Sponsored message
Logged in as
Audience-funded nonprofit news
radio tower icon laist logo
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Subscribe
  • Listen Now Playing Listen

The Brief

The most important stories for you to know today
  • High-profile VA case will go forward
    A restored historical building with two visible floors is framed by clouds above and people walking in the foreground.
    One of the two newly restored historic buildings at the West L.A. Veterans Affairs campus that was converted into housing, seen here at their May 2, 2023 grand opening event.

    Topline:

    At a hearing Monday, a federal judge challenged Veterans Affairs officials’ efforts to toss out a lawsuit seeking to fast track housing construction for unhoused veterans at the sprawling West L.A. VA campus.

    Lawsuit will likely proceed: At the hearing – which ran for several hours Monday – U.S. District Judge David O. Carter distributed a draft ruling in which he would let much of the lawsuit proceed – largely rejecting the government’s requests for him to dismiss it.

    Why it matters: Across L.A. County, about 3,900 veterans experience homelessness, according to the latest count. The VA is years behind schedule on its promise to help bring down that number by building 1,200 units of housing on its West L.A. campus.

    What’s next: If the parties don’t settle the case, Carter said he probably would schedule a trial for April or May.

    At a hearing Monday, a federal judge challenged Veterans Affairs officials’ efforts to toss out a lawsuit seeking to fast track housing construction for unhoused veterans at the sprawling West L.A. VA campus.

    At the hearing — which ran for several hours — U.S. District Judge David O. Carter distributed a draft ruling in which he would let much of the lawsuit proceed, largely rejecting the government’s requests for him to dismiss it.

    In a tense back and forth, Carter repeatedly questioned VA lawyers’ position that it has no legal duty to put veterans first — and at one point had the government’s lawyers call the VA’s housing hotline in open court to ask about outreach efforts to veterans experiencing homelessness.

    “We’ve got a judge who feels it, who’s concerned, who wants to do the right thing,” said Mark Rosenbaum, the lead attorney for the veterans suing the VA in the case. “He gets it.”

    Attorneys for the VA told LAist they were unable to comment on the tentative ruling.

    Carter said he would finalize the ruling in the coming weeks, cautioning that his thinking could change. If it proceeds, Carter said he would likely schedule a trial for the spring.

    During the hearing at First Street U.S. Courthouse in Downtown L.A., Carter expressed frustration at the complicated web of agencies involved in the housing efforts – saying the VA ultimately is “absolutely responsible."

    And he disputed the VA’s claims that it has no legal obligation – or “fiduciary duty” – to act in the best interest of veterans.

    “I think you do have a duty,” Carter told lawyers for the VA.

    Carter called the finger-pointing by various government agencies, while veterans suffer on the streets, tragic.

    “It’s a magical mystery tour of how these bureaucracies interact,” Carter said. “It’s quite a journey for the court, trying to look through this spaghetti of bureaucracies.”

    Federal lawyers argued that federal district court judges — like Carter — don’t have any jurisdiction to decide veteran benefits. But lawyers representing veterans who are the plaintiffs in the case strongly disagreed, arguing that the VA has a legal duty to ensure housing for veterans so they can access healthcare.

    Their lawsuit is asking Carter to force the VA to:

    • Speed up the building of 1,200 units at the campus so that they’re all built within 5 years, rather than the VA’s current plan of 2030 (which isn’t legally binding).
    • Create at least 2,500 new housing options within five miles of the campus, providing permanent supportive housing for veterans with severe mental illness.
    • End leases on the campus for non-veteran purposes (such as those with private school athletic facilities) and not enter into any other leases that don’t primarily benefit veterans.

    The backstory

    In a previous case about veteran homelessness — settled in 2015 — a federal judge found the VA had been illegally renting out the West L.A. campus land for private purposes like athletic facilities for an expensive private school.

    As a result of that settlement, the VA promised to build 1,200 units of housing on its campus. But it’s years behind schedule, prompting this latest lawsuit, filed in November. And as the delays linger on, the latest point-in-time count conducted in January shows about 3,900 veterans experience homelessness in L.A. County.

    “We wouldn’t be here if that agreement had been honored,” Carter said, expressing frustration with what he said was failures to implement a series of past L.A.-area homelessness court settlements.

    The resolution of this lawsuit will need strong court oversight and accountability, Carter told lawyers on Monday, saying the whole system is lacking accountability.

    Bureaucracies are “bumping into each other,” he said.

    The land was originally gifted to the federal government in 1888 with a deed restriction requiring that it be used as a home for former soldiers. A century ago, about 4,000 veterans lived on the land, but the government started removing the housing after the Korean War.

