Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Learn history, eat well, visit sites and more
    GRIFFITH-PARK
    A view of the Hollywood hiking trails as the sun sets, as seen from Griffith Observatory.

    Topline:

    If you want to explore L.A. more in 2024, Griffith Park is a good place to start, not only for its trails but its intersecting history. This is your guide to all things Griffith Park.

    History highlights: The parkland has been the site of a lot of things, including ostriches, affordable housing, civil rights protests and (yes) Disneyland.

    What about today? We got that covered too. If you’re looking for a map to the park or need help finding something to visit, that’s in here too.

    Go deeper… to learn more about the park’s fascinating past.

    Griffith Park has always been more than, well, just a park. It’s been compared to New York’s Central Park and Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, but this urban wilderness is in a league of its own.

    Its past lives — aside from the over 4,200 acres of natural chaparral and parkland landscape — include an aerodrome, an ostrich farm, public housing, multiple civil rights actions, and of course, the stomping ground for P-22.

    If you’ve resolved to explore more in 2024, Los Angeles’ great backyard is worth your time. It’s got great hiking trails, compelling history, and stories that overlap with plenty of cool things (and some not so cool) about this city. Here’s your guide to everything Griffith Park.

    A brief early history (and curse)

    A black and white panoramic view of Mount Lee and the Hollywoodland sign from the peak of Mount Hollywood. There are multiple ridges and brushes before you see the white letters on the peak.
    A view of the Hollywoodland sign (not yet Hollywood!) from Mount Hollywood taken in 1937.
    (
    Herman Schultheis
    /
    Herman J Schultheis Collection, Los Angeles Photographers Collection/Los Angeles Public Library
    )

    Before you get up close and personal with nature, it’s important to appreciate how this vast park came into L.A.’s care.

    The San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, also known as the Gabrieleno Tongva people, have been the Indigenous caretakers of the L.A. basin long before it was ever called that.

    Archaeologists found artifacts in Griffith Park indicating the mouth of Fern Dell Canyon was once a tribal village, with council meeting grounds and a trading post area. The area has been a L.A. historic-cultural monument since 1973, with a plaque making it under the Fern Dell sign.

    A black and white view of snow in Los Angeles at the Griffith Park Zoo. The pens, cages and Bee Rock in the background are dusted with a layer of snow. Footprints can be seen in the snow on the road.
    A rare look at Bee Rock during a snowy time in 1949.
    (
    Van Yuneo
    /
    Security Pacific National Bank Collection/Los Angeles Public Library
    )

    Things changed under Spanish rule. The area we know as Griffith Park became part of Rancho Los Feliz (yep that Los Feliz), a Spanish land grant owned by José Vicente Feliz. He was a corporal for the Crown who escorted the 11 families who settled L.A. in 1781, so he was a very big deal here.

    There’s a bit of lore here too. In 1863, a member of the Feliz family who had rights to the land died of smallpox. Even though his live-in sister and niece were still alive, he gave most of the Rancho to the family’s lawyer, Don Antonio Coronel, in his will.

    As lore would have it, Coronel and his lawyer, Don Innocante, “were believed to have dishonestly obtained the dying Feliz’s signature on the will.” In retaliation, his niece Doña Petranilla is said to have gone up to Bee Rock — a peak in the park — to call upon the gods.

    “She cursed the land,” said Mike Eberts, a professor and Griffith Park historian. “You know, 'the cattle shall not fatten. There will be pestilence and plague' and so on and so forth. And for the next 50 to 100 years, whenever anything bad would happen in Griffith Park, it’d kind of get blamed on the curse.”

    Eberts, who wrote a book on Griffith Park, doesn’t put much stock into the curse and believes a newspaper columnist is responsible for drumming it up. (For a bit of fun, LAist asked the people interviewed for this story if they believed in the curse. Everyone said no, but acknowledged that bad things have happened there.)

    In later years, the parkland changed hands a couple more times before falling under the control of a particularly important person in 1882: Griffith J. Griffith.

