Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Huntington Beach's measures A, B headed to victory
    Voter Game Plan: Live Results is written in big bold blue letters, surrounded by gold starts. Text box is sitting on a sketchy collage background, depicting election result charts of different races in washy periwinkle colors. Some results are circled, and there are big "I Voted" stickers overlaid.

    Topline:

    Voters in Huntington Beach appear on track to approve two ballot measures that would allow the city to ask for voter ID and restrict which flags can be flown from government flagpoles.

    What's the vote count? According to the Orange County Registrar of Voters' latest tally, "yes" votes on the voter ID measure, Measure A, were ahead by about 3,100 ballots, or 54%.

    On Measure B, the flag restrictions, "yes" votes were ahead by about 6,300 votes, or 58%.

    Have all votes been counted? No. But Protect Huntington Beach, the main group opposed to the ballot measures, conceded defeat in social media posts on Wednesday evening.

    Why it matters: These election results are being closely watched both inside and outside the city. The measures are one of the first big tests of residents' feelings about the city's sharp turn to the right under the leadership of an ultra-conservative city council majority, elected in 2022.

    Voters in Huntington Beach appear on track to approve two ballot measures that would allow the city to ask for voter ID and restrict which flags can be flown from government flagpoles.

    Protect Huntington Beach, the main group opposed to the ballot measures, conceded defeat in social media posts on Wednesday evening.

    According to the Orange County Registrar of Voters' latest tally, "yes" votes on the voter ID measure, Measure A, were ahead by 53%.

    On Measure B, the flag restrictions, "yes" votes were ahead by 57%.

    Measure A

    An election bar chart headlined A-City of Huntington Beach Charter Amendment Measure No. 1, and showing boxes for the yes vote, and the no vote. At last check, the measure is heading to victory.
    This is the so-called Voter ID measure on Huntington Beach's ballot. It has been referred to in some corners as Measure A, and also as Measure 1.
    (
    Courtesy OC Registrar
    /
    OCVote.gov
    )

    Measure B

    An election bar chart headlined B-City of Huntington Beach Charter Amendment Measure No. 2, and showing boxes for the yes vote, and the no vote. At last check, the measure appears to be headed for victory.
    (
    Courtesy OC Registrar
    /
    OCVote.gov
    )

    These election results are being closely watched both inside and outside the city.

    The measures are one of the first big tests of residents' feelings about the city's sharp turn to the right under the leadership of an ultra-conservative city council majority, elected in 2022.

    Huntington Beach Mayor Gracey Van Der Mark said the results were validating. "It does, in a sense, give peace of mind that this is what the voters asked for, it's not just us on the dais," Van Der Mark said.

    When LAist spoke to her the Thursday morning after the election, Van Der Mark said she was at city hall waiting to speak with city attorney Michael Gates about the next steps toward implementing Measure A, which wouldn't take effect until the 2026 election. She said she expected a legal challenge from the state.

    "I do anticipate Sacramento is going to come after us, they always do," she said.

    Still, she said she's committed to implementing the measure.

    Connie Boardman, a former Huntington Beach mayor who is part of the Protect Huntington Beach group, told LAist she was disappointed in the results but that they were not unexpected. "We knew it was an uphill battle," Boardman said, noting that voters in primary elections tend to skew Republican.

    Despite voters' approval of the voter ID measure, it's almost sure to face major hurdles to implementation. State officials have already warned the city that asking for voter ID and monitoring ballot boxes — also part of Measure A — would violate state law.

    In California, as long as voters show ID when they register to vote, they don't have to do it again at the polls.

    State Sen. Dave Min has also introduced legislation to clarify that cities cannot implement their own voter ID measures separate from the state.

    Measure A also faces a legal challenge from Mark Bixby, a former Huntington Beach planning commissioner. Bixby told LAist he plans to continue fighting implementation of the voter ID measure. "I still remain firmly opposed to voter ID," Bixby said, "and so I'm expecting the fight will continue."

    The city is, in essence, already implementing Measure B, which restricts flying flags from city flagpoles to only government flags, the POW-MIA flag, and the Olympic flag during the summer games. Last year, the city council rescinded an earlier council's decision to fly the rainbow Pride flag each spring and replaced it with restrictions similar to Measure B.