    Promised housing running years behind

    At Monday’s hearing, Carter pressed the VA’s attorneys to share how many people are currently living in the newly built housing. There were four attorneys representing the VA at the hearing. But initially none of them had answers when Carter asked in the morning portion of the hearing.

    So it fell on the attorney for the veterans suing the federal government — Rosenbaum — to provide a number.

    Despite the VA’s promises to build 770 units at the campus by last year, only 185 veterans are housed there, Rosenbaum told the judge.

    A few hours later in the hearing, the government attorneys said they heard back with the latest number — 198 people housed currently, out of 233 units that have been built.

    Rosenbaum questioned how the VA could still have 35 vacancies, months after those apartments were finished.

    “You mean to tell me [in Los Angeles] you can’t find 35 homeless vets?” he said.

    The VA’s lawyers said all units have been matched to people, but that they’re just waiting for paperwork to be sorted out.

    The problems follow issues first reported by LAist in July. At the time, two thirds of the most recently remodeled apartments on the West L.A. VA campus were still sitting empty two months after after a high-profile ribbon cutting event last spring that declared them move-in ready.

    A possible trial next spring

    If the parties don’t settle the case, Carter said he probably would schedule a trial for April or May.

    He encouraged both sides to “try to get together” to work out a deal that helps veterans and gives the court oversight.

  • Shaw concedes the race
    Sonja Shaw, a woman with long, dark brown hair and a medium-light skin tone, holds a microphone and speaks. She wears a black top, a white blazer, a ring and a pearl bracelet. Behind her are flags for the USA and the state of California.
    Sonja Shaw, Chino Valley Unified School District Board President, speaks at the California Policy Center and PERK event, "A Line in the Sand A Rally for Parental Rights" at Rancho Madera Community Park in Simi Valley, on Tuesday, Sept. 26, 2023

    Topline:

    Republican Sonja Shaw conceded the race for California Superintendent of Public Instruction to Democrat Richard Barrera late Wednesday evening. “Last night voters made their choice. I would be lying if I said my heart wasn’t heavy,” Shaw said in a statement shared on social media. “As a mother and a protector of children, I feel deeply saddened for the kids. They are the ones who deserve so much better.”

    The backstory: The office of California superintendent of public instruction is nonpartisan, with no party affiliation listed on the ballot. In past races, it was not unusual for two Democrats to advance to the November election. But this year, endorsements, campaign funding and campaigning broke largely along partisan lines. Shaw, a Republican and board president of Chino Valley Unified, emerged as the top vote getter in a crowded June primary that featured several Democratic state lawmakers. But she contended in her statement that her race didn’t have the “money or machinery” that her opponent did in the November election.

    What to know: Shaw trailed Barrera by nearly 15 percentage points, according to the latest election results Thursday morning. Shaw’s campaign raised about $595,000 compared to Barrera’s $812,000. However, the California Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union and a heavy spender in state superintendent races, also spent $8.4 million to support Barrera, the board president of San Diego Unified.

    Republican Sonja Shaw conceded the race for California Superintendent of Public Instruction to Democrat Richard Barrera late Wednesday evening.

    “Last night voters made their choice. I would be lying if I said my heart wasn’t heavy,” Shaw said in a statement shared on social media. “As a mother and a protector of children, I feel deeply saddened for the kids. They are the ones who deserve so much better.”

    In her social media post, which included a photo of Shaw locking hands with her husband and two daughters, Shaw said her kids had motivated her to run for state superintendent. Shaw won election to the Chino Valley Unified school board in 2022, fueled by support from conservative parents.

    “The problem is that for decades, the same people have had their hands on our education system while our children have continued to fall behind,” Shaw said. “I believe we had an opportunity to change that.”

    The office of California superintendent of public instruction is nonpartisan, with no party affiliation listed on the ballot. In past races, it was not unusual for two Democrats to advance to the November election. But this year, endorsements, campaign funding and campaigning broke largely along partisan lines.

    Shaw, a Republican and board president of Chino Valley Unified, emerged as the top vote getter in a crowded June primary that featured several Democratic state lawmakers. But she contended in her statement that her race didn’t have the “money or machinery” that her opponent did in the November election.

    Shaw trailed Barrera by nearly 15 percentage points, according to the latest election results Thursday morning. Shaw’s campaign raised about $595,000 compared to Barrera’s $812,000. However, the California Teachers Association, the state’s largest teachers union and a heavy spender in state superintendent races, also spent $8.4 million to support Barrera, the board president of San Diego Unified.

    That pales in comparison to the combined $50 million raised in the 2018 state superintendent race Tony Thurmond won against Marshall Tuck in 2018. The 2026 state superintendent race had the distinction of featuring two local school board members.