    Griffith J. Griffith’s big role

    A black and white portrait of Griffith J. Griffith, a light-skinned man wearing a suit jacked, with a handle-bar mustache.
    Griffith J. Griffith, the donor of Griffith Park to Los Angeles, taken in 1910.
    (
    Security Pacific National Bank Collection/Los Angeles Public Library
    )

    As you might’ve guessed, Griffith Park is named after this former owner. Griffith emigrated to the United States in 1865 from South Wales. He was a man with a fortune from California’s gold mines, a fake colonel title and a “complicated personality,” Eberts said. (Fun fact: His business card said G. J. Griffith, Capitalist.)

    He enjoyed nature, put an ostrich farm on the grounds and set up an aerodrome. According to Eberts, before Griffith eventually donated the land, someone made a pact with Griffith that if there were any gold doubloons found under today’s park center, they’d “split the booty.” Griffith was never short of dreams.

    “Among his insights, Griffith was looking out over Los Angeles in the 1890s, which was, you know, a little bit the backside of nowhere, but growing,” Eberts said. “And Griffith really thought that Los Angeles was going to become a great city.”

    Griffith really thought that Los Angeles was going to become a great city.
    — Mike Eberts, historian and professor

    He imagined the city growing around a big park, which seemed a bit lofty at the time because Griffith Park in those days wasn’t actually in the city limits. In fact, for the first few years after Griffith and his wife donated the park, it was outside L.A. boundaries.

    "Then, with the annexation of Hollywood in 1910, there was a move to make the park accessible from Hollywood," Eberts said. “That led to the development of not just roads, but Fern Dell itself.”

    Fern Dell (also spelled Ferndell) is a half-mile trail that is often described as a hidden gem or an enchanting, shaded path that takes you up to the park from Los Feliz Boulevard, winding through a canyon with the same namesake. (That’s also where the Gabrieleno Tongva village was located.)

    Red, orange and pink flowers cover the green landscape to the left, and on the hill in the background is the Griffith Observatory, as cars drive by on the right.
    A vintage postcard shows Fern Dell, so named because it is covered with ferns and other tropical growth.
    (
    Security Pacific National Bank Collection/Los Angeles Public Library
    )

    When Griffith and his wife donated the park to the city in 1896, it was a 5-square mile Christmas gift to Angelenos, given with the intent of it remaining a free park. In later years, Griffith shockingly shot his wife (she lived), which tarnished his reputation with city leaders.

    But their donation still impacts L.A., because not only is there a large swath where nature can run free by our concrete home, it’s free for Angelenos to access too.

    “It’s serving what the Colonel [Griffith] wanted,” said Marian Dodge, a past president of Friends of Griffith Park and chair of its history committee. “He wanted it to be a relief valve and it really does that.”

    He wanted it to be a relief valve...
    — Marian Dodge, Friends of Griffith Park

    A magnet for significant events

    Griffith Park has been like the quiet background actor in quite a few big movements in L.A. Here’s a brief look at some of those.

    A public housing stint

    There are quite a few buildings in Griffith Park, but did you know that a community lived in the park?

    At the end of World War II, thousands of people returned to L.A. to build civilian lives. But that influx, combined with an already-growing population of war industry workers, created a severe housing shortage. For military folks, many came here unable to find housing to rent.

    In 1946, a temporary response was set up in Griffith Park in just a matter of months: a major city-run public housing project. Rodger Young Village consisted of 750 quonset huts — temporary buildings made of steel — which were intended to house 1,500 families or about 6,000 residents (this took over where that aerodrome used to be).

    “[Rodger Young Village] was not just public housing, but the first real integrated public housing in Los Angeles,” said Sarah Lann, the education director for the Los Angeles Conservancy.

    Residents were primarily families of color who were discriminated against in the private housing market, making Rodger Young Village a viable home on many levels. But after public housing lost favor and the housing crisis eased, the village was razed in 1954.

    There aren’t any remnants at its spot on the northeast corner of Griffith Park, even though the place had everything you’d expect from a town, like a malt shop to a dental office. The land now holds L.A. Zoo and Autry Museum parking lots. Lann says Rodger Young Village reminds her that if you want to understand L.A., “you poke Griffith Park and some amazing new aspect of history rears its head.”

