Biltmore Los Angeles workers celebrate a tentative deal reached with the hotel to end their strike in October 2023.
(
Jim Brown/Getty Images
/
iStock Editorial
)
Topline:
The Los Angeles City Council recently approved raising the city’s minimum wage for hotel and airport workers in time for the 2028 Olympics and Paralympics. L.A. hotel owners have already demonstrated they can handle a $30-an-hour wage — and much more.
The details: The minimum wage for tourism workers — including hotel and airport employees — will rise to $30 an hour by 2028. The measure starts with an increase to $22.50 in July 2025 and includes additional health care stipends.
Approved despite opposition: While critics argue that the raise will damage the city's budget and deter investment, David Roland-Host, a Berkeley-based economist hired by the city to study the wage proposal, estimated that L.A. hotels will accommodate the increase by raising their rates about 6%. Roland-Host said those pay raises will become “a tool for economic growth” and the ultimate creation of 6,000 full-time jobs by the Olympic year of 2028.
This article was produced by Capital & Main. It is published here with permission.
In the months preceding the Los Angeles City Council’s vote to gradually improve tourism industry workers’ wages to $30 an hour, the hotel and developer lobbies threw everything they had into pushing one apocalyptic message: Paying higher wages would prompt the businesses to retrench, downsize operations and abandon projects in and around the city.
They brought the heat. The Hotel Association of Los Angeles warned the local Olympic organizing committee that it might not be able to honor contracts to furnish rooms for the 2028 L.A. Games. One property company said its investors would kill a planned expansion of a Hilton in Universal City if the higher wage kicked in. Another chief executive asserted that the city “has been crossed off the map by investors” in hotel projects.
The councilmembers approved the measure anyway. And one reason they did may be that L.A. hotel owners have already demonstrated they can handle a $30-an-hour wage — and much more.
The council’s action came less than a year after a prolonged series of rolling strikes by unionized Los Angeles hotel workers that resulted in new contract agreements with some 60 area hotels. (Disclosure: UNITE HERE Local 11, which led those strikes, is a financial supporter of Capital & Main.)
Those 2024 agreements are illuminating, and there’s no doubt the members of the City Council have been taking notes. Under the union contracts, most room attendants will see their hourly wage reach $35 by July of 2027. Nontipped workers received wage increases of 40% to 50% over the four-and-a-half-year life of those deals, and the hotels agreed to return to pre-pandemic staffing levels and mandatory daily room cleanings.
The new city ordinance initiates a series of annual raises beginning in July, when the workers’ minimum hourly pay will increase to $22.50. (The current hotel minimum wage in Los Angeles is $20.32.) They won’t hit the $30 mark until July of 2028. Airport and hotel workers will also receive $8.35 per hour to cover health care costs by July of next year.
That’s a lot of numbers. Here is some context: According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Living Wage Calculator, a single working adult in Los Angeles County with one child needs to earn $48.65 per hour just to cover basic living expenses. If two adults are working and have one child, each of those adults must earn nearly $27 an hour.
“We want to be paid enough to live where we work,” Brenda Mendoza told me. Mendoza, a unionized worker at the JW Marriott L.A. Live hotel, is a Koreatown native; she and her family spent nearly a decade trying to afford life in the area before finally moving to San Bernardino County a couple of years ago. Mendoza, her husband and two sons make a nearly 200-mile round-trip commute daily to their jobs in Los Angeles.
The hotel workers strike affected hotels across the region, including in downtown L.A. at the Intercontinental — pictured here at right with the tall antenna.
(
Unite Here Local 11
)
No hourly wage increase is going to suddenly solve the affordable housing crisis in the L.A. area, but the city’s new ordinance is a massive development nonetheless. For airport workers like dishwashers and food caterers, the raises amount to a pay bump of 56% over three years, and it’s a 48% hike in the minimum wage for hotel workers.
UNITE HERE and other pro-labor organizations pushed hard for the ordinance’s passage — but that’s not a new tactic. The groups have spent decades trying to change the labor landscape in and around Los Angeles, stumping for pro-union candidates for public office and helping to pass higher minimum wage requirements in Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Glendale and Long Beach.
In almost every case, those efforts were met with dire warnings from industry leaders and lobbyists about the deleterious effects of raising minimum pay. Those same red flags were raised when the L.A. City Council passed a hotel minimum wage more than a decade ago.
Hotel development and job creation, though, have only grown since then. More recently, the announcements that Los Angeles would host a spate of huge sporting events — the 2026 FIFA World Cup for soccer, the 2027 Super Bowl and the 2028 Olympics — have spurred a flurry of new hotel projects.