    Shaw said she’s not sure what her next steps will be.

    “I don’t know exactly what God has next, but I know He isn’t finished,” she said.

    Shaw will not be returning to the Chino Valley Unified school board where she began her political career. Her husband, Chris Shaw, ran for her open seat and is trailing his challenger by 11 points, according to the San Bernardino County Register of Voters.

    This story was originally published by EdSource.

    EdSource is an independent nonprofit organization that provides analysis on key education issues facing California and the nation. LAist republishes articles from EdSource with permission.

  • Sponsored message
  • Coyote spotted on the bridge above 101 freeway
    A black and white still of a video shows the backside of a coyote walking with a stick or bone in its mouth near brush. The image is dated 11-05-2026 and timestamped 01:35:46 AM.
    A coyote is seen early Thursday morning, the second sighting of the mammal using the wildlife crossing.

    Topline:

    A coyote has become the first large animal to be seen using the wildlife crossing over the 101 Freeway ahead of its opening next month.

    The backstory: The expansive bridge, on which construction began in 2022, is aimed at giving animals a way to safely cross the freeway in Agoura Hills.

    Why it matters: The crossing took years of planning and research, and footage of a coyote using it has encouraged those behind the bridge. “The animals are already blessing this crossing and saying, ‘Yep, you got it right,’” said Beth Pratt, president of the Wildlife Crossing Fund.

    What’s next: The crossing officially opens on Dec. 2 in a ribbon-cutting ceremony.

    Read on… to learn more about the sighting.

    The Wallis Annenberg Wildlife Crossing over the 101 Freeway in Agoura Hills is set to officially open next month, but that hasn’t stopped some wildlife from already using it.

    Cameras captured coyote footage twice — once last week and again on Thursday morning — making the mammal the first large animal species seen using the crossing.

    “This is amazing — obviously, the wildlife are not waiting for our opening date,” said Beth Pratt, president of the Wildlife Crossing Fund. “The animals are already blessing this crossing and saying, ‘Yep, you got it right.’”

    Construction of the expansive bridge began in 2022, aimed at giving wildlife safe passage between the Santa Monica Mountains and Simi Hills after years of research.

    Pratt said it’s unclear whether the images of the coyote are of the same animal. The coyote in the most recent image from Thursday morning can be seen on the 101 structure holding a bone or a stick in its mouth.

    “The coyote is validating that we got this designed right, and I think that there's something also about a coyote being first — kind of the L.A. mascot next to P-22,” Pratt said.

    The National Park Service is installing more cameras along the crossing to document and study how animals use it. While images will be made publicly available, there will not be a livestream.

    “We can't, for security reasons, because this is L.A., and if there's a mountain lion going across, somebody's gonna go try to pet it,” Pratt said.

  • Marissa Roy defeats John McKinney
    Marissa Roy, a woman with medium, light skin tone, wearing a gray shirt, poses for a photo while crossing her arms.
    Marissa Roy has won the race for Los Angeles city attorney.

    Topline:

    Marissa Roy will be the next L.A. city attorney. Her opponent, John McKinney, appeared to concede Thursday.

    • How we got here: Roy held on to a strong lead over McKinney ever since polls closed and is currently ahead by more than twice as many votes. Roy will be a fresh face in the role after incumbent city attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto was ousted in the June primary in a rare defeat of an elected city official. 

    • What the candidates had to say: 
      • Roy said on social media Wednesday that election night was “a really good night for the people who believe that we should take care of one another, that we can stand up for our rights — even in what feels like an increasingly lawless world — and that we will achieve justice when we fight for it.”
      • McKinney posted on social media Thursday that he’s back in his old office at the Hall of Justice. “The run for City Attorney was an incredible journey, and I’m truly grateful for everyone who believed in me, supported me, and stood by my side,” McKinney wrote. "While I’m disappointed things didn’t turn out the way we hoped, I wouldn’t trade the experience for anything." He acknowledged Roy in a social media video earlier this week, describing her as a “hard worker” who put together a strong coalition of support. McKinney added that he would be “rooting for her.”
      • Neither campaign immediately responded to LAist’s request for additional comment.
    • What’s at stake: The city attorney runs an office of more than 550 lawyers representing L.A. in all legal matters, including filing lawsuits and defending against them. Roy, backed by powerful progressives like U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, has vowed to take on the Trump administration in court.
    • Go deeper: Read more about the city attorney's role and what's on the table for Roy's first term.

    Topline:

    Marissa Roy will be the next L.A. city attorney. Her opponent, John McKinney, appeared to concede Thursday.