    You poke Griffith Park and some amazing new aspect of history rears its head.
    — Sarah Lann, L.A. Conservancy education director

    Dreaming up Disneyland

    Another highlight about Griffith Park comes from Walt Disney himself.

    As the story goes, Disney would sit on a bench by the merry-go-round as his daughters rode. That lull, observing his kids have fun, gave him an idea: To create a theme park where children and adults could have fun. And boy, that idea took off. Disney Adults are thriving these days.

    If you go to Disneyland, look along Main St. USA for a display with a Griffith Park bench and restored merry-go-round horses.

    A black and white photo of two children with medium skin tones enjoying their merry-go-round ride at Griffith Park on July 16, 1987.
    Dean Musgrove
    (
    Herald Examiner Collection/Los Angeles Public Library
    )

    Civil rights moments

    That merry-go-round has seen some things. In 1961, it was the site of a protest with people who were angry over the operator’s treatment of Black teens. The kids reportedly jumped on and off the ride without paying, calling themselves “Freedom Riders” and aligning with the Civil Rights protests then happening.

    Reportedly, the 75 police officers who were called to shut down the protest used racial slurs — a contentious example of how law enforcement treated Black communities in the ‘60s.

    Seven years later, the merry-go-round was the site of a “gay day” in the park. At least three gay-ins were held in Griffith Park, which was a popular cruising spot for men back then, and those in attendance came to hear activists talk about gay civil rights.

    Things to do at Griffith Park

    Now, onto enjoying nature at the park.

    We’ll spare you the usuals — of course Griffith Observatory is a great time. There is a lot to do and see here, ranging from a Bette Davis picnic area to the Travel Town Museum. But there are a few spots that could be new to you.

    You could check out Amir’s Garden, which was created after a brush fire swept through the area in 1971. It’s named after Amir Dialameh, a wine merchant who asked the city if he could repair part of the burnt land. Before passing in 2003, he planted a garden to make a scenic rest spot for hikers with more than 60 varieties of trees.

    There’s also a Firefighter’s Memorial that commemorates those who died in the 1933 brush fire that took over Mineral Wells Canyon.

    Griffith Park has its own official list of attractions. The L.A. Conservancy also has a list of 30 different sites to check out. Out of those, here are a few options we’d recommend:

    • The Old Zoo: 4801 Griffith Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027
    • Bee Rock: No set address, but directions can be found here.
    • Feliz Adobe: 4730 Crystal Springs Drive, Los Angeles 90027
    • Fern Dell waterfall and bridge: 2333 Fern Dell Drive, Los Angeles 90027
    • Ellen Reid SOUNDWALK: No set address. SOUNDWALK is a GPS-enabled, app-based experience where the path you walk dictates what music you hear.

    Getting around the park

    Want to navigate the park without getting turned around? Keep this Griffith Park map handy, traveler.

    You can find Metro, biking and parking information here. Walking directions are available there too.

    For activities in the park, such as camp and bike rental locations, check that out here. Griffith Park has maps of trails, current information on trail closures and special restrictions at the Ranger Station.

    The park is open from 5 a.m. to 10:30 p.m.

    Nearby eats to try nearby

    And if you’re hungry after a long hike, we got you covered.

    Griffith Park Clubhouse

    • What: A clubhouse that’s located around the Wilson and Harding golf courses. Anyone can eat at the restaurant, which offers American-style breakfast and lunch favorites, like omelets and sandwiches.
    • Where: 5500 Griffith Park Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027
    • When: Daily, 7 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.

    Franklin's Cafe and Market

    • What: A cafe to pick up snacks and maps, or sit down and get a kimchi bowl or BLT. The cafe also serves wines and crafted beer. (This spot is cash-free.)
    • Where: 2650 North Vermont Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90027
    • When: Daily, 7 a.m. - 6 p.m.

    The Trails

    • What: A self-described “rustic” walk-up cafe that specializes in baked goods, coffees and teas. You can pick up quick breakfast and lunch foods to eat outside.
    • Where: 2333 Fern Dell Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90027
    • When: Open Thursday to Monday, 8 a.m. - 4 p.m.