    Measure B puts the restrictions in the city's charter, and allows other flags to be flown only by a unanimous vote from the city council.

    Measure C, which would implement a two-year budget and change the way city council vacancies are filled, still appears to be headed for a loss.

    Measure C

    An election bar chart headlined C-City of Huntington Beach Charter Amendment Measure No. 1, and showing boxes for the yes vote, and the no vote. At last check, the measure appears to be headed for defeat.
    (
    Courtesy OC Registrar
    /
    OCVote.gov
    )

    Measure C is an in-the-weeds initiative that would guide the inner workings of the city government. For example, Measure C would allow the mayor or a majority of city council members to cancel a city council meeting. It also specifies that at least one city council meeting must be held each month. Currently, the city's charter requires the council to hold meetings twice a month.

    The measure would change the rules for filling city council vacancies, and require the city to adopt a two-year, or biennial, budget. Supporters say adopting a two-year budget cycle would give city departments greater stability and allow for longer-term planning.

    A note on the results

    About the vote count

    Keep in mind that in tight races particularly, the winner may not be determined for days or weeks after Election Day. In Orange County, the first batch of results released includes vote-by-mail ballots received before March 5, followed by early votes cast in-person at vote centers, then votes cast in-person on Election Day.

    Votes left to process

    As of the evening of Monday, March 18, the Orange County Registrar-Recorder reported the following estimates of remaining ballots to count:

    • 16,631

    Breakdown of those votes:

    • 56 are vote-by-mail
    • 391 are drop box
    • 7,089 are "final drop box" pickups
    • 5,836 are mail-in ballots returned to vote center
    • 2,352 are "eligible" ballots received after election day
    • 586 are "duplicated" ballots
    • 322 are provisional ballots

    Note: In California, ballots postmarked on or before March 5 are counted toward the results as long as they arrive within seven days of the election, or by March 12. Results must be certified by county election officials by April 4.

    How we're covering this election

    Early voters and mail-in ballots have fundamentally reshaped how votes are counted and when election results are known.

    Our priority will be sharing outcomes and election calls only when they have been thoroughly checked and vetted. To that end, we will report when candidates concede and otherwise rely on NPR and The Associated Press for race calls. We will not report the calls or projections of other news outlets. You can find more on NPR and The AP's process for counting votes and calling races here, here and here.

    Ask us a question

    What questions do you have about this election?
    You ask, and we'll answer: Whether it's about how to interpret the results or track your ballot, we're here to help you understand the 2024 general election on Nov. 5.

  • President names L.A. and San Diego as Iran targets
    Donald Trump stands on a red carpet with fists raised in front of a crowd and a sign reading 'Make America Great Again'.
    President Donald Trump at a campaign rally on the Nebraska State Fairgrounds on Monday where the crowd laughed and cheered as he made remarks about Iran targeting L.A. and San Diego as a "small price to pay."

    Topline:

    During a rally last night in Nebraska, President Donald Trump floated the idea that Tehran could “take out” two major American cities. “They could take out a city,” he said. "Let ‘em take out Los Angeles. Let ’em take out San Diego.”

    What else did he say: The crowd laughed and cheered and he added: “This is a very small price to pay, and it’s going to be over with very soon.”

    Reaction: Local and state leaders condemned the president's remarks on social media. Gov. Gavin Newsom called Trump “deranged and dangerous.” L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said "the role of a president is to protect the country, not to actively threaten it and encourage attacks on American lives." San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria said: "We are not expendable. And we are never a 'small price to pay."

    During a rally Monday night in Nebraska, President Donald Trump was going through his usual insistence that gas prices are only temporarily high and worth it as part of his war on Iran.

    Then he added a new wrinkle, floating the idea that Tehran could “take out” two major American cities.

    “They could take out a city,” he said. "Let ‘em take out Los Angeles. Let ’em take out San Diego.”

    He continued as the crowd laughed and cheered: “This is a very small price to pay, and it’s going to be over with very soon.”

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who may run for president in 2028, answered on X, calling Trump “deranged and dangerous.”

    L.A. Mayor Karen Bass, who is running for reelection against Councilmember Nithya Raman, called the president's statements dangerous in a social media post.

