Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • Goal is to get 3,000 animals with families
    Two golden retrievers wearing sweaters and collars sit in front of a well-lit Christmas tree in a public place.
    Dogs stand in front of a Christmas tree as people wait to have their photo taken with Santa Claus at a shopping centre.

    Topline:

    The Los Angeles Animal Services is working to get 3,000 pets into homes this holiday season.

    Why it matters: The six L.A. Animal Services centers are just past halfway to their “Home for the Howlidays” goal, and they’re hoping another 1,333 dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, and other animals will be adopted, fostered, or reunited with their families by the end of January.

    Why now: Staycee Dains, the the general manager of L.A. Animal Services, told LAist they’ve been trying to think of creative ways to promote adoption, and they thought this would be a great time of year to invite people to bring a new family member home.

    The backstory: Dains said when Mayor Karen Bass appointed her to lead the department this summer, it was clear right away that the shelters were seriously overcrowded.

    Go deeper: ...to see some of the adoptable animals that need a home for the holidays.

    The Los Angeles Animal Services is working to get 3,000 pets into homes this holiday season.

    The six L.A. Animal Services centers are just past halfway to their “Home for the Howlidays” goal, and they’re hoping another 1,333 dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, and other animals will be adopted, fostered, or reunited with their families by the end of January.

    About the goal

    Staycee Dains is the the general manager of L.A. Animal Services. She told LAist that when Mayor Karen Bass appointed her to lead the department this summer, it was clear right away that the shelters were seriously overcrowded.

    Dains said it was also obvious that the staff and volunteers are “incredibly dedicated to lifesaving.”

    They’ve been trying to think of creative ways to promote adoption, and Dains said they thought this would be a great time of year to invite people to bring a new family member home.

    “That goal is because we need to find homes for not only the pets that have come into the shelter, but the pets that have been in the shelter for quite some time,” she said.

    3,000 pets represents the number of animals that typically come into L.A. Animal Services centers this time of year, plus the animals they’re overpopulated with, Dains noted.

    To encourage people to come to the centers, adoption fees will be reduced by $50 for dogs, puppies, cats, and kittens every weekend of December.

    Available pets

    If you want to help L.A. Animal Services reach their “Home for the Howlidays” goal but don’t know where to start, here are some of the pets that have been up for adoption the longest.

    First up is Franco, an adult male mixed breed. This big brown brindle boy has been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center for more than 2 years.

    Then there’s Zeus, a white senior male. This gorgeous mixed breed has been available for adoption through the North Central center for more than 1 ½ years.

    Say hello to Chip, an adult male mixed breed. This large, tan affectionate boy enjoys going for walks and getting lots of treats. He’s been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center since March 2022.

    If you’re more of a cat person, here’s Harley, an adult male domestic shorthair. This medium-sized feline looks quite dapper with his tuxedo coloring and has been available for adoption through the East Valley center since May 2022.

    A gray and brown cat is making eye-contact with the camera while it sits on towels and blankets in the back of a metal cage.
    A photo from Kalimba's adoption profile through the L.A. Animal Services.
    (
    L.A. Animal Services
    )

    There’s also Kalimba. She’s a young adult medium-sized domestic shorthair and has been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center for more than a year.

    Meet Michi, an adult male domestic shorthair. This small black and tan cat has been available for adoption through the Chesterfield Square / South L.A. center since July 2022.

    An all black rabbit sits stark against a white backdrop.
    A photo of Bill the bunny from his adoption profile through the L.A. Animal Services.
    (
    L.A. Animal Services
    )

    If you’re looking for a furry friend that’s a bit smaller, let me introduce you to Bill. He’s a medium black shorthair rabbit that’s been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center for a little more than a year.

    Jumping in next is Joy, a small white rabbit. This female shorthair has also been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center for a little more than a year.

    There’s also Avalanche, a white adult male rabbit. This small American breed has been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center since Jan. 31.