    Scout’s Honor BBQ

    • What: Near the topside of the park, this place is where you can get a more meaty meal. From ribs to burgers, you can get all the barbeque trimmings here.
    • Where 1223 West Riverside Drive, Burbank, CA 91506
    • When: Daily, 3 p.m. - 8 p.m.

  • The issue has sparked criticism from her opponent
    A woman with medium-dark skin tone with long dark wavy hear wearing a black blazer speaks into a microphone holding a piece of paper while standing behind a wooden dais with a wooden nameplate that reads "Raman."
    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since being elected in 2020.

    Topline

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since she was first elected in 2020, according to an analysis by LAist, a number that has been criticized by her opponent in the upcoming mayoral race.

    The details: A closer look at data from the L.A. city clerk reveals Raman ranks in the middle of the pack of the 15-member council when it comes to votes missed. She was eighth among her colleagues when it came to votes missed so far this year. Last year she ranked third. In 2024, she ranked sixth.

    The vast majority of those votes were unanimous or near unanimous among the other council members, meaning her vote on those matters would not have changed the outcomes.

    Criticism: The campaign of her mayoral opponent incumbent Karen Bass has stressed that the missed votes matter. "This isn't just missing a few votes, it's about six years of Nithya Raman not showing up — for constituents wanting encampments outside of schools cleaned up or voting to make it cheaper to film here,” said Alex Stack, Bass’ campaign spokesperson.

    Conflicting meetings: Raman’s campaign said she was officially excused from many of the meetings because she was appointed to represent L.A. on the board of the Air Quality Management District, which is charged with reducing local air pollution and improving public health. Bass appointed her to the board.

    Los Angeles City Councilmember Nithya Raman has missed nearly 3,000 votes since she was first elected in 2020, according to an analysis by LAist — a number that has been criticized by her opponent in the upcoming mayoral race.

    A closer look at data from the L.A. city clerk reveals Raman ranks in the middle of the pack of the 15-member council when it comes to votes missed. She was eighth among her colleagues when it came to votes missed so far this year.

    Last year she ranked third. In 2024, she ranked sixth.

    The vast majority of those votes were unanimous or near-unanimous among the other council members, meaning her vote on those matters would not have changed the outcomes.

    Still, the campaign of her mayoral opponent — incumbent Karen Bass — has stressed that the missed votes matter.

    "This isn't just missing a few votes, it's about six years of Nithya Raman not showing up — for constituents wanting encampments outside of schools cleaned up or voting to make it cheaper to film here,” said Alex Stack, Bass’ campaign spokesperson.

    “If you don't show up for your job, you shouldn't get a promotion," he said.

    Bass brought up Raman’s City Council meeting absences during a debate earlier this month, and the campaign has since set up a website, titled NoShowNithya, devoted to highlighting those absences.

    Raman’s campaign said she was officially excused from many of the meetings because she was appointed to represent L.A. on the Air Quality Management District board, which is charged with reducing local air pollution and improving public health.

    Those meetings happened at the same time as some council meetings. The board meets on the last Friday of every month. The City Council meets three times a week — on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Fridays.

    “The data shows that Nithya’s attendance is in line with other council members,” said campaign spokesperson Liz Garcia. “These desperate attacks from Mayor Bass will not distract Nithya from campaigning to make LA a city that works and is affordable for everyone."

    The numbers

    City Councilmember Adrin Nazarian has missed the most votes so far this year — 393 — compared to Raman, who was ranked eighth at 233. Last year, Councilmember Monica Rodriguez ranked first with 631 and Raman ranked third with 556.

    In 2024, Rodriguez ranked first with 741. Raman ranked sixth with 575.

    Bass isn’t the only one who believes this is an issue.

    “Attendance at meetings isn't ceremonial,” said Pomona College Associate Professor of Politics Sara Sadhwani. “It’s where amendments and laws get shaped, it's where budgets get fought over and it's where constituents' priorities either make it into policy or they don’t. So missing that work means missing those leverage points.”

    “Generally, the expectation is that you show up for work,” she added.

