Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • MLB looks into gambling allegations
    An Asian man in a blue Dodgers sweater and baseball cap gestures No. 1 to the crowd with his hand.
    Los Angeles Dodgers designated hitter Shohei Ohtani gestures as he warms up during batting practice prior to an opening day baseball game at the Gocheok Sky Dome in Seoul, South Korea, on March 20, 2024.

    Topline:

    Shohei Ohtani is being investigated by Major League Baseball for the gambling allegations surrounding the Dodger superstar and his interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, who was fired by the team Wednesday.

    Why it matters: Ohtani’s bank account allegedly wired millions of dollars to an illegal bookmaker, who is currently under federal investigation, as reported by ESPN and the L.A. Times.

    Why now: The league confirmed in a statement that it's been gathering information about the allegations since they learned about them in the news earlier this week, and began their formal process Friday.

    The backstory: Mizuhara, Ohtani’s years-long interpreter who he’s described as a “best friend,” originally said the player had paid off his gambling debts, but his lawyers later said Ohtani was really the victim of a “massive theft.”

    What's next: The Dodgers’ home opener against the St. Louis Cardinals is Thursday, but fans can catch the team at home on Sunday when they play against the Angels for their final spring training game.

    Go deeper: Learn more about the allegations.

  • Georgia rep. to resign amid Trump tiff

    Topline:

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican who rose to prominence as one of President Donald Trump's biggest defenders and recently became one of his biggest critics, is leaving Congress.

    The context: Greene's announcement late Friday that she would resign effective Jan. 5, 2026, is the latest escalation of months of clashes with the president over his second-term agenda, including the release of the Epstein files.

    Why now? The third-term Congresswoman also said it would not be fair to her northwest Georgia district, one of the most conservative in the country, to have them "endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president we all fought for," while noting that "Republicans will likely lose the midterms."

    Why it matters: Greene is one of a record 40 House members and 10 senators who have indicated they do not plan to return to their seats after the 2026 election, joining a number of lawmakers who are retiring or running for a different office.

    Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Georgia Republican who rose to prominence as one of President Donald Trump's biggest defenders and recently became one of his biggest critics, is leaving Congress.

    Greene's announcement late Friday that she would resign effective Jan. 5, 2026, is the latest escalation of months of clashes with the president over his second term agenda — including the release of the Epstein files.

    "Standing up for American women who were raped at 14, trafficked and used by rich powerful men, should not result in me being called a traitor and threatened by the President of the United States, whom I fought for," Greene wrote in a lengthy statement shared online.

    The third-term Congresswoman also said it would not be fair to her northwest Georgia district, one of the most conservative in the country, to have them "endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me by the president we all fought for," while noting that "Republicans will likely lose the midterms."

    Greene is one of a record 40 House members and 10 senators who have indicated they do not plan to return to their seats after the 2026 election, joining a number of lawmakers who are retiring or running for a different office.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • DA seeks to drop charges against 2 police officers
    A close-up of a law enforcement patch affixed to a black shirt sleeve. The patch says "Torrance Police" in white letters.
    DA Nathan Hochman is seeking to dismiss charges against two Torrance police officers who fatally shot a Black man in possession of an air rifle in 2018.

    Topline:

    Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman filed a motion Friday in Superior Court to dismiss manslaughter charges against two Torrance police officers who fatally shot a Black man in possession of an air rifle in 2018.

    Hochman argued in court documents that prosecutors can’t meet the legal standard of proof needed for the officers to be convicted of a crime.

    The backstory: Officers Matthew Concannon and Anthony Chavez were indicted in 2023 in connection with the killing of Christopher Deandre Mitchell, 23, who was suspected of stealing a car. As the officers approached the car, they saw what was later revealed to be an air rifle between Mitchell’s legs. When Mitchell appeared to reach for the rifle,the officers opened fire, according to police.

    What's next: Superior Court Judge Sam Ohta did not immediately make a ruling Friday on the motion to dismiss the charges, saying the state Supreme Court is also considering the case.

    Go deeper ... for more details on the case.

    Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman filed a motion Friday in Superior Court to dismiss manslaughter charges against two Torrance police officers who fatally shot a Black man in possession of an air rifle in 2018.

    Hochman argued in court documents that prosecutors can’t meet the legal standard of proof needed for the officers to be convicted of a crime.

    The court has not yet ruled on the matter.

    The details

    Officers Matthew Concannon and Anthony Chavez were indicted in 2023 in connection with the killing of Christopher Deandre Mitchell, 23, who was suspected of stealing a car.

    As the officers approached the car, they saw what was later revealed to be an air rifle between Mitchell’s legs. When Mitchell appeared to reach for the rifle,the officers opened fire, according to police.

    The backstory

    Former District Attorney Jackie Lacey declined to file charges against the officers in 2019, saying they reasonably believed Mitchell had a gun. Her successor George Gascón, elected in 2020 on a platform of police accountability, assigned a special prosecutor to review the case. The special prosecutor sought the criminal indictment.

    When Hochman took office in 2024, he appointed a new special prosecutor, who recommended the charges be dropped.

    “We cannot move forward in good faith with prosecuting these two officers because we cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt with admissible evidence that the officers unreasonably believed they were in imminent danger when they saw what looked like a sawed-off shotgun or rifle between Mr. Mitchell’s legs and his hands moved toward the weapon just before the officers shot,” the statement read.