    • How we got here: Roy held on to a strong lead over McKinney ever since polls closed and is currently ahead by more than twice as many votes. Roy will be a fresh face to the role after the incumbent city attorney, Hydee Feldstein Soto, was ousted in the June primary in a rare defeat of an elected city official. 

    • What the candidates had to say: 
      • Roy said on social media Wednesday that election night was “a really good night for the people who believe that we should take care of one another, that we can stand up for our rights — even in what feels like an increasingly lawless world — and that we will achieve justice when we fight for it.”
      • McKinney posted on social media Thursday that he’s back in his old office at the Hall of Justice. “The run for City Attorney was an incredible journey, and I’m truly grateful for everyone who believed in me, supported me, and stood by my side,” McKinney wrote. "While I’m disappointed things didn’t turn out the way we hoped, I wouldn’t trade the experience for anything." He acknowledged Roy in a social media video earlier this week, describing her as a “hard worker” who put together a strong coalition of support. McKinney added that he would be “rooting for her.”
      • Neither campaign immediately responded to LAist’s requests for additional comment.
    • What’s at stake: The city attorney runs an office of more than 550 lawyers representing L.A. in all legal matters, including filing lawsuits and defending against them. Roy, backed by powerful progressives like U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, has vowed to take on the Trump administration in court.
    • Go deeper: Read more about the city attorney's role and what's on the table for Roy's first term.
  • Construction begins Nov. 16
    Los Angeles officials expect construction of a fence around MacArthur Park will start in November and continue through fall 2027.

    Topline:

    Construction of the green metal fence around MacArthur Park will begin Monday, Nov. 16, with work scheduled to continue through fall 2027. The city announced the start date on Thursday, saying crews will install an 8-foot fence around the park’s perimeter. Nearby residents and businesses can expect some noise, dust and vibration during construction, although the city said mitigation measures will be in place.

    Why it matters:

    The backstory: Crews will work Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and the park will remain open while crews are working. The fence is the city’s latest attempt to tackle longstanding problems at MacArthur Park, including drug use, homelessness and crime. The city first approved plans for the fence in October 2025, and the proposal has since drawn both support and criticism from residents and community groups.

    Go deeper: for more details on the fence roll out.

    Construction of the green metal fence around MacArthur Park will begin Monday, Nov. 16, with work scheduled to continue through fall 2027.

    The city announced the start date Nov. 4, saying crews will install an 8-foot fence around the park’s perimeter. Nearby residents and businesses can expect some noise, dust and vibration during construction, although the city said mitigation measures will be in place.

    Crews will work Monday through Friday from 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and the park will remain open while crews are working. 

    The fence is the city’s latest attempt to tackle longstanding problems at MacArthur Park, including drug use, homelessness and crime.

    The city first approved plans for the fence in October 2025, and the proposal has since drawn both support and criticism from residents and community groups.

    Some say they hope the fence will make the park safer, while others question whether it will actually improve conditions there. Police and city officials say the fence will give them more control over the space and make it easier to enforce the law.

    Ana Luz Vazquez, a street vendor near MacArthur Park, said her main concern about the fence is what will happen to the unhoused people who stay in the park throughout the day and whether the city plans to address that issue directly.

    She is also concerned that construction during the day could affect her ability to work because of traffic, less parking availability and loud noise.

    Vazquez said she would prefer construction to take place at night so it would have less of an impact on street vendors.

    “If they’re working in the day then how are we supposed to come here and who is going to help us survive,” Vazquez said.

    Construction will happen in two phases

    Phase 1

    • Alvarado St. from W. 6th St. to Wilshire Blvd.
    • S. Park View St. from Wilshire Blvd. to W. 6th St.
    • Wilshire Blvd. from Alvarado St. to S. Park View St.

    Phase 2

    • Alvarado St. from Wilshire Blvd. to W. 7th St.
    • S. Park View St. from W. 7th St. to Wilshire Blvd.
    • Wilshire Blvd. from S. Park View St. to Alvarado St.
    • W. 7th St. from Alvarado St. to S. Park View St.

    Existing trees will be protected and monitored during the work, according to the Department of Recreation and Parks. Traffic control measures will be in place during work hours, and crews will post temporary “No Parking” signs near active work areas in advance.

    Services at the park are expected to remain the same throughout construction. The schedule could change because of weather or other unforeseen circumstances, according to the city.

    The city has allocated $2.3 million for the project, but officials have not said whether that will cover the full cost.

    After the fence is installed, the city plans a second phase focused on adding decorative elements. Officials have said residents will have an opportunity to provide input on the design.

    Residents with questions or concerns about the project can contact Recreation and Parks at RAP.PublicInfo@lacity.org or 213-202-2700.

    The post MacArthur Park fence construction to begin Nov. 16 appeared first on LA Local.