter of the rail project, has committed $1 billion a year from the state’s climate fund toward the rail project until 2045.

Choudri has also led efforts to cut consultant contract costs, attract private investments and speed up contracting, rail authority chief of staff Mark Tollefson said during a Wednesday presentation touting Choudri’s achievements.

Ian Choudri, CEO of California High Speed Rail, speaks during a press conference on the high-speed rail project at the Wasco Rail Yard facility in Wasco on Feb. 3, 2026.

(

Larry Valenzuela

/

CalMatters

)

On Wednesday, the board unanimously approved a $772.1 million contract to Germany-based Siemens Mobility, Inc. to design, build and test three seven-car high-speed bullet trains by 2030. The authority will also pay up to $63.7 million in import duties and tariffs, because the trains will be designed and built in Germany.

The vote comes three years after the agency first opened bidding for six trainsets in August 2023 to qualify for more than $3 billion in federal grants, before ultimately losing the funding following missed deadlines.

In his resignation letter, Choudri said he was proud to have transformed the project.

“I took on a project facing significant challenges and serious questions about its prospects for success, and led its turnaround into a successful program,” he wrote.

But the project has continued to face significant cost overruns, schedule delays and lawsuits.

The train agency could run out of cash by December 2027, the office of inspector general warned in July. Meanwhile, the authority failed to make clear in its latest business plan that the Central Valley segment is now expected to be completed by 2034 at a cost likely exceeding $40 billion, the inspector general said.

The authority also based its project schedule on the assumption it would achieve legislative proposals it failed to push through this year.

To save money, the authority proposed shrinking the Merced-to-Bakersfield segment by 9 miles and moving the downtown Merced station to South Merced, in apparent violation of state law. It also requested an exemption from environmental regulations and solicited contractors for the new location, prompting a lawsuit this month from the Central Valley coalition Community Alliance for a Sustainable Economy.

“This challenge follows an unlawful pattern of behavior by the HSRA — proposing to relocate the downtown Merced station, then acting as if that move has been approved when it has not,” the complaint said.

Questionable trips plague the authority

Between 2024 and 2026, employees from four consulting firms working for Choudri's agency billed the state for questionable trips to locations including gyms, a nightclub, an escape room, a tiki bar and a cigar lounge, according to last month’s probe by the inspector general’s office overseeing the rail agency.

Many trips were poorly justified, yet the agency routinely reimbursed them without sufficient vetting, the inspector general said.

One legal consultant traveled between Denver and Sacramento 30 times in a year, charging the state $86,500 in “travel time” payments and an additional $40,800 in reimbursements.

In a testy meeting earlier this month, the board accused them of using the agency as a “piggy bank.”

On Wednesday, authority staff reported that the consulting firms have paid nearly $1.3 million in reimbursements to the agency.

CalMatters filed a public records request last month seeking the questionable travel invoices from the inspector general’s office. The agency provided records only from one firm, Nossaman, arguing that the records for other consultants are related to audits or investigations and therefore are not required to be publicly disclosed under a recent law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom.

The records that were released were heavily redacted by both the inspector general’s office and the rail agency, which argued much of the information is protected by attorney-client privilege.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Land in the Portuguese Bend area of Rancho Palos Verdes is now moving more than an inch per week, city officials said in a statement Wednesday. That’s an increase from August, but it is still moving much less than it was last year at this time.

Officials said the increase in land movement is due to coastal erosion after tropical storm-fueled waves walloped the Southern California coastline in mid-October.

Why has RPV's landslide gotten worse?

The Portuguese Bend area in Rancho Palos Verdes once offered spectacular views of the Pacific Ocean and Catalina Island. Now, much of that land is riddled with chasms that run as much as 20 feet deep or span a dozen feet across.

For decades, land movement was minimal. But with above-average rainfall in recent years, that movement rapidly accelerated — up to 1 foot per week in some places. Land movement has since slowed, thanks in part to wells the city installed that suck water out of the ground. But damage to the area remains, and the underlying issue will likely never be stopped.

What happens now?

Rancho Palos Verdes is preparing for a very wet winter as a super El Niño is expected to drench Southern California in the coming weeks.

The city reported that the winterization measures, which include filling large fissures, “fared well” during recent rainfall. For instance, pump trucks were not needed on Palos Verdes Drive South, the road through the landslide area that typically floods during rainy weather.