    "The role of a president is to protect the country, not to actively threaten it and encourage attacks on American lives," she wrote.

    Sam Diego Mayor Todd Gloria, in another post on X, said "San Diego is not collateral damage. We are not expendable. And we are never a 'small price to pay."

    Trump has a history of denigrating U.S. cities, especially the largest ones that lean heavily Democratic. Los Angeles was among the cities where Trump deployed federal military personnel for what he said was a crackdown on crime, despite local authorities not wanting the troops.

    At a recent North Carolina campaign rally, Trump said the state’s cities are “blood-soaked killing fields.” North Carolina’s violent crime rate ranks in the middle third of states, according to FBI statistics.

    LAist staff contributed to this report.

  • Sponsored message
  • The $81B closes on "Skydance" studios
    A water tower with the WB logo rises above the Warner Bros. studio lot, with hills in the background.
    The $81 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery also means a new name for the legendary studio: “Skydance.”

    Topline:

    It’s official: Skydance-owned Paramount has closed its $81 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery. The companies completed the deal today, ushering in a new Hollywood giant with the now shorter “Skydance” nametag.

    Why it matters: The merger brings two of America’s oldest moviemaking studios together. And HBO Max, titles ranging from “Harry Potter” to “Sinners” and even networks like CNN find themselves under the same roof as Paramount+, CBS and the likes of “Top Gun” and “The Godfather.”

    Who's in charge: All of them will come under the helm of billionaire David Ellison, and his new co-CEO Ynon Kreiz. That further concentrates power in an industry already run by just a handful of major players. Ellison’s Skydance bought out Paramount for $8 billion just last year, and set its sights on Warner — an even bigger fish — very soon after.

    How we got here: It was a tumultuous, roughly year-long fight over Warner’s fate. Keep reading for the details, and for Hollywood's reaction.

    It’s official: Skydance-owned Paramount has closed its $81 billion takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery.

    The companies completed the deal on Tuesday, ushering in a new Hollywood giant with the now shorter “Skydance” nametag. The merger brings two of America’s oldest moviemaking studios together. And HBO Max, titles ranging from “Harry Potter” to “Sinners” and even networks like CNN find themselves under the same roof as Paramount+, CBS and the likes of “Top Gun” and “The Godfather.”

    All of them will come under the helm of billionaire David Ellison, and his new co-CEO Ynon Kreiz. That further concentrates power in an industry already run by just a handful of major players. Ellison’s Skydance bought out Paramount for $8 billion just last year, and set its sights on Warner — an even bigger fish — very soon after.

    What followed erupted into a tumultuous, roughly year-long fight over Warner’s fate.

    Skydance Corp. emerges from one of the biggest tie-ups ever in the media and entertainment industry. Including billions of dollars in debt, the Warner acquisition amounted to nearly $111 billion.

    “Today is a historic day, not just for Skydance but for our entire industry," Ellison said in a statement Tuesday. "We couldn’t be more excited to get to work.”

    Here’s a look at some of the key moments that got us here.

    Netflix v. Paramount

    The early days of Paramount's quest for Warner turned into a messy bidding war.

    Months after disclosing it was open to selling parts or even all of its business, Warner initially struck a studio and streaming deal with Netflix back in December. But Skydance-owned Paramount, which claimed Warner management “never engaged meaningfully” with its previous proposals, soon launched a hostile counterbid aimed at taking over the entire company — including networks like CNN and Discovery.

    The Hollywood giants spent much of early 2026 in a heated back-and-forth over who had a stronger offer on the table, with Warner leadership repeatedly backing Netflix as its preferred suitor. But Paramount eventually upped its offer to buy all of Warner for $31 per share, and Netflix opted to bow out of the race. Warner and Paramount inked a mutual merger agreement by late February.

    The response from Hollywood

    Hollywood was closely watching the fight over Warner's future. And from awards shows to online petitions, A-list celebrities and other creatives made their voices known.

