Sponsor
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Museum of Jurassic Technology escapes fire
    a group of Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD) firefighters in full gear—helmets, oxygen tanks, and protective clothing—standing in front of The Museum of Jurassic Technology
    Los Angeles Fire Department crews arrived at the Museum of Jurassic Technology the night of July 8. No one was injured and the museum sustained minor damage.

    Topline:

    Culver City's beloved Museum of Jurassic Technology has reopened after narrowly surviving a fire last month.

    The backstory: In July, the museum and all of its irreplaceable curios came within minutes of being lost to a fire that broke out.

    What was lost: Museum founder David Wilson said, miraculously, only some replaceable items from the gift shop were destroyed. He added that officials told him that if the fire had gone just a minute longer, the museum would have been lost.

    Reopening: Thanks to a dozen or so volunteers, Wilson says the museum is now re-opened. And he’s looking forward to bringing people back into his dream-like world.

    Read on ... to learn more about that close call in July.

    In today’s edition of "Don’t take L.A.’s cultural institutions for granted"...

    Culver City’s Museum of Jurassic Technology has for decades been beloved for its surreal showcases of esoteric artifacts and natural history, like a rain forest-dwelling ant that exhibits zombie like behavior after it’s infected by a particular fungus spore.

    In July, the museum and all of its irreplaceable curios came within minutes of being lost forever. After months of restoration, the quirky L.A. institution has finally reopened.

    Listen 1:51
    Listen: The Museum of Jurassic Technology's irreplaceable artifacts narrowly escaped

    ‘A place of mysterious inquiry’ 

    Founded by artist and filmmaker David Wilson, the Museum of Jurassic Technology has had a permanent home on Venice Boulevard in Culver City since 1988.

    People love the place for its bizarre exhibits, some of which blur the lines between fact and fiction and have you questioning what’s real or not.

    Museum-goer Anthony Loyd probably said it best when he was interviewed by author Lawrence Weschler for this NPR story back in 1996:

    “This place has always been a very pulling force for me. And even some other people in the neighborhood. It’s always been a place of mysterious inquiry, you could say, you know. People talk about it. Nobody really knows what’s in here. But we know that it’s something worth being known about, you know.”

    The museum has hosted many surreal experiences over the years, including tiny sculptures you need magnification to see and a portrait gallery of Soviet-era space dogs.

    But on the night of July 8, all of it was almost lost forever.

    “It was an extraordinary event, actually,” Wilson told LAist.

    Wilson said both he and his son-in-law live very close by and started trouncing the fire with extinguishers.

    “I made it to the front and there was a tower of flame like 8 feet tall just lapping voraciously,” Wilson recounted.

    Miraculously, Wilson said, only some replaceable items from the gift shop were lost. He said officials told him that if the fire had gone just a minute longer, the museum would have been lost.

    The cause of the fire is considered undetermined, an LAFD spokesperson told LAist, and there is no active investigation.

    Thanks to a dozen or so volunteers, Wilson says the museum re-opened Aug. 7. And he’s looking forward to bringing people back into his dream-like world.

    “We feel that we are — through whatever good grace — able to offer people something that people need, enjoy and appreciate. And to have lost the ability to do that... that would be the big loss,” Wilson said.

    The Museum of Jurassic Technology is open Thursday through Sunday and online reservations are required. More information on their website.

  • Thanksgiving feast will cost less this year

    Topline:

    A survey by the American Farm Bureau Federation found the average price of food for a Thanksgiving feast is about 5% lower this year than last, largely thanks to a steep drop in the price of turkey.

    Why now: "What that tells us is that we have a mega surplus of food in this country," says food economist Michael Swanson of Wells Fargo. "We're just done harvesting the largest corn and soybean crop ever." Low grain prices make it cheaper to feed turkeys.

    Costs down, but not for all: Falling wheat prices have also led to lower costs for stuffing, dinner rolls, and pie crust for the Thanksgiving spread. The sweet potatoes to fill that pie are likely to be more expensive this year, due in part to hurricane damage in North Carolina, a big sweet-potato producer. Fresh vegetable prices are also up in the Farm Bureau's tally, but cranberry prices are down.

    Read on... for what to expect for costs for a Thanksgiving feast.

    Here's something to be thankful for: The price of turkey and stuffing is down from this time last year.