    If you’ve never had a rabbit as a pet before or need a little refresher, L.A. Animal Services has a thorough care guide that covers everything you need to know before you take your new friend home.

    A tiny tan hamster nibbles on dry food from a container shaped like an apple.
    A photo of Palentena from her adoption profile through the L.A. Animal Services.
    (
    L.A. Animal Services
    )

    There’s also more than just dogs, cats, and rabbits available for adoption. Meet Palentena, a tan toy hamster. She’s been available for adoption through the East Valley center for about a year.

    You can also take home El Bronco, a small black male guinea pig. He’s been available for adoption through the West Los Angeles center since July 29.

    If fur just isn’t your thing, maybe Lee-roy Tyrone can join your family. This small female iguana has been available for adoption through the Chesterfield Square / South L.A. center for almost 6 months.

    About adopting an animal

    When you adopt a dog, cat, or a rabbit from one of the L.A. Animal Services centers, your new pet will come home already spayed / neutered, vaccinated, and microchipped.

    The centers are open on Tuesdays through Fridays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and Saturdays and Sundays from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. — no appointment necessary. The centers are closed on Mondays and city-observed holidays.

    These are the six LA Animal Services centers:

    • West Valley - 20655 Plummer St. Chatsworth, CA 91311
    • West Los Angeles - 11361 West Pico Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90064
    • Chesterfield Square / South L.A. - 1850 W. 60th St. Los Angeles, CA 90047
    • North Central - 3201 Lacy St. Los Angeles, CA 90031
    • Harbor - 957 N. Gaffey St. San Pedro, CA 90731
    • East Valley - 14409 Vanowen St. Van Nuys, CA 91405

    The adoption fees includes vaccinations, spaying or neutering surgery, as well as microchipping for dogs, cats and rabbits. If you live in the city of L.A., it also covers the first year license fee for dogs.

    L.A. Animal Services is also hosting a dog adoption event at the Vermont Square Branch Library on Saturday, Dec. 23 from 11 a.m. through 2 p.m.

    These are the regular adoption fees on days when the $50-off “Home for the Howlidays” offer does not apply:

    • Dogs 4 months and older - $102 if you live outside the city of L.A., $122 if you live in the city of L.A. (price difference is first year licensing fee)
    • Puppies under 4 months old -  $150
    • Cats 4 months and older - $25
    • Kittens under 4 months old - $50
    • Rabbits - $71
    • Guinea pigs, hamsters, and other small animals - $17

    You’ll need to bring your driver’s license, passport, or other form of government-issued identification with your name and photo to adopt a pet. You can pay the adoption fees by cash, check, or credit card, and the name on the credit card needs to match the name on your photo I.D.

  • They aim to increase accountability
    The Lineage warehouse in Boyle Heights
    Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday signed two pieces of legislation aimed at increasing accountability and protections for communities in the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire.

    Topline:

    One bill by Assemblymember Mark González, AB 817, prevents the city and county of Los Angeles from issuing new building permits to cold storage facilities like Lineage unless the company maintains a contingency fund, or insurance, that can support residents in states of emergency.

    What the legislation does: One bill by Assemblymember Mark González, AB 817, prevents the city and county of Los Angeles from issuing new building permits to cold storage facilities like Lineage unless the company maintains a contingency fund, or insurance, that can support residents in states of emergency. The other bill by state Sen. María Elena Durazo, SB 716, increases fines for violations of local ordinances when companies pose a risk to health and safety. If the violation results from a state or federal disaster declaration, fines can reach up to $50,000 per violation.

    The backstory: The fire on June 17 blanketed the LA region with thick smoke for days and led to a monthslong cleanup of 88 million pounds of rotting food. Residents dealt with putrid odors, toxins in the air, an infestation of flies and rats.

    Gov. Gavin Newsom on Sunday signed two pieces of legislation aimed at increasing accountability and protections for communities in the aftermath of the Lineage warehouse fire.