    In April, thousands of movie stars, writers, directors and other professionals announced their “unequivocal opposition” to the Paramount-Warner merger. The open letter — which was signed by long-outspoken critics of the deal like Jane Fonda and Mark Ruffalo, as well as Hollywood heavyweights from Denis Villeneuve to J.J. Abrams — warned of fewer jobs and “less choice for audiences in the United States and around the world.”

    Meanwhile, some other stars lined up to back Paramount as Ellison reiterated his commitments to the movies. At CinemaCon this past spring, the company debuted a glossy mini movie about the studio directed by Jon M. Chu and narrated by Tom Cruise — who ended the spot atop the iconic Paramount water tower, with the words “the future is paramount and the future looks pretty great from here." Director James Cameron also doubled down on his support of Ellison.

    The prospect of a new Warner owner also loomed over awards season this year, from #BlockTheMerger pins to more subtle nods in acceptance speeches. When accepting her Emmy last month, “Remarkably Bright Creatures” actor Sally Field — who also signed the open letter in opposition to the Paramount-Warner deal — stressed that “unique storytelling matters” and “we can’t let those voices be silenced, or compromised or merged.”

    Many industry critics were also outspoken when Netflix's studio and streaming deal was on the table, with particular focus on the future of movies staying in theaters.

    Trump and CNN

    Trump has regularly attacked reporting he deems unfavorable at CNN (most recently attempting to bar the outlet from the White House altogether). And over the course of the Warner buyout, his administration wasn't afraid to chime in about hopes for a new owner.

    In December — days after Paramount launched its hostile bid for Warner — the president said that CNN spread “poison and lies,” adding that “I think the people who have run CNN for the last long period of time are a disgrace" and "it’s imperative that CNN be sold.”

    The White House took aim again at CNN in March, over the network's coverage of the U.S.-Israeli war against Iran. At the time, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters that “the sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better.”

    Ellison has said editorial independence will be maintained at CNN, and under a since-finalized settlement with the states, the company also agreed to form a “News Editorial Independence Board." But critics point to turmoil already seen at CBS under Skydance ownership — and aren’t convinced this new body will move the needle much, because Ellison is set to have ample oversight over appointments. Outside this board, however, the combined company is retaining Mark Thompson as CNN’s editor-in-chief.

    Trump has separately continued to criticize CBS coverage under Skydance ownership. Still, the president has held a long relationship with the billionaire Ellison family. Paramount's chief reportedly hosted a dinner in Washington in Trump’s honor back in April, on the same day Warner shareholders gave their greenlight for the merger. And in June, just two days after the U.S. Justice Department said it wouldn't intervene in the deal, Ellison attended an Ultimate Fighting Championship match on the White House lawn for Trump’s 80th birthday (streamed by Paramount+).

    Gulf money

    To help fund its Warner buyout, Paramount racked up billions of dollars in financial backing from three Gulf countries: Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The Federal Communications Commission approved the company’s request for sizeable indirect ownership from those foreign investors.

    Paramount previously disclosed it expected those funds to indirectly own nearly 50% of equity interests — but no voting rights — of what is now the larger Skydance. But the company asked for clearance of up to 100% to account for potential future investments, which the FCC granted, citing in part that access to more capital would strengthen the broadcast industry and was therefore “in the public interest.”

    Critics — including FCC’s sole Democratic Commissioner, Anna Gomez — have called the move alarming and unprecedented. They argue that amount of money opens the door to behind-the-scenes influence.

    The final antitrust fight

    Paramount cleared antitrust hurdles for its Warner acquisition from regulators worldwide over the summer, including the Trump administration's Justice Department.

    But in July, Democratic attorneys general from 12 states — led by California's Rob Bonta — sued to block the merger, alleging the combined company would “extinguish competition” and lead to fewer choices for consumers, particularly movie theatergoers and cable customers across the U.S.

    The Writers Guild of America followed suit. And Paramount agreed to put its Warner buyout on ice well into next year so the challenges could head toward a larger antitrust trial.

    Settlement agreements emerged in September. The states' terms, eventually approved by a judge, include pledges from the company to increase film production in the U.S. over the next five years, commit millions of dollars to a fund aimed at supporting workers displaced by the merger and again establish new editorial monitoring of CNN and CBS.

    Settling these challenges marked a key hurdle ahead of closing the deal. Critics decried the deal as capitulating to corporate pressure and said the remedies were too weak.