    That's welcome news to Kayla Jenkins, who's hosting 10 people for dinner on Thursday.

    "Only 10," she says with a laugh. "I'm the oldest out of eight, so it's expected to have at least seven. At least."

    Jenkins was pleasantly surprised by the prices she found at a Giant supermarket outside Washington D.C.

    "They're not bad, honestly," she said. "It's inflation, but it's not terrible compared to how it was earlier."


    Grocery prices soared during the pandemic and the years that followed. And they're still climbing faster than many people would like — up 2.7% for the 12 months ending in September.

    But a survey by the American Farm Bureau Federation found the average price of food for a Thanksgiving feast is about 5% lower this year than last, largely thanks to a steep drop in the price of turkey.

    "We have a mega surplus of food"

    Turkey is typically the most expensive item on the Thanksgiving table, but the Farm Bureau found the cost of whole frozen turkeys was down 16% from last year.

    "What that tells us is that we have a mega surplus of food in this country," says food economist Michael Swanson of Wells Fargo. "We're just done harvesting the largest corn and soybean crop ever." Low grain prices make it cheaper to feed turkeys.

    Wells Fargo's own forecast of Thanksgiving food prices also highlighted savings this year, although not as large as those in the Farm Bureau survey.

    There was some fear of a spike in turkey costs after an outbreak of avian flu caused wholesale prices to jump this fall. But Swanson says major grocery chains lock in their prices with turkey producers far in advance. And many stores sell Thanksgiving turkeys at a deep discount to get shoppers in the door.

    The Giant store where Jenkins was shopping advertised frozen birds for 27 cents a pound, so long as customers also buy a cartful of other items. The Wells Fargo economist was surprised.

    "Wow!" Swanson said. "Absolutely wow! It costs a lot more than 27 cents a pound to get that bird in the freezer."

    Costs are down for stuffing, dinner rolls and pie crust. Not the sweet potatoes, though

    Falling wheat prices have also led to lower costs for stuffing, dinner rolls, and pie crust for the Thanksgiving spread.

    The sweet potatoes to fill that pie are likely to be more expensive this year, due in part to hurricane damage in North Carolina, a big sweet-potato producer. Fresh vegetable prices are also up in the Farm Bureau's tally, but cranberry prices are down.

    Shoppers can often save money by choosing store-brand products instead of big national brands. But that price gap has narrowed in recent years, as customers have become more cost-conscious and the big brands want to be competitive.

    "The national brands are feeling the heat," Swanson says. "It's really, really hard to convince people these days that the national brand is worth the premium."

    Cynthia Pearson, another shopper at Giant, chose store brands for some items on her shopping list. She's hosting dinner for five on Thursday.

    "I could go store brand, because I'm usually going to doctor it up somehow," she says. "Put my own little touch and taste on it."

    While the price of some Thanksgiving staples has fallen in the last year, they're still higher than they were before the pandemic. Pearson said she hopes to stretch any savings as far as possible.

    "We're going to eat Thursday, Friday, it should all be gone by Sunday," she said. "You can't waste anything. This is not a year for that."

    Just be thankful our national holiday is not built around beef, where prices have jumped nearly 15% this year.

    "Just for our own interest, we prepared a prime rib menu to ballpark it," said Wells Fargo's Swenson. "That's an expensive menu."
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • Sponsored message
  • Federal judge tosses Comey and James prosecutions

    Topline:

    A federal judge today dismissed the Justice Department's criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, finding that the acting U.S. attorney who secured the indictments against the two prominent critics of President Donald Trump was unlawfully appointed.

    Why now: In dual rulings, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie said "all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan's defective appointment," including the indictments against Comey and James, "were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside."

    Why it matters: Currie's decision on the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as the top prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia marks a significant setback to efforts to go after the president's perceived political enemies.

    What's next: The cases were dismissed without prejudice, meaning the Justice Department may be able to bring those cases again.

    A federal judge on Monday dismissed the Justice Department's criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, finding that the acting U.S. attorney who secured the indictments against the two prominent critics of President Trump was unlawfully appointed.

    The decision from U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie on the appointment of Lindsey Halligan as the top prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia marks a significant setback to efforts to go after the president's perceived political enemies.