    One bill by Assemblymember Mark González, AB 817, prevents the city and county of Los Angeles from issuing new building permits to cold storage facilities like Lineage unless the company maintains a contingency fund, or insurance, that can support residents in states of emergency.

    The other bill by state Sen. María Elena Durazo, SB 716, increases fines for violations of local ordinances when companies pose a risk to health and safety. If the violation results from a state or federal disaster declaration, fines can reach up to $50,000 per violation.

    The fire on June 17 blanketed the LA region with thick smoke for days and led to a monthslong cleanup of 88 million pounds of rotting food. Residents dealt with putrid odors, toxins in the air, an infestation of flies and rats.

    “Boyle Heights showed us the lasting impact a major facility emergency can have on a community. These laws strengthen the tools, resources and accountability needed to protect residents and help communities respond when emergencies happen,” Newsom said in a statement.

    The laws will be in effect locally and will expand statewide until July 1, 2028.

    Earlier this month, Lineage Chief Executive Officer Greg Lehmkuhl told Boyle Heights Beat and The LA Local that the company has not decided whether to rebuild its Boyle Heights warehouse.

    “We haven’t even come close to making a decision or determination there,” Lehmkuhl said. “We’re still focused on holding the right people accountable here and making sure that we’re continuing to support the community.”

    The CEO’s comments about the uncertainty surrounding a rebuild come after permit applications were filed in late July to restore the warehouse in Boyle Heights. Lineage described it as a repair permit that’s typical when a building is significantly damaged, adding it was filed by the building’s owner via a contractor.

    The post Newsom signs new safety laws aimed at accountability after the Lineage fire appeared first on LA Local.

  • Sponsored message
  • California won't use system
    An "I voted" sticker and arrow sign posted on a wall of a large walkway at Union Station as people walk by.
    California officials say the Supreme Court ruling will have no effect on the elections that are just five weeks away.
    Topline:
    California officials say they will not use a federal database pushed by the Trump administration to check voter eligibility. That’s after the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way last week for states to use it.

    The backstory: The Trump administration wants states to use its controversial data system, Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements — or SAVE — to check citizenship status on voter rolls. The system has faced criticism for mistakenly flagging some eligible voters as noncitizens.

    What’s new: California says nothing is changing despite the SCOTUS ruling. California Secretary of State Shirley Weber told LAist’s AirTalk that the system has had “a number of errors.”

    “We did not find the list valid for us and as a result decided some while ago we would not use it,” Weber said. “And as a result, Californians can feel secure that they're not going to be run through some other list in terms of trying to determine who will vote and who will not.”

    California officials say they will not use a federal database pushed by the Trump administration to check voter eligibility. That’s after the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way last week for states to use it.

    The Trump administration wants states to use its controversial data system, Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements — or SAVE — to check citizenship status on voter rolls.

    The system has faced criticism for mistakenly flagging some eligible voters as noncitizens.

    California says nothing is changing despite the SCOTUS ruling. California Secretary of State Shirley Weber told LAist’s AirTalk that the system has had “a number of errors.”

    “We did not find the list valid for us and as a result decided some while ago we would not use it,” Weber said. “And as a result, Californians can feel secure that they're not going to be run through some other list in terms of trying to determine who will vote and who will not.”

  • New CA laws include owners take a 4-hour class
    An over the shoulder shot of a person sitting at table with a paper guide of a gun, along with guns on the table.
    Hector Corral listens during an L.A. Progressive Shooters firearms education course in Norwalk, on Oct. 29, 2023.

    Topline:

    Have a gun? You’re going to need to take another safety class after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package of bills Saturday that are a boon to gun control advocates and anathema to Second Amendment groups.

    Four-hour class: The law, Senate Bill 948, would apply to current residents with newly purchased guns starting in 2029. The class would need to be at least four hours long. Starting in 2028, people moving to California with guns would need to obtain a firearm safety certificate within 180 days of arrival. Berkeley Democratic Sen. Jesse Arreguín wrote the legislation.