  • Forecasters say this year's will be "very strong"

    Topline:

    Federal forecasters say this year the planet could see the strongest El Niño event on record. It's already being called "Super El Niño" and even "Godzilla El Niño." El Niño is a natural climate pattern that has far-reaching impacts across the planet, potentially affecting hundreds of millions of people.

    Why now: NOAA forecasters say this year's El Niño will fall into the "very strong" category. It's measured by the temperature of the ocean in a particular region off South America. The warmer the water, the stronger the El Niño. When that water is more than 2 degrees Celsius warmer than average, it qualifies as a "very strong" El Niño.

    The backstory: El Niño occurs every two to seven years. It develops when a vast amount of water in the eastern Pacific Ocean warms up around the equator. That water releases massive heat, redistributing warmth from the ocean to the atmosphere. That shifts weather patterns around the world.

    What's next: El Niño also shifts rainfall patterns globally, raising the chances for destructive flooding in some parts of the world. Other regions get drier, exacerbating droughts. Both impacts can be catastrophic to agriculture around the world. The United Nations World Food Programme estimates that El Niño could push at least 49 million more people into acute food insecurity by the end of 2027.

    Federal forecasters say this year the planet could see the strongest El Niño event on record. It's already being called "Super El Niño" and even "Godzilla El Niño." El Niño is a natural climate pattern that has far-reaching impacts across the planet, potentially affecting hundreds of millions of people.

    Where those impacts happen can vary drastically from one El Niño to the next. Here are the basics of what this historic event could bring.

    What is El Niño?

    El Niño occurs every two to seven years. It develops when a vast amount of water in the eastern Pacific Ocean warms up around the equator. That water releases massive heat, redistributing warmth from the ocean to the atmosphere. That shifts weather patterns around the world.

    The flip side of El Niño is a La Niña, which is marked by relatively cool water in the tropical Pacific around the equator. These events are responsible for some of the biggest weather variability the planet experiences.

    Loading...

    El Niño is like dropping a rock in a pond, says Daniel Vimont, professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Even though you're not where the rock hit, you still may feel the effects of those waves," he says. "El Niño is the same thing, except it's an enormous rock in our entire Earth's system, and we feel the response."

    How strong is it?

    Sure, "Godzilla El Niño" is catchy, but technically, NOAA forecasters say this year's El Niño will fall into the "very strong" category. It's measured by the temperature of the ocean in a particular region off South America. The warmer the water, the stronger the El Niño. When that water is more than 2 degrees Celsius warmer than average, it qualifies as a "very strong" El Niño.

    The last strong events were in 2015-16, 1997-8 and 1982-83. El Niños typically peak in November and December, but already, this El Niño is the strongest ever measured for this time of year. NOAA forecasters expect it to last through early 2027.

    What will the impacts be globally?

    All that added heat in the atmosphere raises temperatures globally. El Niño years tend to be the hottest on record. Forecasters say this year may get close to taking the top spot, but it's very likely that temperature records could fall in 2027. The planet is already warmer due to climate change, because emissions from burning fossil fuels are trapping more heat in the atmosphere.

    El Niño also shifts rainfall patterns globally, raising the chances for destructive flooding in some parts of the world. Other regions get drier, exacerbating droughts. Both impacts can be catastrophic to agriculture around the world. The United Nations World Food Programme estimates that El Niño could push at least 49 million more people into acute food insecurity by the end of 2027.

    Loading...

    What will the impacts be in the U.S.?

    In El Niño years, the southern U.S. tends to see more intense rainfall because the jet stream shifts to the south. That raises the risk of floods along rivers and in cities. Still, in the Southwest, more rain could alleviate drought and recharge underground aquifers.

    "El Niño tends to juice up those storms so that you get more really strong rain events," says Martin Hoerling, meteorologist and adjunct lecturer at the University of Colorado Boulder. "So if you were running a deficit in your water supply, a big El Niño, especially like the one we're having, can really get you into recovery mode that otherwise might have taken you years."