More than 465 Orange County workers with the Teamsters Local 952 returned to the picket line Thursday after failing to reach a deal late Wednesday. Union officials say they once again expect delays in landfill operations and other county services.

The workers include heavy equipment operators, waste workers, custodial workers and more from county departments such as OC Public Works and OC Waste & Recycling.

Workers first went on strike on Oct. 13, but went back to work a week later when bargaining resumed.

“The County respects the rights of our dedicated employees to engage in lawful strike activity under California law,” a county spokesperson said in a statement. “The County will continue to execute contingency plans as needed to minimize any service disruptions.”

Union leaders said they initiated bargaining talks in 2025 — about six months before the active contract was set to expire. They also claim the county made no significant movement toward a deal until August.

How we got here

Eric Jimenez, secretary-treasurer for Teamsters Local 952, told LAist that members rejected two county offers, which included a 3% raise and another offer with a 4% raise. Both offers did not include retroactive pay.

“(Workers) didn't do anything to hold these negotiations up,” Jimenez said. “To receive no retroactive pay for something they didn't do … the members took it very offensively.”

What’s next? 

County and union officials are expected to meet Thursday for another round of bargaining.

In a February 2026 interview, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass drew a clear line on drug enforcement around MacArthur Park: The city's focus would be on traffickers, not people who were in the park to use drugs.

On June 4, 2026, LAPD officers, working with federal agents, started arresting people in the park for being under the influence, drinking or carrying bulky items. Two days later, at a World Cup watch party in the park, I asked Bass whether she had approved the shift. She told me she had not.

A federal prosecutor who oversaw the operation said she did

Los Angeles Police Department officers stand near two handcuffed men in MacArthur Park on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

Police officers and federal agents gather at MacArthur Park on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

Law enforcement officials watch as LAPD officers and federal agents sweep through the park to arrest drug users on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

Law enforcement officers and officials observe during a drug enforcement operation on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

Other members of the Southern California Drug Task Force joined the LAPD for a joint drug enforcement operation on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

From left, L.A. County District Attorney Nathan Hochman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli and DEA Special Agent in Charge Anthony Chrysanthis speak at a press conference after a drug enforcement operation on June 4, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli and L.A. County District Attorney Nathan Hochman were at the park as the arrests were being made. They told reporters on the scene this was a new stage of operations following the arrests of alleged 18th Street gang leaders and drug distributors.

“This is our third phase of this operation,” Essayli said. “Phase three will be a consistent law enforcement presence in the park to enforce state law, which prohibits people from being under the influence of narcotics and possessing drugs with the intent to use them.”

Hochman said people who were in the park to use drugs would still get assistance with substance use treatment, mental health care or housing. But he said that by bringing demand for drugs to the park, buyers were enabling the illicit trade and turning the park into a “cemetery.”

“If there's no one demanding drugs in the park,” Hochman said, “the suppliers have nowhere to go.”

That framing — that law enforcement would be cracking down on drug use — was a departure from what Bass had told me four months earlier.

In February 2026, I asked Bass about the city's strategy at MacArthur Park. She was direct.

“There is a difference between drug use and drug sales and trafficking,” she told me. “My focus is not on the users, but what I want to do with the users is provide more access to drug treatment programs.”

Enforcement that made a difference, she said, needed to focus on people “trafficking girls,” drugs and stolen goods.

“You can arrest somebody who is under the influence,” she said. “That's not going to go anywhere.”

On June 4, the LAPD arrested people who were under the influence.

On the ground in the park that week, some people told me arresting drug users didn’t seem to change much.

“This park's always gonna be like this, man …” one man, who asked to be identified only as Don't-do-dat, told me. ”We had the DEA and all that raid. Man, that's just for a little while. [People using fentanyl are] gonna be out here again the next day.”

A man who goes by Don't-do-dat sits on a bench in MacArthur Park on June 15, 2026.

(

Jordan Rynning

/

LAist

)

Others welcomed the new enforcement.

“A lot of the people here in the community were happy that there was operations here,” Elaine Alaniz, president of the Westlake North Neighborhood Council, said. “It was temporary, but we got to see, actually, families at the bus stops with their kids — before it wasn’t like that.”

A student at a nearby high school said she doesn’t use the park because she doesn’t feel safe in the area.

“Going outside is pretty scary for me and for my family, because we just see a lot of [people using drugs] and everything going around,” she told me. “I would like to see more kids and families able to just walk around here freely.”