    In dual rulings, Judge Currie said "all actions flowing from Ms. Halligan's defective appointment," including the indictments against Comey and James, "were unlawful exercises of executive power and are hereby set aside."

    The cases were dismissed without prejudice, meaning the Justice Department may be able to bring those cases again.

    Abbe Lowell, an attorney for James, said they would continue to fight any further charges against her.

    "The President went to extreme measures to substitute one of his allies to bring these baseless charges after career prosecutors refused," Lowell said in a statement. "This case was not about justice or the law; it was about targeting Attorney General James for what she stood for and who she challenged."

    Former lawyer for Trump

    Trump tapped Halligan to serve as acting U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia after he pushed out the previous top prosecutor, who had expressed doubts about bringing charges against both Comey and James.

    Halligan is a former insurance attorney who once served as Trump's personal lawyer before his return to office, when she joined his administration as a White House aide.

    Halligan, who has no previous prosecutorial experience, was sworn in as acting U.S. attorney on Sept. 22. Three days later, she secured a two-count criminal indictment against Comey—just days before the statute of limitations expired. He has pleaded not guilty.

    Two weeks later, Halligan secured an indictment against James on charges of bank fraud and false statements to a financial institution. James, too, has pleaded not guilty.

    "I remain fearless in the face of these baseless charges as I continue fighting for New Yorkers every single day," James said in a statement.

    In both cases, Halligan was the only prosecutor to present before the grand jury, the government has said in court papers.

    Days before she was sworn into the role, Trump in a social media post called on Attorney General Pam Bondi and the Justice Department to prosecute Comey, James and California Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff.

    Schiff is not facing charges but federal prosecutors are investigating him on allegations of mortgage fraud.

    The Justice Department has defended her appointment and said it followed all proper procedures.

    In their separate cases, Comey and James had both sought to have the cases against them dismissed.

    —NPR's Carrie Johnson contributed to this report.
    Copyright 2025 NPR

  • The legal cases and candidates running in SoCal
    A large "Yes on 50!" sign appears above a freeway with cars driving underneath.
    A Yes on 50 sign is posted on a walkway over Highway 101 on Nov. 3, 2025.

    Topline:

    Since Californians decisively passed Proposition 50 to redraw the state’s congressional district maps, there have been legal challenges, a shift in the national redistricting arms race and maneuvering among congressional candidates lining up to run in 2026.

    The lawsuit: California Republicans announced they were challenging Prop. 50 in federal court, arguing the new district maps favor Latinos at the expense of other groups in violation of the Constitution. The federal Department of Justice filed last week to join the lawsuit. This doesn't affect Prop. 50 for now, although the plaintiffs have requested to pause Prop. 50 while the case goes through review.

    The national redistricting race: A federal court ruled that Texas cannot use its recently redrawn congressional maps in the 2026 midterm elections, finding it was racially gerrymandered. If the decision holds, Democrats will be ahead in the national redistricting race. The Trump administration has appealed the ruling.

    The congressional races: The new Prop. 50 map is causing a big game of musical chairs among sitting congressional representatives now deciding which new districts to run in. Two Republican incumbents are facing off in the 40th District covering Orange and Riverside counties, while there's an open seat in the mostly-blue 38th District in southeast L.A. County.

    Read on...for more about how the 2026 races are shaping up.

    It's been nearly three weeks since we found out Californians decisively passed Proposition 50 to redraw the state’s congressional district maps. The Associated Press called the vote within minutes of polls closing, but the vote won’t become official until after results are certified in early December — and yes, votes are still being counted with about 12,000 to go statewide.

    In the meantime, we’re keeping tabs on potential legal battles, the status of the national redistricting arms race, and how Prop. 50 is already shaping choices for the 2026 midterm elections.

    Here's what's been going on so far.