    The backstory: It was one of 10 gun safety laws Newsom signed. They represent his last gun control efforts as governor, and his own record shows that some of the measures will likely face legal challenges from pro-firearm organizations. For instance, the 2016 ballot proposition Newsom carried that demanded background checks for ammunition purchases is awaiting a final determination from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Read on... for more on the 10 new laws.

    Have a gun? You're going to need to take another safety class after Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a package of bills Saturday that are a boon to gun control advocates and anathema to Second Amendment groups.

    The law, Senate Bill 948, would apply to current residents with newly purchased guns starting in 2029. The class would need to be at least four hours long. Starting in 2028, people moving to California with guns would need to obtain a firearm safety certificate within 180 days of arrival. Berkeley Democratic Sen. Jesse Arreguín wrote the legislation.

    It was one of 10 gun safety laws Newsom signed. They represent his last gun control efforts as governor, and his own record shows that some of the measures will likely face legal challenges from pro-firearm organizations. For instance, the 2016 ballot proposition Newsom carried that demanded background checks for ammunition purchases is awaiting a final determination from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Rebecca Marcus, a lobbyist for the gun control organization the Brady Campaign, told lawmakers in March that more than 69,000 shootings resulted in death or required urgent medical care in California from 2016 to 2021. Roughly a third of those shootings were accidental, she said, and many involved children.

    In a press release, Newsom described the cadre of signed pieces of legislation as efforts to “address multiple stages of firearm-violence prevention: identifying and understanding crime guns, preventing prohibited possession, intervening when someone poses a risk, safely storing firearms, improving training and accountability, supporting young survivors and responding to emerging technologies.”

    Emma Brown, executive director of the gun safety advocacy group Giffords, commended Newsom for signing the laws. “California leads the nation in gun safety because its leaders work tirelessly to prevent violence and keep communities safe,” she said in a written statement. “The policies enacted today will save lives by closing loopholes and investing real resources in community violence intervention.”

    But pro-gun group California Rifle and Pistol Association faults the four-hour exam law as a possible infringement on Second Amendment rights. Its members fear they’ll be on the hook for expensive safety classes, which they view as one more tax on gun ownership in California.

    The group is fine with voluntary courses, but not a mandatory one as a prerequisite for acting on a constitutional right, it indicated in an opposition letter.

    “Public safety is better served by enforcing existing laws against prohibited persons, prosecuting violent criminals, and supporting voluntary education programs,” the group wrote.

    Another law Newsom signed would expand the list of persons barred from owning weapons. Senate Bill 1220 would bar a person from owning a gun for 10 years if they're convicted of stripping a gun of its serial number information that law enforcement officers use to track weapons.

    “Imposing a 10-year blanket prohibition on Second Amendment rights for such misdemeanors goes beyond what is necessary for public safety,” the California Rifle and Pistol Association wrote in an opposition letter.

    And with Newsom’s signing of Assembly Bill 1743, cities and universities in California can request data from the state Department of Justice on weapons recovered during criminal investigations. A supporter of the legislation, Brady United to End Gun Violence, argued that by allowing academics to look up the serial numbers of the guns, research can be strengthened on how weapons find their way from manufacturers to crime scenes. “Are the guns coming from in state? Are they coming from a specific county? Are they coming from nearby or far away? Are they coming from a specific dealer?” the Brady organization asked.

    But this bill too was opposed by guns rights groups, including the rifle and pistol association. It wrote that the legislation “poses significant risks to the privacy and safety of California's law-abiding gun owners and could be weaponized to advance anti-gun agendas.”

    That agenda seems to be well signalled by California’s political leaders. After signing the bills, Newsom said he “couldn't be more proud of California's continued bold leadership on gun violence prevention.”