Local and federal agencies conducted two more operations near the park by the end of June, arresting people who were dealing or using drugs.

'That is not coming from the city'

Two days after the June 4 sweep, I asked Bass whether she had approved the targeted arrests of people using drugs.

She was at the park for a World Cup watch party. Federal and county prosecutors had said, on the record and in front of me, that this was a coordinated operation with the mayor's support.

“I've personally spoken with Mayor Bass,” Essayli had told reporters in the park on June 4. “She supports this operation, and LAPD would not be here without her support.”

Bass told me something different.

“That is not coming from the city,” she said about targeting drug users. “I'm sure that you're aware of that. That's coming from the federal government.”

I asked the mayor's office to clarify her remarks, which appeared to contradict what Essayli had said and what I had seen in the park. A spokesperson replied by email that the office would not comment on law enforcement operations, but that “Mayor Bass has directed the LAPD to utilize every resource available to stop the flow of narcotics and stolen merchandise in the park and surrounding area.”

The statement called on L.A. County to increase services in the area.

“Because the State and County — not the City — are responsible for providing mental health and drug treatment services, they must increase funding for treatment facilities and recovery services to stop the revolving door between jail and our parks,” the statement said.

I reached out to County Supervisor Hilda Solis for comment. Solis said the county has expanded services for behavioral health care, substance use treatment and housing in the MacArthur Park area.

“Through these ongoing efforts,” Solis said in an emailed statement, “over 3,000 lives were saved since 2023, and more than 750 were linked to treatment and medication.”

An earlier statement from Bass' office, sent when I first asked whether the city's stance had shifted on the LAPD targeting drug users, did not address the question directly. It said the office would not comment on law enforcement investigations, but that “the park is no place for drug use and criminal activity of any kind.”

“After decades of failures from City Hall, Mayor Bass is leading the way to restore MacArthur Park to families,” the spokesperson wrote.

What remains unresolved: LAPD officers made the arrests. A federal prosecutor watching on said Bass approved. Bass told me she did not.

What happened to those who were arrested?

Over the weeks following the June 4 operation, I asked the district attorney and city attorney's offices whether charges had been filed for the arrests and citations made that day or in similar sweeps that followed. Both offices said they had not been presented with any such cases from the LAPD.

The LAPD did not respond to my request for identifying information about those arrested — information the prosecutors' offices need to search their records and determine whether any of those arrested or cited were placed in diversionary treatment programs.

So the question of what the June 4 arrests actually accomplished — whether they routed people into the treatment Bass said she wanted for users, or moved them somewhere else in the neighborhood — cannot yet be answered from the public record.

What is clear, however, is that the focus on arresting people using drugs in the park wasn’t permanent.

By August, an LAPD officer told the MacArthur Park Neighborhood Council during an online meeting that they would not see any more joint operations between the police department, the DEA and other law enforcement agencies in the park.

The LAPD was transitioning to a final phase of operations, connecting people dependent on drugs in and around MacArthur Park with services while continuing to target suspected drug dealers.

I spoke with LAPD Capt. Ben Fernandes during a town hall on Oct. 13 to get his perspective on what had happened during the June 4 operation.

Fernandes leads the Rampart Division and was on the scene that day.

“The mayor's our boss,” Fernandes said. “But we're peace officers, and we follow the law — and we follow what the chief of police tells us.”

He told me the department tries to follow the mayor’s requests, but that they are “duty-bound” to arrest people when they see them breaking the law.

“I wouldn't say that there was any conflict [with the mayor] there at all,” Fernandes told me. “I would say that we worked with our federal partners and went out and took bad actors to jail, and some of them are going to prison.”

Bass had a different perspective when asked during a DTLA Residents Association forum on Oct. 15 whether she would instruct LAPD to cite or arrest people using drugs in public.

“When LAPD does that, they don't arrest anybody — it's a cite and release,” Bass said. “They don't even get in the car, so I think it's fake. I think what is real is holding people accountable for their drug use.”

Bass said she supports drug court, where some people arrested on nonviolent felony drug charges can have their cases dismissed if they agree to go to supervised recovery programs.

“You can go into treatment or you take a stint in jail,” Bass said.

L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman, Bass’ opponent in the race for L.A. mayor, answered the same question by saying she would “direct LAPD to enforce the laws, and they are welcome to enforce the laws however they see fit.”