    The courts

    Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Sam Ohta did not immediately make a ruling Friday on the motion to dismiss the charges, saying the state Supreme Court is also considering the case.

    The state Supreme Court is considering an appeal filed by one of the officer’s attorneys after Ohta rejected an earlier motion to dismiss by the defense.

  • Report: More water wouldn’t have helped firefight
    A reservoir surrounded by hills with a gray cover on top of it.
    The Santa Ynez Reservoir in Pacific Palisades was offline for repairs in January. Repair work is expected to be completed by May 2027.

    Topline:

    A new report by several state agencies found that the water supply during the Palisades Fire was too slow, not too low, and even a functioning Santa Ynez Reservoir likely wouldn’t have helped much.

    Why the hydrants stopped working: “The water system lost pressure, not due to a lack of water supply in the system, but because of an insufficient flow rate,” the report states.

    Could it have been prevented? Though the exact data was missing, the state agencies running the investigation found that it was “unlikely that [the reservoir] could have helped maintain pressure for very long.” Municipal water systems like L.A.’s are not designed to fight large-scale urban conflagrations. Their main function is delivering drinking water.

    What’s next: The repairs to fix the Santa Ynez Reservoir’s broken cover and make it usable again are slated to begin in June and finish by May 2027.

    Read on ... to learn what the report recommends.

    As the Palisades Fire was still burning in January, residents saw an eye-grabbing headline: the Santa Ynez reservoir, perched directly above the Palisades, was offline for repairs and empty.

    The reservoir’s closure frustrated residents and spurred Gov. Gavin Newsom to announce a state investigation into whether the reservoir being full of water would have made a difference fighting the deadly fire.

    After months of analysis, California agencies including the state’s EPA, Cal Fire and the Department of Water Resources issued a report confirming the explanations given by local officials and experts in the aftermath of the fire: the water supply was too slow, not too low — and even a functioning reservoir likely wouldn’t have done much in the face of an unprecedented natural disaster.

    Why the hydrants stopped working

    The report found that not even a full reservoir positioned uphill from the Palisades Fire could have maintained water pressure and stopped the unprecedented disaster.

    “The water system lost pressure, not due to a lack of water supply in the system, but because of an insufficient flow rate,” the report states.

    A reservoir perched at a high elevation, such as the Santa Ynez, can serve an important role in maintaining water pressure for hydrants throughout the system. As water gets used downhill, water from the reservoir flows to pressure towers. Because of gravity and limitation on flow rates, the pressure towers can't be refilled at the same pace as they are drained. Meanwhile, the reservoir dries up.

    In the case of the Palisades Fire, the report states, a full reservoir would have helped keep water pressure up for only a short time.

    The report noted that the exact data on the demand on the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s system was missing.

    However, investigators found that based on experiences with other fires, the high demand across the system meant it was “unlikely that [the reservoir] could have helped maintain pressure for very long.”

    The system’s design

    The report found that the closure of the Santa Ynez Reservoir was in line with the primary purpose of L.A.’s water infrastructure: maintaining a clean drinking water supply. The reservoir repairs were prompted by a damaged cover. The repairs, the report notes, were required by federal and state laws on drinking water safety.

    More broadly, municipal water systems like L.A.’s weren’t built to fight wildfires, as LAist reported in January.

    “This report confirms what we and others have been saying more broadly regarding water system expectations and capabilities, but does so completely independently and with new details specific to the L.A. fires,” Greg Pierce, the director of UCLA’s Human Right to Water Solutions Lab, said in an email to LAist.

    What’s next

    The report makes two major recommendations: continue to follow the California Wildfire and Forest Resilience Action Plan, and make sure firefighters in the state are positioned for year-round fires.

    The state stopped short of recommending any changes to L.A.’s municipal infrastructure. Water experts like Pierce say massive amounts of water and a very expensive redesign of L.A.’s water system would be needed to keep fire hydrants working during large urban conflagrations.

    For their part, researchers and others have been looking into other solutions, including putting more utility lines underground and redistributing water across the system.

    The report about the reservoir comes on the heels of a separate report from the Fire Safety Research Institute about the timeline leading up to and during the January firestorm. That report, which was commissioned by the California governor's office, contains a detailed account of the Palisades and Eaton fires' progressions and emergency services' responses on Jan. 7 and 8.

    As for the Santa Ynez Reservoir, the repairs to fix its broken cover and make it usable again are slated to begin in June and finish by May 2027.

  • First home receives certificate of occupancy
    A newly-built home next to a dirt lot. A sign in the foreground reads "TJH: The smarter way to design + build."
    The first rebuilt home in the Pacific Palisades has been given a certificate of occupancy following the Palisades Fire in January 2025.

    Topline:

    The first rebuilt home in the Pacific Palisades received its certificate of occupancy Friday.

    Why it matters: The certificate of occupancy is the final step in the rebuilding process. It means the home has been inspected, is up to code and is ready to be lived in.

    "The Palisades community has been through an unimaginable year, and my heart breaks for every family that won't be able to be home this holiday season. But today is an important moment of hope," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement.

    What's next: Bass' office says more than 340 projects have started construction in the Palisades, with more rebuilding plans being sent in daily.

    More good news: On Thursday, LAist's David Wagner reported on the first home in L.A. County to receive a certificate of occupancy after the fire — an Altadena home belonging to LAist community engagement producer David Rodriguez.