    In January, Bass removed Raman from the Air Quality Management District AQMD board, a role she’d been serving in since 2022 when she was appointed by then-Mayor Eric Garcetti.

    Nazarian was appointed to the air quality board to replace Raman.

    As for Raman’s absences, her campaign sought to turn the tables on Bass. It pointed to the incumbent’s absences from commission meetings of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority.

    Since joining, the mayor has skipped more than half of the meetings held by the L.A. Homeless Services Authority Commission, according to an LAist review of attendance records, despite the mayor’s insistence that homelessness is her No. 1 issue.

    The Raman campaign also pointed to Bass’ absence during the early hours of the Palisades Fire when she was on a diplomatic trip to Ghana.

    "This is ironic coming from a mayor who was missing during our city’s most devastating emergencies [and] failed to show up for more than half of LAHSA homelessness meetings,” Garcia said.

    Bass’ office told LAist that, regardless of her attendance record, she has kept up to date on what LAHSA has been doing. The regional agency is responsible for managing the region’s homelessness response.

    Earlier this month, following LAist’s reporting, Bass announced she was stepping down from the LAHSA Commission.

    “It cuts both ways, and it's a reminder that both of these candidates are political insiders and have a track record with the city,” Sadhwani said.

    Too many meetings?

    The issue of missed meetings points to another question: Does the City Council meet too often? The city charter mandates that the panel meet three times a week. Its counterpart on the county level — the Board of Supervisors — meets once a week even though its budget is far larger.

    In addition to deciding who will be L.A.’s mayor, voters in November will decide whether the number of mandated weekly City Council meetings should be modified. The council has placed a proposed change to the city charter that would require only one meeting per week.

  • Sponsored message
  • See who won at the 2026 primetime awards

    Topline:

    The winners of the 2026 Emmy Awards were announced Monday night for shows that aired between June 2025 and May 2026.

    The context: Last year's winner for best drama, The Pitt, was up against Pluribus, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, The Diplomat, and more. On the comedy side, two Apple TV newcomers — Widow's Bay and Margo's Got Money Troubles — were up against a slate of returning nominees including Hacks, nominated for its fifth and final season, and The Bear, nominated for its fourth season.
    Read on... for an updated list of winners as they're announced.

    Updated September 14, 2026 at 21:26 PM ET

    Law & Order: SVU star Mariska Hargitay is hosting the Emmy Awards on Monday night. The ceremony is on NBC and Peacock starting at 8 p.m. PT, 5 p.m. ET.

    Last year's winner for best drama, The Pitt, is up against Pluribus, A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, The Diplomat, and more. On the comedy side, two Apple TV newcomers — Widow's Bay and Margo's Got Money Troubles — are up against a slate of returning nominees including Hacks, nominated for its fifth and final season, and The Bear, nominated for its fourth season. (Eligible shows aired between June 2025 and May 2026.)

    Noah Kahan is set to perform "Bridge Over Troubled Water" for the In Memoriam segment.

    We'll be updating this page with winners in bold as they come in.

    Outstanding writing for a comedy series

    WINNER: Katie Dippold, Widow's Bay
    Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
    Tim Robinson, Zach Kanin, The Chair Company
    Michael Patrick King, Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback
    Lucia Aniello, Paul W. Downs, Jen Statsky, Hacks
    Anthony King, Jury Duty Presents: Company Retreat

    Outstanding lead actor in a comedy series

    WINNER: Matthew Rhys, Widow's Bay
    Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Wonder Man
    Steve Carell, Rooster
    Jason Segel, Shrinking
    Martin Short, Only Murders in the Building

    Outstanding lead actress in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Sally Field, Remarkably Bright Creatures
    Claire Danes, The Beast In Me
    Carey Mulligan, Beef
    Sarah Pidgeon, Love Story
    Sarah Snook, All Her Fault

    Outstanding supporting actor in a drama series

    WINNER: Tom Pelphrey, Task
    Patrick Ball, The Pitt
    Billy Crudup, The Morning Show
    Shawn Hatosy, The Pitt
    Gerran Howell, The Pitt
    Jack Lowden, Slow Horses
    Carlos Manuel-Vesga, Pluribus

