The Brief

Dozens of volunteers spent Sunday creating Elysian Park’s first monarch butterfly habitat, planting some 200 milkweed plants.

Western monarch populations in California have been dwindling for decades in part because there are fewer milkweed plants. And monarchs will only lay their eggs on milkweed, since that’s what their caterpillars like to eat.

Laura Velkei, founder of Project Monarch L.A., said volunteers planted the habitat in the Victory Memorial Grove area of Elysian Park in order to support the black and orange butterflies.

“The more people that are putting their hands in the ground ... getting a crush on a caterpillar or a butterfly, all those things connect us more deeply to nature than any other conversation could possibly do,” Velkei said. “How do you not love a monarch butterfly? They’re just amazing."

Volunteers gather for a group photo at Elysian Park in Los Angeles.

(

Courtesy Project Monarch L.A.

)

The planting event was co-organized by Friends of Elysian Park, which has worked for the past few years to beautify this portion of the park, planting oak trees, agaves and more.

“We’ve really kind of brought it back to a beautiful natural state, and I think the community ends up taking better care of it because of that,” Sakae Koyama, co-president of Friends of Elysian Park, told LAist.

Philip Murphy, co-president of Friends of Elysian Park, said he tried to propagate dozens of milkweed plants for the park a couple years back but they didn’t take. So he was happy to work with Velkei and Project Monarch L.A. to try again.

The monarch habitat even got its own art installation in the form of local artist Katrina Alexy’s orange totems. They’re meant to draw attention to the need for more milkweed in our region.

If you’d like to sign up for future Project Monarch L.A. volunteer events, head over to their website. You can also visit Santa Monica Mountains Fund for tips on how to grow milkweed at home.

And the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has some pointers on how you can help support monarchs.

A series of community listening sessions will give residents a chance to weigh in on whether streets, monuments and public parks bearing the name of former labor leader César Chávez should be renamed. 

The sessions, scheduled for October and led by the Los Angeles County Chief Executive Office, come after the county launched a survey in June asking the public what mattered most to them in a renaming process.

In March, the Board of Supervisors approved a motion, authored by Supervisors Hilda Solis and Lindsey Horvath, to rename county honors following a New York Times investigation that alleged Chávez sexually assaulted women and girls within the United Farm Workers movement, including fellow labor leader Dolores Huerta.

“The County of Los Angeles has a firm responsibility to ensure any public recognitions reflect our shared values of justice, dignity, and respect,” Solis said in a statement at the time.

Following the investigation, some Eastside residents called for Cesar E. Chavez Avenue to revert to its former name, Brooklyn Avenue, and for murals depicting Chávez’s face to be taken down.

The board also approved a motion by Solis to rename the César Chávez holiday as Farmworkers Day across the county, which will continue to be observed on the last Monday in March instead of Chávez’s birthday on March 31.

How to weigh in

Three in-person community listening sessions will be held in East LA in October. Online registration is encouraged but not required. To register, click here.

Saturday, Oct. 10 – Anthony Quinn Library

Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Location: 3965 E. Cesar E. Chavez Ave., Los Angeles

Saturday, Oct. 17 – Ruben F. Salazar Park

Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Location: 3864 Whittier Blvd., Los Angeles

Note: This session will be held in Spanish only 

Saturday, Oct. 24 – East LA Service Center

Time: 10 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

Location: 133 N. Sunol Dr., Los Angeles

*Spanish-language interpretation will be available

The post LA County wants your input on renaming Cesar E. Chavez Avenue. Join these meetings to weigh in appeared first on LA Local.

Republican State Assemblyman Carl DeMaio is seeking to distance the voter ID measure Californians will see on their November ballot from President Donald Trump’s efforts to restrict voting at the federal level. During a Monday night speech at the Orange County GOP Central Committee meeting, DeMaio said the ballot measure, Proposition 39, is “not the same” as the failed federal SAVE Act, which would have required proof of U.S. citizenship when registering to vote.

Speaking to dozens of O.C. Republican leaders, DeMaio acknowledged Californians’ overwhelming embrace of mail-in voting, calling Prop. 39 a “bipartisan solution that keeps mail ballots, so that voting is convenient, but improves trust and confidence by requiring an ID to vote.”

What would Prop. 39 do?

• Prop. 39 would change California’s constitution to require voters to provide a government-issued ID when they cast a ballot.
• Mail-in voters would have to include the last four digits of that ID on the ballot envelope.
• The measure would also require election officials to use “best efforts,” using government data, to verify that voters on registration rolls are U.S. citizens, and to report annually the percentage verified.

Reaction to the ballot initiative

Supporters note that nationwide polling has shown widespread support for voter ID across political parties. They also say using a voter’s signature on their mail-in ballot to verify identity, as California currently does, delays election results and causes some valid voters to have their ballots rejected.

Opponents of Prop. 39 say the initiative feeds into President Trump’s claims of widespread election fraud, which they say are false. Opponents also say the measure would make voting more burdensome and expensive, while opening up mail voters to potential identity theft.

How Prop. 39 is being pitched to voters

The latest polling on Prop. 39 suggests it could face an uphill battle in November.

Registered Republicans make up only about one-quarter of California’s electorate, which means Prop. 39 will need significant support from Democrats and independent voters to pass.

A recent poll from the Public Policy Institute of California found a sharp partisan divide in interest in Prop. 39, with a majority (52%) of Republican voters saying it was the ballot measure that most interested them compared to just 7% of Democrats and 23% of independent voters.

In an effort to appeal to the state’s liberal majority, DeMaio and his Reform California PAC recently launched an ad campaign aimed at persuading Trump foes that Prop 39 is unrelated to the president’s efforts to curb mail-in voting and implement stringent checks for U.S. citizenship.

“Can you dislike Trump and still vote ‘yes’ on Prop 39 for voter ID?” a voice in the ad asks. “Yes, you can.”

During his speech Monday, DeMaio said Prop. 39 would boost confidence in elections “whether you think voter fraud is a big problem or a small problem.”

In a subsequent interview with LAist, DeMaio said he thinks voter fraud is a problem. “ How much fraud is hard to prove because we're not looking for it; we don't have internal controls,” he said.

Trump has claimed that large numbers of noncitizens are voting. In California, a handful of recent cases have made headlines. But nationwide efforts to find and prosecute noncitizen voters have thus far turned up few culprits.

The Texas example

Julia Gomez, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU of Southern California, which opposes Prop. 39, blamed the decrease in voter confidence on the “chaos” sowed by people including Trump and DeMaio in questioning the integrity of elections with scant evidence of fraud.

“The way we build trust in elections is not by adding more hurdles to voting, which the data shows will disenfranchise voters every election, but by educating voters, by not lying to voters about what is and isn't a problem,” she said.

Gomez pointed to Texas as a cautionary tale about the potential consequences of adding an ID requirement to mail-in voting: After Texas passed a similar requirement in 2021, a large percentage (14%) of mail-in ballots were rejected, according to a study last year from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.

The study found that non-white voters were more likely to have their ballots rejected. Also, many of those voters stopped casting ballots in subsequent elections.