    This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

  • Trump administration revises rules

    Topline:

    The Trump administration announced Monday it's scaling back how fuel efficient American carmakers need to make their fleets. The revised rules, which were finalized Monday, will now require carmakers to make their new passenger car and truck fleets up to 1% more fuel efficient each year, aiming for an average of 34.9 miles to the gallon in model year 2031.

    Why it matters: This is down from Biden-era rules, which required an annual 2% increase in fuel efficiency with a goal of most vehicles getting, on average, 50.4 miles to the gallon by 2031.

    Why now: Administration officials argue that fuel efficiency technology is expensive, and has helped to drive up the cost of vehicles. They estimate that scaling back the standards will shave about $1,300 off the sticker prices of new cars.

    What are others saying: Climate advocates and auto industry observers say the rules change is another step in the Trump administration's efforts to roll back Biden-era climate policies — including cutting the federal tax credit for electric vehicle buyers, delaying federal dollars for a nationwide EV charging program, and striking down federal waivers that let California set its own strict pollution regulations.

    The Trump administration announced Monday it's scaling back how fuel efficient American carmakers need to make their fleets.

    The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards set average fuel economy levels for carmakers. The revised rules, which were finalized Monday, will now require carmakers to make their new passenger car and truck fleets up to 1% more fuel efficient each year, aiming for an average of 34.9 miles to the gallon in model year 2031.

    This is down from Biden-era rules, which required an annual 2% increase in fuel efficiency with a goal of most vehicles getting, on average, 50.4 miles to the gallon by 2031.

    The rationale: affordability. Administration officials argue that fuel efficiency technology is expensive, and has helped to drive up the cost of vehicles. They estimate that scaling back the standards will shave about $1,300 off the sticker prices of new cars.

    "This administration is delivering relief to families and reviving the beating heart of American manufacturing," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy in an online statement announcing the change.

    President Trump weighed in over the weekend on Truth Social: "These new Standards will take the waste out of building cars in America. That means LOWER PRICES, saving families thousands on a new, beautiful, and safe car."

    Climate advocates and auto industry observers say the rules change is another step in the Trump administration's efforts to roll back Biden-era climate policies — including cutting the federal tax credit for electric vehicle buyers, delaying federal dollars for a nationwide EV charging program, and striking down federal waivers that let California set its own strict pollution regulations.

    In a statement emailed to NPR, Dan Becker, director of the Safe Climate Transport Campaign at the Center for Biological Diversity, wrote that rolling back the standards would increase gasoline usage and pollution, "costing consumers at the pump and at the doctor's office."

    "Trump is tanking sensible mileage standards at the worst possible time for consumers, who're getting hit with sky-high prices at the pump," he continued.

    According to AAA, the national average price for gasoline today is close to $4.50 a gallon, and for diesel, a gallon is hovering close to $6.50, just short of last week's record high.

    Easing CAFE standards will hinder the industry's realignment toward more fuel-efficient and electric vehicles, said economist Sue Helper, who studies the auto industry at Case Western Reserve University. "It's very bad in the long term, because it slows progress," she said. "Then we make our auto companies less competitive. We give them less practice in making the cars that both Americans will want in the future and that the rest of the world will want." After all, American carmakers hope to continue selling their cars in foreign markets that may have stricter emissions standards. And a future presidential administration could change the rules again.

    A legacy of the 1970s oil shock

    CAFE standards have been part of the auto industry for decades. In 1975, during that decade's great oil supply shock, Congress enacted rules that encouraged carmakers to make their fleets more fuel-efficient in an effort to reduce Americans' dependency on the Middle East for oil.

    Since then, the national conversation about fuel efficiency has changed; the U.S. is now the world's largest oil producer, and many regulatory changes have instead been driven by concerns about climate change. Since the early 2010s, the fuel efficiency requirements for passenger cars and light trucks have consistently risen.

    In practice, the Biden-era standards meant carmakers needed to make electric vehicles to balance out their gas guzzlers — otherwise they were subject to a fine.