    Outstanding lead actor in a drama series

    WINNER: Noah Wyle, The Pitt
    Sterling K. Brown, Paradise
    Gary Oldman, Slow Horses
    Mark Ruffalo, Task
    Rufus Sewell, The Diplomat

    Outstanding reality competition program

    WINNER: The Traitors
    Dancing With the Stars
    RuPaul's Drag Race
    Survivor
    Top Chef

    Outstanding supporting actor in a comedy series

    WINNER: Stephen Root, Widow's Bay
    Colman Domingo, The Four Seasons
    Paul W. Downs, Hacks
    Nick Offerman, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Michael Urie, Shrinking
    Tyler James Williams, Abbott Elementary

    Outstanding lead actress in a drama series

    WINNER: Rhea Seehorn, Pluribus
    Carrie Coon, The Gilded Age
    Chase Infiniti, The Testaments
    Keri Russell, The Diplomat
    Zendaya, Euphoria

    Outstanding supporting actress in a drama series

    WINNER: Allison Janney, The Diplomat
    Taylor Dearden, The Pitt
    Fiona Dourif, The Pitt
    Katherine LaNasa, The Pitt
    Sepideh Moafi, The Pitt
    Julianne Nicholson, Paradise
    Karolina Wydra, Pluribus

    Outstanding lead actor in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Matthew Rhys, The Beast In Me
    Riz Ahmed, Bait
    Jason Bateman, Black Rabbit
    Charlie Hunnam, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
    Oscar Isaac, Beef

    Outstanding supporting actress in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: Linda Cardellini, DTF St. Louis
    Dakota Fanning, All Her Fault
    Laurie Metcalf, Monster: The Ed Gein Story
    Joy Sunday, DTF St. Louis
    Youn Yuh-jung, Beef
    Constance Zimmer, Love Story: John F. Kennedy Jr. & Carolyn Bessette

    Outstanding supporting actor in a limited or anthology series or movie

    WINNER: David Harbour, DTF St. Louis
    Jason Bateman, DTF St. Louis
    Richard Gadd, Half Man
    Richard Jenkins, DTF St. Louis
    Charles Melton, Beef
    Nick Offerman, Death by Lightning

    Outstanding lead actress in a comedy series

    WINNER: Jean Smart, Hacks
    Quinta Brunson, Abbott Elementary
    Ayo Edebiri, The Bear
    Elle Fanning, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Lisa Kudrow, The Comeback

    Outstanding supporting actress in a comedy series

    WINNER: Kate O'Flynn, Widow's Bay
    Dale Dickey, Widow's Bay
    Hannah Einbinder, Hacks
    Janelle James, Abbott Elementary
    Michelle Pfeiffer, Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Megan Stalter, Hacks
    Jessica Williams, Shrinking

    Outstanding comedy series
    Abbott Elementary
    The Bear
    Nobody Wants This
    Hacks
    Margo's Got Money Troubles
    Only Murders in the Building
    Shrinking
    Widow's Bay

    Outstanding directing for a comedy series
    Randall Einhorn, Abbott Elementary
    Christopher Storer, The Bear
    Andrew DeYoung, The Chair Company
    Lucia Aniello, Hacks
    Mary Lou Belli, The Ms. Pat Show
    Hiro Murai, Widow's Bay

    Outstanding drama series
    The Diplomat
    The Gilded Age
    A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms
    Paradise
    The Pitt
    Pluribus
    Slow Horses
    Your Friends and Neighbors

    Outstanding directing for a drama series
    Salli Richardson-Whitfield, The Gilded Age
    Hanelle M. Culpepper, Paradise
    Noah Wyle, The Pitt
    Vince Gilligan, Pluribus
    Saul Metzstein, Slow Horses
    Salli Richardson-Whitfield, Task

    Outstanding writing for a drama series
    Peter Ackerman, Debora Cahn, The Diplomat
    Kirsten Pierre-Geyfman, R. Scott Gemmill, The Pitt
    Valerie Chu, The Pitt
    Vince Gilligan, Pluribus
    Will Smith, Slow Horses
    Brad Ingelsby, Task

    Outstanding limited or anthology series
    All Her Fault
    The Beast In Me
    Beef
    DTF St. Louis
    Love Story

    Outstanding variety series
    The Daily Show
    Jimmy Kimmel Live!
    Last Week Tonight With John Oliver
    The Late Show With Stephen Colbert
    Saturday Night Live

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • Trump's mail voting restrictions rejected

    Topline:

    The Supreme Court has sided against President Donald Trump, rejecting his efforts to enact new mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm election.