    Texas’ map was blocked by a federal court

    • What happened: A federal court ruled that Texas cannot use its recently redrawn congressional maps in the 2026 midterm elections, finding it was racially gerrymandered. 
    • Wasn’t this the map that led to Prop. 50 to begin with? Yep. A quick refresher: Over the summer, President Donald Trump encouraged Texas officials to start an unusual mid-decade redistricting process to help Republicans gain five seats in the House of Representatives in the 2026 midterms. After Texas’ state legislature produced those new maps, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that California would respond with a similar move to redistrict in favor of Democrats and neutralize Texas' map — which eventually became Prop. 50. 
    • Does the ruling affect Prop. 50? No. But there's a separate challenge underway in California. More on that below. 
    • What does this mean for the House elections in 2026? If the federal court’s ruling on Texas holds, Democrats will be ahead in the nationwide redistricting battle. However, the Trump administration has already appealed the Texas decision, and it could wind up in the U.S. Supreme Court.

    California Republicans and the DOJ filed a lawsuit

    • What happened: Shortly after Election Day, California Republicans announced they were challenging Prop. 50 in federal court, arguing the new district maps favor Latinos at the expense of other groups in violation of the Constitution. The federal Department of Justice filed last week to join the lawsuit.
    • Does this change anything? Not at the moment. The lawsuit requests a preliminary injunction — essentially a pause on Prop. 50 going into effect — while the case gets reviewed, but it’s not clear if the court will grant one. Any injunction would have to happen very soon, since candidates are already gearing up for the 2026 elections.

    Here’s how O.C. cities voted on Prop. 50

    A line of people wait to vote on the right side of the image. On the left side of the image voting booths are shown with Orange County's logo and the words "Orange County Elections." An American flag hangs in the widow behind the people waiting in line.
    Voters wait to cast their ballots in the California Statewide Special Election at the Huntington Beach Central Library on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025.
    (
    Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times via Getty Imag
    /
    Los Angeles Times
    )

    • What happened: Prop. 50 won in Orange County, but data from the county's registrar’s office gives us a clearer picture of how that vote broke down across cities. 
    • Who voted no? “No” votes led by more than 60% in Villa Park, a mostly residential enclave in the heart of Orange County, along with Newport Beach and Yorba Linda, traditional Trump strongholds.
    • Supporting Prop. 50: The cities of Santa Ana, Irvine, Anaheim and Tustin were among those with the highest support for the measure. You can see the full breakdown of vote margins across O.C. here.

    Prop. 50 moved an entire district out of the Inland Empire 

    • What happened: The previously safe-Republican 41st Congressional District, which covered the Inland Empire and Coachella Valley in Riverside County, is now primarily in blue L.A. County, with some small slices of Orange County.
    • What cities are in the new 41st District? It includes Downey, Lakewood, Sante Fe Springs and Brea. You can see a map of the district here. The 41st District currently stretches through Riverside County from Corona to Palm Desert. It’s represented by Republican Rep. Ken Calvert.
    • Geographic changes this big are unusual, right? Yes — even though Prop. 50 shifted most California congressional districts, this change stuck out. As Jodi Balma, a political science professor at Fullerton College, told LAist: "The others, you could kind of understand how the borders changed and some segment of the district remained the same. But this one just wholesale was picked up from the Inland Empire and moved to Los Angeles, and it's a completely new district."
    • Who could represent the new 41st District? So far, there's only one candidate in the race. That’s Democratic Rep. Linda Sánchez, who currently represents the 38th District. She could have chosen to run in either the newly drawn 38th District (covering Bell, Diamond Bar, Rowland Heights and part of Yorba Linda) or the new 41st District, since both include communities she currently represents. Here’s what she said when she announced the decision:
      “After Proposition 50 passed and split my current district, deciding where to run was an emotional but ultimately an easy choice — I chose home. Boundaries may change, but my commitment to fighting for the people I love will never waver.”
    Linda Sanchez, a woman in glasses, red shirt and large pearl necklace, speaks at a podium with two men behind her.
    U.S. Rep. Linda Sanchez speaks at the U.S. Capitol on May 10, 2023 in Washington, DC.
    (
    Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
    /
    Getty Images North America
    )

    The other SoCal congressional candidates running in 2026

    As expected, the Prop. 50 map is causing a big game of musical chairs among sitting congressional representatives now deciding which new districts to run in. New candidates are also jumping in to see if voters in freshly redrawn districts will elect them to office. Here’s what Southern California’s choices are looking like for the 2026 elections:

    • Two sitting Republicans face off to represent O.C. and Riverside: The 40th Congressional District is one of the only districts that’s significantly more Republican under Prop. 50, so it’s prime territory for GOP candidates. 
    • Previously in the 40th District: It covered eastern Orange County, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, including North Tustin, Chino Hills, Yorba Linda, Laguna Hills and Mission Viejo. It’s currently represented by Republican Rep. Young Kim. 
    • The 40th District after Prop. 50: It hangs on to parts of Orange County, including Mission Viejo and Villa Park, but now includes large swathes of Riverside County, including Lake Elsinore, Murrieta and Menifee. 
    • Who’s running in 2026: The 40th’s current representative, Republican Rep. Young Kim, will run for reelection. Republican Rep. Ken Calvert, who currently represents the Riverside County areas being added to the 40th District, says he will run against Kim in 2026, so voters will see a rare race between two incumbents from the same party.

    An open seat in southeast L.A. County

    A woman with light skin tone and dark hair wearing a black jacket over a red blazer stands behind a podium speaking into a microphone.
    L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solis speaks at a press conference on Feb. 18, 2025 in Los Angeles.
    (
    Carlin Stiehl
    /
    LAist
    )

    The mostly-blue 38th Congressional District seat is staying mostly blue, although it’s grabbed a larger piece of Orange County — and the seat is up for grabs.

    • Previously in the 38th District: This L.A. County district included Montebello, Santa Fe Springs, Norwalk, Whittier and Diamond Bar, and is currently represented by Democratic Rep. Linda Sánchez.
    • The 38th District after Prop. 50: It holds on to Montebello, Hacienda Heights, Rowland Heights and part of Diamond Bar, and adds on Bell and part of Yorba Linda. It also loses Norwalk, Whittier, Santa Fe Springs and La Habra to the 41st District. 
    • Who’s running in 2026: With incumbent Sánchez running in the 41st District, the 38th is open. L.A. County Supervisor Hilda Solís, a Democrat, is already in the race. Solís previously served in the House from 2001 to 2009 before becoming Secretary of Labor under President Barack Obama and then being elected to the L.A. County Board of Supervisors in 2014.

    Huntington Beach moves to a Democratic stronghold

    The city has an all-Republican City Council that’s supported voter ID laws and restrictions on children’s books in public libraries. Under Prop. 50, Huntington Beach will join the 42nd Congressional District, which includes a heavily Democratic swath of L.A. County.

    • Previously in the 42nd District: It was in L.A. County alone, covering Huntington Park, Downey, Bell, Lakewood and Long Beach. It’s currently represented by Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia.
    • The 42nd District after Prop. 50: It covers the coast between L.A. and Orange counties, starting at Long Beach and going south to Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and Newport Beach. The new district includes significantly more Republican voters than before, but it still has a Democratic majority. 
    • Who's running in 2026: Incumbent Garcia is running for reelection. If he wins, that would put the progressive Long Beach Democrat — who has directly challenged the Trump administration on immigration enforcement and spending cuts from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — in place to represent some of the most conservative areas of Orange County.

    This story was adapted from an issue of LAist's Make It Make Sense newsletter. You can sign up here.

  • What if US can no longer attract them?

    Topline:

    Many experts say recent immigration and health policies are only making it harder — and less appealing — for foreign-born talent to augment the short-staffed American health system.

    Some background: Immigrants make up about a quarter of all the country's doctors, and the U.S. health care system depends heavily on them. There are roughly 325,000 physiciansnot including nurses or other critical health care workers — living and working in the U.S., who were born and trained elsewhere.

    Why it matters: Immigrant physicians have historically found jobs in U.S. communities with serious health care staff shortages to begin with, so those places also stand to see more impact from curtailed international hiring, says Michael Liu, the Boston medical resident.

    Read on... to learn more about what this means to patients.

    Michael Liu grew up in Toronto, Canada, then moved to the U.S. for college and medical school because, to him, America was the premiere destination for fulfilling his aspirations to become a physician and researcher.

    "You know, in chase of the American Dream, and understanding all the opportunities — that was such a draw for me," says Liu, who attended Harvard University. He is now 28 and has deep personal and professional roots in Boston, where he's an internal medicine resident at Mass General Brigham.

    But this spring, he was shaken by the Trump administration's cuts to scientific research at the National Institutes of Health and staff at the Department of Health and Human Services. "That was a really striking moment for me," Liu says. "It made me question where, professionally, it made most sense for me. I still have strong connections to Toronto and mentors."