That doesn’t mean every project will work, and it’s certainly possible that some investor groups will cite rising labor costs as a reason to avoid the L.A. hotel market and build elsewhere. Industry analyses, though, find that high interest rates and construction costs are the real challenges. In terms of the market itself, Marriott executive Javier Cano said, “There are always opportunities in L.A.”
Not every company will be eager to jump on them. “The wage is too high. It will drive up costs significantly,” said Stuart Waldman, president of the Valley Industry & Commerce Association, which loudly opposed the City Council’s action. “This self-immolation will have dire consequences on the city’s budget for decades to come.”
Or — it won’t. At a council meeting last December, a Berkeley-based economist hired by the city to study the wage proposal estimated that L.A. hotels will accommodate the increase by raising their rates about 6%. The economist, David Roland-Host, also told the council, “We don’t see any empirical evidence of massive layoffs in response to minimum wages anywhere in California.” His projection? Those pay raises will become “a tool for economic growth” and the ultimate creation of 6,000 full-time jobs by the Olympic year of 2028.
Frank Stoltze
is a veteran reporter who covers local politics and examines how democracy is and, at times, is not working.
Published November 24, 2025 5:01 PM
Federal law enforcement officers conduct an immigration enforcement operation.
(
Hyoung Chang
/
Denver Post via Getty Images
)
Topline:
Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight on Monday launched a new tracking system to document possible misconduct and abuse during federal immigration enforcement operations under the Trump administration, according to Rep. Robert Garcia of Long Beach, who is the ranking member of the committee.
The details: As of Monday, the the new dashboard listed 252 incidents dating back to Jan. 26. Only incidents verified by reputable media outlets or referenced in litigation are included, according to the committee website. Social media videos without corroboration are not included. Each incident is categorized as either under one or more of the following types of possible misconduct: "concerning use of force," "concerning arrest/detention," "concerning deportation," and an "enforcement action at a sensitive location.” Incidents involving U.S. citizens are categorized with a "U.S. Citizen" tag.
The backstory: Immigrant rights organizations and many Democratic leaders have long expressed concerns about the practices of federal immigration authorities carrying out President Donald Trump’s mass deportation plan. “Our Dashboard shines a light on the harmful actions perpetrated against U.S. citizens and immigrants across the country,” Garcia said in a statement.
In-custody deaths: More than 40 members of the U.S. House, including 15 representatives from California, are also demanding answers from federal authorities about the record number of people who died in immigration detention this year. Fifteen people have died so far this year, including two at the Adelanto immigration detention center.
Coyotes like this one are among the many animals driven closer to humans during periods of drought.
(
Courtesy Kendall Calhoun
)
Topline:
A study from UCLA found that in drier years, larger animals are more likely to head closer and closer to where people live.
What’s driving this: It depends on the animal, but food and water are the main factors. Less rain means less standing water and less vegetation for herbivores. As these animals look for food and water in more populated areas, omnivores and carnivores also follow them.
What animals are affected: Among many others, deer, elk, squirrels, mountain lions, bobcats, and black bears are all inclined to leave their natural habitats to seek out supplemental food sources in yards and agricultural areas.
Read on... for more on what the data tells about our wild visitors and what are climate has to do with them.
If you’ve noticed more wildlife visiting your yard in recent years — maybe digging up your vegetable garden or even drinking from your pool — you’re not alone.
A recent study from UCLA found that larger predators like mountain lions and bears are more likely to interact with humans and travel closer to population centers in drier years. To determine this, the researchers analyzed state data collected on reported property damage, nuisances, conflicts and sightings.
“It kind of runs the full gamut of how people interact with wildlife around their neighborhoods and their homes,” said UCLA postdoctoral researcher Kendall Calhoun, the lead author on the study.
It's not just P-22. Mountain lions across the whole state are forced to leave their habitats for survival.
(
Courtesy Kendall Calhoun
)
Different motivations for different animals
As you might expect, different animals might have different reasons for entering populated areas. But in large part, Calhoun said, it comes down to animals’ survival instincts.
The primary motivator for many herbivores is likely to be food. That’s because with less precipitation, there’s also less plant material for them to eat. (Don’t forget: even with all the rain we’ve had recently, much of Southern California is still in a drought.)
“ Deer and elk might be pushed to find those food resources in places that they normally wouldn't go, like agriculture, crops, things from people's yards, persimmons from your tree,” Calhoun said.