    The context: The ruling released Monday by the high court means the U.S. Postal Service is expected to continue delivering ballots as usual. Voting by mail has already begun in states including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, with more soon to follow — including Western states such as Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, where elections are held primarily or fully with mail ballots.

    Why it matters: Under the still-blocked USPS plan, which followed an executive order by Trump, states would have had to turn over lists of voters' names and addresses and have certain specific barcodes on ballot envelopes in order to have them delivered by the mailing agency.

    How we got here: Earlier this month, a federal judge in Boston had issued a preliminary injunction against USPS, blocking the mailing agency from imposing those new ballot requirements on states. The judge found the requirements are likely illegal because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting. Now, a majority of the Supreme Court decided to keep that injunction in place.

    Updated September 14, 2026 at 21:18 PM ET

    The Supreme Court has ruled against President Trump, rejecting his efforts to enact new mail-in voting restrictions for the midterm election.

    The ruling released Monday by the high court means the U.S. Postal Service is expected to continue delivering ballots as usual.

    Voting by mail has already begun in states including Alabama, North Carolina and Wisconsin, with more soon to follow — including Western states such as Hawaii, Oregon and Washington, where elections are held primarily or fully with mail ballots.

    Under the still-blocked USPS plan, which followed an executive order by Trump, states would have had to turn over lists of voters' names and addresses and have certain specific barcodes on ballot envelopes in order to have them delivered by the mailing agency.

    Earlier this month, a federal judge in Boston issued a preliminary injunction against USPS, blocking it from imposing those new ballot requirements on states. The judge found the requirements are likely illegal because the Postal Service has no authority to control mail-in voting. A second federal judge issued another preliminary injunction late Sunday.

    Now, a majority of the Supreme Court decided to keep that injunction in place. The court said the Trump administration was unlikely to succeed on the merits of its challenge.

    Conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a short concurring opinion, saying "there is at least a fair prospect that the final rule falls within the Postal Service's statutory authority." But, he added, "applying the rule in the 2026 elections would be arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act because state and local election officials do not have sufficient time to reasonably implement the rule before the elections."

    Indeed several Republican state election officials, including from the mostly vote-by-mail state of Utah, signed on to a Supreme Court brief, warning that any attempt to carry out the USPS plan now "will almost certainly lead to mistakes, delays, and confusion for both voters and election officials."

    Conservative Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented from the order, and would have granted the administration's request to pause the Boston-based judge's ruling.

    While the USPS plan remains paused for the midterms, the legal fight will likely continue over how the agency may try to implement it for future federal elections.

    For now, challengers of the proposal are celebrating their victory.

    "Today, the Supreme Court refused to allow the federal government to throw our elections into chaos just weeks before Election Day. The Postal Service exists to deliver Americans' mail — not to rewrite election rules, demand voters' personal information, or decide which ballots make it through the system," Celina Stewart, CEO of the League of Women Voters, said in a statement.

    New York State Attorney General Letitia James said in a separate statement that she was "truly relieved" by the high court's ruling.

    "Voters should never have to wonder whether a ballot they legally cast will be counted because the federal government suddenly changed the rules," said James, whose state was among the 24 mainly Democratic-led states that sued alongside Washington, D.C. "We will keep fighting to make sure every eligible ballot is counted come November. Now, I encourage all eligible Americans to get out and vote — and vote early."

    Trump said he issued the call for USPS to change its rule for mail ballots as a way to stop illegal voting by non-U.S. citizens, a problem that many studies and audits show is extremely uncommon. For this legal fight over the USPS plan, the administration's lawyers have provided the courts with no evidence of mail-voting fraud.