    The northern half of the country gets warmer and drier, something that could exacerbate the current drought in the Intermountain West. Some states experience mixed effects during El Niños, like California. The state saw historic flooding in the 1997-98 El Niño, but was drier than average during the 2015-16 one. Climate experts say the current El Niño is so strong, it's more likely California will experience extreme rain.

    El Niños can also lead to fewer hurricanes in the Atlantic Ocean, since it's more difficult for the storms to form. In the Pacific Ocean, hurricanes can get more frequent, fueled by warmer ocean water. Already this year, hurricanes have intensified rapidly in the Pacific, and Hawaii has had close calls with several hurricanes that brought destructive rain and wind.

    Loading...

    Can we blame it all on El Niño?

    Certain weather changes are common during El Niños, but there are no guarantees that extreme weather events this winter will match those predictions for every region.

    "El Niño is like loading the dice," Vimont says. "While we're loading the dice for a certain type of response from El Niño, we still know that in any given year, there are still natural fluctuations that may mask that or cause the response to be slightly different than what we might expect."

    In addition to that natural variability, weather events are also being affected by climate change. The most intense storms are already producing more rainfall in most of the U.S., since a warmer atmosphere can hold more water vapor. Heat waves and droughts are also getting more intense due to rising temperatures. Climate experts say El Niño and climate change impacts will both play out this winter, but while El Niño will fade, the effects of climate change will continue.
    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Inside Hollywood Burbank Airport’s spiffy terminal
    A wide view of the new Hollywood Burbank Airport sign that's connected to a large rounded overhang across the facility.
    Hollywood Burbank Airport's new sign.

    Topline:

    Hollywood Burbank Airport’s new terminal is ready for prime time and slated to open to the public next week. Here’s what you can expect.

    What is it like? The new billion-dollar terminal has LAX’s modern feel, but presumably without the headaches. It’s replacing the old terminal that opened in 1930.

    Why was it needed? The airport needed improvements to meet FAA safety standards and state building requirements. The expanded space also allows for all gates to fit the large, modern planes.

    Read on…. to see what the new terminal looks like inside.

    Fans of Hollywood Burbank Airport have a new way to rag on LAX-ers.

    Burbank’s ambitious new terminal building has been completed on time and on budget. The long-awaited structure, known as the Elevate BUR project, is ready for prime time.

    It’s slated to open to the public on Oct. 13, with a new entrance at Winona Avenue and Hollywood Way. On Monday, LAist got a look inside.

    Why now?

    The $1.3 billion terminal is a decade in the making. The project comes from Burbank’s Measure B, which voters passed in 2016.

    Burbank Mayor Tamala Takahashi said the new building will replace the terminal that opened in 1930, which will eventually be demolished.

    “ The old building is not to code, so it can’t be reused. It’s too close to the airstrip. That’s why we had to do this in the first place,” she said.

    The new facility is more than 50% larger. Plus, it has a slate of improvements needed to meet FAA safety standards and state building requirements. That includes new seismic and accessibility features and more runaway space.

    Takahashi said the new terminal will open up  capacity because all of the gates will be able to accommodate modern planes.

    “What that means is that we’re going to have the same number of flights, the same number of planes, the same number of gates, but more people going through the airport every day,” she said.

    There’s one thing travelers can count on to stay the same: You’ll still be able to board your plane on the tarmac.

    The Hollywood touch

    Tyron Hampton, president of the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority, which owns the airport, said it’s time everyone knows about L.A.’s best insider tip for flying.

    “ This is no longer a secret,” he said. “We want people to come here. We want people to see this experience.”

    Hampton said the new building has space for more amenities, which feature local retailers like Jones Coffee and Octavia’s Bookshelf.

    A close-up of the ceiling made up of square tiles with black dots on them next to a large window with silver framing.
    The specs on the ceiling are supposed to mirror one of Marilyn Monroe's dresses.
    (
    Cato Hernández
    /
    LAist
    )

    Art is also woven into the design. Brent Kelley, who worked on the architecture at Corgan, said one of their themes was classic Hollywood.

    For example, small dots on the ceiling are meant to evoke Marilyn Monroe’s glimmering dress during her iconic “Happy Birthday, Mr. President” moment.

    A “silver screen” canopy extends across the building outside, alongside an installation that honors the time the buildings were covered in camouflage during World War II.