The Brief

At the California Republican Party convention in Garden Grove over the weekend, the theme was, “Going on the Offense.”

The opponent was clear: Proposition 50 on the November ballot has galvanized an often fractious state GOP.

All political eyes are on California and Proposition 50, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s redistricting plan. Big money is already flowing into the fight and campaign mailers are flooding mailboxes over a measure that could determine which party controls the U.S. House of Representatives.

It could attract as much as $200 million total from both parties and their allies from around the country.

The measure, if passed by California voters, would redraw the state’s congressional district maps in a way that at least five Republicans would likely lose their seats to Democrats. Right now, the GOP holds nine of California’s 52 seats. Democrats hold the rest.

“To the extent that Republicans already are an endangered species in California, this would be like an extinction level event,” said Jon Fleischman, a former executive director of the California Republican Party and convention delegate from Orange County.

The national spotlight is on California after the Texas Legislature passed a redistricting plan that will likely result in five more Republicans getting elected to Congress from that state.

Newsom has said his last-minute effort — the special election was called only last month — is in direct response to Texas. Newsom, an especially vocal critic of President Trump, has pointed out it was the president who encouraged Texas to draw new political boundaries to favor the GOP.

Shawn Steel, a national Republican committee member from Seal Beach who attended the convention, said the fight over Proposition 50 has unified the state GOP.

“We’ve got people in the same room on this issue who hated each other for 20 years,” he said. “Those days are over, at least for the next 58 days.”

Conventioneers celebrate Trump

But for Proposition 50, there was a lot to celebrate at the convention, which was held at the Hyatt Regency Orange County and attended by more than 1,000 people. Many people said they were thrilled about President Donald Trump’s first six months in office.

“I wake up everyday happy and joyful that he’s still president,” said Johnnie Morgan, 74, a delegate from South L.A., citing Trump's policies on transgender people and deportations.

“He’s fearless and he stands for this country, and no matter what anybody throws at him, he stands strong,” said Bonnie Wallace, a delegate from Pasadena.

As usual, vendors sold all manner of Trump paraphernalia, including hats, sequined blouses and jewelry with the president’s name.

The hallways of the Hyatt were plastered with campaign signs for candidates ranging from governor to local party vice chair. Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative commentator Steve Hilton are the two most prominent Republican candidates for governor. Both attended the convention.

Newsom is termed out of office next year.

But it was the topic of Proposition 50 that people came back to time and again.

“It's just pure cheating again,” said Wallace, 47, who teaches dance classes. “It’s election fraud.”

Help from Schwarzenegger

Under Proposition 50, voters would override the political map drawn by an independent citizen’s redistricting commission and replace it with one drawn by Democrats. The new lines would govern elections in 2026, 2028 and 2030. Another independent commission would be appointed to determine boundaries for the 2032 election.

Former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who co-authored the measure that created the state’s independent redistricting commission more than 15 years ago, is expected to campaign against Prop 50.

Fellow Republicans say his participation is considered key to winning over independent voters.

“I think he’s clearly the most recognized name against Prop. 50,” said Roxanne Hoge, chair of the L.A. County Republican Party.

Fighting Newsom

At a convention workshop designed to educate people about how to campaign against the measure, some party leaders urged people to avoid the complicated topic of redistricting and instead focus on California’s Democratic governor.

“Just ask if Governor Newsom and the legislative body in Sacramento deserve more power,” Assemblymember David Tangipa of Fresno told one convention workshop.

The attendees shouted, “No!”

Orange County Republican Party Chair Will O’Neill said he believes Newsom’s ascent to power is what Prop. 50 is all about.

“This is to feed the presidential ambition of a governor who has gotten way over his skis,” he said.

Steel, the national Republican committee member from Seal Beach, agreed.

“We want to embarrass Newsom so he doesn’t have a chance to be president in the future,” he said.

Plans to mobilize voters

Whether Prop. 50 passes or not will likely come down to which party is more successful at getting voters to the polls.

“It’s going to be a high- profile, high- dollar campaign,” Fleischman said. “These kinds of campaigns really have two aspects to them — it's voter education and voter turnout.”

Some said one way to convince people to vote no on the measure is to show them the maps.

O’Neill described the maps as a tangled web of lines that resemble elephants and spiders, noting how they sweep up Democrats to form new Democrat-majority districts.

Steel said the party needs to “awaken the base” in the way Trump did last year.

“This is a big deal. This is the future of our party,” he said.

But only about 25% of voters are registered Republican in California. So reaching out to independents will be key. That’s where Schwarzenegger comes in.

Independents represent 22% of voters. Democrats represent 45%.

Still, Republicans at the convention were optimistic.

“I think we have a good shot at having this not pass,” said Matthew Craffey of Los Angeles. “But it's going to be a fight.”

The Los Angeles World Cup host committee has quietly posted its guidance on human rights after months of speculation over where the plan was and when it would be published.

Advocates had pushed the committee, an arm of the Los Angeles Sports & Entertainment Commission, to produce its plan. But now that it's out, they're not satisfied with what they're seeing.

The human rights guidance is required by FIFA and outlined on the host committee's website. It includes a list of online resources including where to file complaints with various local and state level agencies and a summary of local, state and federal laws protecting human and civil rights. The committee is also touting a partnership with L.A. County in which people can call 211 to report a concern during the tournament.

"Los Angeles is weeks away from hosting one of the largest sporting events in the world, and yet what has been posted is not a plan,” Stephanie Richard, director of the Sunita Jain Anti‑Trafficking Initiative at Loyola Law School, said in a statement. “It is a list of laws and hotline numbers."

The human rights document also skirts fears around ICE and its potential presence at the tournament and surrounding celebrations. Todd Lyons, the agency's head, said earlier this year that ICE's investigatory branch will play a key role in security for the tournament.