    But the Trump administration dropped that penalty last July as part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, effectively defanging the Biden-era CAFE standards. In December, the White House proposed scaling them back altogether. Soon after, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened a period of public comment.

    In its final rule announcing the change, NHTSA also said it's eliminating the ability of carmakers to trade credits among themselves for making electric vehicles — a part of the Biden-era CAFE Standards that Republicans often criticized. This rule allowed automakers to buy credits from EV manufacturers to offset making less fuel-efficient vehicles. This helped them meet their CAFE targets.

    Will easing CAFE standards make cars more affordable?

    In announcing the new change, the administration said lowering the CAFE standards will make cars cheaper.

    "Instead of allowing manufacturers to design and produce vehicles they believe their customers will want and need, while spreading real-world fuel economy improvements across their fleets, the system has increasingly led manufacturers to try to fit square vehicle pegs in round classification holes to force the adoption of technologies that do not meet the demands of American families," stated NHTSA in the final rule. "All of this adds inefficiency and cost — pushing even more consumers out of an already unaffordable new car market."

    "It's true that the price of new cars has gone up quite a lot," says Helper at Case Western. But she contends that much of that is not because of fuel economy standards. Instead, she says, it's because vehicles have gotten larger, they've faced tariffs and supply chain issues in recent years, and they are often loaded with extras like infotainment systems.

    A Consumer Reports analysis from 2023 found that between model years 2003 and 2021, vehicles got about 30% more fuel efficient, but attributed the rise in prices to an industrywide shift toward expensive SUVs, rather than from using more fuel-efficient technologies.

    And when it comes to the monthly costs of a new car, there are external factors beyond a carmaker's control — like the cost of an auto loan, which is affected both by the Federal Reserve's benchmark lending rate and by an individual buyer's credit score.

    "One of the cruxes of vehicle affordability right now is the average monthly payment getting jacked up, because interest rates are so high," says Ellen Hughes-Cromwick, who spent much of her career as Ford's chief global economist and now studies clean energy as a senior visiting fellow at the center-left Third Way think tank.

    Plus, a cut in the sticker price might eventually be offset by spending on gas. If vehicles are less fuel efficient, that means drivers will need to fill up at the pump more often — which is especially salient in a year of high gas prices due to the war in Iran.

    Will carmakers still make fuel-efficient vehicles? 

    For now, American carmakers are stuck in a kind of jam.

    On the one hand, Helper said, a rules change that makes it easier for them to sell trucks and SUVs is "good in the short-term, because they make a lot of profits making these giant vehicles," though they are not as popular outside of the U.S.

    This new move "allows the U.S. more of a playground in this protected little Galapagos of an ecosystem where no one else is wanting to compete," Helper continued.

    But the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, a trade group representing car and light-truck manufacturers that sell vehicles to the U.S. and that includes automakers such as Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, praised the move. "We're still reviewing the final rule, but NHTSA made the right call to better align fuel economy standards with the law and current market conditions," said John Bozzella, president and CEO of the alliance, in an emailed statement to NPR.

    "The standards finalized under the previous administration effectively required a switchover to electric vehicles that was out of step with market realities and customer demand. Today's final rule is an appropriate course correction," he continued.

    But in the long term, the CAFE standards change risks hindering American carmakers in a global industry, said Hughes-Cromwick. " The future of the industry is all about the transition to electric vehicles," she said. "The rest of the world is marching on in this transition to EVs. We have a very powerful competitor in terms of the Chinese electric vehicle industry."

    And automakers may have other reasons not to shift gears too quickly on fuel efficiency: The administration's latest move could face legal challenges, which could take a while to work their way through the courts. Or a future administration could put more aggressive fuel economy standards back in place. For companies that need to make decisions years in advance, to decide which models to build, or which factories to design, the easiest course to keep might be the one they're already on.

    Copyright 2026 NPR