    Then, in September, Liu was doing rounds with two doctors from Mexico and Costa Rica, when the administration hiked fees nearly 30 fold for H1B visas, which are for highly trained professionals, to $100,000. He watched his colleagues' tearful reactions to the sudden uncertainty that thrust on their careers, knowing that employers like hospital systems are unlikely to be able to afford to pay for such dramatic increases.

    "It was terrible to see," Liu says. He has a green card, having married an American citizen earlier this year. But, he says, the Trump administration's actions affect him.

    "It feels like my contribution is — just because I was not born in this country — less valued," Liu says. "I really hadn't thought so deeply about going back home before, but definitely it's been much more top of mind."

    A rural workforce

    Immigrants make up about a quarter of all the country's doctors, and the U.S. health care system depends heavily on them. There are roughly 325,000 physiciansnot including nurses or other critical health care workers — living and working in the U.S., who were born and trained elsewhere.

    In rural communities, and in some subspecialties of medicine, the reliance on immigrant physicians runs much higher. In primary care and specialties like oncology, for example, foreign-born doctors account for about half of the workforce.

    Meanwhile, health care is already burdened by retirements and burnout. Many experts say recent immigration and health policies are only making it harder — and less appealing — for foreign-born talent to augment the short-staffed American health system.

    "This is a real pivotal moment right now where decades of progress could be at risk," says Dr. Julie Gralow, chief medical officer at the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

    She says policies defunding everything from scientific research to public health have damaged the U.S.'s reputation to the point where she hears from hospitals and universities that top international talent are no longer interested in coming to America. "Up until this year, it was a dream — a wish! — that you could get a job and you could come to the U.S. And now nobody wants to come."

    Gralow says, meanwhile, other countries like China, Denmark, Germany and Australia are taking advantage by recruiting international talent away from the U.S. — including American-born doctors and medical researchers — by promising stable grant funding and state-of-the-art facilities abroad.

    American patients will feel the rippling impact from that, Gralow says, for generations.

    Immigrant physicians have historically found jobs in U.S. communities with serious health care staff shortages to begin with, so those places also stand to see more impact from curtailed international hiring, says Michael Liu, the Boston medical resident.

    He points to his own recent co-authored research in JAMA estimating that 11,000 doctors, or roughly 1% of the country's physicians, currently have H1B visas. "That might seem like a small number, but this percentage varied widely across geographies," he said, and they tend to congregate in the least-resourced areas, reaching up to 40% of physicians in some communities.

    "High poverty counties had a four times higher prevalence of H1B physicians; we also saw that same pattern in rural communities," he says. (Many physicians and physician residents may have different kinds of visas, such as J1Bs, and others.)

    Groups like the American Medical Association have asked the administration to exempt physicians from the new H1B fees. HHS did not respond to requests seeking comment about recent visa policies and health care workers, though some opposition has seemingly softened the president's position.

    A history of immigration

    For the past six decades, immigrants have contributed heavily to the U.S.'s reputation as the undisputed world leader in health research and practice. In pay and prestige, the U.S. has been unparalleled, helping attract the world's best talent — at the expense of their home countries.

    That began in 1965, during a period of expanding federal investment in public health and scientific research, spurred by international competition and fueled by Cold War rivalries over events like the Soviet launch of Sputnik. That year, Medicare and Medicaid were created, and with them, sudden demand for doctors, says Eram Alam, a professor of science history at Harvard.

    "Overnight, you have 25 million — approximately — people who can now access health care services," Alam says. Passage that year of the Hart-Celler Immigration and Nationality Act opened U.S. borders to doctors and other people with in-demand skills, says Alam, who recently published a book, The Care of Foreigners, about the history of immigrant physicians in the US.

    Over the following decade, the U.S. granted visas to 75,000 physicians, and by 1975, roughly 45% of all U.S. doctors were immigrants, Alam says. The U.S.'s first-rate reputation allowed it to attract more physician talent than America could educate and train: "There were more immigrant physicians that were entering the labor force per year than there were U.S. trained physicians that were joining," she says.

    Now, Alam says, the U.S. is undoing a lot of that, as it dismantles its global leadership role in medicine and science, and narrows its borders.

    Copyright 2025 NPR