But ICE and immigration enforcement aren't mentioned on the host committee's web page on human rights or in its outline of its approach to human rights. "Immigration status" only gets a mention in the list of existing anti-discrimination laws.

"It certainly could have been much stronger," Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights in Los Angeles, said of the plan. She added that her organization participated in a roundtable on the plan, and she was disappointed ICE and recent immigration sweeps weren't mentioned in the resulting document.

"In order for all of this to happen, immigrant workers are part of it," she said of the World Cup. "Your hotel workers, your service workers, stadium workers, drivers." 

LAist reached out to spokespeople for the host committee for comment via email, phone and text, but did not hear back in time for publication. FIFA's press team also did not respond to an email from LAist.

According to the host committee's website, the human rights plan is the result of coordination with the city and county of Los Angeles, the city of Inglewood, and 14 roundtable discussions held in the fall of 2025.

"As a non-profit organization, the Host Committee’s role is primarily and necessarily focused on aligning and collaborating with governmental and non-governmental organizations," the document sums up the committee's approach.

The plan also promises more actions, including "Know Your Rights" training for L.A. residents and visitors and "Know Your Responsibilities" training for businesses and vendors. The committee also says it will develop a "rapid response" strategy to respond to potential problems at the tournament.

Available details on those plans were scant. And with the tournament just 30 days away, labor unions and community groups are continuing to voice concerns about potential ICE presence at SoFi Stadium and other potential consequences of the tournament coming to town.

The mayor of Arcadia has agreed to plead guilty to a charge she acted as an agent for China, federal prosecutors announced Monday. She has resigned from her position with the city.

Eileen Wang, 58, faces one count of acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. The charge carries a potential sentence of up to 10 years in federal prison.

What we know about the criminal case

According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Wang and Yaoning “Mike” Sun of Chino Hills worked at the direction of the Chinese government and with individuals based in the U.S. to promote pro-People’s Republic of China propaganda in the United States. Those actions occurred between 2020 and 2022, prosecutors said.

According to federal prosecutors, Wang and Sun operated a website — known as U.S. News Center — billed as a news source for the local Chinese American community in Los Angeles County. They posted content on the site, described as "pre-written articles," based on directives from Chinese government officials.

Sun, 65, pleaded guilty in October 2025 in federal court to acting as an illegal agent of a foreign government. He is serving a four-year federal prison sentence.

Prosecutors also said Wang communicated with John Chen, whom they described as “a high-level member of the [Chinese government] intelligence apparatus,” in November 2021, and asked him to post an article from her website.

In a group chat, Wang referenced the article and wrote: “This is what the Ministry of Foreign Affairs wants to send,” according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

Chen pleaded guilty in New York to acting as an illegal agent of the People’s Republic of China and conspiracy to bribe a public official. In 2024, he was sentenced to 20 months in federal prison.

What's next

Wang, who was elected to the City Council in November 2022, was expected to make her first appearance in U.S. District Court Monday afternoon.

Citing a plea agreement, prosecutors said she's expected to enter the guilty plea within the next few weeks.

Arcadia's mayor is selected from the elected council members. A post on the city's website announced that Wang had resigned her position as of Monday and that a new mayor would be picked from the remaining council members at the next meeting.

The Supreme Court on Monday gave itself more time to consider a national ban on telemedicine access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

Justice Samuel Alito extended an earlier order he issued by three more days, so rules for prescribing mifepristone online or through the mail remain in effect through Thursday at a minimum.

The case at issue

The tumult over the future of telemedicine access to mifipristone started on May 1 with a ruling from the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals. That ruling re-instituted prescribing rules from before the pandemic that required patients to receive mifepristone in person in a doctor's office or clinic.

The Food and Drug Administration determined that the rule was medically unnecessary in 2021. The state of Louisiana sued last fall, arguing that telemedicine access undermines the state's abortion ban.

What is telemedicine abortion?

The telemedicine abortion process starts with a patient connecting with a healthcare provider on the phone or online. If the patient is eligible, that provider can prescribe two medications — mifepristone and another pill called misoprostol. Patients can pick up the medicine at a local pharmacy, or providers can mail the drugs to a patient's home.

That access is a big part of the reason why the number of abortions nationally has actually increased since the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022. Now, most abortions in the U.S. use this combination of medications, and one quarter happen via telemedicine.

After the 5th Circuit ruling, some providers said they would continue offering telemedicine access to abortion medication using a different protocol that involves higher doses of misoprostol and no mifepristone.

Researchers say that method is just as safe and effective, but tends to cause more pain for patients and more side effects, like nausea and diarrhea. Misoprostol has other medical uses, such as treating gastric ulcers and hemorrhage, and has been on the market longer than mifepristone. It is likely to remain fully accessible, even if mifepristone is restricted.

Since the FDA's prescribing rules for medications apply to the whole country, a change to the rules about how mifepristone can be accessed has national impact. That means it affects states with constitutionally-protected access to abortion, states with criminal bans, like Louisiana, and all states in between.

States' rights

Nearly two dozen Democratic-led states submitted an amicus brief in this case, writing that the appeals court decision put the policy choices of states with bans above the choices of states "that have made the different but equally sovereign determinations to promote access to abortion care."

There are also stakes related to the power of FDA and other expert agencies to set rules. While the Trump administration's FDA did not respond to the Supreme Court's request for briefs, a group of former leaders of the agency, who served under mainly Democratic and some Republican presidents, wrote about this in an amicus brief.

They defended the FDA's process in approving the medication and modifying the rules for prescribing it, and say the appeals court decision "would upend FDA's gold-standard, science-based drug approval system."

Copyright 2026 NPR