And as herbivores get pushed toward humans, the animals that prey on them follow. In fact, the species that saw the highest increases in clashes with humans were omnivores and carnivores, specifically mountain lions, coyotes, black bears and bobcats.
But even these animals have varying reasons for getting close to people.
“Mountain lions might be more inclined to look for supplemental food in livestock — that might be a sheep or a goat,” Calhoun said. “Black bears may be more willing to go into your trash to look for food to help supplement what they're missing in their resource-scarce natural areas.”
Meanwhile, animals of all kinds might enter a yard even when they have enough food to look for standing water.
About the data
Researchers analyzed data from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife that were reported over the last several years as part of a citizen science initiative.
One important caveat is that the researchers primarily looked at conflicts between wildlife and residents, and there may be differences in how these interactions are reported.
For example, you might not report a deer eating fruit from an overloaded tree as a nuisance, but even a peaceful black bear digging through your trash could raise alarm bells.
"People also really value having wildlife living alongside them," Calhoun said. "It really is important for us to try to strike that balance where there's pros for both sides, without some of the negative interactions that come with living in close proximity with wildlife species."
Learn more about human-wildlife interactions
There’s more background on the research on UCLA’s website, and you can find the full study here.
You can also learn much more about interactions between humans and wildlife in LAist’s Imperfect Paradise podcast series, “Lions, Coyotes, & Bears.”
Listen
45:45
Lions, Coyotes, & Bears Part 1 Redux - The Mountain Lion Celebrity
Destiny Torres
is LAist's general assignment and digital equity reporter.
Published November 24, 2025 3:32 PM
A student takes notes during history class.
(
Allison Shelley
/
via EDUimages
)
Topline:
Fast, affordable internet service in parts of L.A. County is expected to become available soon and organizers say now is a good time to sign up for alerts when the program goes live.
How much will the service cost? There will be different plans available — low income, market rate and small business — at different internet speeds and fixed price rates. The low-cost service plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month.
How will it work? The internet provider, WeLink, will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof that will then connect to the internet network.
Why it matters: About 23% of households in East L.A. and Boyle Heights, and more than 40,000 households in South L.A., don’t have home internet.
Read on … for how to stay in the loop when the service rolls out.
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of L.A. County at the end of this year, and organizers say eligible households can sign up for alerts when the service becomes available.
The service — a partnership between L.A. County and internet provider WeLink — is the latest project from the county’s “Delete the Divide,” an initiative meant to bridge the digital divide in underserved neighborhoods.
Major funding for the project comes from the American Rescue Plan Act, as well as a grant from the California Public Utilities Commission.
It’s badly needed
About 23%, or more than 20,000, households in the East L.A. and Boyle Heights area don’t have home internet, according to Delete the Divide.
The service will also soon be coming to South L.A., where more than 40,000 households were identified as lacking home internet.
What you need to know
There will be different plans available — including low-income, market-rate and small business options — at fixed prices. The low-cost plan will start at $25 per month for qualifying families. Those who don’t qualify could also purchase plans starting at $65 a month. Monthly rates are fixed until at least September 2027.
Every plan includes unlimited data, a router and parental controls.
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in South L.A. at the end of this year.
(
Courtesy of L.A. County
)
Low-cost internet service will soon roll out in parts of East L.A. and Boyle Heights at the end of this year.
(
Courtesy of L.A. County
)
How it works
WeLink will install a Wi-Fi router inside a home and a 4-inch radio on the roof to connect the household to the internet.
Interested households can sign up for updates and be notified by WeLink when service is available here.
Robert Garrova
covers general assignment stories and mental health.
Published November 24, 2025 2:34 PM
Fresh produce and fruits at the farmers market.
(
Courtesy Food Access LA
)
Topline:
A program that offers CalFresh recipients an extra $60 a month to spend on fresh produce at participating stores and farmers markets is restarting thanks to renewed state funding.
How it works: When CalFresh recipients spend money on fresh fruits and vegetables at participating locations, their EBT cards are immediately rebated the amount they spend, up to $60 a month.
Funding boost: Thanks to a boost of $36 million in state funding, program organizers are hopeful it will last about 10 months. The renewed funding comes after food banks and meal programs in Los Angeles were forced to scramble to serve a rush of people looking for help during the longest government shutdown in American history.
The quote: The continuation of the program was a priority for State Sen. Laura Richardson, who represents cities including Carson and Compton. “You know, people are hurting," Richardson told LAist. "The number one thing that we hear that people are concerned about is affordability."
Find participating locations: There are about 90 participating retailers and farmers markets. You can find a list here.