    Trump has been a vocal critic of the way about one-third of voters cast ballots in the last two federal elections. In 2024, the share of voters who reported casting ballots by mail was higher among Democrats (37%) than Republicans (24%), according to a national survey by the MIT Election Data and Science Lab.

    In a social media post last year, Trump said he is "going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS" and claimed that "ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING."

    This year, Trump himself voted by mail in Florida.

    Editor's note: USPS is a financial supporter of NPR.

    Edited by Benjamin Swasey

    Copyright 2026 NPR

  • What he's saying about Caltech's future with JPL
    Ray Jayawardhana, the incoming president of Caltech, walking down a set of stairs
    Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana at his announcement ceremony at Caltech in Pasadena on January 6, 2026.

    Topline:

    Ray Jayawardhana — or Ray Jay for short — has served as Caltech's president officially since the beginning of July. His expertise in astrophysics, coupled with extensive experience in university administration, is what he's using to lead the school while continuing his own research. He sat down with AirTalk, LAist 89.3's daily news show, saying he's optimistic about the school's future and relationship with the Jet Propulsion Lab.

    Why it matters: NASA — which now owns and sponsors JPL — is opening its contracting to other research institutions for the first time, which could mean a bidding war. Losing the contract for Caltech would mean losing a stream of federal funding valued at $3 billion per year.

    What's next? Jayawardhana said he’s confident Caltech and JPL’s partnership will continue, saying that the university's value proposition is unrivaled. NASA’s current contract with Caltech expires in September 2028.

    Listen to the full conversation with Caltech's new president

    Listen 22:22
    New Caltech president Ray Jayawardhana

    Ray Jayawardhana, a seasoned astrophysicist and university administrator, officially took over as Caltech’s 10th president on July 1.

    The newly appointed president sat down with Larry Mantle on AirTalk, LAist 89.3’s daily news program, to talk about his plans for the future of the esteemed university.

    Ray Jay and Caltech — it was in the cosmos

    Jayawardhana, who goes by “Ray Jay,” told Larry he was always interested in the cosmos growing up.

    He shared that, as a teenager in Sri Lanka, he wrote to the Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) — NASA's leading space exploration center, which is managed by Caltech — to ask for images from the Voyager space missions they were conducting during the 1980s.

    “I waited impatiently for a response, and one day, this large envelope with an oversized wheel of books arrived with a set of images of the outer planets and their moons,” he said. “That just delighted me to no end.”

    Today, he’s the first South Asian American to lead Caltech, overseeing the operations of the same Jet Propulsion Lab he wrote to in the '80s.

    How he came to the U.S.

    After attending St. John’s College in Sri Lanka, he decided to pursue higher education in the United States. He earned an undergraduate degree from Yale and subsequently his doctorate in astronomy from Harvard, quickly establishing himself as one of the world’s most renowned astrophysicists.

    He previously held positions at Cornell University and Johns Hopkins.

    Exoplanetary president

    Aside from his main focus as the school’s head of administration, Ray Jay continues his own research exploring the formation of planets and stars, saying it keeps him intellectually engaged.

    He's part of a team that works with the James Webb Space Telescope to observe and characterize so-called exoplanets — planets around other stars — with an eye toward the potential for life beyond Earth.

    He’s confident in Caltech’s future with JPL

    Universities like Caltech are on rocky terrain amid sweeping federal government cuts of public funding for scientific research.

    Additionally, JPL's future is uncertain. NASA — which now owns and sponsors JPL — is opening its contracting to other research institutions for the first time, which could mean a bidding war.

    A dark sign reads "Jet Propulsion Laboratory - California Institute of Technology" with trees and a white building behind it
    The entrance to NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California.
    (
    Robyn Beck
    /
    Getty Images
    )

    Losing the contract for Caltech would mean losing a stream of federal funding valued at $3 billion per year.

    Jayawardhana said he’s confident Caltech and JPL’s partnership will continue, saying that the university's value proposition is unrivaled.

    “It’s not only about the self-interest in continuing to ensure there's federal and public funding for research, it's also about enriching humanity,” he said.

    NASA’s current contract with Caltech expires in September 2028.